A bit on the ultra left

What is the left? The rabble attaining to power. The soft left is the rabble cutting a deal: you get to run it, but you evacuate the privilege of high places. The hard left is: we run it and demolish the high places. The ultra left is: we take over and inhabit the high places.

Heidegger was... But I get ahead of myself.

What makes rabble rabble is a lack of genealogy. All the noble things, forged through millenia, are dennied them. Often, when conditions are right, some of these things begin genealogical birth among them.

Yet the activity of high places is less and less hidden from the rabble. Curiously, or not so curiously, Christianity had a lot to do with this. Indeed, Christianity is an instance of ultra left. They inhabited the high places and extricated nobility. Newton, for instance, was rabble.

The next big wave of ultra left was nazism, flanked by the hard left of fascism.

Heidegger, being rabble, looked at the high places shown by Nietzsche (a veritable encyclopedia of nobility) and wanted in. So he built for nazis a blueprint, a map of those high places, and a way to inhabit them sans nobility. The result was, of course, grotesque, but beautiful in its way.

Left/Right politics have been the bi-polar exchanges of schizophrenics, based on a binary version of the world.
Absolute ONE versus Absolute NIL.
Absolute ORDER versus absolute CHAOS.

The left wants infinite possibilities - space/time. Everything and anything is possible.
The right wants infinite probabilities - regulated order. they want to be the ones regulating.

Nature contradicts both.

Possibly the single good idea leftists ever had was to abolish the "noble class".

Children who have good parents will inevitably enjoy certain advantages anyways, no need to further reinforce this.

It has no basis in nature, either. The only things non-human organisms leave to their offspring is their genes, and possibly a decent upbringing/nurturing. Other than that, they mostly have to earn their place in the world on their own.

Too much comfort leads to degeneration.

That's the problem with the right.
It passes on privilege to those who have not earned it and then have an entire system backing them.
I prefer Timocracy.

Yes. In nature there's a balance in the sense that every organism tends to take as much as it can defend.

A parent dog may pass on to its puppy a big bone and lots of meat that the parent dog managed to defend from other predators, and then it is up to the pup to defend it on its own after the parent dies. If it cannot, it would have to either perish fighting, or share its resources with other predators. Or alternatively, it may even be able to take and accumulate more than its mommy/daddy dog.

In human created systems, offspring do not have to defend what their parents left them. The system does it for them. This lack of stress is what leads to degeneration. There is no more incentive to improve or either to maintain one's current qualities.