Things to Watch

Maxwell's equations are much more impressive than Einstein's (partly appropriated) work.

Einstein is more flashy because his relativity theory has little impact on the earthly/mundane daily modern life. Except inside certain orbiting satellites, they say. So it has a mysterious quality.

But how about telling anybody from the time of Maxwell you can create a visual portal to another place via a display and a camera, almost instantly communicating across the planet via em-waves.
Talk about (working) magic.

This bike lock is protected by a magic spell.
They cast the spell named "Titanium".
The spell Titanium makes you think it's mechanically almost indestructible.

Tucker Carlson with the checkmate: "Do Walls Work In Israel?" [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— The Judge (@V8GTO70) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The Great Wall of China didn't work. (TM)
Really, law enforcement doesn't work, there will always be criminals.

What works for Jews does not work for any other race of people.
It's the double-slit made into the double standard.

Is it a particle or a wave?...in the double-slit experiment.
Is it Hebrew or not? in the double standard social experiment.
What applies to the 'chosen' does not apply to the not-chosen.

Walls only work in Israel and nowhere else.
Strict immigration policies are only 'good' to protect the 'holy people' and 'bad' in every other case.
The only holocaust was perpetrated against the only 'victims' that matter, and although the slaughter and destruction of 'natives' in North-America are, on a percentage basis, greater than any other, we must only focus on theHolocaust....because we must never forget the Nazis, and what it says about European males.

"You can't stop love"

Arabic slave-trade was barbaric when compared to European practices.
Arabs are a Semitic tribe.

Negro males were castrated, a more severe form of circumcision - a tradition among the Semites.

A movie, about a fantasy land, in a fantasy world, populated by fantasy Negroes, is what these imbeciles are proud about.
They are typical Moderns....living in their heads, in fantasy, resenting all those who point it out or try to wake them up out of their dream-worlds.

The strategy now is from the 'negative' = how do we recognize what is a 'dream' and what is 'real'.
This is their last desperate act of cynical negation.
Only possible in sheltering systems where one could us this scepticism because with it he or she demands that his idiocy not face the consequences it deserves.
They demand that all share the costs, because they want to evade the heavy price of idiocy....and then delve deeper into idiocy.

This is why these morons are, almost always, Marxists, Abrahamics, and social activists promoting social welfare systems.
Their social activism is a cover for: protect me from my own idiocy, or protect me so that then I can remain sceptical about all the things i refuse to face.
Because if they were forced to face the consequences of their judgements, they would either wake-up fast, forgetting all those mind-fart mental masturbation word-games, or they would die very quickly.
In reality, life and death cares sober your right up.
There were no dreamers on the trails headed west, no cynics and sceptics, questioning existence and races and gender on those old explorers ships.
There are no social warriors in the trenches of war, proclaiming human brotherhood.

When it comes to life or death, things suddenly become very clear, and extremely obvious.

With regards to the previous discussion with Autsider, this is what i was alluding to when we spoke of female domination.


Varg restated my previous point about the Home being the realm of the Female and Nature being the realm of the Male, which he mentions that if the female is denied her dominion, will likely result in your own offspring becoming slavish as well.

Varg is wrong. Dominance is a zero sum game. The more "free and strong" the woman is, the more "slavish" the male has to be to compliment her, and vice versa.

So if he's right about it being propagated, it would get propagated either way. Except he's wrong about that too. If the male offspring inherits his mother's feminine personality, would he also inherit her tits, ass and pussy? Not how biology works, but nice try Varg.

Dominance doesn't mean a man is constantly ordering his wife around like some cartoon tyrant and she's obeying like a robot slave. He may delegate the task of running the household to the woman to free up his mental energies, as long as it isn't ran contrary to his desires (which it wouldn't be, if the wife is properly taught). It just means that if there is disagreement, the man's word goes or there will be a violence conflict for dominance over the territory.

That so many men even on the far-right fail to grasp these simple things shows how low we've fallen, and why.

Related:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Autsider wrote:

If the male offspring inherits his mother's feminine personality, would he also inherit her tits, ass and pussy? Not how biology works, but nice try Varg.

No, it means that the most feminine women would be selected for and as a result produce more feminine men, who would eventually overwhelm you, like they do today.

It can never be a zero sum game due to entropy. Perhaps this is why the ancients gave females freedoms to counterbalance the resulting feminization that emerges from dominance, and allowed them to run free to a degree instead of having something like feminism occur down the road as it did for the Christians and is somewhat occurring to the Muslims.

Ideally the male and female beast would dance together in a perfect symbiotic state, but the dominance of one beast necessarily domesticates the other.

What applies to men applies to women.
They are of the same species.

Females are also feminized, reducing their manly attributes.
This is exhibited by a prissiness, and an increase in their inability to think 'outside the box' or outside conventions.
The feminine is intuitively attracted to power. She surrenders to it and makes herself a means towards its end.
If the masculine is replaced by the State, then she surrenders to the State, and its conventions.
State, system, society. She wants to belong to it and be its ideal presentation....same goes for effete males.

Feminization works on both genders.
Hyper-Masculinity also applies to females. As real masculine attributes atrophy, as systemically criminalized, forced to suppress themselves, or suffer dire circumstances, the void is compensated with pretence of masculinity.
Pretence can never be the real thing. Pretending also exposes itself in some form of hyperbole - gaudiness.
Hypermasculinity, such as that displayed in cRap musac - is such a display - an exaggeration to compensate for the reduction of true masculine essence.
Women, sometimes, try to fill in the absence with their own hyper-displays of how the system defines' masculinity.

In primordial times the home was the domain of the woman.
The goddess of the hearth - Hestia - is female.
She passed on the male's heritage, which was most often also her own. She religiously repeated spiritual practices, recipes, taught the children their culture's basic principles as accurately as she could.
She did not think outside the box.

Today - in genetically/memetically heterogeneous systems - the institution is the only masculine entity, and she repeats its principles and beliefs, teaching her children to be ideal citizens....which, in nihilistic systems, this also means effete, feminized, so as to not be a threat to the system. She, unconsciously, trains her children to be automatons, to not think 'outside conventions' thusly threatening, or challenging systemic rule.
With no masculine energy, in the home, or none that is worth shit, there is no counter to this.

Today it is mostly single mothers, raising sons and daughters to be perfect citizens for a State she has no genetic nor memetic retaliation with.

Judaism has advanced a non-sexually dichotomous phenotype. European females do have more testosterone than other races. This doesn't select for effeminate men, but even more testosterone in men. Abrahamism blends male/female. Aryan Gods had dichotomous natures, male and female forms. Females are more promiscuous and increasingly unfaithful when they have less testosterone. Too much testosterone in a woman, and she will not submit to the men her mother selected for. Too little, she will be a harlot. Right now, the attack on whites is responsible for the destruction of caste hierarchy, which makes men act as men. Now the nations are confused, saying men and female are equal, etc.

No, testosterone is what increases unfaithfulness.
They injected monogamous birds with testosterone and they flew the coup, so to speak....they abandoned their mates.

Testosterone increases the sex drive in both sexes.
Less testosterone is a guarantee of more faithfulness.

Monogamy is a product of strong social rules that prohibit unfaithfulness.
Paternalism was a source of such strong rules.
Now that Paternalism is non-existent, males and females are returning to primal sexual behaviours, only this time masculine behaviour is criminalized, whereas female promiscuity is encouraged and idealized.
Technologies, such as the contraceptive pill, and abortion techniques, contribute to female promiscuity by eliminating naturally evolved limits....such as impregnation.
This also reduces the female's care. She no longer has to fear the consequences of falling pregnant.

She can be as slutty as she wants, while at the same time, male evolved responses are prohibited....forcing males to adopt feminine sexual behaviours and beta-male sexual strategies.

I was actually under the impression testosterone increased unfaithfulness, but a recent study I unfortunately lost surprised me; saying otherwise. More effeminate women are more promiscuous (perhaps distinguished from unfaithful - it is possible I conflated them.)

I think testosterone increases sexual aggression and arousal momentarily; but women soaked in testosterone develop stricter dispositions. Degenerate structures freeing the woman just makes her lose that discipline.

Judaism is the epitome of emasculation.
Matrolineall inheritance of identity is evidence.
'Males' are essentially the alpha-male's - God's - representatives - marked by a symbolic castration: circumcision - which also has pragmatic use for tribes - such as the Semites - that lived in low water environments.
Muslims and Jews practice the same hygienic and dietary practices and rituals.

They are the custodians of god's harem. His earthly eunuchs.
Their talent for language- including money - is a testimony of their emasculated, feminized nature - socially engineered over centuries. Their strategies are distinctly feminine, and if it were not for technologies - others invented - they would he harmless as fighters.

Slaughtz wrote:

I was actually under the impression testosterone increased unfaithfulness, but a recent study I unfortunately lost surprised me; saying otherwise. More effeminate women are more promiscuous (perhaps distinguished from unfaithful - it is possible I conflated them.)

More effete females are impressionable, easily dominated and controlled.

I'm pretty sure testosterone has the opposite effect than what you think....but you can look it up on-line.

I do recall the experiment with the a species of bird that is monogamous by nature.
I remember it because it surprised me how more testosterone - or a chemical - can alter genetic programming.

Credit where it is due, while cucky Varg is extremely intolerant of sexual degeneracy.

Except his standards would exclude 99% of modern women.

Easy to have such standards and preach female freedom when you're a famous musician and criminal murderer who's already managed to find the 0.01th percentile woman.

The guy he killed was a communist called Euronymous who was planning to kidnap Varg and torture him to death on camera. Aside from that, once upon a time killing a man was considered a rite of passage, not a crime.

I'm aware of the circumstances, I wasn't condemning him. Willingness to take life is a sensible rite of passage.

Globalization forces one into the niche of captive participant or captive outcast. Like a monstrous digestive system, it will use those who offer value to its survival and filter and excrete those who are worthless and have no function. These creatures do not “drop out” of the system as is meant to imply, they are owned and controlled by it as they waste away in lonely mentally ill misery. The system gave them their spiritual leprosy.

The message here, is that the answer to one’s problems and woes, is to learn to give yourself to what oppresses you instead of hiding from it, and find happiness in it. It’s a circular pattern of misery. One path is interchangeable with the other. Participate in the system, or don’t, the result is the same. The modern has no identity or internal life outside the system and therefore wallows away in decrepitude when in solitude. His identity is based on how he function’s as a cog, even in solitude.

Solitude has a valuable use, and a great purpose, if one understands it. A meaningful embrace of isolation by ostracizing oneself, would be to return to nature, not hide out in a concrete modern urbanized coffin apartment unit being regulated by the forces that put you there and then claim to have dispelled them.

Hyper-sensitive, above average in intelligence, makes people less able to ignore details that elude the average mind, and to settle for whatever they can find.
It's usually males who are excluded, making inclusion too high a price for many to pay.
Paternalism managed to integrate such males, but with the increase in feminism they've been forced to the periphery, as they would have in more primal circumstances.

The other factor is technologies. They prevent socialization. Individuals can no longer relate to other living humans.
Sheltering is another factor. Society is overprotective not allowing individuals to grow thicker skins...you know "What does not kill me only makes me stronger".
We live in a nihilistic system promoting victim identity. Nobody is allowed to be hurt, to any degree, for any reason.
No pain no gain...meaning populations are atrophying psychologically.

Self-consciousness is the other factor. Especially difficult for the hyper-sensitive intelligent ones.
They are always aware of how they appear to others, and this becomes overwhelming where there are so many that the individual cannot compensate.  
Empathy is the problem. Sophisticated minds are always adjusting to accommodate others but where there are so many the task becomes too much. This is why this is a phenomenon that first appeared in Japan, where respecting others, or being constantly aware of how you are affecting others, part of their culture.
The mind is fatigued by the quantities of accommodating it is forced to make, seeking solitude to rest. When one is alone there is nobody to take into consideration when doing anything.
This becomes unbearable when all are being judged superficially - on first impressions.

Deep Fried Human Nuggets....

Abrahamism was a spiritual nihilism, adopting the binary good/evil, or God/Satan, from the Zoroastrians.
Absolute 1 absolute 0.
This is the foundation for all linguistic dualities.
Absolute Order....or Absolute Chaos - either/or.
When existence is neither.
These are noetic interpretation of fluctuating existence.  

But the cocnept of God is outdated for modern, more sophisticated, more literate masses with access to data influxes so great that it overwhelms them.
The mediocre mind, having been dumbed-down, does not have the judgment to distinguish what is probably true from what is probably false - especially when it has been entrapped in absolute dualities.
For the average Modern moron, if it is flawed, to any degree, it is absolutely flawed.....the only criterion is emotion. A feminization of judgment that relies in intuition, feelings, how it makes the mind feel, is what distinguishes what is absolute true from what is absolutely false.  
Hedonism - pain/pleasure is used as a criterion. But pain/pleasure is the judgment of the body....the mind cannot make sense of it, outside the sensation - it cannot justify or validate so it makes the sensation the end in itself, the absolute criterion. It literalizes the feeling.
This is a feminine form of 'judgment'...the female being the purest natural agency. Females intuitively judge, unable to understand why or how. A reversion back to primitivism.

Secular Nihilists replace the previous concept of the absolute 'one' i.e. God...with a Modern cocnept, 'Humanity'.
It's scientific replacement is the mathematical cocnept of 'One'.
Humanity is made divine.
When Moderns speak of 'world' they mean 'humanity' and when they speak of 'humanity' they imply 'world'.
All is reduced to the image of Humanity....but humanity stripped of its corporeality its tangible essence, its spirit connected to earth....it is converted to 'pure spirit'....pure idea, ideology.
It is detached from 'earth' form the material, and converted to pure noetic abstraction. This is the foundation of the current 'crisis of identity'.

This is why degenerates want to discredit language.
They want to disconnect it from reality, from the limitations imposed upon language by natural order, and make language a purified expression of 'human' reactions, desires, needs, fantasies; free from external judgements, validations, restrictions.
They want to replace 'philosophy' with spirituality - or make philosophy into a form of spirituality, in the Abrahamic sense...or converts it into politics, because politics deals with the human; politics is about human order.
Language adjusted accordingly.

So for these degenerates 'humanity' is an ideology and it has nothing to do with real, corporeal, tangible, flesh & blood humans.
They use it to promote themselves and their own, personal, well-being.
It's a cover, just as 'god' is for the Abrahamics, to hide their life-hating, nature-despising ideologies behind. ideologies based on insecurities and existential anxieties.
None of these degenerates actually care about humans...but they profess a deep love for 'humanity'....in the abstraction, the ideal form.
See, an idea can be anything for anyone at any time....there's nothing tangible, empirical, to prevent each moron from imagining the cocnept in whatever way satisfies their private insecurities and desires.

One of the highest currencies in life, and yet so little is known about it. It really makes you think.



Short Version


I didn't think some humans were fundamentally so malleable.
The thing nobody asks about incels is if they exist then what exactly in the environment changed that provided their parents the ability to reproduce, but not them.
I think the mass phenomena of things like inceldom, hikkimori, lbtq, etc are just humans that are being filtered out of the gene-pool that don't have the tendency to provide their offspring with a good and guided environment, while that being what they sorely require themselves.

New traits are being selected.
The amount of change that has occurred in human environments is like an invisible asteroid that eliminates a main type in the species. And creates two off-set types - one that requires much more nurturing and one that requires much less. But I don't know, that's just a conjecture.