Feminism

The abstraction of masculinity into a concept, i.e., state, church, god, institution etc., replaced genetic markers with memetic markers representing male health and virility.
The institution is alpha - a faceless, formless masculinity that can be represented by anyone and anything.

So, a dominant female is now the one that gives herself to this abstraction, e.g., career - female social status is now a sign of being the alpha male's chosen - high social value bestowed upon them by the institution.
It is provider and protector.
Biological males are now representations of said power - its physical manifestations offering what the abstraction cannot, e.g., physicality, sperm.
A socioeconomically successful male - represented by wealth and privilege - is a male that has proven his loyalty, his adherence to the institutions values; a worthy proxy which can now attract females that have submitted to institutional values and norms.

With no risks and costs a woman can now select and sample males with impunity.
The family is no longer relevant as a unity of genetic reproduction and has become a unit of memetic replication, reproducing, repeating, validating, a collective value system that has been institutionalized - abstracted to a degree that it no longer requires anything physical.
Race, gender, genetic markers are insignificant - disruptive to collectivization. Even concepts like ethnicity, or god, are sources of disparity that must be eliminated to produce perfect cohesion.
A bee hive dynamic.
One's work, one's rewards from labour, are the only source of identity. Popularity, wealth are representations of collectivized appreciation.

A jewel from Jarno...

Satyr wrote:

A jewel from Jarno...

I was once told that the way to stop myself from thinking during workouts and everyday life was through "meditation" which thinking about it, really is just the feminine submission to the void. The extension of the orgasm is just stress relief and sheltering taken to such a degree that probabilities are disregarded for possibilities, many of these feminine pagans describing themselves as "gender fluid" as if their behavior was not explicitly female to the core.

They want to remain fluid and formless like the "primordial soup" we emerged from so as to never be held to be responsible for anything and become irate whenever one might try to "classify" or "order" them into a category like "female" or "feminine".

They have no problem putting us in a box and hating us for attempting to bring structure to their lives though.

Feminization means all-inclusion. No us & them.
No thing that diversifies is to be tolerated. Nothing that excludes is to be accepted.
Uniform humanity. The only differences are superficial, cosmetic, fashion, ephemeral subjective choices with no significance, no meaning.
No us/them, only us.
Whatever stands in the way of all-inclusive uniformity is to be condemned and abandoned as primitive man must be transcended.
Collective humanity is god.
Morality is the common bond - divine grace, love.
Every individual accepts the burden of another's mistakes - collectivization of culpability, of guilt, and of shame.

Renouncing free-will is a renouncing of personal choice.
All judgements are collectivized. All choices are common.
Consequences are distributed within the church, the body of Christ, the messiah.
He absolves us of sin, of personal responsibility.
This is what it means to belong to a collective, an us with no esoteric divisions.

There is no natural selection. All is fated. There's nothing to select. Selection is fate. Choice is an illusion.
a greater power has determined, has decided, has chosen.....who is to be chosen.
Nothing to divide.
Unity via oneness?
No, better, uniformity through the nil.  
The nil is better because it is void of meaning. Nothing cannot divide.
What is half of nil?
The perfect absolute.

The guy in the video reminded me of this..

What man cannot comprehend, cannot find a pattern in, cannot make sense of, cannot define, he mystifies or "comprehends" as "complexity".
See chaos.
Women have been describes as "complicated" or "mysterious" - feminine mystique - owing to the fact that the average retard cannot let go of his romantic idealism, nor his postmodern naiveite, so the only way to reconcile feminine actions, choices - exposing inconspicuous judgments - and feminine convictions - conscious beliefs, convictions, ideals, principles, morals - when they contradict each other is to explain them away using an assumed complexity and an ambiguous mystification.

The only "complexity" of females - experienced as a conflict between what they do, what they say, and what they actually think - is in how their genetic impulses conflict with their ideological convictions.

This is being normalized because males are now being feminized, and one aspect of this feminization is their ability to simultaneously hold two contradictory beliefs in their mind - wordspeak, compartmentalization, schizophrenia - and to say one thing, with passional lucid conviction, do a second, and think a third, as he tries to internally reconcile the dissonance.
Genes to Memes.

We see this in the current American crisis of identity.
How do these schizophrenic, feminized, masses reconcile their romantic idealism - that race and sex, for instance, are social constructs - with how individuals perform, how they act - choose, judge?
In this case what they do is accuse the system of failing to abide by the collective delusion, the common romantic idealism.
Something, or someone, is failing to live up to shared beliefs.

With communists, in general, this is also how they explain the failure of their ideology to produce the predicted system.
There must be some evildoer, or a failure to adequately understand and apply the perfect ideology - what other reason could there be?

Kamala has a history of dating powerful men [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"Shattering the glass ceiling" with her vagina.
Her hysterical laughter exposing the stress relief of fearing to be discovered being an incompetent "strong woman".

Feminism will end...when and if they ever invent an artificial womb and men can buy an egg - like women can buy sperm - and begin to grow their own foetus.

Satyr wrote:

Feminism will end...when and if they ever invent an artificial womb and men can buy an egg - like women can buy sperm - and begin to grow their own foetus.

Whatever creature is born from the result, seems like it will viscerally and violently seek the destruction of the world that denied it a Mother.

Ανανεώνουμε αντιδράσεις από Ιάσονα και αριστερές φεμινίστριες... [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Buzz Daz Jazz! (@jazz_daz) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Only an idiot or ideologue would ever think men and women are the same, but an interesting chart nonetheless. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

The midwit bonobos will continue to drive for equality between men and women because its pursuit benefits them.

They don't care whether its probable or how long it takes to achieve their paradise, they will continue to drive for such a goal as long as they stand to gain genetically.

Some, like Doolittle, think one should not "hate" them as they are like machines expressing programming, but i think hatred is a suitable emotion as its an evolved reaction to reproductive strategies that detract from and stand against ones own.

The issue with hate is that, like love, it blinds the mind....clouds reason.

For me its always helped bring focus, but too much focus can lead to tunnelvision. But i feel that's what some men might need, who endlessly drift in abstraction, never taking anything personal about modernity. Their drive and will sapped by a lack of object/objective, a target to love and a target to hate.

This does provide the opportunity for some men to reconnect with their inner Daemon as you can see towards the end.

Harry Potter is old af [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Guide to Kulchur (@real_gtk) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

These "diverse armed forces" will defeat Russia.

---Why are women cast as "evil"?
Because females are chaos/order - submissive to nature. They become nature's perfect agencies.
Males want to tame, change, nature. Order what chaos exists and appropriate what order exists.

---"Nature only cares about variety"....
Why?
Because it creates to then test and weed out the superior from the inferior.
So all kinds of mutations emerge, and only those that offer an advantage are reproduced.

This new years eve i was dog-piled by many online "Pagan-Racialist" types some of whom identify themselves as "Apollonians", who told me just how great feminism's liberation of women from Christian Patriarchy was. While i can understand rooting for the former, i largely argued that the latter has been a detriment to many of the very men who would be receptive to their message and are good quality men, some of whom have died alone recently and in history.

They largely scoffed and laughed, which struck a cord in me so deep that its made me wonder who really one's allies really are. Sure, its not about necessarily gathering quantities or even gathering period, but its made me wonder what is largely the point of their online posturing.

Sure, i might be guilty of projection, but when i see them and their vitriolic response, i cant help but see the same in them, the women validating their freedom and the men validating their modern success despite being childish faggots who think their reproduction in one of the safest periods in history makes them worthy of a Man's respect.

The think feminist liberation of female sexuality also liberates their masculine sexuality...which it doesn't - see toxic masculinity - nor do they understand the consequences being filled with the confidence of youth that they will succeed where others failed in this new competitive field of sex liberated from Patriarchy...the Stardusk syndrome.

He too, back when MRA was still beginning, was against Patriarchy and then shamed females thinking this would giult-trip them to change their ways...finally he advocated "going your own way" when this failed to produce the expected results.
So, this moron, supported the very ideologies that condemned him, and those like him, to the ravages of the open market of sexual competitions, only between males, and then bitched about women not choosing rationally or fairly....as if they ever did, or could ever do.
finally he accepted being excluded from the gene-pool as a by-product of his choice to fight patriarchy.

I told the cunt, back then, that we simply adopted feminist methods to make feminism capitulate....and it never will because it is supported by the system - feminine sexual power is institutionalized and supported technologically to reduce the natural costs and risks to its, i.e., limitations to its power.
Hyper-femininity forcing hyper-masculinity...where masculinity is restricted and labeled "toxic", making it a form of feminine posturing, linguistic trash-talknig, seducing, bribing...but never coercing.

******
It's the same psychology that keeps most Americanized individuals - primarily young males - as staunch socialist, anti-government, capitalists.
They still believe they can compete in the market place and that only institutional controls are keeping them from succeeding.

The institution - government - becomes the reason for their failures - if only it were not around, or not as interventional - like Paternalism - they would be having the time of their life.

See Tomassi and his analysis on female party phase or "ho phase"...where they are fucking many males.
Young males want to be one of those males.
But then they reach their thirties.

Feminism has made subversion to Nation-States and international Corporations (Globalists) far more severe than ever before.

It seems this is the unintended consequence, that is still unchecked.

The masses become more slavish, not less, as Masculinity wanes.

Feminism has "liberated" both males and females from all earthly authority made them Americanized individuals, i.e., helpless, powerless to accomplish anything, because they cannot accomplish anything on their own.
Such "free radicals" are easily controlled and manipulated by institutions.
Divide and conquer.
Better radical anti-goverment morons than organized groups.

These same "radical anti-goverment" individualists are then integrated into the system via the market - supply/demand.

Satyr wrote:

He too, back when MRA was still beginning, was against Patriarchy and then shamed females thinking this would giult-trip them to change their ways...finally he advocated "going your own way" when this failed to produce the expected results.
So, this moron, supported the very ideologies that condemned him, and those like him, to the ravages of the open market of sexual competitions, only between males, and then bitched about women not choosing rationally or fairly....as if they ever did, or could ever do.
finally he accepted being excluded from the gene-pool as a by-product of his choice to fight patriarchy.

One of the males in particular was the supposed father of a daughter who i couldn't help see the projected self-interest in promoting feminism since it delays/prevents relationships/reproduction with other men, of course he will defend it as wanting the "best" man for his daughter despite largely leaving the choice to her, i wonder if he would respect her choice to pair with a retard, faggot, or negro...

Æon wrote:

Feminism has made subversion to Nation-States and international Corporations (Globalists) far more severe than ever before.

It seems this is the unintended consequence, that is still unchecked.

The masses become more slavish, not less, as Masculinity wanes.

Well apparently they think this is an overall positive due to their "survival of the fittest" mindset, of course such people have that mindset up until the point they need the state to intervene on any situation where such an ethic would not suit them.

Impulso Oscuro wrote:

One of the males in particular was the supposed father of a daughter who i couldn't help see the projected self-interest in promoting feminism since it delays/prevents relationships/reproduction with other men, of course he will defend it as wanting the "best" man for his daughter despite largely leaving the choice to her, i wonder if he would respect her choice to pair with a retard, faggot, or negro...

And if and when she has a child with a retard, or negro, and it cannot compete in the academic market because of a low inherited IQ he'll become anti-racist, claiming race is socially constructed, since all humans are born with the same potentials, and that the system is racist.
His own judgement error excuses.

It is how Globalism tried to prevent resistance.
Globalism = Americanism.
The only way to resist Globalism is to organize against it into Super-States....but this is accused of being a part of Globalism, so morons - like those two Greeks, Alex and Alexandros, I watch on their Geopolitical analysis, advocating the maintenance of the nation-state -  any attempt to resist Globalization/Americanisation is accused of pandering or being part of the conspiracy, so maintaining the nation-state makes it easier for a Super-State to absorb them.

Imagine if the same method was used to prevent city-states from being absorbed into nation-states.
A large nation-state would call any organization into alliances between the city-state of being a anrtion-state...and this would keep them apart and unable to resist the antion-states dominance and gradual absorption of each city.

Same with Americanization of individualism.
Exploit ego, manipulable emotions...keep each individual separate and independent, and then swallow them one at a time...or deal with each one separately and easily.

They use masculine nature against itself.
What is masculine energy?
Competitive, egotistical, anti-auhtority, independent....

They manipulate masculinity in young males to turn them against the vary source of power, dividing them and keeping them from organizing into anything that could challenge or take over power.
Same with those morons you described and Stardusk.....they turn them against Paternalism the only source of access to females....turning males into coopetitors rather than allies.
Then you exploit their frustrated sexual energies separately....easily....harmlessly....
Look what they did with Stardusk and his MGTOW....."go your own way"....in other words, remain impotent and un-invested.

Satyr wrote:

They use masculine nature against itself.
What is masculine energy?
Competitive, egotistical, anti-auhtority, independent....

They manipulate masculinity in young males to turn them against the vary source of power, dividing them and keeping them from organizing into anything that could challenge or take over power.
Same with those morons you described and Stardusk.....they turn them against Paternalism the only source of access to females....turning males into coopetitors rather than allies.
Then you exploit their frustrated sexual energies separately....easily....harmlessly....
Look what they did with Stardusk and his MGTOW....."go your own way"....in other words, remain impotent and un-invested.  

Yeah i used to be sympathetic to the separatists/isolationists but the societal qualities they want are only possible within the sheltering of larger states given the current state of things. They also usually want such systems because they only care about their immediate families and could largely care less about the very race and ancestors they claim to respect.

Men like Varg who already had several children and live a comfortable existence within their modern state, can endlessly project their cynicism and think themselves superior for being largely lucky that they either didn't have to adapt to modernity for a mate or that they did and were chosen, being fine with the men around them being "left behind" genetically.

Now i see, that when they call these Pagans "LARPers", its not so much pointing out the religion or worship, but their attitude towards politics today. The "Apollonians" themselves thinking they can produce change with a small elite of successful modern men, not seeing the irony of having the same frame of mind as modern global elites.

We've entered the social selection era
Genes to Memes.
Adapt or die.

As always females are the agency of filtering out undesirable memes.

The enemy is Mannderbund....Latin, Roman - Comitatus.
That is "toxic masculinity".

For women sex is the only source of power.
This is why - like I've said numerous times - rape is so devastating to them, despite the fact that they are physically built to be penetrated.
Rape is disempowering, a reminder that her power has limits and that it can be challenged and broken.
This is the primary reason women support the status quo - the alpha as peace keeper, i.e., protector - and why she needs a reliable beta-male as provider and ally in her conflicts with other females and males in the group.

"The Wall", is nature's reminder that she has a shelf life - her ovum are running out and she is continuously losing her sexual market value.
Tik-Tok....nature reminding her that time is running and temporal attrition, i.e., change, interactivity, is deteriorating her power.
Male power is expendable but it does not suffer the same rate of attrition, at least not sexually.

*****
Feminine = power through association; value via another human.
So, feminine methods of competing - feminine warfare, i.e., Judaism - always go through proxies, and are psychological, linguistic as a method of manipulation, exploitation, control.
They engage reality via a proxy....semiotically. Parasitically.



Marriage used to be about protecting a female from inter-gropu challengers, establishing familial alliances, and integrating males into the system.
This is no longer necessary.
Women can be protected and provided for by institutions - they are becoming institutionalized, like many emasculated males are, i.e., married to the state.
The institution is the only permitted masculine entity and it can be represented by any biological type, because biological identifiers are now prohibited.
This is what it means when nihilists say "gender and race are social constructs".
The body's appearance is insignificant, since it is all mental, i.e., psychological, ideological...

Biological males are simply sperm producers and psychological providers, representations of the alpha, i.e., institution, state.
If they cannot be that then they are excluded - filtered out of the gene pool.
Biological males are female proxies that can be replaced by other female proxies....of any sex.
All are women in spirit, below the only masculine entity, the institution.
Sperm can be purchased on the market, or delivered the old fashioned way, making the biological male expendable, other than the psychological factor which is still a remnant of genetics....and no memetic indoctrination can erase it.
Social selection may, in time, eradicate it completely, but it hasn't, yet.