Feminism

The denial of sex differences is the postmodern equivalent to the undermining of self-evident realities. If you ask them would they run from a wild tiger charging at them and their answer is yes, they then, unwittingly or not, disprove their own subjective bullshit, that appearances are not illusions. Sexuality is visceral and the body's response to it does not lie, thus, neither do their physical appearances

All forms of nihilism, and their branches - one of which is feminism - are so detached from reality that when, and if, they are taken out of the protective umbrellas of institutionalization, and exposed to natural order, they face a rude awakening.
Wokeness, as with all nihilistic idioms, is a reversal, inversion of reality. It really means falling into a deep sleep and to live in a shared dream - utopia, paradise - or an inter-subjective alternate reality.
The problem with sleepers is that if nobody stays awake to watch over them the world will punish them.
Buddhist monks realized this and relied on the "kindness of strangers" to continue their esoteric meditations, otherwise they would die.
A sleeper, or one that enters a deep meditative state, does not exit reality he enters the mind, produced by the brain, housed within the skull - the body. The body does not leave space/time but suffers the natural consequences of existing.

Ive had a spat with the "Nazi Radfems" on twitter who have a frame of history that basically conflate Abrahamism with Paternalism and see it as a dysgenic attempt by inferior men to control female hypergamic sexuality.

When i ask them to explain Rome and Greece they chastise the former and selectively appreciate the latter implying a desire to return to some pre-bronze age maternal bonobo society where they largely play the role of thinkers and leaders while men are relegated to labor and defense.

Its just so fascinating to me the ways in which nihilism can shift and adapt to represent frames of history akin to the ones described here.

They truly hate the majority of their men, ridiculing and patronizing their struggles in finding a partner even if some of those men might sympathize with their positions. Its not even that these women are "bitter" or "single" many of them have boyfriends or are married. They have a pathological desire to support their sex regardless of the racial consequences. I can understand the issues with many men today but they think men should be responsible for improving their situation in a vacuum, even if they lack the motivation and passion that can only be inspired by a real woman.

Perhaps these Viragoes cant be argued with and their overly masculine demeanor must be directly repressed, because their husbands definitely aren't doing that, the type of man that would allow his wife to engage in politics online instead of being a mother probably is not a very insightful or dominant one, even if she praises his engineering or moneymaking ability.

Varg seems to have achieved a good balance with his wife rarely posting and him being the "face" of his family and not the other way around.

Jewish women are supposedly quite domineering.
Different tribes, different genetics, different social roles and idealised futures that they gravitate towards.

I think Varg would openly support those Radfem types while at home he has a different life. Talk and actions not being congruent.

Anfang wrote:

Jewish women are supposedly quite domineering.
Different tribes, different genetics, different social roles and idealised futures that they gravitate towards.

I think Varg would openly support those Radfem types while at home he has a different life. Talk and actions not being congruent.

For being domineering they sure seem to be fine with their men largely in control of their institutions, although perhaps they don't consider their tribe as masculine enough to warrant challenging their god, if it even is a masculine deity given CJB's theories.

Yeah, he likely considers such women akin to his wife, a fallacy which many married Generation X gurus tend to project upon men today. He also did what few men in the west could get away with, killing another man (at least with the jail time he received) and indulges in the loyalty this inspires in his woman.

Impulso Oscuro wrote:

Anfang wrote:

Jewish women are supposedly quite domineering.
Different tribes, different genetics, different social roles and idealised futures that they gravitate towards.

I think Varg would openly support those Radfem types while at home he has a different life. Talk and actions not being congruent.

For being domineering they sure seem to be fine with their men largely in control of their institutions, although perhaps they don't consider their tribe as masculine enough to warrant challenging their god, if it even is a masculine deity given CJB's theories.

Yeah, he likely considers such women akin to his wife, a fallacy which many married Generation X gurus tend to project upon men today. He also did what few men in the west could get away with, killing another man (at least with the jail time he received) and indulges in the loyalty this inspires in his woman.

I think they are the quintessential feminist type that we've come to associate with feminism for at least the last century. It also makes sense, they don't see themselves connected with European men, they are not their kin, it seems pretty natural to undermine men of the enemy tribe. European women who adopt this animosity that they pick up in the media and the institutions end up being a slightly different breed - more of a universal men hater while the J-feminists have no problem covering up crimes of J-men, as to not endanger their own tribe.

I haven't kept up with Varg for several years by now. I just remember that he is selling some pseudo iron-age lifestyle, which is a hobby for those who have the money to set up their (early) retirement home in some rural area while still ultimately depending on the, at least mechanised, agriculture and its produce.

Technologies benefit women - offering them the delusion to pretend to be like males - and it has its negative side-effects, exposing female promiscuity in order to hide from "good guys" the fact that they want to fuck "bad boys".

Being married to the institution has its positives and negatives.
Destroying paternalism has good and bad consequences.

Being an internet slut is no different than being an actual - physical - slut.
Pretence, hypocrisy, gestating another's ideas and passing them off as someone else's.
Pretending to be what you are not; using words to conceal the truth.

The mind can lie - using words - the body.....cannot - DNA.
Actions speak louder than words because, unlike what these imbeciles tell you, actions, ACTIONS, precede logos.
First came the action...not the word.
Words may be "magical" but actions cut through that shit.

Notice the projections.
These women flatter themselves as they are pretending to be flattering others...who they cannot see and do not know.

Sure, feminism has some positive consequences, for women and men, but it also has negatives.
Every dark cloud has its silver lining and every silver cloud....
Cliché time:
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Adaptation means the clever ones will come up with ways of adapting to the environmental shift.

Romantic idealism is modernism submitting to the cynicism of postmodernism.
The original error in judgement morphs into cynicism because it hasn't adequately identified the cause for a unexpected negative effect.

These women remind me of MRA's like Stardusk....
They did this to themselves but they cannot understand it so they blame the world for failing to validate their expectations....and they refuse to even consider Paternalism because they are clueless as to why they find themselves in their predicament.

Women "wake up" after menopause, if they wake up at all...but it's far too late then.
Morons like the Stardusk kind, cannot let go of their romantic idealism. They want to be "loved for what they are"....this is how naïve and delusional they are.
These imbeciles actually believed that when women were "liberated" that all would then "live happily ever after"...everyone would find their "soul mate", all would make rational compromises, all would settle down....but it never happened because it can never happen. It's all based on delusions.
How can the subjective delusion ever become real?

Remember the lie that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder"?
It implies that no matter how you look there will be someone, out there, that finds you attractive.
Interesting that all these same morons always seem to be attracted to the same "kind of men" and women. Ironic huh"....no a paradox.
A paradox, I repeat, is the product of words being contradicted by reality, or actions, since existence is interaction.
All paradoxes, ancient and modern, are a consequence of taking words literally, and not representationally.

Victims of.....their own judgments.
But, responsibility cannot be acknowledged, so it must be the other's fault, or some non-distinct, abstracted, other's fault.....existence itself, if not god...fate, luck....someone or something else is to blame.

*They always go for the same kind of men.....as if by magic.
These twats don't know how they are judging and choosing subconsciously, without even being aware of it.
Not so much fate as impulse. They choose males they later accuse of being "playas" because they refuse to accept how uncomplicated and predictable they truly are - this "feminine mystique" is bullshyte.
What's "complicated" about women is what is complicated about nihilists: word, linguistic manipulations.
As soon as you stop listening to what they say and watch what they do, there's no confusion, no complexity.
Mind can lie, via words, the body can never lie, and so it must concealed under make-up and garments and learned gestures imitating a social ideal, a stereotype, an archetype.

*Women don't even realize that they have a shelf life, for males.
Men don't care about soul mates or friends....they get plenty of comradery from other men, they don't need more form a woman.
Except for the exceptions to the rule, as a rule women make terrible friends.

*They fuck the chad, have a child, realize their options are now reduced and then they go for the nice guy they rejected before.

In a feminized world abortion becomes a means of increasing feminine power.
Sex is the only source of power for women, so anything that reduces the costs - the natural risks and consequences of sex - increases possibilities.
Abortion, and all contraceptive technologies, expand feminine power by reducing natural limits upon it.
To put it another way, nature's cap of feminine power and feminine promiscuity is eliminated by technologies males invent, fund and maintain.

*Whatever number of sexual partners a woman admits to, multiply by 3.
*When a woman over 30 says anything about finding her "soul mate" run.....
She's a moron.

*Rape is how male agency circumvents and overpower female sexual power.
It also makes monogamy ineffectual.
As such women evolved the instincts to create social alliances, particularly with inferior males, and to be passionate about preserving the status quo.
Any shift in masculine hierarchy is detrimental to females. We see this in nature.
Female lions, or chimpanzees, will rally behind the dominant male, unless there's another factor like the dominant male is abusive or insane or sickly.
This translates into human behaviours.
A woman most often supports peace and stability, supports the prevailing power, and quickly adjust to the new power if she cannot stop it from overcoming the old one.
There are of course, exception to the rule that serve to prove the rule. These exceptions can be analyzed case by case to determine why it is contrary to the rule and to what degree.
A female masculinity is one factor - hormonal - making her more masculine in demeanor, e.g., challenging to authority, thinking outside the box, aggressive etc....another may be the females daddy issues...and so on.

*Males that attack Paternalism are especially heinous...like Stardusk was and is.
We see how emasculation of the mind may contradict the body.
Not know why paternalism is in your interests and rejecting it on ideological principles only proves how indoctrinated you've become to these modern/postmodern nihilistic ideologies, with their own standards and principles.
"Turning your back on women", to punish them - sulking - as the MGTOWS proposed is adopting the feminine strategy to punish females and their feminine strategies of withholding sex.
This assumes that women are like men, or men are like women and that male adopting feminist tactics will somehow work against feminists.
Naïve, idiotic, moronic, retarded.
It actually buys into what females want: not to be bothered by the sexual advancements of inferior, effete, males.
What is implied is that these beta to omega males will no longer support female sin their inter-group competitions and conflicts with other females; they will refuse to be the "knight in shining armour" that is left holding his cod piece....or perhaps getting a hand job on the side as a reward for his life threatening support of a female.

*a delusion based on the romantic idealism that believes that if liberated from all forms of authority men and women will all find their soul mates nd live happily ever after.
A delusion that hasn't materialized, so who is blamed?
Women blame males and ....men-children blame females.
Both refuse to blame themselves and their own convictions.

How much of it is cultural/material and how much of it is biological is a constant dichotomy many bio realists face. Either way if you get married past 30 you’re done with as a woman. Aside from that based Eastern Europeans I guess. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— UBERSOY (@UBERSOY1) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Institutionalization has confused women.
Liberated from their biological constraints, enslaved to a monogamy model – remnant of a despised paternalistic past – and placed on a pedestal so that they believe they deserve the best, and that if they wait long enough a happy ending in the arms of a tall, dark, and handsome… and rich, and sensitive, and smart, knight in shining armour will eventually come their way, they eventually come to their senses a bit too little and a lot too late, necessitating a settling for what they can get.
This is real wokism – naïve romanticism slapped in the face by indifferent reality.
Who’s to blame, in the end, other than those men who failed to “man-up”, and to ride in to their rescue?

Feminism, degeneracy, are the expressions of nihilism that produce this growing population of incels - primarily males.
Females supported by technologies invented by males to reduce the natural limitations to their sexual options, restricting their sexual choices.
This excludes increasing numbers of males from the gene pool - from the future.
Un-invested in the system they turn to alternate realities, or to hedonism, via technologies - porn, video games etc.

This is what destroys a civilization.
Technologies cannot compensate for the deficiency it makes produces.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Some truths are stereotypically simple.
Those with the least sexual power are the most vocal about denouncing it.
This is true for all forms of power, viz., the powerless complain and obsess over what they don't have.

Women are just children we've afforded authority to. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Rollo Tomassi (@RationalMale) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I believe her....'cause I have to.
No means no....Me too

Watch out Putin....here they come.
Fire and fury...

Ok girls.
Your time to shine![You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Aaron Clarey (@aaron_clarey) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

...I feel safer already.

1:28 Such a lovely couple, the man letting the woman speak and hiding with her as a rat. I'm sure her choice will stand the test of time.

Men with no children are free-radicals - un-invested - some unintentionally, not due to their convictions - incels - but women that manage to go through life without bearing children - if they have no physical ailments - are another issue altogether.
They chose their fate, either because they were naïve or too demanding....too rigid.

They cannot blame themselves so they blame everyone other than themselves....usually males who, somehow, "failed to live up to their high standards".
Women value themselves off the average male's price range.

Their genetic/memetic filtering has an additional modern problem.
In nature there's always a community structure, but this is often not the case in modern/postmodern circumstances.
When you marry an abstraction and give yourself, body and mind, to an idea, an institution, a concept...you are left with nothing tangible, in the end.
That's when it hits hard.

A part of me knowing the malleable nature of their choice/agency makes me not attribute as much responsibility for their choices to them as much as their fathers and brothers, males who should have evolved a more intimate relationship with the consequences of choices as women will always diffuse their consequences through proxies.

Not all consequences are diffused and some might come later than sooner, but its not something that an animal living in the moment can ever learn and understand without paternal discipline and an elimination of the parasitic predators who attempt to sell them libertine fantasies, knowing they either cant understand or feel the fine print of such choices until it is too late.

Modern women, look upwards because they don't have to ground themselves in selecting the masculine qualities that they once respected and feared. They look upwards to a man who is often as empty as her, serving as the perfect placeholder for the god to come.

It's why I despised StardDusk, and the MRA, and his anti-paternalistic idiocies.
He was shooting himself in the foot....balls, but could not break free from the American liberal postmodern ideology.
He adopted feminist tactics, but they don't work on women, they only work on males, precisely because men and women are different.

Men did this.
Men infected by a mental disease - carried by a ideological parasite.
Women are like children..... They need a form hand. They feel things, know things, hey don't understand them.
Women screed themselves with this feminist ideology.
Most are depressed turning to drugs and alcohol - their participation in sports is now being threatened. In a few generations all "women sports" will be by male transsexual.
Fewer and fear are getting married or having children....facing a future which for them will be devastating.
Women that do not bear children eventually go insane in their later years.

Why are Ukrainians permitting women to leave the country and not men?
What if men identify as women, will they then be permitted to flee?

Just curious, because when the shit hits the fan the bullshyte suddenly disappears.
Ideology cannot tolerate reality.
Suddenly all the ideological lies vanish.