A War Like No Other

A meta-war, over meta-physics is being fought over the hearts and minds of the masses of mediocrity that can only understand it through religion.
Currently Abrahamism and its Messianism is attempting to dominate the world, via money and markets, attempting to reduce all alternate spiritualities and world-views into its all-levelling contexts - supply-demand. Identity reduced to a product/service that can be exchanged - manufactured and sold on the markets, to be purchased as one purchases any service or good.
The abstraction of resources - via money - mirrors the abstraction of the body - i.e., physical, tangible, real - to an idea/ideal, i.e., a concept, given a alphanumerical code.
All natural identifiers reduced to need/suffering, e.g. victimhood.
Hedonism is the standard - what liberates the body from the world's need/suffering - salvation. What feels good is "true", and what feels bad is "untrue". Simple binaries for manimal judgments.
The only identifier is organic need/suffering - all-inclusive, and certain. All are victims of existence, therefore all ought to be liberated, theoretically.

Biden’s inauguration coverage was ‘vomit-inducing,’ says media analyst Lionel [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— RT (@RT_com) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Religious reverence.
The "good" shall prevail - mankind will be saved, whether it wants it or not.
Messianic mission: Globalization.

"Victims of the world, Unite!!"

lol
ok guys it's time to stop noticing [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— onetallorder (@onetallorder1) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

You can't make it up. They got the account suspended btw. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Not Jqhnny (@punish3d_aIIy_4) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The war is against consciousness: perception of patterns.
Moral Marxism: we ought not perceive  sexes, races, behaviours, or any pattern associated with biology, or genetics.
Dumbing-Down = losing trust in your own senses, e.g., what you perceive - especially what you see - is not real, it is illusion or superficial, or misleading.
What is more real, more trustworthy, is what feels good, and what feels good is what offers safety, inclusion, flattery, comfort.
Ergo memes disconnected from the tangible, perceptible, shared world, i.e., sensually experienced reality.
Ideology usurps and/or negated reality.

Everything ought to be experienced as a novel occurrence, disconnected from a sequence, a pattern - e.g., generalities are forbidden.

When the migrants fled Old Europe for the new World they left their past behind - carrying this rebirth as an ideology that would develop into Americanism.
Wandering spirit constantly leaving its past behind, as it moves from place to place, from host to host, from home to home.
This is what it means to be "saved from the past" – without a past no patterns can be perceived. Every moment is distinct, arising from the void – not connected to anything preceding it. Noticing a pattern, for example, is an act of aggression.
Do not notice sex, race, or any kind of consistent predictability. Therefore, all is nurture, not nature – nature being the sum total of all past nurturing, manifesting presence, perceived as appearance, i.e., American individualism: man void of a past, constantly recreating himself/herself, itself, anew – innocence.

Satyr wrote:

Dumbing-Down = losing trust in your own senses, e.g., what you perceive - especially what you see - is not real, it is illusion or superficial, or misleading.
What is more real, more trustworthy, is what feels good, and what feels good is what offers safety, inclusion, flattery, comfort.
Ergo memes disconnected from the tangible, perceptible, shared world, i.e., sensually experienced reality.
Ideology usurps and/or negated reality.

Everything ought to be experienced as a novel occurrence, disconnected from a sequence, a pattern - e.g., generalities are forbidden.

It's the destruction of judgement. The act of evaluating reality through ones own standards is what must be eliminated; the very source of what distinguishes oneself from others. Judgement, the independent faculty of determining the quality of reason and self is what must be eliminated. That is, that which establishes separations of power and quality. Beauty for example, is based on this natural foundation of superiority and quality which is designated as a standard for judging what is inferior/ugly, from what is superior/beautiful. Skepticism has been weaponized by postmodernism to doubt everything into absurdity, which is taken up by its institutions as a form of social engineering to deconstruct truth and reality; to destroy any possibility of power or superiority, the self, one's identity, must be destroyed.

Sometimes the worse damage you can do to your enemy is to step aside and let him act in accordance with his essence.

My own dream of a united Europe is closest to Jean Thirart's, expressed in his books, primarily The Great Nation - Unitarian Europe - from Brest to Bucharest.

In it he correctly identifies both America and Russia as enemies, and admits that Europe is trapped in old ethnic animosities that produced Napoleon's and Hitler's attempts to unify Europe under a French or German yolk.
Although Hitler did realize his mistake, late in the war, when he began conscripting volunteers from multiple European nationalities. We can add it to his other great blunder Barbarossa and the debacle in Stalingrad.
Once Russia turned the tide of war America entered on the side she predicted would then be victorious - until then she did not dare, keeping out of a European conflict caused by European ethnic animosities.
Hitler did not learn from Napoleon's strategic mistake - narcissism and ethnic fanaticism were his undoing.

Thiriart - who I am currently reading - correctly identifies the US and Russia as Europe's enemies.
SuperStates stand in the way of European unification, just as a Franco-dominated or a Germanic Europe would be undesirable.
Europe should be a multi-ethnic SuperState, unified by a common genetic and memetic heritage - sharing a common currency, external policies and defences - a military - but remaining culturally distinct. An ethno-Federation.

Dugin is copying this vision in his Eurasian project, only he includes Asiatic ethnicities into his desired Soviet-Super-state, dominated by Russia.
Thiriart considers the US more of an enemy than he does Russia - difference between covert memetic - feminine - insidiousness, and overt - masculine - direct force.
Americanism undermines all ethnic identifiers - all genetically founded (biological) identifiers - and it does so via soft-power multiplied by hard-power, whereas Russia used hard power multiplied by soft-power.

Sheltering nurtures complacency - fear nurtures lucidity and discipline.
When China emerges as a clear and present danger - from behind the duplicitous sheltering façade of Americanism - it may shock Europe out of tis present lethargy.
If it doesn't then Europe deserved to die.

Romantic idealism is the expression of naïveté and inexperience, in the form of seductive hopefulness. It possesses the charm of infantile innocuousness, concealing a threatening feebleness, like a child which begs to be protected so as to enjoy its fleeting innocence for a little while longer, inspiring parental protectiveness. Maturity is impulsively driven to protect it, wanting to preserve its own past innocence in the form of an-other. It is maternal love calling for help.

Words are all the Abrahamics have.
Words with the power to affect minds, converting them into proxies of their communal will.

Words which are impotent within the world and potent within the world of man - where world = humanity; humanity = world.
Extending and growing their power necessitates increasing and growing converts - extending their power within the world, i.e., humanity.
Magic, the occult, the mystical, is how they manipulable and exploit - linguistic parasites.

Feminization means a use of semiotics to trigger sensations, emotions.
A war like no other means a war of words, over hearts and minds. The feminized, emasculated, are prone to be overly affected by triggering words.

Baudrillard, Jean wrote:

We will live in this world, which for us has all the disquieting strangeness of the desert and of the simulacrum, with all the veracity of living phantoms, of wandering and simulating animals that capital, that the death of capital has made of us—because the desert of cities is equal to the desert of sand—the jungle of signs is equal to that of the forests—the vertigo of simulacra is equal to that of nature—only the vertiginous seduction of a dying system remains, in which work buries work, in which value buries value—leaving a virgin, sacred space without pathways, continuous as Bataille wished it, where only the wind lifts the sand, where only the wind watches over the sand.

When desert tribes emerged reborn their fate was sealed as people of the sand, where no place would be considered home unless the world would be reduced to the desert they found themselves in – a desert of shifting codes, creating data dunes with no oasis in sight.

China's – as well as India's and Russia's – influence on a possible future European renaissance will be by pushing back American Judeo-Puritan Liberalism, giving breathing space to what remains of the European spirit to breathe, allowing it to inhale and exhale the rhythms of its own essence – if there is any life left in it after centuries of infirmity.

What a beautiful fragment; premonitions about a getaway civilization in Antarctica. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Autonomous Life == (@Seanrothmans) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Yukio Mishima wrote:

We live in an age in which there is no heroic death.

The new varangian guard [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Bad Takes Central (@BadTakes_Ltd) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The "War Like No Other" - as I've defined and understood it - is a linguistic - feminine - war using semiotics' a war against obscurantism and mysticism; a war to return semiotics, i.e., words/symbols, back to their original role as connectors of mind to body, the abstract, apparent, with the present, existent, the idea/ideal with the real; a war of words, over [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], against an enemy that uses words to corrupt and to confuse, using the seductive practice of surreal, supernatural, promises.
The "enemy" is insidious and feminine in its methods and strategies - it attempts to dominate from the "inside out" - from the esoteric towards the exoteric, using tactics we find in nature - parasitical zombification: using language to hijack and contradict the individual organism's genetic processes.

A preliminary step is to begin by reconnecting concepts with experienced reality - such as male/female, morality, free-will, power, value, self/ego, order, god....before we proceed towards the more difficult task of constructing metaphysical foundations and ideological objectives.

This is the task I've set for myself: to rescue concepts form the clutches of nihilists, using obscurantism and mysticism, to exploit and manipulable.
A task everyone can set for himself independently, guided only by the limitations of a shared existence.
Words/Symbols have never been arbitrary. Their role was clear and obvious, until their potential to be used to manipulate and exploit the masses was fully understood - in the west it happened over 2000 years ago, gradually gaining sophistication and understanding until the current age when even concepts such as "male/female" disputed and are being corrupted by charlatans.

Returning words to their original role is not arbitrary, nor dominated by a personal prejudice, or culture.
The experienced world - phenomenal world - is the guiding standard. It dictates how, and to what degree, mental abstractions (noumena) can be connected to experienced reality (phenomena), i.e., verified and/or falsified.

Any attempt to obscure and to mystify, exposes a motive other than clarity.

Not all concepts can be connected with reality, but let us begin with those that can, and from there move to the others, using the first as our foundation.
Each one can do so on his/her own - with a bit of help, if they so require, to inspire them.
This is philosophy.

Skepticism in pursuit of truth is necessary for exhaustive permutation+falsification. Conspiracy theorizing isn't necessarily unscientific or irrational unless (a) it's supporting justification of an intuition, (b) conflates common interest, incentive, intent, organization, plan.

— Curt Doolittle (Gab: curtd) (@curtdoolittle) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Judaism is not an ethnicity. It has become one, in the minds of contemporaries, due to the corruption of language and centuries of dogmatic propaganda.
Judaism is no more an ethnicity than Christianity or Islam is one.
Semite is an ethnicity. Hellen is an ethnicity. Han is an ethnicity.

When Judaism came in contract with Hellenism Christianity was produced, splintering Indo-Euroepan spirituality with a variety of absolutist version of a singular divinity. But Judaism did not go unscathed, because it also splintered into three major branches: Orthodox (original), Cultural (Zionism), and Political (Marxism).
Three branches in conflict with each other - each with tis own variant of Judaism, spanning form the zealotry of the religious to the secularization of moral principles, in Marxism, to a return to tribal identifiers. in Zionism.

Struggle between Athens & Jerusalem is the conflict between Reason & Faith.

The main difference between Athens (reason) and Jerusalem (faith) based approaches is the difference between generosity - potlatch - and miserly - hoarding - approaches.
Both, if taken to their extremes - absolute ends - become problematic, by contradicting existence as being void of immutable, complete, indivisible, absolutes.
One veering towards the ideal of attaining omniscience/omnipotence, the other towards attaining complete and final assimilation - identification - with omniscience/omnipotence.
The two attitudes indicate the psychological divergence that cannot be harmonized - antithetical.
One exhibits respect for other divinities, spiritual beliefs etc., only arguing for its own superiority, the other declaring its own as the one and only, to which all must submit to, concealing themselves as agencies of divinity, and offering a either/or absolutist choice - salvation or damnation.
We've been under its spell, in the west, for over 2,000 years. To the point where we've associated Western - Indo-European - ideals, and morals with its Afro-asiatic ideals and morals.
Tribalism masked as Theocracy.
We've been indoctrinated to believe that what we consider moral behaviour - altruism, compassion, sympathy - was invented by Abrahamism - or by one of our preferred three - and that before Abrahamism, and its Mosaic laws, men were vicious brutes with no morals or rules - at least none that began with the victim.
This association of justice, fairness, kindness with Abrahamism has been so successful that when Nietzsche hammered us awake, by declaring god was dead - he meant the one-god of Abraham and not only the Christian version - the majority suddenly became anxious and considered this an end to morality altogether.
If not absolute morality - universal codes of ethics - then all is amoral.
This either/or absolutism has been ingrained into western man's thinking and into his language use, to the point that most can no longer conceive of morality as anything other than what has been created by a willful agency and imposed upon us.

Many concepts follow the same either/or absolutist institutionalization, such as identity, and free-will.
The current "crisis of identity" is rooted in the disillusionment with abstracted, institutionalized, forms of identity.
As Americanism declined, and its idealized identity with materialism and market forces, i.e., production/consumption, supply/demand, falls apart and is exposed as a chimera, those who "wake up" - become woke - dismiss identity altogether or surrender to the temptation of making identity an act of will - or a product of power.; American individualism is exposed as an ideological construct with no substance, and these masses confuse this as a universal truism, making the emotionally driven cognitive leap towards the other extreme.
"If Americanism was a ruse, an insubstantial ploy, and all that was associated with it is now being exposed as lies, then all is a ploy and lies."
This is the by-product of institutionalization.
Imagine an individual who was born and raised within a prison - seeing the world from behind bars and over walls. Such a psyche would be convinced that the entire universe was regimented, controlled, ordered, with tis incarcerated rules and regulations being its ethical codes. If such an individual experienced the collapse of his prison, or its gradual loss of control would signal a deterioration of its controlled, regimented, rules and standards, as an end of the world scenario; in such an institutionalized mind the decline of rules and regulations and the revelation that they were manmade would indicate that the 'real world' is a world of anomy, with no rules an regulations; a world of chaos and absolute freedom to be and say and do whatever you like - He could only imagine the world as an antithesis to his prison circumstances. The majority would be so anxious about such a prospect that they would imagine the world as governed by an invisible, omnipresent, warden, and all existing within invisible , transcendental, cells guarded by ethereal guards imposing the same regimented rules and regulations.
They would be unable or terrified of even imagining a world where life was not so predictable and organized - the idea of it would be so terrifying that they would prefer incarcerating themselves within minds.    
As the latest "western empire" declines, and as it gradually loses control, some of its underlying principles will be exposed.  



Europeans have been institutionalized into Abrahamic semiotic prisons of the mind.
Time to break out - now that its walls are crumbling, the guards don't give a shit, and the hoards are flooding in.
It's scary out there in a world or order and chaos - an uncertain world - believe me I know.
But that's the challenge to your generations. Break out and roam free from your mental prisons, before a new warden shows up - and he will.
Break free and return to your ancestors, with new eyes, and language liberated from this disease - dare to give yourself a linguistic vaccine.
Not by me...or anyone else. Do it yourself.
We all have the tools....but we've forgotten - we've slept and aimlessly floated upon the river Lethe for a long, long, time.

Let the daemon out of you....
Break out of your mental prisons....the ones they've built and placed you in.



"First principles....simplicity!
What is it in itself - what is its nature."

I don't need to seduce or coerce or even bribe you....see how Doolittle "project"...paraphrasing:

Doolittle wrote:

Doolittle = 3 modes of coercion, religion, state, law. Depending on which one develops first determines the next two, and the essence of a culture/civilization.

Notice how wonderfully they correlate with Plato's Reason/Will/Pathos, or with Past/Present/Future, or with Real/Intent/Ideal, or with Real/Movement-Momentum-Motive/Ideal, or with my Gene/Interaction/Meme triads.

I only tell you what you've always felt to be true. I've only tried to awaken you to what has always been in front of your senses...to what many still deny, or to even look at.
I've convinced, or at least I've become convincing, so that those who refuse to look - having lost trust in their won eyesight, or have been traumatized by what they've seen - accuse me of one of the three methods of coercion.
But I've not done any of them. I simply do not give a damn enough, or I am willing to let the world do the coercing for me - and it will.
Simpletons insist on imagining reality as a entity - a divinity - a willful intentionality - but it is indifferent - much more than I can ever hope to be, for I remain mortal and vulnerable to the "mother of all emotions".
When they hear or read the term "nature" they immediately imagine it as a god, omnipotent, omniscient, intentional and absolutely in control, i.e., as absolute control.
Even their enemies must be integrated into their institutionalized contraptions...their entrapments, their little prose and obscure narratives implying, always insinuating, what they can never show, nor reason, for that matter.
So they must coerce, seduce or bribe.
Exchange rates, value standards, inseminating penetrations, poking and prodding, looking for something to infect with their willful brilliance.

Translation for the uninitiated - not chosen - to comprehend:

Code = Language – semiotics. World = humanity – world is humanity; humanity is world.
The only place where codes have a direct effect, not requiring translations via a mediating medium, such as other creative art-forms, e.g., painting, sculpting, technologies. Revolution against this mediation, so as to conceal the use of mediating proxies to constantly and predictably rebel against the world.
[See what happened to the creators to glean the underlying motives, and their source... back in Abrahamic spirituality].  
To control language – code, logos – you must liberate it from its anchoring in reality – reality inhibits or limits creativity. Control of world via humanity – as a mediating proxy. To inhibit a challenge and a competitor the idea of mediation is rebelled against – pseudo-revolutionaries, inciting rebelliousness in others so as to make them more malleable, more controllable.
With no natural – tangible – anchoring the mind is abandoned to emotion, pleasure, which can be controlled – Pavlovian training.
Words lose meaning so as to then be given new meanings – corruption of language and through language corruption of civilization.
Words are liberated from the tangible to make them arbitrary... knowing that human psychology needs collectives, so it is a means of enslaving minds to collectives. Similar to how mediators are rejected so too is human nature rejected – as a lie – so as to make it more potent in those who know how true it is.
Subjectivity – like American individualism, delivered by minds like Peterson and other messianic figures – is meant to divide and conquer – like awakening from the artificiality of Abrahamic logos only to find yourself in a subterranean theoretically more "real reality" named "Zion" – occult, obscure... a secret cult-like city within a surrounding technocratic global city.
[The symbolism will be left to be deciphered elsewhere and by the reader]
Instead of going upwards towards the sun, the city of "free humanity" goes into itself, into a world of artificial light; a concealed, secretive, esoteric realm, no less dependent on artificiality than the one on the surface, superficiality created and maintained by machinery, technologies; a hippie commune, a ghetto concealed within a cosmopolitan metropolis which has been covered by clouds – the by-product of its own concealment. We have concealment within concealment – crypsis.
The matrix is replaced by another set of matrices, further away from natural light – distancing from Olympian gods, deeper into the Platonic cave; cave emerging into another cave. Those select (chosen) to be awakened wake up – woke culture – believing they are escaping artificiality when they've gone deeper into it – there's a technocratic maintenance source on the surface on top of a spiritual creative source below – a buried death cult in collusion with sarcophagi pods - Egyptian tombs of mummification - that keep their bodies alive but in a state of atrophy. The awakened ones are convinced they are exiting a cave when they are delving deeper into it, trapping themselves within its contrivances.
The movie offers the door, as Orpheus tells Neo – Orphic occult oracle – offering him a way out in the form of a pill – pharmakon; a test of faith.
The Wachowski's are offering the audience a way out through the data codes streaming upon the screen, only it leads further into their incarceration, i.e., enslavement, indoctrination, not out of it. This is most evident in how they present free-will.

Satyr wrote:

The matrix is replaced by another set of matrices, further away from natural light – distancing from Olympian gods, deeper into the Platonic cave; cave emerging into another cave. Those select (chosen) to be awakened wake up – woke culture – believing they are escaping artificiality when they've gone deeper into it – there's a technocratic maintenance source on the surface on top of a spiritual creative source below – a buried death cult in collusion with sarcophagi pods - Egyptian tombs of mummification - that keep their bodies alive but in a state of atrophy. The awakened ones are convinced they are exiting a cave when they are delving deeper into it, trapping themselves within its contrivances.
The movie offers the door, as Orpheus tells Neo – Orphic occult oracle – offering him a way out in the form of a pill – pharmakon; a test of faith.
The Wachowski's are offering the audience a way out through the data codes streaming upon the screen, only it leads further into their incarceration, i.e., enslavement, indoctrination, not out of it. This is most evident in how they present free-will.

Yes. It is also why they rely on the machine programs (the Oracle) within the system to guide them and instruct them, still vicariously attached to the umbilical cord of the machine God-head that they were originally programmed by, even though they are "unplugged". Infantile dependency. They continue to return to it, finding their identity in it, their purpose in it. "Don't let the Matrix tell you who you are", says Trinity to Neo. Self-deception and the illusions of 'uniqueness'. Moderns are so dependent on the institutions and government that programmed their minds, that they invent their own free thinking within it, free-will constructed by it, dominance in it, Will to Slavery.