Satyrnalium

The weak-willed and the coward prefers to believe that he is a product of his upbringing, and that everything he is ashamed of and proud of is a result of nurturing.
He sacrifices the positive to deal with the negative.
In this way he convinces himself that what has been done can be undone, with a simple change of heart and a different perspective, using a new title.

Morality is the adjustment of individual inclinations to group needs.
A matter of genes adapting to memes.
The process becomes problematic when the meme is nihilistic and the genes are forced to turn against themselves, but all memes impose upon the genes restrictions.

With no god men begin worshipping other men with the same fervour.
Idealism replaces superstition, and, in accordance with natural selection, some separate from the throng, dominating their inferiors, declaring themselves gods, or earthly representations of the divine, and the rest worship it through him.
Intelligence has always seemed divine to those who do not possess it.
The superior can understand the inferior, but the inferior can only feel superiority like a mysterious godly presence, and a powerful magical force.

Devout followers, and passionate believers, can be found among those that call themselves atheist.
Scripture believers can be found among those who have replaced the Bible with a new text.

There are leaders and there are followers, one needing the other.
The leaders want to worship themselves through others, and the followers, having no immediate reference point to guide them, and no courage to stand alone, need an idol and an icon to direct their wills and to comfort their fears.

Sub-consciousness is not un-consciousness.
We use unconscious in everyday parlance to refer to someone who has fallen beneath self-consciousness and consciousness.  
We use the same word to refer to a self-conscious mind that is unaware of itself, as we do to describe an animal, or a conscious mind, that loses consciousness of world.
Using the same term is what creates confusions and misunderstanding.  

To say that non-living matter/energy is unconscious is to allude to one of the two previous states, implying that nonliving matter is the same as living matter.
Death is not a state of unctuousness if by the word we imply a potential for becoming conscious again.
Most of philosophy is based on word confusions.

Life is memory.
The words identity or self do not apply to unities with no memories.
We project ourselves into alien phenomena, and then forget we've done so.
We see reflections of ourselves everywhere - intentions, motives, judgments. These things are not necessary to explain the multiplicity of patterns and non-patterned Energies we categorize, in our own mind.
The interactions and synthesis of different patterns, called particles or toms, do not require memory...nor intent, nor motive...nor Will, if by will we mean a intent, a desire alluding to need.
One wills what one does not posses...such as power.
Life wills, not the non-living.
The non-willing just interacts, repelling or attracting as an expression of its patterns. its kind. It cannot not to do....it is not other than its own rhythms patterns....it is them.
It harmonizes or not, with other patterns unintentionally.  

Harmony means attraction/repulsion as a description of the pattern's relationship with other patterns.
A pattern is characterized by rhythms, speed, direction, sequence...All these mean pattern.
A non-pattern, randomness (chaos) lacks a predictable sequence, direction; has no rhythms. Therefore it can interact but never harmonize, never unite into balanced circumstantial unities an organism can perceive.

The idea/ideal of God is based on this projection of man his increasing and always incomplete knowledge and understanding of self.
Gods change to accommodate increasing human self-awareness.
Man projects into the unknown what he knows.
He sees himself everywhere.
The primitive mind saw spirits everywhere.
Ancients saw gods.
Moderns infected by Nihilism see 'nil', everywhere, only they call it 'one', as a projection of their desire for a final, certain end - a resolution a completion.
Man made of humanity a god, to eliminate the middle-man, the unnecessary proxy.
But he projects not himself, but an idealized version of himself.

For every action there's an equal and opposite reaction.

Without chaos, defined as randomness, order, defined as consistency, is worthless uniformity.
Without chaos consciousness is unnecessary, and free-will is impossible.

Linear time is not arbitrary. It cannot be reversed but only in the mind, as theory, as noetic abstraction.
The causal chains cannot be inverted, no matter how hard the nihilists try.
Cause cannot be preceded by its effect.
Self, cannot precede life.
Consciousness cannot precede mind, mind cannot precede life, life cannot precede existence, as it has no creation moment, but is a series of interactions experienced linearly as events connected by chains of causality.
The causal chain is existence.

Language can invert concepts but the phenomena they represent remain unaffected by human word-juggling.    
The mind may be comforted, inspired, invigorated by this lie, but it changes nothing, but only postpones the inevitable.

World is not the creation of mind, but mind is created by the world.

Natural selection applies whether it be in the arena of genetic competitions, or the arena of memetic competitions.
Each mind chooses, gives itself direction, meaning, purpose, as a relationship of it's emergence with the world it emerged within.
Each individual subjectivity judges and then acts on these judgments, or holds them as theoretical possibilities, and then faces the consequences of these judgments, if and when it chooses to convert them to actions, or faces the repercussions of never applying its theories.
An idea affect the mind and through the mind the body, even if the idea is never externalized and converted to actions.
Consequences being costs and benefits, in relation to the objective, and the intent.
Whether the mind acknowledges, or understands, the consequences accurately is insignificant to all but to the mind itself, because if it fails to appreciate the costs/benefits and adjust its judgments and any subsequent actions accordingly, it is the one that will face the consequences of that, as well.  

But Modernity does not like this.
Deluded by fear, it idealizes the theory that all minds are equal, and therefore all judgments are also equal.
They imagine an evil will intervening to make them uneven, burdening some with more costs and others with more benefits.
To achieve their idealistic construct of equal outcomes, in other words equal consequences, they propose social engineering - a collective human intervention upon the consequences, adjusting them to increase and/or decrease the costs/benefits in relation to a conceptual average - mediocrity.
It proposes a system where costs/benefits are distributed equally.
Failing to do so, repeatedly, they do not accept responsibility for this failure. They do not question nor do they discard their delusions, but accuse that invisible will of maliciously causing their failure.
This is what makes them dangerous and, trapped in their own minds.
Desperate to avenge themselves against this invisible malicious will that condemns their delusions to repeating failures.

Recently they've adopted the tactic of using language to manipulate minds and to produce their desired outcomes.
The idea that 'all is subjective' is part of their mindset - their deluded naive propaganda.
The idea that 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' is another one of their deluded naive mottoes.
The idea that 'there is no objective world' is another.
The idea that 'word came first' or that 'effect, such as consciousness, precedes cause, such as life' is part of their linguistic inversions.

They have no trouble finding desperate, needy minds to rally behind these naive idealistic delusions, and that's why they equate 'truth' with quantity' and reject 'quality' because they have no mind for it, and because they fear the implications.

There is no issue with identity when only consciousness is present.
An animal does not have identity conflicts.
Consciousness perceives otherness, and is that which perceives.

Conflict arises when self-consciousness emerges from consciousness
In its nascent stage it results in the Bicameral Mind, and in beliefs that attribute the self becoming conscious of consciousness as an external spirit, a god.
This confusion is exacerbated as awareness of self, in relation to other, results in insecurities and dissatisfaction with the juxtaposition.
Nihilism soothes these conflicts.
Self is associated with self-consciousness declaring itself master over consciousness, and it uses the psychosomatic effect of repeating language to impose itself - mind lording over body.
But this has no effect no the world, on otherness. The most it accomplishes is the mind affects the body it emerges from.
The effects remain internalized and result in consequences when the body begins to act under the influence of the mind's impositions.
To deal with this restriction and any costs that may ensue the mind seeks follower, converts, to influence and to trigger in them the same processes.
When costs are shared the mind is validated.

Self-consciousness identifies itself using the negative.
"It is what it is not".
"It is other than otherness".
It identifies self as a reflection of other.
It unloads upon other all the negative and accepts all the positives as identifiers.
This is its primal first stage of maturation.
A stage difficult to let go of.
At this stage Nihilism becomes stuck when it inverts other to define self.
Self is no longer 'other than other', but the 'inversion of other'.  
When it projects itself into everything, as a method of understanding the other, it projects an idealized version of itself.
Now, the other is defined as the negative of the idealized self - so 'other is that which is other than self'.
Positive nihilism.
If this idealization of self does not occur then 'other is negation of self' and both are nullified.
Self is absorbed into a negative other and it vanishes in the nil.

A pattern is indivisible because it isn't a thing to be divided, but a fluctuating process - energy.  
It is converted into a thing by the mind that has to do so in order to process it - this is called interpretation.
The mind must also conceptualize existence as a 'fabric' of vibrating localities, each with its own rhythm, around a centre: point in noetic space/time.

The mind simplifies/generalizes, reducing the phenomenon into a form it can process - converting it into sensation, thought, abstraction.
When the dynamic phenomenon is translated into a noumenon, then it becomes mystical, contradicting the phenomenon if it is taken literally and as what it is a representation.
This noumenon can be infinitely divided so as to represent fluctuation.
Fractions are how the language of math represents dynamic fluctuations, within the framework of its ambiguous binary representations of 1 and 0.
Language uses verbs, and metaphors to represent fluctuating existence by using absolute models.

The extremes a Modern will go to in order to escape the determined past is equal to his internal insecurity and desperation.
Using [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] in novel ways to appear like something new and profound is being revealed; using words and symbols, to baptize themselves an ideal their appearance contradicts; using words to manipulate and through this manipulation feel powerful, using words to cover the world, to bury reality, and then declare themselves above it, or open to the world.

This war of words, this Word War, is the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
A war converting the masses to brain-dead [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], with their delighted consent.
The world cannot be tolerated by all, and the degree to which one can tolerate it determines his objectivity, and his philosophical acumen.

Quantities threaten Qualities.

Spinoza's pantheism is the new Abrahamic mutation. It's more secular form.
Whatever new words are used to represent the same concepts, he remains the source.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

As with many ideas in our age of nihilistic linguistics, the same concepts are renamed and presented as new, or synthesized with other concepts, by using a new symbol/name.
The merger may not be harmonious, because vagueness can smooth over any contradictions, using the method post-modern cRappers use to sell their sampling word-associative nonsense, or fArtists their jumbled chaotic mess to naive simpletons and vain douche-bags.

Psychology is now philosophy.
How to manipulate and to exploit mental weakness, using symbols/words.

The mind can fabricate many more possibilities which the world cannot.
World restricts what the mind can consider as probable, and language must reflect this fact as a starting premise.

Precedent tells the mind what is more and what is less probable.
Precedent refers the causality, and is called history, nature as the sum of all previous nurturing and generally it is called past.
Past manifests as presence; is made present, and interpreted as appearance.
But past refers only to order and so speaks to what is determined and how. It speaks to patterns.
What it excludes is chaos, the random factor.

Without it consciousness would be unnecessary.
Reactivity would be superfluous.
Every contingency would have developed an automatic reaction to it without having to engage the processing and judging of a mitigating mind.
Why is consciousness necessary?
Because no matter how much you know and perceive, there remains the unpredictable, the unforeseeable requiring immediate adjustments, sometimes contrary to automated reactions.
Without the unforeseeable evolution would be completely rational, and not have an element of the irrational, of madness, such as eros does.

If men and women of nobility, pride and integrity, do not come together and fight against this linguistically transmitted scourge then all is lost.
The virus kills the host, sealing its own fate. It cannot help itself. It is its nature to do so.

Morality is the individual adapting to group dynamics, and the group adapting to natural order.
It becomes problematic when in the name of group cohesion the group contradicts natural order.

Memes intervening upon Genes.
It has been called cultivation, but can just as easily be called social engineering: the individual submitting to the group.
Control of self, before social conventions, becomes repression of self before survival concerns.
This becomes psychosis when the memes do not simply enforce rules of control over genetic dispositions, but totally contradicts them, forcing them to hide, internally, and to pretend, externally.
The individual is forced to contradict its past (nature) within genetically heterogeneous groups, using memetic nihilism to fabricate group harmony.

An honest philosophy, a philosophy with integrity, is one that works from the Bottom<>Up....building evidence, adding to precedent, and presenting a more probable thesis, expecting a response of superiority not absolute finality.
It begins with a honest and clear application of words.
Connecting them to world, and then building from there.
Clarifying, not trying to confuse and manipulate using mystification.

I've said that the world is mystifying on its own, because of chaos, properly defined.
What we need is ordering, clarifying, so that we do not lose our understanding of what has already been clarified - to not regress but to progress.

Conflicting theories are good things.
Through them the highest is separated from the lowest.
The more real is distinguished from the unreal - the most probable is distinguished form the least probable.

Language has to be applied to serve its function of describing and differentiating experiences and existence.
Language gives a name a symbol to what is made conscious, so as to make it clear and distinct.

To this end i will sue the words NEED, DESIRE and WANT.
I've offered my extensive opinions on the matter before....but I fear I must repeat myself.

Needs must be differentiated from desires, as the former refer to lack, produced by interactivity with Flux, and the latter refers to a successful dealing with the former producing excess.


Need = lack....sensation of depleting resources such as nutrition, hydration, oxygenation...
Desire = excess, sensation of pressure produced by the accumulation of superfluous resources or the byproduct of their collection and storage....such as defecation, sexual urge...

Want can now be defined as a mixture of the two, or the offering of a objective that promising a releif from either or both.
Want = that which presents itself as a potential relief from need and/or desire.
So wants can be manufactured just as consent can be, according to Chomsky.
An example of a want is an automobile.
An automobile is not immediately able to satisfy need nor desire, but it can act as a medium through which both can be gratified.
An automobile becomes a symbol of the ability of the owner to gratify both needs and desires...a signal to potential mates and/or friends etc.
A social signifier and a tool to find and maintain work, and to find and maintain a sexual relationship.
Modern life is full of such wants. Capitalism uses commercials and pop-art to fabricate wants.
Another example is an icon, or a pop idol.
Let's take Nietzsche as the favourite idol of post-modern men-children.
This idol/icon is, like the automobile, a sigifier, implying gratification of needs and desires.
His association with 'power' is the same as the automobile's association with access to resources, social mobility...a self-handicapping signal.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Order....Chaos = randomness, not complexity.

When man studies the cosmos he is studying order.
Chaos is subsumed in order.

The mystical has to do with chaos.
Abrahamic God is absolute order, called 'good', subsuming chaos as evil.
Randomness cannot become apparent, because it cannot emerge into complex unities, like order can, but can only affect order and become apparent through this effect.
Randomness, or dynamic energies with no pattern, always remain on the infinitesimal level....which is always getting smaller because time/space is expanding, dimensions fragmenting.
Space = possibility
Matter/Energy, the apparent, = probability

Philosophy, thus far, has been about the study of order, or, the study of man, organism, reacting to cosmos - relating to reality
It's been psychological as well as empirical. Study of mind & body...the noumenon and the phenomenon.
In Nihilistic ages, or feminized times, this study leans towards psychology....in more masculine ages, Aryan, it leans towards rationalism, science, empiricism.
Women prefer to talk about feelings, emotions, relationships....themselves.
We see this approach in intellectuals like Peterson, Jung...the romantics like Schopenhauer and Nietzsche.
The last called it Dionysian, and the more rational, masculine Apollonian = esoteric versus exoteric approach.

Feminine spirits speak through metaphors, which they then think of in literal terms....its all prose, innuendos, insinuations.
They are more chaos oriented, contrasting to the masculine order oriented.
Chaos is counter-intuitive and so can only be alluded to....sensed, intuited, and named, given a symbol as if it is ordered and known.

Uniqueness is another way of saying 'something comes from nothing'.
An absurdity. All is process of interaction and synthesis - flowing into other and from other.

Philosophically this takes the form of gene/meme.
Genetics - From the mother/father into world, and from self synthesizing with an other, a 'new' combination.
Memetics - From past ideas, theories, relating to reality, and from the synthesis of meme/gene a new perspective, a new idea is born and passed forward.
The past is the determiner - God.
but there are no absolutes so chaos (devil) makes a new synthesis possible, and necessary.
The world is Flux, and so a new response, a new reaction is called forth.

But this new cannot be completely free from the past, and what has been determined - it cannot lack order. It can only be a new variant, with new potentials for reacting to ongoing flux.

Being stuck in the past is remaining adolescent, beneath the parent's shadow.
Their order is adopted as your own, or is used in lieu of your own.
In philosophy the 'thinkers' that cannot escape the shadow of a mentor are not philosophers but followers of a philosophy.
They never engage the world directly, but engage the parent, the teacher, the authority, engaging the world - they go through a proxy.
The proxy shapes the meaning of words....and so the language has no reference outside this relationship of follower to leader.
Such males are stunted men-children....or females.
Like females they need a proxy, an other, to intervene between them and the unknown, indifferent, world.
Words become more than a convention to exchange ideas....they become codes of wall, creating an artificial space.
Words referring to other words....and not to world.

So 'will' no longer refers to an observable phenomenon, such as the focus of an organism upon a task, an objective, but becomes a connector to the mentor's mind - solipsism via a mediator.
The word can be redefined idealistically to accommodate this relationship - to reinforce it.
The man-child cannot break free....he returns behind the linguistic webs connecting him to the proxy, and the safe-space this creates.
He is forever in the shadow of his parent, his mentor....and dares not come out from beneath it to stand forth.
His words no longer refer to world, but to the meme, the ideas, the theory, his mentor has created for him.

He remains a child, appearing as a man because he projects himself as the mentor's reincarnation.....the parent's offspring.

In genetics this is a fact. The child carries 50% of the parents genes - his memories.
In memetics this is not a given.
The child must prove to himself, and to the world, because ti needs validation, that he is the parent's true heir. that he may not have lived the parent's life, nor experienced the world as the parent has, something given ion genetics, but that he knows and understands the parent, the teacher more than any other - favourite son.
Memes, of course, fertilize minds to a grater extent than genes can ever hope to...so a famous thinker can father many children, each presenting itself as the mentor's legitimate child, or the favourite son.
Philosophy becomes a competition over the dead father's love, but the fact that the father is dead makes the competition unending.

There is no world to establish higher and lower probability, because these stunted psychologies refuse to exit the mentor's shadow...so it all remains esoteric, theoretical, and very emotional.

Only a halfwit would consider the friendship of a dimwit something to be proud of.
The witless find in one another a witty support.

Kindness is not only mistaken for weakness but it is also used as a shield for its preservation.

Watched one of the Planet of the Apes movies on TV, and in one of the scenes where the humans were gathered in preparation for a coming battle with the apes there was one black guy among the whites, and I thought to myself:
"Can't they see they've sent a spy?"

Almost all absurd ideologies can be traced back to some degree of ignorance or denial concerning human nature, beginning with one's own.

What is a pattern?
Visualized in four dimensions it is a oscillating/vibrating string, without a string, but oscillation/vibration alone.
Its range of effect is the arc of the oscillation, covering multiple dimensions.
This is its attraction/repulsion range, equal to its force, its power.
The arc represents the dimensional possibilities/probabilities of (inter)action - relating to other patterns.
Space = possibility, which for patterns is probability, also named energy/matter.
Time is its relationship with other patterns, using the observing conscious mind as a reference. Time is a subjective measurement of movement in relation to each other and in relation to an observing mind - triangulation.

The rhyme of the oscillation/vibration determines its kind - eidos.

The noetic centre of this oscillation/vibration is a shifting space - around which the oscillation/vibration circles.
The concept of God as a 'circle whose centre is everywhere and its circumference nowhere' is a projection of this.
The centre is everywhere because all is moving, and so the space (possibility) is shifting. The circumference is nowhere because the oscillation/vibration in interacting in a different dimension as it shifts in relation to its centre.

Another way I conceptualize it is as a vortex.
Transcendent water representing space, its circling around itself representing the patterns, and if this is not consistent and the waves of the vortex not symmetrical representing chaos.
At the centre of the vortex is the shifting...it is where the esoteric disappears into an incomprehensible point in space - which is nothing more than possibility.
the shifting, in relation to this centre, periphery of the vortex is always nowhere, as it moves within the ocean. It has no specificity, but is always in relation to this disappearing centre.
In between noetic centre and fluid periphery is the pattern.....

Where one or more patterns participate in what we call an organism, psychology is determined by the dominance of one pattern over the other patterns.
Psychology being the exploration of organic, or organ hierarchies.
I call this personae...distinguishing it from character which I define as the outward expression of this personae - not always honest or direct. The character is a role the organism plays in relation to other organisms. It's a relationship between personae.
Therefore, your character changes depending on which other personae you are interacting with, or relating with.
The personae, like the vortex, is also centred around a noetic point is space/time which lacks presence.
It is the swirl around it, with the character being its outer periphery which is nowhere but centred around this noetic point.
Character is the fluid adjustment of the personae at it relates (interacts) and moves through the ocean.
Organism is a unity of patterns that have achieve balance between their different rhythms.
This balance can only be destroyed, torn asunder, by a force equal to the excess of harmony, relative to disharmony, determined by this internal inter-relationship.

Feminization of Mankind...not people-kind, is the stunting of the masculine; its preservation in a state of perpetual adolescence, its retardation, returning to the infantile desire to be loved, to be included, rather than to be respected and to be the one excluding.

Feminization of Mankind...is the feminine rising to fill in the void left by the absence of masculinity; exaggerating of what she can never embody as masculinization of females, mirroring the same among men-children expressed as hyper-masculinity, overt egoism, and the declarative magical word-magic that proclaims itself what it feels most insecure about.

Over-socialization, all-inclusion, the insatiable need to be liked, to be loved, to be appreciated by everybody, by anybody.
Chatter, gossip, endless word-games, innuendos, seeking one's social status in the demeanour, and subtle body-language of everyone and anyone.
Overt arrogance socially corrected, returning to a covert humility in an endless cycle of flattery, lies, fake appreciation, platitudes, social graces, duplicitous praise chocking down a mocking laugh....and in the background repressed resentments, hubris, controlled anger and lives of quiet misery putting on a brave face and a wide smile.

Feminization of Mankind....feminine social competitions, character assassination, slander, personality wars over tea and cookies - toothy smiles, beneath squinting eyelids; manicured fingers rubbing in expectation, a miser's world of gold-fillings and push-up bras - loyalties built on mutual self-interests and portfolios.

Feminization of Mankind...fashion shows in posh mansions; pop-cultural hits echoing on abstract paintings in the foyer, beside four-car garages and swimming pool forever-on-holidays lifestyles; a planned trip to an exotic place, over cocktails, and the kids out pretending to be hippie rebels, helping the impoverished and the victims of wealth and power.
Selling altruism, with Will to Power beneath one's arm, and a Communist Manifesto tucked away in the back-pocket.

Chaos is inevitable...change requires no effort, it just happens.
What is truly revolutionary is order(ing), resisting change.....we also call this living.
Life is a continuous ordering of what is being disordered. It is a resistance to change, attrition measured by time.
We experience this as need/suffering.
Consciousness is the awareness of being alive....of this constant struggle against change, against time.

Reproduction is a method of resistance.

Man is no god.
There is no absolute, means there is no god.

Man is that which wants to become God.
God is, like all ideals, a projection that orients man's agon, and focuses his will - it's an objective.
God is man's idea(l). A weak man's idea(l). The weaker the man the more extreme, unrealistic, his ideals.
A strong man defines god as natural processes, so he has many gods. He sees them struggling along side himself.
But, of course, these forces are not really struggling, because they have no objective, no motive, but in them man sees parts of himself, so he projects himself into these unconscious forces of order, and identifies with them, as an organism seeking higher order, dependent on order, calling order 'beautiful', and resistance to chaos 'power'.

Proposition:
Mandatory military service for no less than two years to get a citizen card.
You do not vote without one.
Females can serve in some other capacity, like I the medical field as nurses.

Remember how years ago the MRA suddenly awoke to an epiphany concerning women?
They suddenly realized that women practice hypergamy and are selfish, and though they could not articulate it, they were genetic and memetic filters.
Men-children who had been raised on the lies of feminism were given an insight to explain why despite the destruction of 'evil paternalism' they could not get laid, or find a mate to have children with.
Thee same men-children could not accept the proposition that their predicament could be resolved by paternalism because being pussies they could not break out of the post-modern Marxist brainwashing.

And they could not apply the same reasoning they used to discover women again, to any other part of their pitiful existence....such as races.

Same thing is occurring in many other forms.
Men-children are now selectively awakening to the selfishness of man, and how life consumes life, and consumes what is most like itself. This is so fantastically new that like the MRA's they feel enlightened,a s though they were discovering something revolutionary.

This is what happens after decades of sheltering and mental atrophying - retardation.

I often wonder if there is only one satyr in this world...or if there are others lurking, under hill and under dale.
I wonder if two satyr's could procreate or if their half-breed status condemns them to infertility.