Desperate Degenerates

The Modern surrounds himself with those he agrees with, or shares a common psychology and ideology.
Under the advice of self-help manual direction of 'getting rid of toxic individuals' they are inclined to create an entourage of positive feedback - a self-contained, self-consistent, echo chamber.
An effective system if what you believe in has no reference in the world, and the world is not your standard you use to evaluate your opinions.
When the ideas you espouse are nihilistic, used as a defensive mechanism to cope with reality, the only way they can be challenged is by other minds. Having no empirical reference makes them entirely theoretical, noetic, political.
The world cannot contradict them because they are sued to usurp the aesthetic and the experienced. Ignoring nature is easier in our urbanized time than it had been in the more agrarian past.
Living in nature, form nature, meant your ideologies were confronted daily by natural order, and could not survive for long unless the individual was mad.
But in our world of artificiality and manmade environments, natural order can no longer confront our naive opinions.
We can isolate ourselves, ignoring what creeps through the asphalt cracks, and carry on as if nature were fenced parks and protected sanctuaries, existing no the periphery of our daily routines.

But this is not enough, for modern. They need complete peace from all challenging confrontation; seclusion to create and live within their private universe, populated by individuals who buy into it, rather than threaten its premises.
This is given the protective sanction of the state, enforcing rules that allow each individual to exist in their private world, undisturbed by anything outside of it; these so-called 'toxic, negative people'.
Little tribes within the tribe form; cliques, existing within the socio-economic environment, like species exist in the wild, within a shared environment.
Each with its own principles, rituals, art, and lingo.

With no shared world, used as a common standard and reference point, it all becomes part of an inter-subjective, pseudo-realities; a network of intertwined matrices, that find their shared nexus in the institutions that offers them this service.
The idea of mind being a world-creator/destroyer makes sense within this hyper-real context.
There is no 'world' to limit the human ego, or human creative imagination. The only standard is a shared genetic past, producing common emotional reactions, but even these are not guaranteed if we believe that 10% of the population lack the emotional reactivity of empathy, sometimes called sociopaths.
But emotion is common enough to be used as a replacement for world/nature.
An ideas emotional appeal becomes a measurement of its veracity. To not exhibit the same reaction, to the same degree, distinguishes you as someone of a different social species.
Memes have replaced genes, as identifiers, so we can use 'species' in this context.
We are now entering a artificial world of social selection, populated by creatures and monsters no natural environment has ever known.
Calling them 'freaks' will be improper and outdated.
Natural rules no longer apply; natural identifiers have been transcended.
Language morphs to reflect this warping of reality and natural order.
members of different tribes can no longer communicate. They are not using words in the same way, or when they do, it becomes rigid, stagnate, pontifically-correct, bland; used only to exchange basic information necessary for the institutionalized sharing of data.
Everything else is lost in 'translation', words that have no impact because they no longer make sense.
Modern talking through each other, because there is no common world to be limited by - no objective reality implies all is subjective.
Causality no longer works because its all sheltered within protective institutional, noetic fencing. The system intervening to protect the individual from his own detachment from reality; his own insanity.

The idea that humanity had to either be saved or destroyed, could only have fermented among those who didn't quite feel confident of their own human identity.
Saving the 'world', translated to Modern lingo, means 'saving humanity'; 'changing the world' became the ideology of those who wanted to save themselves from humanity.
Abrahamism worship destruction. Underneath their 'positive' rhetoric hides a desire to erase it all, as a way of saving themselves.
Marxism slaughtered millions when they realized their ideology was unworkable, and the masses could not be saved, using their naive methods.

Nihilism cannot correct itself, because changing itself would abandon its defence against reality - it would admit its noetic armour had a crack.
It never accepts responsibility, promoting any ideology that denies it.
All error is always the world's fault.
The dogma, or ideology, is never imperfect, but the world, meaning humans and nature, seem to consistently fail to attain its level of perfection.

See the narcissist cannot accept any flaw in himself. The flaw is always another's.
The cynic cannot laugh only at himself, he must laugh at the world, which may also include himself.

Narcissist/Schizophrenic & Cynical/Sociopath are the two socially selected by-products of Modernity.

The same sentiments that spares its hand from the pathetic, spares also its hand from the pathetic and cruel. If the former, one commonly complains; even though the pathetic and their obsequient gentility is its own sort of cruelty against conscience.

"Worse than the desire to destroy life is this refusal to risk it – nothing being worth the rouble of being sacrificed." - Jean Baudrillard

Parasitism is about adopting the host's smell, smearing it all over your form, hiding the parasitical stench that could expose you to the host; it is about pretending to be a member of the host's group, part of its cells, imitating their behaviours even contributing to their functions.

A parasite's life depends on its ability to appropriate, and adopt the host's processes, its activities, so that it can inconspicuously suck the life-blood from it.
It cannot produce, on its own. It must exploit the production of the host.

The aprasite's adaptive genius is partly due to its void.
There isn't much there to keep hidden, or to repress, making imitation and adjustment easier than it would have been if there were substance, already present.

Ants, bees, termites make the perfect Communist system because there's not much self-awareness, or self-identity present to overcome.
Humans have to be reduced to the level of bugs for the Marxist Utopian to become plausible.  
It sounds like a thousand-year Maoist plan. Maybe a bit of Trotskyite friction can speed-up the process; a steady level of revolution, and warfare to gradually wear down resistance.
Redirecting pain distracts the host, allowing the parasite to bore into its flesh deeper and faster; feeding no the tasty morsels while its heart is still beating.

(((Hollywood))) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
Their pet race, used as a front, is being trained.

A parasite feels no kinship with the host it feeds on.
It cannot relate to its care for its young, because its fate is disconnected from their future.
It is an alien organism, masking as belonging to another.
When the host begins to deteriorate, the parasite becomes bolder - revealing itself, knowing that the host no longer has the strength to eradicate the infestation.

Poetic justice.
Hollywood is eating itself alive.
Its politically-correct comedies are dull....it's monies, promoting feminine and post-modern themes, are flopping, its anti-rape witch-hunts,a re raping their own, and exposing their anuses to the world.

Her's one of the (((chosen tribe)))...Irony of ironies....


What's "funny" is that Kevin Heart is not funny.
He's just a quirky short Negro...and he looks like a nice guy. But not funny.
I like comedy with an edge...not this bubble-gum, self-deprecating, trash-talking crap.
But, not even this harmless Negro could limbo under the political-correct line.

I can't watch TV any more. It used to be terrible, but you could find one, ro two shows that you could follow.
Now, there's nothing...Sit-coms with their laugh-reels are bland, repetitive, and shallow....what a simpleton would find amusing.
TV made safe for the big, fat, feminist, or the sensitive fag, considering a sex-change to bring out his inner-woman.

When you cater to the lowest-common-denominator you bring the level so low, that it has to fall lower, and then lower.

Desperate Degenerates, living in an absolute either/or universe, of their own making, exists in a artificial reality of either 'absolute free-will' or 'absolute determinism'....or natural versus unnatural, or absolute subjectivity or absolute objectivity, or, either God, as representation of absolute Order, or Satan, representation of absolute chaos....either one or nil.
They are trapped in their own minds....their own noetic abstractions, their own ideologies.
The ARE in Plato's proverbial cave, or darkness/light...and the light is artificially produced and maintained, making it a double entedre.

We are dealing with a level if idiocy, cowardice and hypocrisy that no reason, not even simple common sense, can break through.

The Desperate Degenerate has to reduce his opponent to an absurdity, so that he can then dismiss him, or ridicule him.....because his own reasoning is lacking, or because he has to argument to support his own absurdities.

You know how morons attack, so called 'racists' on the ground that 'pigmentation' is no way to judge....like reducing 'species' to a skin and/or fur pigmentation to then dismiss it as ridiculous, because you have no way to justify your own desire to reduce all life to a uniform whole.
Well, morons cowards and retards do the same with natural and unnatural.
They cannot defend their own positions so they must reduce the other to a ridiculous claim, like 'homosexuality is unnatural'....implying that the adversary is simpler than a simpleton like them; claiming that humans are not natural agencies, so anything human is some ambiguous absurd concept called 'unnatural'.
They have to straw man the other to deal with them
...and their straw men, inevitably, become reflections of their quality of mind...the simpler the mid the simpler the absurdity they use to degrade and dismiss the other.

They do the same with so called 'conspiracies'. they can't defend the idea that human do not conspire, so they caricature the opponent, associating him with 'Big Foote' and 'lizards in the White House'  because they cannot explain how three building collapse in the same way, as if they were taken down by a controlled demolition....
Unable to explain why the third building was not even struck, yet it came down, at the speed of gravity, falling in upon its foundations, damaging no neighbouring buildings.

Imagine....how if you were a simpleton, you would have to reduce the opponent to a level 'beneath you' so even more idiotic than an idiot, more retarded than the typical retard.
This is what these desperate morons do...exposing themselves, by trying to expose those they cannot offer a viable and rational challenge against.
These people vote!!!! They are given 'rights'!!!!
Then they wonder why the world is so fucked-up....when it is THEY who are the primary cause.

Know why sluts, idiots and whores advocate free contraceptives and access to abortion clinics?
Because they want the system, the whole, to subsidize their pretend equality with males...or gender parity.
Because they want all to foot the bill, supporting their idiocy, paying to correct their errors in judgements.

'Affirmative Action' for females, helping them overcome nature, or what 'evil unjust nature' has made of them.
They want all of mankind to pay for them to pretend they are just like men.
Penis Envy Syndrome...not in any psychology books.
We've heard of Oedipal Complex, and Peter Pan Complex, because these mostly apply to males...but what of Napoleon Complex and how it manifests in females...or what about Penis Envy Complex?
What about the Cat Lady Complex, or the spinster psychosis?
Who dares speak about that?!

They're the 'no child left behind' delusional imbeciles...who would rather slow mankind to a crawl than dare to admit that the slow can never speed-up.  
They're the either/or declaring that it is 'all or nothing'...or that it OUGHT to be so....'thou shall not...leave any child behind, no matter how slow'.

I saw this username "justgivemethetruth".

The 'truth', which even idiots will ask 'to be just be given', is twisted in meaning. When they ask for 'truth', they ask for coping mechanisms at the most and comforting lies at the worst. It is not a self-minimized truth, but a self-required or easily digestible morsel (as that of a child) 'truth'. They experience no shame about the knowledge another has of them on the imparting of it, unless that other is 'hateful' or, sometimes, indifferent.

The superior can know and understand an inferior being more than it understands and knows itself, but the inferior being can never fully understand and know the superior, but ti can only imitate it superficially.

A starting premise.
A dim-wit, coward and degenerate, can only understand other by using himself as an example....particularly what is above his intellectual capacity to comprehend he can only attempt to understand by suing himself as the only example he does understand...or to whatever degree he does so.

Therefore, when a dim-wit imbecile attempts to understand how 'truth' is a building of probability, he cannot escape his absolutist either-or dichotomies that entrap him in his dim-wit mind.
He must presume all are like him, because he cannot fathom anything above his limits.

So, even though a rational healthy intelligent mind never declares absolutes, but only higher and lower probabilities, the dim-wit remains obsessed, addicted, to certainties, to absolute final ends, conclusions.
Every word he sues, including that of 'truth' itself, is rooted in his absolutist either/or dichotomies.
Trapped, immersed in his own stupidity...or subjectivity; his/her own nihilistic paradigms - based on simplistic representational methodologies like 1/0.
The dim-wit degenerate cannot fully grasp what 1/0 represents, or how they evolve and what their utility is based on. He can only presume that they represent something profound, existing somewhere out there, beyond the boundaries of his shallow perceptions....a yet to be....a yet to be discovered, an immanence.
He feels it as something present, yet not fully so...something mysterious.
His own tiny brain's intuitions and sensation he attributes to something external. Contact with something larger than himself....indisputable.
The feeling comforts him....like a baby feeling the presence of its mother hovering over its crib; something warm, loving, intimate....yet not fully comprehensible.

A dim-wit born and raised on nihilistic dualisms cannot escape their comforting certainties.
He does not want to escape....where would a coward and a retard go if he left the institution?
He is trapped in his own brain....and he likes it there.
The binary dualities like solid comforting bars in a cell he has grown to rely on - it provides the necessities and he's grown accustomed to its regimented lifestyle.
A bovine would not know where to run to if it escaped the fencing of the farm, or it sneaked through the barn-doors.
it would linger, outside the periphery.....terrified by the world beyond.....frozen in confusion.
How would it survive in a world it has never experienced?
Where would it feed, drink, find warmth....and where would it find its own kind when they are all nestled within the barn?

Nihilism offers such cognitive certainties in the form of binary dualities.....bar-space-bar-space....one-nil-one-nil....fence post - void space - fence post - void space - fence post....It has become accustomed to the fencing. They are certain.

What does it matter what a desperate degenerate believes?
What does it matter whether or not a moron tells himself he's an atheist and does not believe in a one-god, when he lives his life telling himself that his actions have been decided by something other than himself?

What does it matter what name he gives to the exact same concept, or if he or she imagines it with a beard or as a mathematical symbol, or a vague idea.... a feeling?
What's in a name?

If I call my delusion about ghosts, 'spirits', or 'spectres, 'phantoms', or some mysterious 'presence' I can only sense, does it change the idiocy?
Whether I imagine it as a skeleton, or a wise old man, or a mist, a cloud, as light....does it change anything?

Does it change anything if I call a dog, a canine, or an entity, or if I deny its existence based on appearances?
Does it matter if I play word-games, or if I discredit the validity of language to discredit the essence of the organism called 'dog'?
Will it help if I declare 'dog' a social construct?
Will quoting Nietzsche help?

...'a rose by any other....'....no 'an imbecile, emasculated, fag by any other name.....is still a....'

What does it matter how macho you think you are, when you think and behave like a woman?
Does your musculature change anything?
How about the size of your dick?
Maybe your opinion of yourself, your 'self-love', your self-esteem will make a difference.... will make a difference?
Every transsexual is with you on that one.

Gay 'pride'!!!!
Say it, want it, mean it!!!!

The underlying narcissism, compensating for a deeper insecurity, is made obvious in the insinuating belief that the subjective mind must be 'convinced' for an idea, a theory, to be validated.
It's the other side of the binary psychosis, that believes that by changing words around, or by denying the validity of language that this, somehow, frees them from the consequences.

The other side of the same Nihilistic binary coin:
One moron, is a narcissist, convinced that he can manipulate existence using language.
The other moron believing that if he denies language all validity, if he remains unconvinced, that prevents the 'real' from being real.

These two types of imbecile usually find in each other a validating opposition.
One sees in the others psychosis validation for his own psychosis.
It's the either/or 1/0 nihilistic dynamic.

The noble spirit builds under the sunlight.
Digging into the darkness, and upward towards the sun.
He has nothing to hide, and want the sun's radiation to burn away what he cannot accept in himself.

The miserly degenerate builds in the darkness, hiding and hoping nobody will shine a light upon his vague shadows, claiming to be divine light.
He lights matches, to cast a small light on selected parts, implying great edifices of profound beauty and meaning.
He hides his degeneracy from himself, and through himself he attempts to convince others. hoping they will lend validation to what he cannot display under the sunlight.

It’s all for entertainment effect. Moderns and Americans enjoy being lied to. It’s one of their past times, like watching televised sports and doing drugs. If it means they can get a laugh out of it, some kind of kick or thrill, they feel themselves above anything that insults them. The feminine snickering mentality to chide and dismiss, while pretending to be superior, when they are just naïve idiots.

Neil Postman’s insights into the entertainment psychosis is relevant here. When they see one image, they allow the cathartic release of toxic energies that the imagery stimulates, until the next imagery erases those feelings and replaces them with new ones, ad infinitum. Around the world, modern wage slaves, with delusional run of the mill superiority complexes, will be in their employee break rooms, drinking their Starbucks lattes and dick sucking each other by scoffing at this Smollett douchbag and enjoying the scandalous spectacle of being lied to by the media for the 100 billionth time, and then talk about something else. They will feel themselves above it, because they think they know what the fix is, when their psychologies have been programmed into mind-controlled servitude to accept this fix, and that the real clowns and morons are themselves.

Lies and deception is part of this degenerate culture, and its denizens revel in it. They are unaware of it, by earnestly claiming they are aware of it. It's already ingrained in their identity. Victim culture finds its expression in sadomasochism. This is why the leftist elites have no discretion and let all their corruption and lies hang out and why it’s become a free for all of any attention seeking scumbag to come up with the next stunt to win sympathy and victim status. They understand the passive idiocy of Americans. I’ll give them that much.

The US is an Empire masking as a Democratic Stare.
It's 'Roman' appearance is really a cover for an Abrahamic soul.
It's elites secretly play at being pagan when they are Satanists, masked with Abrahamic pretences.

Every Empire descends into decadent degeneracy as it slowly declines.
It's decline brings about the conditions that lead to its fragmentation.
A resurgence may follow, but it will be a corrupted version of its previous glory.

Transsexuals are this generations 'homosexuals'. The next group of sexual dysfunctions that will be 'emancipated' and then socially 'normalized' will be paedophiles.
They've already set up the slandering myth that acnet-Greeks were homosexual paedophiles, so they have a angle to start from.
It'll happen gradually.
A few sit-coms alluding to ageism and the 'right of children to choose who to love', then movies painting a positive picture of 'misunderstood' pedos who only want to express their 'love of children' or 'age deficient humans'....and the usual 'pedophobia' accusation.

"Why do you hate children so much?"

they have the recipe now. It's worked twice and is working a third time.
It's all back to Bernays, and his 'debunked' uncles insights.

Degenerates have convinced themselves that physics must adapt to their metaphysics. (1)
The real insane ones go further.
They have convinced themselves that their metaphysics must adapt to their ideals, or ideologies, and then physics has to be integrated into that mess of degenerate insanity. (2)

We can see how there are two tiers of nihilistic degeneracy, the first looking down on the second, and the second looking down on the first.
Bi-polar, binary, dualistic nonsense.
Nihilism provides the masters with a tool to keep the slaved preoccupied and convinced, with a passion, that they are either absolutely free or absolutely good.
In either case their right/left hemisphere 'genius' is a given.

Desperate Degenerates will always misconstrue all interest in them - positive and negative - as respect for their views.
They can only think of one reason anyone would pay attention to them, and that one reason is always self-flattering, and/or self-comforting....in all cases it is always self-deceiving.
The idea comes first and foremost. The Above all else.
This idea is usually 'positive' towards them and their well-being. From there they work backwards, integrating all experiences all events, all phenomenon within this starting principle.

A narcissist places there, no the pedestal, their 'ego'. Everything invigorates, inflates the ego.
A cynic places there the 'nil' as the highest ideal. Everything can be laughed away as 'negativity'.
A hedonist places there pleasure. All is feeling, sensation.
The pedestal is where the 'positive' is placed, in the 'positive Nihilistic' mindset.
'God' for example can be placed up high, beyond space/time. Unreachable, unsoiled, 'perfect'.
God being an indirect way of saying 'self' - man is in His image.

An example from current events:


They are so desperate to get rid of Trump that everything is incorporated into a narrative that will result in what they've determined as the starting goal.
Top<>Down emoting.

Obscurantism and modern fArt, including cRap, the semiology is simple and vague enough to allow any interpretation, unusually centred around a lowest-common-denominator like sex.
Sex is common to all so it becomes a trigger point fArt can centre around insinuating alluding towards it without being overt, permitting any sexual dysphoria to project its own psychosis - this is inter-subjectivity.

A mind that has gradually lost confidence in its own judgements, compensates by referring and deferring to 'authorities': communally sanctioned judgements.
It's belief in absolute determinism is founded on this fact alone. Determinism conceptualized as an anthropomorphic God, or as a faceless abstraction, Order, represented by the symbol, the word 'order' or 'one', conceptualized in ways that refer to nothing experienced.
A mind compensates for its wordy imperfections and absences with noetic extremes, because the real no longer limits the idea.
All concepts are idealized....made divine. Losing their 'imperfect' reality, by detaching from the real.

Such a mind finds itself in relation to others, in all things - it values itself in relation to how he is appreciated, how his labour is evaluated, by the community.
An absent parent, particularly a missing 'father', of any merit, is compensated for by the acceptance of the institution as a representative of what it has no experience with.
Inexperience produces hyperbole. With no first-hand experiences it resorts to second-hand, and third-hand accounts, usually through institutional sources. It can only exaggerate the idea, represented by the institution, because it has no personal experiences with the corporeal, the tangible.

The 'father' becomes a god-like entity - an absolute. The individual either entirely submits to it, or entirely rejects it.

Does it matter what you say to a 'bitch' to try to convince her of anything?
No!
No reasoning, no argument, no deferring references will suffice...though referring to idol and icons may cause her to pause, for a bit, before she launches into her prescribed word vomit.
The absence of an absolute masculine biog cock will be enough for her to remain a mind-whore, sampling ideas and ideals as a biological female samples sperm - always prostrating her ass to cover it, with a proxy...a warm body, a mediator.
She would rather be raped than be exposed...at leas the rapist will offer a covering.

If she is attracted to you, if you've seduced her with your mojo, your style, then she'll be your whore....forever, in her mind.  
But don't be fooled...she's only waiting for another more impressive dick to surrender to....and then she'll drop you like a pizza crust.
All she needs is a 'man'...some big, strong authority to hide her ass beneath, behind.
A bitch only understand pathos...emotion, prose and poetics...nothing more. She needs to be seduced, swept off her feet, so as to spread them wide open, otherwise They stand firmly, on the earth, pragmatic and cold as shit.
Don't try to make sense of it...'cause is senseless Only dudes like me can do so because they can relinquish any claim on the demystified.
Only a 'monster', nay a gamma, can ever hope to do so.
I think I've heard another term for it...but I can't recall.

There's no logic...no integrity...it's all about insane passion.  
So, stop wasting your time on cunts. Fuck 'em and leave them, mindlessly...before they turn on you. They'll luv it...and thank you, in between slaps.
Sure, there's a risk that among the slut-fest a rare gem will be found...but what are the odds?

Don't be fooled...I ain't just talkin' about women, nor about sex.

I read the over-stylized prose of the typical degenerate and I can only smile and thing: 'What a gloriously pretentious nit-wit'.

But in these times of darkness such tactics are effective among the lost.
Would not a match-light flicker like a blazing furnace in the dark? Would it not gather seeking eyes to its contrasting brilliance?

Now, look what I've done. I've imitated the wit of the nit to draw attention to his matchstick.

Infantile Mind-Games
Desperate Degenerates are driven by a need to remain innocent, to not be discovered, uncovered; held accountable.
They imply rather than clearly state, so as to retain plausible deniability.
So, while they imply a 'one-god' they then deny a belief in one, trying to evade being discovered as being crypto-Abrahamics.They indirectly describe all the common characteristics of a one-god, of an absolute singularity, but then they refuse to admit that they believe in such nonsense, because that would force them to accept responsibility for their own beliefs, and to be held accountable by others...and this they fear the most: being held accountable for their own beliefs and actions.
They use different words, trying to pretend that they are saying something completely different; some, often, intentionally, if only subconsciously, convolute language so as to cloud their tracks, from those who have picked-up the scent of a common degenerate - a type repeating through the ages, in one form or another; a type that changes garments, names, appearances, so as to pretend progress is being made, when they are running on a 'psychological treadmill' going nowhere fast.
Placing validation outside themselves - using an objective standard to evaluate their subjective choices - is terrifying to the Modern degenerate.
'Freedom,' for him, is this cynical method of evading culpability.
Ego is his refuge. Ego detached from all external judgements. Self-referential, consistently self-evaluating, they want to implode into their own subjectivity so as to not account for their errors in judgement.
They cannot even accept responsibility for their own convictions.

Nihilism, I repeat, is a defensive mechanism, emerging in response to developing self-awareness.
Clarity is not a cosmic telos, so if remaining self-deceptive promotes self-preservation then this is adopted by the mind as a survival method.
Nihilism places self-preservation above all other motives. For this reason narcissism and cynicism are inevitable means toward that overriding end.
All is sacrificed on the alter of survival, of protecting the ego from awareness that may destroy it. What exceeds or lies outside this process of self-preservation can be ridiculed and/or dismissed as inconsequential.

Goethe wrote:

In the beginning there was the action.

Goethe's adaptation of the Abrahamic logo-centric myth implies that the speaker need not acknowledge or be aware of his own underlying motives.
His actions, choices, behaviours, expose them to others, and do not require his agreement.
It's not necessary for the subject to admit anything, so as to be held accountable, no more than a dog needs to admit, to be aware, of itself, in order for man to tame and train it - nor does a mountain goat need to be aware of why it behaves in the aggressive way it does, once every year, during rut. We might say that its awareness, if it were possible, would inhibit the performance.
All is judged, after-the-fact, from the consequences. This is where Nihilists choose to intervene, to invert, or to block judgment.
Between past/present/future -  determined/determining/projecting - humans intervene to invert or to convert.
In-between body/nervous system/mind - past-made-present/interactions/projected objective - is where the Nihilist corrupts the temporal sequence to insert a defensive measure.

A duck need not be aware of itself, agree with an external assessment and naming of it, identifying it as 'duck'.
What quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck....can only be a duck, though any other name will do if it refers to the exact same behaviour, and inherited potentials.
Another may call it 'canard', a third may refer to it as 'παπια', and all would be correct.
the act comes before the word/symbol, just as life proceeds from existence, and consciousness emerges after life emerges, and self-consciousness develops after consciousness.
The sequence is where man intervenes, hoping to save himself from the implications.  
But the organism, the unity of patterns, named 'duck' does not have to agree or accept, or acknowledge its own name.
If the name is understood by the one using it, just as one uses any tool, the outcome is how the validity of the tool is evaluated.
If man, using the term 'duck' can manipulate and exploit the organism this term refers to, the duck's judgements, its resistance to categorizations, its protests, are irrelevant.
Therefore - a long way to go to repeat the same thing - the exact same psychosis that made one a Christian, or an Abrahamic, need not be accepted, acknowledge by the psychotic. the behaviour is the same, though the words ascribed to it differ.
Whether you call the absent absolute a one-god, or a 'whole' or a one, a universe, or Will, or Fred or....duck, is a minor detail, since the behaviour, the underlying motive, remains exactly the same.
Salvation, self-preservation, purification, innocence, sanctification call it by any name...

Shakespeare wrote:

A rose by any other name would smell as sweet...

'Sweetness' is the pleasure of validating the 'truth' of your judgement.
Just as the mountain-goat feels pleasure in the outcome, fornicating with the she-goats he has won as his prize....would it need to know why it feels pleasure?
Would it need to admit anything, or to agree with any assessment of its behaviour?

Does it matter if a modern admits his own participation in the outcomes of his activities?
Does it require, of him, to accept responsibility, to admit to some degree of 'free-will'?
Of course not.
Like with the mountain-goat, if it would be made aware it would inhibit its performance. It may question its own choices, and second guess itself.
This would make it less effective and efficient. Ignorance is more than bliss, its grace.
Does it matter if a modern accepts a degree of responsibility in his own destiny, his own fate? No...ironically it may prove a game-changer.
For fatalism to work efficiently it must surrender to its own denials; for determinism to remain efficient it must remain ignorant of its own participation.

The 'desperate degenerate' is only interested in the immediate - the immediate, indisputable sensation, the immediate, mutable present. It is the only way he can hope to overturn the past, completely surrender to its immutability, or it is the only way he can pretend to be a master of the future, in the fluid, fluctuating present, interpreted through appearances; this is the only way a Modern degenerate hope to declare himself 'master', or 'slave', after-the-fact.
One can claim to be in control, of what has already become - the predictor who is really creator, escaping personal ridicule - and the other can declare that it was all unavoidably inevitable, for one and all - a dedicated and committed slave - but only if all are declared to be one and the same, so as to escape personal shame.

There are two ways for a desperate degenerate to utilize the absolute, corresponding to one/nil - 1/0.
It's part of the either/or dichotomy.
Either as a self-flattering, self-aggrandizing delusion, or as a metaphor to ridicule, and indirectly self-flatter and self-aggrandize.
All we have to do is look at the concepts of God/Satan, and how they've been converted, and adapted to the more Modern concepts of Order/Chaos.
Same imbeciles congregating around the same delusions, only the monikers have changed. Like a performance, of the same play, where the names, the script, and the actors have been replaced.

I mean, the same morons are present, only they are convinced that they've progressed and are no longer like the morons of the past.
This is partially true...they are not the same imbeciles as the ones who were convinced of Abrahamic idiocy....no, they are more sophisticated imbeciles, requiring more updated versions of the same idiocy, to remain just as convinced of exactly the same god damn thing.  
Think of it...would a Zulu tribe fool be superior to his master's foolishness before a European master?
Think about it.
Would the king of morons be any less moronic before a genius?
I mean the difference is so small, as to matter at all...except as a means of discriminating between imbeciles and morons.

For the degenerate there are only two possible options - another absolutist either/or:
Either God is responsible, or nobody is responsible.

There is no third option, because self can never be held accountable.
It either does not exist, or it is a representation of an absolute.

The degenerate must stop with emotion, and/or with feeling.
They cannot go further than the manimal state.
They have to end it with the pleasure principle, or the death principle.
What life is continuously displeased about, so as to demand constant gratification - experienced as pleasure - never enters the analysis.
What 'pleasure' is, in relation to need/suffering' never is doubted, nor questioned. It is an end in itself.
They substitute the 'positivity' of the Christian 'love', as a alpha and omega, with 'pleasure'.
They would realize that 'pleasure' is a 'negative' feeling, though quite 'positive' for an organism in a state of agon within existence. It is an ephemeral sensation, negating the natural relationship between organic life, and indifferent world - a towards-order relating to a towards-chaos.

There's a reason why degenerates hate themselves and life, and must deceive themselves to endure it - or why Christianity had to invent the 'sinfulness' of suicide, to prevent their following from being diminished by them following the 'logical' end inherent in of their own dogma.
Consider the self-deceiving excuses made by those who use the absolute negation of 'free-will - used to purify themselves by projecting the blame on other - when they begrudgingly realize that they cannot apply two standards; their description of world and others, is full of vitriolic accusations, though they describe themselves as innocent, noble, unjustly wronged victims....how can there be a wronged and a accused if all is predetermined?
Their own method of unloading responsibility on other cannot be followed to its logical end, without self-deception intervening to hide the double-standard, and the contradiction to their won beliefs their attitude exposes.

Intellectual dissonance forces compartmentalization - a self-induced schizophrenia.
The method of coping cannot be abandoned, so language is employed to obfuscate, conceal, and deny.

What degenerates prove time and time again, through all their ideological and dogmatic 'philosophical' nihilistic positions - intellectualized emotional excuses - is that Nihilism is not merely an idea, negating the real world, but it is a reaction shared by a imperfect and trembling organism, becoming aware of itself within an indifferent world.  
If it's not one self-deceiving' self-numbing, noetic projection, it can only be another.

The 'god' of Abraham was a necessary invention - a spontaneous reaction to increasing self-awareness.
It was given a textual framework to legitimize it.
Their one-god did not 'die' as Nietzsche so prematurely proclaimed, he cannot die because he is an idea the majority need to endure existence. As long as one feeble degenerate is born this 'one-god' will be reborn with him/her, from generation to generation; as long as one feeble psyche is born and awakens to itself, this one-god will remain viable, all-powerful, all-encompassing, and from age to age, across historical time.
This is the idea of 'progress'. The reinvention and repackaging of the same, adapted to new circumstances, and renamed to hide its historical tracks.