Desperate Degenerates

Degenerates tend to dismiss the idea that men can learn from their mistakes, because they consistently fail to correctly identify the causes of their predicaments, falling from error into another error, until the very idea of 'correctness' is mythologized and dismissed as a fable told by fools.
Three basic reasons: - truth is not complete, static, nor whole - truth is dynamic and fluctuating, and 3- they are incapable of knowing themselves - approaching any honest level - and are unable to reduce the corruptive effects of emotions, ego and subjective self-interest.
Their inability to become objective surrenders them to their comforting, emotional impulses, justifying their inadequacy as a matter for the fates to explain.

Those who cannot challenge the probable, nor offer a superior alternative, simply attempt to undermine what they cannot surpass, hoping that popular sentiment will lower the threat to a level of parity, where quantity replaces quality as the decisive criterion.
Yet, even if they achieve their collectivized populist goal they have not dealt with the objective world which the probable alludes to. All they've done is found validation among the feeblest victims of the objective world, finding in each other an ephemeral comfort.

Ye is proof of how degeneracy can become convinced that it is a genius because it sells.
Ye, another black product of Jewish marketing, was made rich by selling his brand of cRap, - musical and fashion - to gullible, impressionable, midwits and dimwits, and as a consequence he was nothing without his popular appeal.
They can sell lies using linguistic manipulation of human psychology, and this talent they employed to make cRap, or Black 'culture, the American 'culture du jour, so as to undermine all cultures with primal, hedonistic triggers, appealing to the lowliest, most desperate and degenerate across all ethnicities and cultural boundaries.
It was the destructive spear point of American degeneracy, preparing the world for its Global dominion.

Ye was right about the Jews and their power - something Prager tried to justify using some convoluted argument concerning Nobel prize winners - but what he could not understand was how he truly was a product of their making. Not a 'creative genius' - equal to a Beethoven or Wagner - but all he ever was was a Black man who realized how his 'cRap was also being used to destroy the blacks, along with the whites, with their message of violence and superficial hedonistic materialism.
They did make him, by manipulating the mediocre mases into purchasing his cRap....in a system that equates quantity with quality.

Concerning Prager's attempt to use Jewish linguistics to exploit Popular stupidity, by admitting that Jewish are disproportionally represented din media and American entertainment - and so what - with Jewish disproportional representation, as he said, among Nobel winners in medicine, implying that this disproportional overrepresentation was for the 'good of mankind', in classic Jewish manipulation of semiotics.
I'll set aside the objectivity and meritocracy of the Nobel board determining who deserves their prize, keeping in mind that Obama was awarded their 'peace prize', and focus on the difference between the hard sciences, involved in medicine or any science, and the soft sciences, involved in propagandas, entertainment and art.
Prager's challenging 'so what" admission cannot be responded to by the midwits it is addressing because they cannot comprehend the implication of these overrepresentations in core institutions of power.
The issue of nepotism arises, since this overrepresentation cannot be justified by some superiority of talent or creative genius - itself a racist admission.
The other issue is control over information and how this can be used to manipulate and exploit and determine America's election results and its policies.
So, this is nothing like Nobel prize winners.

Dods Candice Owen respond?
No, she cannot think outside her training and dependence on her master.
All she can do is smile and clap approvingly, lending her own midwit validation to Prager's conniving linguistic manipulation of concepts.
The overrepresentation of Jews in the media and Hollywood and Wal Street and positions of institutional power, such as government, is far more subversive than their overpenetration in any Nobel Prize list, except those concerning peace and the humanities.
Being overrepresented in science has nothing to do with being overrepresented din media or politics or entertainment, or pornography....
The first has nothing to do with popularity whereas the second has everything to do with popularity and manufacturing consent and wants, by dominating the information highways that shape a peoples world-views, determining their judgements and choices.
One can manufacture the 'genius of Ye, and his popular appeal, but one cannot manufacture the genius of a scientist.
Prager is evidence on how they are master's in semiotic manipulation, dependent on the dumbing-down of those they seek to control.
It is true that Ye is no genius, except in his own narcissistic mind, and that Jews made him what he was, but it is also true that they also destroyed him, proving that he was correct in at least his waking up to how Blacks have been used to undermine European cultures and the world's cultures, as a way of reducing it all to Americanism's culture-of-no-culture.

Those you find the truth to be brutal, insulting, and unnecessarily negative, ought not to seek out truth-sayers, for in them they will personify everything they cannot tolerate about reality, and though they obtain theoretical victories and find satisfaction in vengeance towards them the truth remains unaffected by their retributions and all they accomplish is to expose their own private vulnerabilities.

Quote :

Want to see nihilism in action, follow iamretarded, on ILP for as long as you can stomach his linguistic anti-phuilosophy antics, pretending to be interpreted in philosophy.
That is what nihilism does to the mind.

There are many others, with varying levels of infection and different ways the same infection manifests in schizophrenia.
This is not theoretical....it is theory in action.
It is meme having an impact on genetics, or finding a genetic weakness to exploit and express itself outwardly.
This is its 'context' as the cunt is obsessed in saying, when she wants to evade being exposed as what she is.

ILP is what happens when you have an open border policy, allowing anyone and everyone into your area.
For me it is a microcosm of Americanism macrocosmic expressions.
iamastupidcunt must be the perfect specimen of nihilistic disease, not because she is clever but because she's a moron and cannot help but reveal the nihilistic mind minus the subtlety - she's in your face obvious about her methods, and admits them - "fractured and fragmented" she calls her schizophrenia or the mind/body dissonance her disease has imposed upon her.

Her demand of context is a demand for a scenario - you know Jack & Jill, so we can witness how she reached her dilemma.
Jack & Jill make good subjective points, so how do we determine who is correct?
This is her plan.
But she will accept no response that is not fractured and fragmented, uncertain, unable to come to a conclusive, absolute answer.
If you try to explain to her that it isn't any one individual who will make this determination but an indifferent world, through the consequences of Jack & Jill's choices, in relation to their intentions and expectations, she refuses to go there.
Because she ain't interested in any objective resolution, she wants to settle upon confusion - fractured & fragmented, schizophrenia.
This is where the submission is supposed to occur - a capitulation to chaos, the nil.....a surrender to uncertainty, to an absence of a complete, final, certain absolute.
A compromise to feebleness....to the abyss, where final parity is achieved in unified nothingness.

We are all 'sinners before god' becomes 'we are all wrong, before divine absolute order.'

The resolution must be complete, final and certain....no probability range, no deference to external forces, if not conscious and intentional, like god.
The absolute must be in a mind...any mind...because it certainly cannot exist outside a mind - so the absolute must be this spiritual absence, a mental nothingness.
She is leading you to her capitulation to the nothing, which you must also do, willfully. She wants you to surrender, like her.
But the absolute is what is absent, not the existent.
The existent cannot be absolute, but only conceptualized as such.

The context of Jack & Jill, some real or imaginary individuals with some imaginary moral dilemma, such as an abortion, is unnecessary for nihilism and my views.
She is my context....ILP is full of contexts exposing what nihilism is and how it manifests as a mental disorder.
All they need to do, privately or publicly, is to honestly compare their present dilemmas with their past expectations; their present circumstances with their past choices and the judgements that they based them upon.

Their present circumstances, dilemmas, confusions, positive/negative, are all a product of their choices, based on judgements that have flaws.
It takes honesty - brutal honesty - and honesty takes courage, to find where they have gone wrong. The world revealed their choices to be wrong, in relation to their own projected expectations, so the source of the error is in them, not in anything other than them, even if it a misjudgment of another.

Jack & Jill have objectives that underlie their judgements and choices.
These motives are tested against the real world, exposing them as relatively faulty or correct.
Is the objective realizable, and if it is realized does it produce the expected consequences?
If not, or to the degree that it does not, determines the degree of the error in the subject, not the world.
The world is, it cannot be right or wrong, moral or immoral.
Morality, as I've said, is an individual justification in relation to collective principles, which have evolved over time, relative to environmental conditioning, producing a specific kind of individual, with a particular world-view, ethical and rational standards, and particular survival and reproductive strategies, constantly being tested by the world, i.e., nature.

---------
My context are all these on-line characters and their real life circumstances. When they reveal them I can formulate an analysis of where their subjective interpretations of reality - the objective, indifferent world - went wrong, producing what they consider 'negative' consequences - so not my evaluations but their own relative to their own expectations.

To evaluate anything you require at least three points of reference - at least a triangulation.
No singularities.
You need the subjects objective, its expectation; you need its actions, movements, choices; and you need the final consequences or their inability to attain their objectives - also a consequence.
This is so for Jack & Jill, for iamastupidcunt, for Brian and his police issues, for shit-stain, for anyone and everyone.
The triad must be honest, and so cannot be a product of the subject simply saying so - individual rarely know themselves, or can break free of their defensive self-deceptinos to be honest with themselves.
So, the evaluation must be based on observation over time, if and when possible...if not, - such as on-line - one can use the two other points of the triangulation to estimate, approximate the subjective third.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Clown World (@ClownWorld_) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Recent events on ILP reminded me of this old rock classic:


Amazing how under Americanism life always seem to imitate its own steady hot, musky fArt emissions.
As if the individuals under its magical spell desperately want to become the idols described in its pop-cultural, bubble-gum inflatable balloons - only a prick away from deflation.
All sugar and spice, and everything nice....but zero nutritional value.

Want a pragmatic context for what I refer to as "sheeple"?
This is one example among many, many, many more...
This is Americanism.

Capitalism is destroying the white race by offering products that induce releases of dopamine in a way that develops addictive behaviors -- to pornography, to computer games, to social media, to food, to all kinds of things. The dissident right needs to understand this. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Dr. Ricardo Duchesne (@dr_duchesne) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Their only position, beneath all the word crap, is this:
If it is you, or another than believes something that contradicts their subjective, and inter-sublective (collective) beliefs then you are wrong, or just as wrong as they are.
This is all that they are saying.....especially the icon of ILP postmodern nihilism iamahypocriticaldouche.

They have no counter-arguments, no alternate theories, all they are saying is that if another says it, and it challenges their comforting, collective, beliefs, then it is the other who is wrong, or, at the very least just as wrong as they might be.
The anti-philosophy philosophy; anti-life lifestyle; anti-truth truism.
All they need - desperately so - is acknowledgment, even if it is negative, i.e., attention; all they need is collective validation, i.e., popularity, quantity.
That's the crux of their positions...then they close their ears, like little kids, and sarcastically - cynically - hum and sing, letting you know how indifferent they are to anything you, or this other, has to say.
They can do this because they feel safe, protected by a collective agency - god, order, society, whatever name they may give this absolute - from the severity of their infantile delusions and methods. This is why they are so passionately collectivists. They need the collective, i.e., system, institutions, authorities, to protect them from a world, i.e., natural order, they deny exists.
Human-order shelters them from natural-order, and this makes them feel empowered and confident enough to continue their childish word-games.
But what will happen if this sheltering institutionalized wall falls?
Then there will be no use in using words to detach and pretend morality, free-will, gender, race do not exist, and are social constructs.
Then, suddenly, all will be clear and "obvious" in their pathetic little minds, because life and death circumstances would have changed and their dependence of the sheltering ideological wall will no longer be effective to preserve their life in a world they once denied existed - since it is all a social construct, what happens when society falls, or cracks, as it is in the US?
The nil then becomes more then an intoxicant to sip and numb yourself, until death do them part.
No, then nil becomes imminent, and linguistic confusions amplify its imminence. Suddenly, words have meaning, and are crystal clear, in their newfound sober state, because if they insist in sipping the intoxicant and remaining men-children, they will soon find nil as being clear and present.

Natural selection can only be contradicted by ideologically based social selection for so long before it begins to suffer the consequences.

I mean, release a herd of cattle that has lived its entire life in a barn, or within a famer's fenced in enclosures.
How many will survive?
Same with ideologically fenced in domesticate minds.

Consider the position of the douchebag of ILP.
She cannot offer an anti-argument - she hardly understands what the other is saying - or a superior explanation - she's practically retarded intellectually - all she does is declare all perspectives as being equally flawed because none can offer her a complete, absolute, final, certain explanations, that will satisfy her feminine needs.
So, of you don't completely satisfy this cunt, you ain't good enough.

So, she challenges all to satisfy her, because she's the final arbiter.
If you completely, absolutely, finally give her gratification then she may accept you; until then you're another suitor vying for her affections.
She'll always find a flaw or a reason, or a justification for her rejection.
She is the final arbiter, after all, because she's said so. All 'truth' must be approved by her, but she's also cognizant of her own flaws, so she readily admits that she may be wrong, or too harsh, but this doesn't stop her.

By the gods, how long will this farce go on?
If it ends, what will replace the entertainment void?
So, let it go on, and on, and on....suitor after suitor, day after day, year after year, knocking on her door, bringing her all kinds of delicacies, desperately trying to convince her that he is her one true love.

Highly unlikely, because she enjoys the attention she's getting, being a horny needy bitch she knows no single cock will completely satisfy her for long.
You see, she's been hurt before - disappointed once, twice, thrice - until she lost all hope in true love, and now is her time for vengeance, until she dies.

One of these civilizations will go the distance leaving the other in its wake.
Which one do you reckon? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Felix Rex (@navyhato) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I think Islam represents how far a people must go, to reject Judæo-Christianity and all its insidiousness.

The Arabs and Persians know better, because they are first cousins to their Semitic brethren.

They know it, and they are more than willing to do what the West deems 'absurd', 'cruel', 'vicious', to escape being influenced and infected by the Torah. Moslems know that their Jewish cousins target women and kids, first and foremost, hence them being so severely shrouded and monitored by Imams and Arab men. Consider those in the West who wear 2 or 3 facemasks, face shields, disinfectant spray on their coffee cups, paranoid about fighting a virus ~ a simile.

Chaos is what degenerates fear the most, so they define it as being entirely caused by 'complexity,' hoping some unseen, underlying, order is still going at work, giving their suffering a mystical purpose, because they certainty can't do rationally.
Irony? no; a paradox? hardly. It is all a product of their own choice.

I used to spend hours debating these degenerates back when I was young.
Huge texts, full of reasoning, evidence, logic, and all I accomplished was to trigger them to attack me ad hominem, allowing me to reciprocate - then they went running to the admin, who was usually one of them, to complain - and then I was usually banned.
These "debates" were on a variety of subjects, but mostly, back then, they were about god - in the Abrahamic sense.
I quickly realized I was not getting through to these imbeciles, but I continued, because there were silent readers which I wanted to reach, before their minds turned to mush.
Now?
Now I don't even give a shit about these theoretical silent readers.
Collapse is inevitable. Trying to talk sense to these desperate degenerates is futile, and their numbers are increasing - because collapse means exactly that.

Futile to take them seriously. They are emotional creatures, governed by hedonism and a desire to find 'happiness' before they die.
There's no hope in talking sense with that.
I repeat the same shit, and still nothing gets through.
It's amazing to me.
I say the same things, using different words, approaching the same issue from different perspectives...and still, nothing gets through.

How could it, their objective is not clarity, or seeing the real, but coping, and finding comfort, happiness, and pleasure before their lives end.
Then there's the genetic factor. Generations born of unfit parents, and grandparents, compounding all sorts of unfit genes, until I am faced with a mutant that is incapable of any level of logic or reason I can converse with.
This is also part of systemic collapse and the inevitable end of an empire - an empire fo leis, nonetheless, which makes it even worse.

Can I stop this?
I am no god.
I can only hope to find a few who get it. The rest are collateral damage.
They should remain oblivious and suicidal; they should remain their own worst enemy.
What can I ever hope to do about it? How can I chisel through all that thickness, made hard over generations of soft living?
This is also part of the process of Kali Yuga.
What can one man do against such cosmic forces?
I no longer waste my time....it's the most precious thing I have.
These degenerates should remain exactly as they are.
It's part of the process.

If the other states the same things after you've answered them, and everything you say is as if you have said nothing at all....then it is time to give up and move on.
Nothing can be done about what natural selection, multiplied by social selection, has produced.
The brain-dead remain brain-dead. No reason can crack their emotional guard.

Like talking to a wall.
You can't crack a wall with words, nor logic, nor reasoning.

This disease must complete its cycle.

What I'm saying is that if you ever come across one of these zombies - these brain-dead hedonistic subjectivists - don't waste your time on them with reasoning.
All they understand is emotion, and pain/pleasure triggers.
They are no more than manimals.
They don't know why they want to have sex - for example - but only know that it feels good.

Treat them accordingly.

Decades of nihilistic social selection cannot be undone in a day or a month or a decade.

Talking over their Desperate Degenerates heads is wise.
Use language that baffles and confuses them.
Better they don't understand, than to allow them to think that they do understand, attacking you based on what they think you are saying.

Degenerates are desperate for a reason, and if they cannot find a solution for their desperation they will certainly try to find it in silencing what reminds them of their degeneracy, hoping that this will finally end their desperation.
It wont....but they cannot hope to understand why.

Confronting Armed Antifa at Drag Queen Story Time in Denton, Texas

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Alex Stein #99 (@alexstein99) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The only thing a manimal understands as 'reason' is a justification, and since anything and everything can be justified it convinces itself that all is subjective.

Either/Or....pain/pleasure....good/evil....1/0....binaries, dualities.
Absolutes.
It knows nothing more than this.
Like a simple animal.
If it feels good, it is true; if it feels bad, it is false.

How can you reason with a manimal that is forever only finding excuses, justifications, for everything and anything it chooses?
For it, this is existential.
It cannot even consider the possibility of not remaining exactly as it is.

It's brain's survival/reproductive objectives have been projected as external agencies - outsourced to justify their other need for innocence.
They need to feel that they do not deserve any suffering.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] how the cunt compeltely ignores what was posted and continues to post, as if nothing was said, repeating her cut & paste bullshyte.
She don't care what you say, in response....most of it is over her head. She will carry on as if you said nothing.
Why read her post when she isn't reading yours, and if she is she seems to be unable to comprehend what anyone is saying?
In-fuckin-credible.
No wonder she's destroyed ILP, lowering it down further than the cesspool it was.
ILP is Americanism on display.

I mean....if there's any real life evidence that one ought not to take these fucks seriously, then this is the ...context.
Unfortunately they are the pawns of charlatans that threaten the world....so we are forced to deal with them.
Not because they are worth shit, but because they are zombie armies sent out by their masters, after it has turned what was left of their minds to mush.

________________
Here is how I see it:
Either she is unable to understand what is too much for her low IQ to comprehend - calling it "up in the sky, yada, yada - i.e., she's retarded.
Or she's doing this intentionally, knowing she has no rational leg to stand on, i.e., she's a hypocrite.

I think it's a mix of the two.
80% a product of retardation and 20% a product of her hypocrisy, desperately trying to protect her lifelong defensive method.

Biggies only interest in online forums is exchanging witty insults. Not one thing more.

WendyDarling wrote:

Biggies only interest in online forums is exchanging witty insults. Not one thing more.

That's what makes her a hypocrite.
But she's also dumb, so not much wit in her remarks to produce clever repartee.
Zero creativity.
She simply repeats....ignores what she cannot understand or challenges her....and predictably repeats the same taunts.

She's a simpleton and like many simpletons she's a dullard.

Back in my day our imbecile clowns were more creative.

But like with all liars and imbeciles....you don't have to do a thing but evade them, as much as possible - unless you want to be engaged in a byllshyte battle on the dimwit level.
Reality will do the job for you.
Reality is doing the job, and that's why they are so desperate and degenerate.....and so obsessive.

Whenever the ILP cunt asks you for a "context," as her preferred way of evading and retuning to her "fractured & fragmented" schizophrenia, necessitating "compromises with insanity," post this:

Quote :

The moral/ethical formula, simplified for simpletons:

1- An individual's actions, behaviours, choices, based on his/her judgements, evaluations, relative to his objectives, values.

2- A group's values and objectives.

3- #1 relative to #2 is morality (evolved over time) and ethics (amendments of morality).
A group's primary objective - as well as an individual's primary, primal objective - is its own survival, propagation, dependent on its cohesion and performance relative to other groups.

4- #3 relative to environment - where this performance and competition takes place - manifest positive/negative consequences.

5- Consequences determine the success of a group's primary objective - #3's success/failure.

Place any individual action, behaviour choice in #1
Place any group values, objectives in #2
_______________________________________________
To the imbeciles:
Place any individual act, behaviours, choice in #1, then evaluate it relative to #2, and then, if you cannot observe it in practice, evaluate #2 in relation to #3.
Preferably, all this can be put into practice so that we are not dealing with theory but with actions with observable consequences.

Example:
Mary Land is either a slut - likes to party and have sex with random guys - or a moron, is too stupid, or naive to judge males, or too impulsive to control herself.
She, predictably, becomes pregnant due to her poor judgements, expressed through poor choices.

Is the group she belongs to willing to offer her a quick and easy correction for her idiocy or her whoring ways?
If so then she has no reason to change, or grow, or adapt, and she will continue being a slut or a moron; she has no reason to control her impulses.
Group values do not punish her because they place individual objectives above group objectives. They actually absorb the negative consequences of her poor judgments and choices.
Consequence?
If Mary Land does it, then Susy Que sees it and does it as well...and then Cum Lately wants to do it as well. It's an easy fix. It becomes the norm in this group, because the group protect all tis members form their own idiocy or impulsiveness.

What does this mean for the group, relative to the environment?
The group does not replace those that die, and so over time it begins to weaken and can no longer compete with other groups, nor can it retain its cohesion as the number of young decline and the number of elderly increase.
The group also suffers a decline in good judgments producing good choices - the group average IQ drops because there is no reason for any thinking, and no reason to control oneself.
The group degenerates.
In time the group is absorbed or destroyed by another group - one in which Mary Land, her lifestyle preferences, and her idiocy suffered the full severity of the consequences because the group refused to fund her and shelter her, forcing her to adapt or die.
Here the individual perishes or adapts, and not the group.

This is the basic function of morality.
Replace 'abortion' with any individual act, choice...like paedophilia, incest, murder, homosexuality, transsexuality, bestiality, etc.
Any human act, behaviour....any and every choice.
This is the basis of why morality evolves only among social species or species that adopt a cooperative survival and reproductive strategy - evolving self-control and tolerance relative to other of their own kind so as to increase their survival and reproductive potentials.

No god required.
God is necessary only as a method of enforcing ethical amendments that are not naturally ingrained, such as:
Rules against adultery, thieving, etc.
God is necessary to offer rewards/threats to midwits and dimwits or those that cannot be rationally swayed to put in the effort and supress their impulses. It's an added level of group control - along with shaming and law & order imposing group punishments on those that contradict group values, threatening group survival.
______________________________________________
From genes to memes - from morals to ethics.
The Jews were the first to invent these ethical codes we call 'Commandments.'
The first theocracy founded on amendments to evolved moral actions/behaviours - behaviours we witness among many species, not only humans.
Ethics, on the other hand, is entirely human since it necessitates language and abstract thinking, as well as self-awareness and the ability to project thinking across space/time.
Marriage, for instance - and according to Socrates - is a technology....
Without its invention sophisticated human systems would be impossible.
Marriage is a development from monogamy, evolved among Aryan peoples to integrate as many males into a cohesive group, increasing the participating individual's survival potentials, and their reproductive potentials, which are extensions of survival, since reproduction is a naturally evolved method of overcoming individual mortality.
Mariage is the institutionalization and codification of monogamy, imposing sexual limits on all individuals so as to make as many of them investors in the welfare of their own group.
A very important Paternalistic advancement that increased survival and reproductive potentials. Its negation - as in Americanism - means group collapse is imminent.
____________________________________________________
Morality and its varied moral/ethical cultural, social, restrictions are evaluated relative to their success/failure - consequences - and the kind of individual they promote and evolve - compared to other cultural values and moral/ethical codes.
Evaluated relative to the environment - not the social environment of their own making, but the natural environment.
Would these cultural ideal citizens be able to survive outside the protective womb of the socioeconomic environment that produced them?
How can they compete, and how do they objectively compare with other cultural ideal citizens?

A formula that works with every ideology, any context, any time and place, is totally independent of all and any cultural influences and prejudices.

To note:
This is the primary phase.
We have not advanced to the secondary phase of morality that does not place survival and propagation as its primary objective.
Nobility of spirit places the group's health, relative to its ideal rooted in nature, above its survival and propagation - anti-nihilistic using words as connectors, not disconnectors, to experienced reality outside all human - manmade - environments/systems - as its foundational principle.
All memes, i.e., dogmas, ideologies, are evaluated using this objective standard - usually through the study of primitive man and related species to discern where manmade concepts begin to detach from non-manmade (artificial), i.e., natural, environments.
A distinction used to discern where man's intervention has sought to "correct" (heal) what man considers detrimental to his survival/propagation, or which challenges his conception of an ideal world.
Definition of Artificial, in relation to Natural, has also been given.