At first it was to connect with minds from around the world who had the potential to break free from the modern bullshit... A need to find people like me, the usual social instinct. I found some along the way, in many different forums over the years. But not many. Too few to justify the time I was expending with what I thought were well thought out positions. When I saw the level I was dealing with in these non-participating venues I became discouraged. Then it was simply to amuse myself and to see my ideas, concerning human psychology, in practice. Particularly the modern mindset which I encounter daily was more easily manipulated and observed on these on-line forums where repercussions were minimal.
Sometimes I could observe in silence, and when things became dull I could insert a spark to get things rolling again. The spark was not hypocritical. All it took was to express my real views, openly and clearly, amongst those living in sheltered delusion...and off they went.
Over time it becomes tiresome. There's no real reason to engage such minds. All they have are emotional words, accusations with no substance which they consider a challenging counter-argument to whatever you say. Over time this "bigot," "racist," "sexist," "homophobe," counter-offensive, followed by the typical infantile "I destroyed your positions", or "I proved you wrong" becomes predictable. Not fun any more. They are not salvageable, and I lack the kind of moral grounding to think that all could, or should, be saved.
You saw it displayed with Only_Humean where he demands indisputable proof,base don his stringent philosophical mind, from anyone challenging the norm, but shows a not so surprising leniency when it comes to any moron with a view which is in line with the fundamental principles of modernity...exposing his own quality of mind and what this "rational stringency" is all about. They want numbers participating to make them feel like something important is going on there. Instead you have the usual reduction of every post to name-calling, innuendoes, and sexual undertones....All other posts are of a casual, shooting the shit nature, with nothing valuable - platitudes and banter. At some point you begin asking yourself "What's the point?"
I've faced the same shit from so many different brain-dead morons, that at this point I just give them my standard responses, not wanting to waste my time. They don't really address the topic, nor my arguments, they simply repeat the common repertoire of modern emotional defensiveness, sprinkled with some famous names, some references to famous theories, which they do not fully grasp, some sexual insults, and the usual comedic, feigned aloofness, when the going gets tough.
ILP is not the only forum of the kind. I've come across at least half a dozen, and the same process repeats itself. Sciforums was my earliest experience and before that KillDevilHill forums. Same shit different cesspool of retards who think philosophy is not about making value judgements, or that its about making people feel good and never hurting anybody's feelings. At first they underestimate me, thinking I'm some common red-neck, or skinhead, a Nazi, or someone they can easily deal with - some sort of modern caricature they feel they can ridicule reaffirming their own "value". Then they begin getting stressed when they cannot deal with me on that level and they turn to insult, duplicitous dismissals, patronizing commentary, ignoring me, declarative statements, put-downs, sexual innuendoes, and so on...what they call "trolling". The usual crap. All fun...but when I respond in kind, they they turn all civil-rights on me, remembering about polite discourse...and in come the moderators to save them from Satyr. Meh, who cares?
Lyssa, I am stating that same gender sex is not normal. Now let me define what is normal. If you know the truth and do it you are wise. If you know the truth and ignore it you are foolish. Wisdom benefits the individual that follows it. Living so as to improve ones life is commonly accepted as normal. It is encouraged by social groups that ones life also benefit the group. Such benificial activities become normal for that social group.
In the arena of sex, normal(beneficial) sexual partnerships that preserve this normality are between a male and female producing offspring. This family, provides nurturing, intimacy and a social imprint that preserves and encourages this template. Homosexuality is in conflict with this "normal" cycle.
This is a very simplified piece of a much larger construct, a very well thought out version of which is expressed in Satyr's remarks.
Anfang
Gender : Posts : 3989 Join date : 2013-01-23 Age : 40 Location : Castra Alpine Grug
To summarize my views - Homosexuality is a trait, a psychology. All psychological and physical phenomena are based in genetics, the body, and develop depending on environmental factors, the nurturing, within its genetic/physical limitations. The rigidness or malleability is again depending on the individual's innate constitution and its upbringing.
Genetically, homosexuality is a mutation which occurs in social animals. It's likely a spectrum and social animals which organize in a feminized way, like a herd, like sheep for example, seem to show a higher likelihood of developing homosexual individuals.
And so I see homosexuality and its increasing valuation in society to be a result and a positive reinforcement for creating an increasingly feminized society.
The restrictions on homosexuality in various societies over the ages, or lack of said, are therefor a good indication of the grade of feminization of its individuals. For example, there should be a positive correlation between flat hierarchy and homosexuality. (meh!)
Lyssa Har Har Harr
Gender : Posts : 8965 Join date : 2012-03-01 Location : The Cockpit
Lyssa, I am stating that same gender sex is not normal.
I got that. But you phrased it like this, "Why should one male and one female join together in a promise to forsake others and bind themselves together until death do us part?"
The 'should' gives the feeling as though one had a Choice in the matter; this normative cannot be preached to a homo. because he is wired differently and his state in the genuine case, is not a lifestyle choice.
Quote :
Now let me define what is normal. If you know the truth and do it you are wise. If you know the truth and ignore it you are foolish. Wisdom benefits the individual that follows it. Living so as to improve ones life is commonly accepted as normal. It is encouraged by social groups that ones life also benefit the group. Such benificial activities become normal for that social group.
In the arena of sex, normal(beneficial) sexual partnerships that preserve this normality are between a male and female producing offspring. This family, provides nurturing, intimacy and a social imprint that preserves and encourages this template. Homosexuality is in conflict with this "normal" cycle.
'Natural' Anomalies have their uses too maybe; my guess as to why ancient homosexuality and warrior cultures co-existed together is prob. to regulate and slow down the excessive killing and dying of the fiercest men in war maybe, and effeminacy is like the funneling of a sand-glass, making deaths trickle slowly, regulating the barbarism. So on the one hand, ancient homosexuality encouraged the rearing of braver and beautiful individuals [tutorship, etc.], and the decadent side to this double-edge process helped thwart the "quick" over-flowering of boys into brave men. It slowed down the pace to the advantage of overall species-survival.
What is Ab-Normal and Sub-Normal today is the Forced Agenda of effeminizing; the intent-ional promotion.
Instead you have the usual reduction of every post to name-calling, innuendoes, and sexual undertones....I've faced the same shit from so many different brain-dead morons, that at this point I just give them my standard responses, not wanting to waste my time.
Satyr was not entirely blameless.
I recall my first encounter with him.
He was fearsome, daunting, formidable, despite all this, his wilfulness was a great part of his charm.
Does not all energy proceed from opposition.
Lyssa Har Har Harr
Gender : Posts : 8965 Join date : 2012-03-01 Location : The Cockpit
Amphion in his reply (frr. 190, 192, 198, 200) praises music and song, decries a philistine absorption in the management of an estate, and declares that brain does more to save a city than brawn. The opposition between toil, combined with athletic and military training, and artistic or intellectuc.l pursuits is a thread that runs through the history of Greek literature; obviously it is always open to people like Zethos to reproach their adversaries for effeminacy, since music and singing do little to develop the muscles of the legs, and their indulgence does not help to accumulate wealth. Phaidros in Pl. Smp. 179d is scornful of Orpheus, who according to the legend was not willing to die himself in order to be with his dead wife in the underworld; he was 'faint-hearted, as you'd expect of a kitharoidos'. Misgolas 's predilection for musicians may imply a distaste on his part for young athletes and warriors of the kind portrayed in earlier vase-painting." [ib.]
You met Satyr after he had decided to go with it. It became part of Satyr's on-line persona. Wanderer was the first moniker I used when I still thought these internet forums could lead to some interesting discussions...but I was soon corrected. Then the same shit played out in various other forums...and I realized what was going on. I adapted.
"Blameless"? No. It became so predictable to me that I almost wished the other would start going personal with it. How else could I tolerate morons and waste my time with these long posts where I tried to cover all the bases, only to have them make declarations, sexual accusations, blah, blah blah...?
reasonvemotion wrote:
I recall my first encounter with him.
He was fearsome, daunting, formidable, despite all this, his wilfulness was a great part of his charm.
Does not all energy proceed from opposition.
Yes. I used it to test my arguments. It helped me flesh out my views, by forcing me to cover all the bases. I had to think of a subject from many directions.
Now, after years of it, I just get the same old shit, and I have nothing new to gain from it...so I give the stock response. One which most of these fucks still have nothing to say that challenges it.
Why would I change what they cannot respond to? Why would I bother? They offer nothing new, and so I have nothing new to say. My positions stand. Not as an absolute, but as superior...most probable.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
reasonvemotion
Gender : Posts : 681 Join date : 2013-01-09 Location : The Female Spirit
Homosexual love can never be reciprocal, Proust argued, because a male homosexual desires a “real man”, that is, a man who is incapable of responding to homosexual desire. Those who would respond positively to homosexual desires are “unmanly” and thus cannot arouse or satisfy fully homosexual desire. Proust wrote of the impossibility of homosexual love: “since loving only those men who are completely manly, men who are single-sexed, it is only with such a man that it can appease a desire it ought not to feel for him, and which he ought not to feel in return – if the need for love were not an arch-cheat, and did not make it see in the most ignominious pansy the likeness of a man, of a real man like other men who by a miracle would feel love for it, or stoop to it…” In his notebooks, Proust wrote: “A homosexual is not a man who loves homosexuals, but a man who, seeing a soldier, immediately want to have him as a friend.” The conclusion is: “Shared love, for them is so beset with special difficulties, in addition to those which hamper all mankind, that one may fairly describe the satisfying encounter, rare in the case of most human beings, as being for them an impossibility.”
Homosexual love can never be reciprocal, Proust argued, because a male homosexual desires a “real man”, that is, a man who is incapable of responding to homosexual desire. Those who would respond positively to homosexual desires are “unmanly” and thus cannot arouse or satisfy fully homosexual desire. Proust wrote of the impossibility of homosexual love: “since loving only those men who are completely manly, men who are single-sexed, it is only with such a man that it can appease a desire it ought not to feel for him, and which he ought not to feel in return – if the need for love were not an arch-cheat, and did not make it see in the most ignominious pansy the likeness of a man, of a real man like other men who by a miracle would feel love for it, or stoop to it…” In his notebooks, Proust wrote: “A homosexual is not a man who loves homosexuals, but a man who, seeing a soldier, immediately want to have him as a friend.” The conclusion is: “Shared love, for them is so beset with special difficulties, in addition to those which hamper all mankind, that one may fairly describe the satisfying encounter, rare in the case of most human beings, as being for them an impossibility.”
_________________ And here we always meet, at the station of our heart / Looking at each other as if we were in a dream /Seeing for the first time different eyes so supreme / That bright flames burst into vision, keeping us apart.
perpetualburn
Gender : Posts : 955 Join date : 2013-01-04 Location : MA
Sexual orientation isn’t a choice ( i.e. the urge is inherently uncontrollable, an uncontrollable urge to consume that necessitates accommodation by a consumer system), sexual urges(to consume too soon) become precedent, the power of sexuality isn’t channeled toward a height but spread out/softened/dissipated within a system of domestication…your sexuality is only “free” then within this system. Sexuality divorced from violence. Violence as something cold, mechanical and detached (a “necessary evil”) to keep everyone “in-line” for undisturbed consuming (at the trough). The specter of violence, the gloom of consumer culture. The restless pain of human interaction when the wild nature in man is destroyed. A culture that perpetually re-enforces a disconnect between violence and sexuality, making “connecting” with another person difficult. You may only invest yourself in system that doesn’t offer healthy divesting possibilities. A private(locked door) nakedness, a tidy war. A “violent nature” as pejorative. Violence treated as something “terrible”(absolutely) while simultaneously being treated nonchalantly… Mass disassociation.
reasonvemotion
Gender : Posts : 681 Join date : 2013-01-09 Location : The Female Spirit
A woman (and I would think most women), can identify almost immediately, whether a man is homosexual, perfect abs or not. These "men" do not live up to the inner concept of masculinity, which is present in the heterosexual man - the very "essence" of a man, which he learns as a boy - is absent in the homosexual and may cause him to question his self esteem.
Why do gay men, when they advertise on line, give the impression of being ultra masculine. Is it not an apparent public display of the characteristics, typically belonging to the heterosexual male, the characteristics of which the homosexual male does not possess.
This concept would of course naturally exclude gay men as they defile the rudimentary criteria for being masculine. They are foppish and their romantic attractions and affections are for other men.
The reality is that the concept and this lack of "essence" - can and does affect how a gay man feels about himself, in spite of considerations or expectations to the contrary, he is his own product.
apaosha Daeva
Gender : Posts : 1852 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 37 Location : Ireland
Sexual orientation isn’t a choice ( i.e. the urge is inherently uncontrollable, an uncontrollable urge to consume that necessitates accommodation by a consumer system), sexual urges(to consume too soon) become precedent, the power of sexuality isn’t channeled toward a height but spread out/softened/dissipated within a system of domestication…your sexuality is only “free” then within this system. Sexuality divorced from violence. Violence as something cold, mechanical and detached (a “necessary evil”) to keep everyone “in-line” for undisturbed consuming (at the trough). The specter of violence, the gloom of consumer culture. The restless pain of human interaction when the wild nature in man is destroyed. A culture that perpetually re-enforces a disconnect between violence and sexuality, making “connecting” with another person difficult. You may only invest yourself in system that doesn’t offer healthy divesting possibilities. A private(locked door) nakedness, a tidy war. A “violent nature” as pejorative. Violence treated as something “terrible”(absolutely) while simultaneously being treated nonchalantly… Mass disassociation.
Yes that's good.
If we look at lust like hunger then we see an inherent drive to satisfy a biological need - mortality. But are all able to satisfy this need directly, naturally, healthily? (Health here defined as heterosexual desire for the purpose of reproduction)
Yet the need persists and it is extremely powerful. If the direct avenue of satisfaction is not accessible, one is forced to redirect desire to whatever is available. This can be seen in prisons.
But outside the institutional environment, where an external force restricts access to sexual fulfillment, what of the sexually inadequate, the socially retarded, the unattractive, the unfit? Must these not also redirect that irresistible animal urge towards what is accessible for them? What of those whose internal forces conspire to deny them the satisfaction of their own desires?
Must they not also redirect to what is accessible, compromise, take what they can get... or give? The nature of this compromise does much to show an individual's response to his inherent limitations - by the manner in which he copes with them.
...
My position is that there are no real choices available to an individual. We are each the products of our pasts, the continuing manifestation of past processes as we move into the future. This past permits us to exist at all, but it also limits us, defines us within parameters of possibility.
_________________ "I do not exhort you to work but to battle; I do not exhort you to peace but to victory. May your work be a battle; may your peace be a victory." -TSZ
Lyssa Har Har Harr
Gender : Posts : 8965 Join date : 2012-03-01 Location : The Cockpit
Bugchasing: a slang term for the practice of pursuing sexual intercourse with HIV-infected individuals in order to contract HIV. Individuals engaged in this activity are referred to as bugchasers.
Bug a neg: intentionally infect someone with AIDS through gay sex
What's interesting and ironic in the article below, if you read the rest of it via the link, is how academics and health workers tried to persuade the journalist not to write the article, as it only applied to a minority of people in the gay community.
Quote :
In Search of Death Gregory A. FreemanPosted Jan 23, 2003 12:00 AM
To bug chasers, HIV isn't a ruthless killer. It's a gift - the most beautiful a man can willingly receive - spread through a secret breeding ground.
Carlos nonchalantly asks whether his drink was made with whole or skim milk. He takes a moment to slurp on his grande Caffe Mocha in a crowded Starbucks, and then he gets back to explaining how much he wants HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. His eyes light up as he says that the actual moment of transmission, the instant he gets HIV, will be "the most erotic thing I can imagine." He seems like a typical thirty-two-year-old man, but, in fact, he has a secret life. Carlos is chasing the bug.
"I know what the risks are, and I know that putting myself in this situation is like putting a gun to my head," he says. Some of that mountain music that's so popular is playing, making the moment even more surreal as a Southern voice sings, "Keep on the sunny side of life" behind Carlos. "But I think it turns the other guy on to know that I'm negative and that they're bringing me into the brotherhood. That gets me off, too."
I met Carlos in New York's Greenwich Village, the neighborhood where he usually hangs out. He is tall, with a large build, and plenty of gay men find him attractive. His longish, curly-wavy hair is jet-black with golden highlights, and his face is soft and just a bit feminine. He has a very appealing smile and laugh, and he's a funny guy sometimes. The conversation veers from the banal -- his fascination with the reality show The Amazing Race -- to his desire for HIV. Carlos' tone never changes when switching from one topic to the other.
When asked whether he is prepared to live with HIV after that "erotic" moment, Carlos dismisses living with HIV as a minor annoyance. Like most bug chasers, he has the impression that the virus just isn't such a big deal anymore: "It's like living with diabetes. You take a few pills and get on with your life." Carlos spends the afternoon continually calling a man named Richard, someone he met on the Internet. They met on barebackcity.com about a year ago, while Carlos was still with his boyfriend. That boyfriend left because Carlos was having sex with other men and because he was interested in barebacking -- the practice of having sex without a condom. Carlos and Richard are arranging a "date" for later that day.
Carlos is part of an intricate underground world that has sprouted, driven almost completely by the Internet, in which men who want to be infected with HIV get together with those who are willing to infect them. The men who want the virus are called "bug chasers," and the men who freely give the virus to them are called "gift givers." While the rest of the world fights the AIDS epidemic and most people fear HIV infection, this subculture celebrates the virus and eroticizes it. HIV-infected semen is treated like liquid gold. Carlos has been chasing the bug for more than a year in a topsy-turvy world in which every convention about HIV is turned upside down. The virus isn't horrible and fearsome, it's beautiful and sexy -- and delivered in the way that is most likely to result in infection. In this world, the men with HIV are the most desired, and the bug chasers will do anything to get the virus -- to "get knocked up," to be "bred" or "initiated into the brotherhood."
Like a lot of sexual fetishes and extreme behaviors, bug chasing could not exist without the Internet, or at least it couldn't thrive. Prior to the advent of Web surfing and e-mail, it would have been practically impossible for bug chasing to happen in any great numbers, because it's still not acceptable to walk up to a stranger and say you want the virus. But the Internet's anonymity and broad access make it possible to find someone with like interests, no matter how outlandish. Carlos surfs online about twenty hours a week looking for men to have sex with, usually frequenting sites such as bareback.com and barebackcity.com, plus a number of Internet discussion groups. Most of the Web sites use the pretense that they actually are about barebacking, which is in itself risky and controversial but still a long way from bug chasing. For the Web sites, that distinction is at best razor-thin and more often just an outright lie. "We got Poz4Poz, Neg4Neg and bug chasers looking to join the club," the welcome page to barebackcity.com, which claims 48,000 registered users, up from 28,000 about a year ago, recently said. "Be the first to seed a newbie and give him a pozitive attitude!"
Within this online community, bug chasers revel in their desires, using their own lingo about "poz" and "neg" men, "bug juice" and "conversion" from negative to positive. User profiles include names such as BugChaser21, Knockmeup, BugMeSoon, ConvertMeSir, PozCum4NegHole and GiftGiver. The posters are upfront about seeking HIV, even extremely enthusiastic, possibly because the Web sites are about the only place a bug seeker can really express his desires openly. Under turn-ons, a poster called PozMeChgo craves a "hot poz load deep in me. I really want to be converted!! Breed me/seed me!" Carlos' profile on one Web site lists his screen name as ConvertMe, and he says he wants a man "to fill me up with that poison seed." His AOL Instant Messenger name is Bug Juice Wanted.
It's not uncommon to see people post replies to the profiles encouraging the men to seek HIV. One such comment reads, "This guy knows what he wants!! I would love to plant my seeds ) Come and join the club. The more we are, the stronger we are." A Yahoo! spokeswoman confirms that the company shuts down such sites when it receives notice that the subscribers are promoting HIV infection or any other kind of harm to one another, but the company doesn't go looking for bug chasers in its thousands of discussion groups, most established by subscribers themselves. Recently, it was easy to find two discussion groups on Yahoo! that promoted bug chasing, one called barebackover50 and one called gayextremebareback. The first discussion group was established in 1998 and had 1,439 members at the end of 2002. Yahoo! closed the group after Rolling Stone inquired about it.
Condoms and safe sex are openly ridiculed on bug-chasing Web sites, with many bug chasers rebelling against what they see as the dogma of safe-sex education; constantly thinking about a deadly disease takes all the fun out of sex, they say, and condoms suck. Carlos agrees and says getting HIV will make safe sex a moot point. "It's about freedom," he says. "What else can happen to us after this? You can fuck whoever you want, fuck as much as you want, and nothing worse can happen to you. Nothing bad can happen after you get HIV."
Isn't it easy to see, given the above behavior, how gays could well have been responsible for the transmission of SIV from primates to human HIV via sexual intercourse in the first place?
I've come across other shit, but to be honest it's too disgusting to post.
_________________ “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” - - George Orwell
Recidivist
Gender : Posts : 435 Join date : 2012-04-30 Age : 48 Location : Exile
Sexual education should be adjusted in accordance to the species and the type of human needed. This seems appropriate for the kind of audience it is directed towards.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
perpetualburn
Gender : Posts : 955 Join date : 2013-01-04 Location : MA
Newton and Truong gave media interviews as a gay couple with an adopted child, stating that their son was born to a Russian surrogate mother they found on the internet.
“Being a father was an honor and a privilege that amounted to the best six years of my life,” Newton told the court minutes before his sentence was announced.
At the age of 22 months, Adam was sexually abused by his ‘adoptive parents’ for the first time. After that he was abused on a daily basis. The ‘parents’ took photos and video recorded practically everything they did to him.
Later on they made Adam available for sex with other members of the pedophile ring in Australia, France, Germany and the US, for which Newton and Truong had to travel extensively. The investigators have found proof of at least eight men in these countries having contact with Adam when he was between the ages of two and six.
_________________ And here we always meet, at the station of our heart / Looking at each other as if we were in a dream /Seeing for the first time different eyes so supreme / That bright flames burst into vision, keeping us apart.
OhFortunae
Gender : Posts : 2311 Join date : 2013-10-26 Age : 30 Location : Land of Dance and Song
Houston’s bathrooms, showers, and dressing facilities will now be open to all, regardless of gender, gender identity, gender expression, or other predilection of gender behavior. By an 11-6 vote of the Houston City Council, Mayor Annise Parker achieved this as the crowning jewel of her tenure as mayor.
Mayor Parker, Houston’s first openly gay mayor, said passing this ordinance was not the most important thing she has done in office, according to an article in the Fairfield Citizen, but it is the “most personally meaningful thing I will ever do as mayor.”
Houston Council Member, At Large Position 3, Michael Kubosh took exception to this. Kubosh told KPRC TV, “It’s going to criminalize people that have been found in violation in the ordinance and the fine could be between $500 to $5,000.”
In an interview with Breitbart Texas, Kubosh said, “The system is flawed and has little, if any, transparency. I did everything I could do to get the ordinance delayed or defeated, but the mayor controlled the whole process.” Kubosh said he voted against the ordinance along with District A Council Member Brenda Stardig, District D Council Member Dwight Boykins, District E Council Member Dave Martin, District G Council Member Oliver Pennington and At Large Position 5 Council Member Jack Christi.
_________________ 1. "Youth, oh, youth! | of whom then, youth, art thou born? Say whose son thou art, Who in Fafnir's blood | thy bright blade reddened, And struck thy sword to my heart."
2. "The Noble Hart | my name, and I go A motherless man abroad; Father I had not, | as others have, And lonely ever I live."
OhFortunae
Gender : Posts : 2311 Join date : 2013-10-26 Age : 30 Location : Land of Dance and Song
I do not think it is a fake; they really are a perverted ''people''. In the Netherlands, 10 years ago, we almost had a minister-president (Pim Fortuyn) who was a open homosexual and admitted to go to dark rooms. He got killed before the elections which his party won anyway - he was popular due to his anti-immigration and anti-islamic viewpoints.
Also, a case in the Netherlands around one year ago, of three homos being convicted for purposely injecting people without them having any knowledge about it, at homosexual parties with needles which contained their HIV samples, also drugging them and then sexually abusing them and infecting them with their HIV while them being unconscious.
_________________ 1. "Youth, oh, youth! | of whom then, youth, art thou born? Say whose son thou art, Who in Fafnir's blood | thy bright blade reddened, And struck thy sword to my heart."
2. "The Noble Hart | my name, and I go A motherless man abroad; Father I had not, | as others have, And lonely ever I live."
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37245 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Gay marriage is a sham. They get married for tax reasons, live together, and live the same promiscuous lifestyles gamy men are known for. In homosexuality we stills e the same sexual differences between females gays and males gays. Lesbians are more discreet, less promiscuous...faggots have an open season on their plughole.
How anyone can respect someone who enjoys shoving a dick up their rectum is beyond me. I guess pretending is what we all must do in this world. Then let's talk about how we value honesty.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Lyssa Har Har Harr
Gender : Posts : 8965 Join date : 2012-03-01 Location : The Cockpit
Newton and Truong gave media interviews as a gay couple with an adopted child, stating that their son was born to a Russian surrogate mother they found on the internet.
“Being a father was an honor and a privilege that amounted to the best six years of my life,” Newton told the court minutes before his sentence was announced.
At the age of 22 months, Adam was sexually abused by his ‘adoptive parents’ for the first time. After that he was abused on a daily basis. The ‘parents’ took photos and video recorded practically everything they did to him.
Later on they made Adam available for sex with other members of the pedophile ring in Australia, France, Germany and the US, for which Newton and Truong had to travel extensively. The investigators have found proof of at least eight men in these countries having contact with Adam when he was between the ages of two and six.
After homosexuality is taken off of the psychology textbooks that described it as a dysfunction, and legitimized in pop-culture, turning it into just another sexual fetish, pedophilia is next.
Wikipedia wrote:
Paraphilia
Focus of erotic interest
Abasiophilia: People with impaired mobility Acrotomophilia: People with amputations Agalmatophilia: Statues, mannequins and immobility Algolagnia: Pain, particularly involving an erogenous zone; differs from masochism as there is a biologically different interpretation of the sensation rather than a subjective interpretation Andromimetophilia :Trans men Anililagnia :Attraction by young men to older women Apotemnophilia :Having an amputation Asphyxiophilia :Asphyxiation or strangulation Autagonistophilia: Being on stage or on camera Autassassinophilia : Being in life-threatening situations Autoandrophilia :A biological female imagining herself as a male Autoerotic asphixiation :Self-induced asphyxiation, sometimes to the point of near unconsciousness Autogynephilia :A biological male imagining himself as a female Biastophilia :Rape of an unconsenting person; see also consensual rape fantasy Breast fetishism :Breasts; also known as mammagynophilia, mammaphilia and mastofact. Debate exists on whether the modern widespread sexual attraction to breasts among heterosexual males of western society constitutes a sexual fetish In clinical literature of the 19th century, the focus on breasts was considered a form of paraphillia, but in modern times this interest is considered normal Chremastistophilia :Being robbed or held up Chronophilia :Partners of a widely differing chronological age Coprophilia :Feces; also known as scat, scatophilia or fecophilia Dacryphilia :Tears or crying Diaper fetishism :Diapers; considerable overlap with paraphilic infantilism Dendrophilia :Trees Emetophilia :Vomit Erotic asphyxiation :Asphyxia of oneself or others Erotophonophilia: Murder Exhibitionism :Exposing oneself sexually to others, with or without their consent Fat fetishism: Overweight or obese people Foot fetishism :Attraction to feet Formicophilia :Being crawled on by insects Forniphilia :Turning a human being into a piece of furniture Frotteurism :Rubbing against a non-consenting person Gerontophilia : Elderly people Gynemimetophilia : Transsexual or transgender women Hebephilia : Generally early pubescent children Homeovestism : Wearing clothing emblematic of one's own sex Hybristophilia : Criminals, particularly for cruel or outrageous crimes Infantophilia : Pedophilia with a focus on children five years old or younger, a recently suggested term that is not in general use Kleptophilia : Stealing; also known as kleptolagnia Klismaphilia : Enemas Lactophilia : Breast milk Liquidophilia : Immersing genitals in liquids Macrophilia : Giants, primarily domination by giant women or men Masochism : Suffering; being beaten, bound or otherwise humiliated Mechanophilia: Cars or other machines; also ‘mechaphilia.’ Menophilia : Menstruation Morphophilia : Particular body shapes or sizes Mucophilia : Mucus Mysophilia : Dirtiness, soiled or decaying things Narratophilia : Obscene words Nasophilia : Noses Navel fetishism : Sexual attraction to navels - either their own or someone else's Necrophilia : Corpses Olfactophilia : Smells Paraphilic infantilism : Sexual arousal based on dressing or being treated like a baby, also known as autonepiophilia or ‘adult baby syndrome’; considerable overlap with diaper fetishism Partialism : Specific, non-genital body parts Pedophilia : Prepubescent children, also spelled paedophilia. Often confused with hebephilia, ephebophilia, and pederasty Peodeiktophilia : Exposing one's penis Pedovestism : Dressing like a child Pictophilia : Pornography or erotic art, particularly pictures Piquerism : Sexual gratification through penetration of another person, most commonly by stabbing or cutting the body with sharp objects Pygophilia : Buttocks Pyrophilia : Fire Raptophilia : Committing rape, possibly consensual rape fantasy Sadism Inflicting pain on others Salirophilia : Soiling or dirtying others Sexual fetishism : Nonliving objects Somnophilia : Sleeping or unconscious people Sthenolagnia : Muscles and displays of strength Stigmatophilia : Body piercings and tattoos Symphorophilia : Witnessing or staging disasters such as car accidents Telephone scatologia : Obscene phone calls, particularly to strangers; also known as telephonicophilia Teratophilia : Deformed or monstrous people Transvestic fetishism : Wearing clothes associated with the opposite sex; also known as transvestism Transvestophilia : A transvestite sexual partner Trichophilia : Hair Troilism Cuckoldism: watching one's partner have sex with someone else, possibly without the third party's knowledge; also known as triolism Urolagnia : Urination, particularly in public, on others, and/or being urinated on Vampirism : Attraction to or involving blood Vorarephilia : The idea of eating or being eaten by others; sometimes swallowed whole, in one piece Voyeurism : Watching others while naked or having sex, generally without their knowledge; also known as scopophilia or scoptophilia Zoophilia : Animals Zoosadism : Inflicting pain on or seeing animals in pain.
Technical terms for non-paraphilic sexual interests
Alloerotic: Sexual attraction to others (as opposed to autoerotic) Androphilia: Sexual interest in men Analloerotic: Lacking in sexual interests towards others (but not lacking in sexual drive—see asexuality) Ephebophilia: Sexual preference for individuals in mid-to-late adolescence, typically ages 15–19. Gynephilia: Sexual interest in women Teleiophilia: Sexual interest in adults (as opposed to pedophilia, etc.)
Homosexuality
Homosexuality and bisexuality were listed as sexual deviations in early versions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and were removed from the third version.
I've said that the time will come when the same arguments being used to defend homosexuality will be used to defend pedophilia.
Pedophilia is today where homosexuality was 50-60 years ago.
After that, who knows? Bestiality? Necrophilia?
When sex loses its natural role as a reproduction method and becomes another hedonistic practice, then there are no limits.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Lyssa Har Har Harr
Gender : Posts : 8965 Join date : 2012-03-01 Location : The Cockpit
) Come and join the club. The more we are, the stronger we are." A Yahoo! spokeswoman confirms that the company shuts down such sites when it receives notice that the subscribers are promoting HIV infection or any other kind of harm to one another, but the company doesn't go looking for bug chasers in its thousands of discussion groups, most established by subscribers themselves. Recently, it was easy to find two discussion groups on Yahoo! that promoted bug chasing, one called barebackover50 and one called gayextremebareback. The first discussion group was established in 1998 and had 1,439 members at the end of 2002. Yahoo! closed the group after Rolling Stone inquired about it.
