Which form of homosexuality has been most prevealtent and other related questions.

Then women are less life?

You people.....

TheJoker wrote:

What I find that is interesting are those individuals who were heterosexual for the longest amount of time prior and then suddenly switched or crossed over in the decision making of becoming a homosexual later on.

What's interesting about that is it shows how homosexuality is not some specific feature people are born with or that is biologically inherent but rather instead is acquired later on as a sort of psychological reaction which I have argued for in other threads here.

We see this with a man that after divorcing his wife having three children later on becomes a homosexual afterwards.

Was the divorce a psychological trigger in the man in resorting to homosexuality?

We see this also with women where a woman after being divorced that also may have three children in this example also decides to make the switch to lesbianism.

Was her mistreatment from the former relationship from a man the trigger that made her switch to lesbianism psychologically in reaction?

It is examples like these that have made me propose that homosexuality is a psychological phenomena that is reactionary within certain individuals that may be exposed to such prevailing behavioral memes.

I find nothing biologically inherent when it concerns homosexual behaviors or practices.

Perhaps after the age of typical capacity for procreation the homosexual activity is genetically encouraged to prevent stale reproduction, as in reproduction of the old that produces those that are less strong, with down syndrome and such. A natural counter action to the continual prevalence of the severe desire for orgasm... In other words could Homosexuality be natural in older ages? Weird thought...

Poison IV wrote:

Or the easier way to do it:

Blame the women.

I don't think blame lies more in one place then another, there is no initial cause...of anything. So there is no reason to blame one more then another.

Poison IV wrote:

Abstract wrote:

What made men want to be in charge? Why are they that way, what aspects of nature abused them into such a state?

You tell me.

One of the mysteries of life?

Maybe it was that women were less arm-and-leg muscular strong then men due to having spent time being in labor rather then doing things that exercised those particular muscles. And as a result men's efforts in that area led to them being more efficient in aspect of defense. so the male assumed by a sort of a natural selection the protective role, and overtime the protections extend to things fed into by odd beliefs and misunderstandings that lead to hardships for women. Which eventually evolves into men thinking they are better because they are the ones that do the "hard" work, which itself is a false social-stigma that evolved in the mind of man...
IDK

Abstract wrote:

As like saying that there is a yin-nature that seeks to combine with the yang-nature...yet does it seek or inevitably meet?

No, there is no "combine" as the two are combined to begin with.

The masculine springs from the feminine, wanting to gain control of it....just as self-consciousness springs from consciousness, and consciousness springs from life.

The masculine is the duo in dualism.
It wants to separate not to combine. It wishes to distinguish itself; to become independent from its nature.

Σατυρ wrote:

Abstract wrote:

As like saying that there is a yin-nature that seeks to combine with the yang-nature...yet does it seek or inevitably meet?

No, there is no "combine" as the two are combined to begin with.

Depends on what meta-narrative you want to speak in.
But indeed.

Σατυρ wrote:

The masculine springs from the feminine, wanting to gain control of it....just as self-consciousness springs from consciousness, and consciousness springs from life.

The masculine is the duo in dualism.
It wants to separate not to combine. It wishes to distinguish itself; to become independent from its nature.

I see what you mean but I wouldn't generalize it to primarily seek to separate, some do, and some actions can be correlated thus. Perhaps that is the average desire of humanity in general though...

The idea of separation stems from the idea that there is such thing as "separate" in the first place, we are all connected, we are already combined, the idea that we aren't is only an idea. The idea that one can separate is only a strain for something that is likely impossible.

Mankind currently wants to distinguish itself in general. It is ignorant.

I watched some videos, saying that male homosexuals were really just bisexuals, and that the modern male homosexual was really just a bisexual shaming their gynocentric side and forcing it out of themselves. This is because, in the ancient texts, there are records of third-genders, bisexuals, and crossdressers, but apparently, never any record of homosexuals. Personally, I never read all of the ancient texts, so maybe homosexuals did actually exist prior to 1900, not sure.

Guest wrote:

Maybe it was that women were less arm-and-leg muscular strong then men due to having spent time being in labor rather then doing things that exercised those particular muscles. And as a result men's efforts in that area led to them being more efficient in aspect of defense. so the male assumed by a sort of a natural selection the protective role, and overtime the protections extend to things fed into by odd beliefs and misunderstandings that lead to hardships for women. Which eventually evolves into men thinking they are better because they are the ones that do the "hard" work, which itself is a false social-stigma that evolved in the mind of man...
IDK

Tried to find data about female bear testosterone, since they are more aggressive, in short wot dr. My guess is human females are more sheltered, thus less testosterone, thus weaker muscles. What I could find about bear testosterone, was that males getting no salmon gives them excess T, the excess T makes them unfit. Read another wall of text article about hyena dickgirls, it was another wot dr, my guess is female hyenas have higher T but not sure. Someone with time and energy can look it up.

On a historical account of homosexuality's 'normalization' in the American dominated "west", and how AIDS was redefined....[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

It wasn't patient 0: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Discover Magazine (@DiscoverMag) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Exploring the sexual preferences of this patient 0, and of the overall HIV epidemic, is covered up.
Nature is self-correcting.
Pollution and disease, hint at a loss of natural balance.

Those who understand, understand, those who do not or cannot, should remain as they are.