Flirting is all about acting. Tell her bullshit, about how much money you have and how she's the only one, as she presents her pushed-up bras tits at you, and is wearing a girdle.
And, as always, if you believe in your own bull, you become more convincing. Later you remember you were lying, but you might not admit it...to anybody.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37245 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
- Whitey being under more social pressure to behave with effeminate, which makes them less attractive. - Lack of options. - No shaming of mixed couples in mainstream media, within p.c.-culture, even encouragement. - Rush of being 'naughty', 'dirty'
Hrodeberto
Gender : Posts : 1318 Join date : 2014-07-14 Age : 37 Location : Spaces
Nah, it ambiguously appears I've already presupposed that, as I'd argue only a marginal number of women have never contracted it, and as such my question was more: at what temp. is her fever running? Is she on fire tonight?
_________________ Life has a twisted sense of humour, doesn't it. . . .
* * *
Last edited by Supra-Aryanist on Fri Nov 14, 2014 6:38 am; edited 1 time in total
Hrodeberto
Gender : Posts : 1318 Join date : 2014-07-14 Age : 37 Location : Spaces
- Whitey being under more social pressure to behave with effeminate, which makes them less attractive. - Lack of options. - No shaming of mixed couples in mainstream media, within p.c.-culture, even encouragement. - Rush of being 'naughty', 'dirty'
How about they just have a primal urge to get all zoophilic, and within a system which grovels to and reveres interracial and interspecies relationships, there is little to hold them back.
_________________ Life has a twisted sense of humour, doesn't it. . . .
* * *
Anfang
Gender : Posts : 3989 Join date : 2013-01-23 Age : 40 Location : Castra Alpine Grug
- Whitey being under more social pressure to behave with effeminate, which makes them less attractive. - Lack of options. - No shaming of mixed couples in mainstream media, within p.c.-culture, even encouragement. - Rush of being 'naughty', 'dirty'
How about they just have a primal urge to get all zoophilic, and within a system which grovels to and reveres interracial and interspecies relationships, there is little to hold them back.
It's not just race-mixing. That's part of the development but it's an overall unhealthy selection and lack of culling across the board which has been going on for decades, centuries, even more... And too many cowardly decisions and emergency measures in sum have brought us to where we are now.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37245 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Females evolved to sample as much genetic variety as possible. Men tried to control this to preserve the purity of their own heritage, after the populations had connected across geographical, natural, boundaries, and genetic isolation was only possible memetically. This is what is called Paternalism.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Hrodeberto
Gender : Posts : 1318 Join date : 2014-07-14 Age : 37 Location : Spaces
Females evolved to sample as much genetic variety as possible. Men tried to control this to preserve the purity of their own heritage, after the populations had connected across geographical, natural, boundaries, and genetic isolation was only possible memetically. This is what is called Paternalism.
I don't know about this. It doesn't follow considering tending to as much offspring as possible could pose as unfavorable.
_________________ Life has a twisted sense of humour, doesn't it. . . .
* * *
Last edited by Supra-Aryanist on Fri Nov 14, 2014 9:47 am; edited 1 time in total
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37245 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
In nature the burden is shouldered by the group of females....and this is why females defend and prefer stable cooperative systems.
Promiscuity is based on the natural predisposition to adapt to change. Environments change, forcing organisms to adapt to them, and so sampling as many variants of genetic codes will ensure that at least one offspring can survive any environmental shift. Male and female promiscuity is explained.
Male is more immediate, a female's, because of the time burdens and risks, it entails is slower, more projected in time/space.
To, first, ensure the propagation of their own genes, their heritage, males imposed a sexual limit to this promiscuity, upon both males and females, but mostly females, because the inheritance passes through the creator of ideals which is the male. Males create culture and then civilization, as a result.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Last edited by Satyr on Fri Nov 14, 2014 9:39 am; edited 1 time in total
Lyssa Har Har Harr
Gender : Posts : 8965 Join date : 2012-03-01 Location : The Cockpit
I.E. patriarchy revolved around male responsibility and sovereignty in the sense it was pro-masculine,,, J.-Xt. patriarchy revolved around female fear in the sense it was anti-feminine.
There are threats of power felt by the gods in numerous Greek myths - Zeus swallowing Metis, etc., but the difference was in the approach, where such feminine powers were sublimated into creativity [and metis turns to Athena], etc., whereas in the J.-Xt. realm, the concept of original sin and eternal shame takes over.
To add, I.E. paternalism was a restriction on female choice for a breeding, while the other was a restriction for a taming.
Nah, it ambiguously appears I've already presupposed that, as I'd argue only a marginal number of women have never contracted it, and as such my question was more: at what temp. is her fever running? Is she on fire tonight?
Prowl around in one of those pantyalleys here you like, and you'll find I'm from Zimbabwe, boy
Satyr, milord, brought me twerkin' here as his slave-girl in chains and bondage,,, and I'm only too proud of my heritage and what I was meant to be,, and that makes me more superior than your reptilian brain sniffing on emotional trails...
If I dont speak of my ancestry more often, its because I'll have my ancestry speak for me.
I'm in preparation for the level where, it would become obvious, there's only one region in this world, only one race, only one culture in this world, that could have produced this kind of rabidity and there would be no mistaking my ancestry for anywhere else. It would show in my gait and in my bait. Get it?
Nah, it ambiguously appears I've already presupposed that, as I'd argue only a marginal number of women have never contracted it, and as such my question was more: at what temp. is her fever running? Is she on fire tonight?
Prowl around in one of those pantyalleys here you like, and you'll find I'm from Zimbabwe, boy
Satyr, milord, brought me twerkin' here as his slave-girl in chains and bondage,,, and I'm only too proud of my heritage and what I was meant to be,, and that makes me more superior than your reptilian brain sniffing on emotional trails...
If I dont speak of my ancestry more often, its because I want my ancestry to speak for me.
I'm in preparation for the level where, it would become obvious, there's only one region in this world, only one race, only one culture in this world, that could have produced this kind of rabidity and there would be no mistaking my ancestry for anywhere else. It would show in my gait and in my bait. Get it?
I'm not questioning your ancestry, shawdy. This ostensible "nigger-hunting" thing you've conjured has gottten to your head. Get it? Just like daddy; come on.
_________________ Life has a twisted sense of humour, doesn't it. . . .
* * *
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37245 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
In this little thing I wrote, a while back, I describe the only way monogamy is possible amongst the upper 1% (intellectually speaking) of men and, primarily women. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
A cognizant male will not reproduce with a Neanderthal, knowing that the offspring will be the mix, which will be a lowering of him, and of his ancestry. The average female has no such qualms, but only surrenders to her instincts, her intuitions, her pleasures, having no other idea(l) or ability to project further, still, than what is required by her sexual specialization.... I've estimated this field of cognition, this perceptual-event-horizon, for the mediocre mind, but for the female, on that level, it usually fluctuates around 5-7 years.
Why 5-7? Because that's the amount of time a human offspring requires to reach a level of self-sustenance. a human female usually falls into heat, at that point. It's also called "the 7 year itch" by pop-culture, adapting convention to the female's cycles.
At that point the female "itches" to sample different genetic material.
The female, will also be restricted by the female's nature which also feels an intuitive, instinctual, attraction to males above her. The MRA's called this hypergamy, referring to this female attraction to genes of equal or higher, to her own, quality. Dependent, of course, on self-awareness and self-evaluation...know thyself.
In feminizing, sheltering systems, where value is artificially produced, or considered something preceding birth, as a "birth-right", this self-evaluation is inflated...creating entitlement, and a false sense of self-worth, in both sexes. One more reason marriages do not last and nobody is getting married any longer.
This I a hyper-real effect, where value, self value in this case, is exaggerated by an protective, artificial environment.
But that's another matter altogether... Attraction to what is above, for a female, is a natural method of ensuring that what genetic material she samples will increase in potential, not decrease. This increase is one of survivability, and is instinctive..no need for awareness. A woman is naturally attracted to a male that is above her in quality. If this evaluation of self is based on artifices, or on artificial conditions, then her judgment will be skewed by this. Therefore modern females, affected by this sheltering that raises their sense of self-worth, will never be attracted to a male who is genetically on her level or even above her. She will overestimate self, and demand something idea(l), within the environment her judgment is enslaved.
The truly superior female, in intellect, will also be burdened by this. For the upper 1% female, who falls within the upper 10% male, to find someone on her level or above it, without being tricked by pretenses, and without succumbing to the social and economic criteria of modern standards, is a formidable task.
In the past the male, the father, was the judge...and his judgments were based on social hierarchies. He "gave" his daughter to someone on his family's social level and within his family's genetic and memetic level.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Hrodeberto
Gender : Posts : 1318 Join date : 2014-07-14 Age : 37 Location : Spaces
In nature the burden is shouldered by the group of females....and this is why females defend and prefer stable cooperative systems.
Promiscuity is based on the natural predisposition to adapt to change. Environments change, forcing organisms to adapt to them, and so sampling as many variants of genetic codes will ensure that at least one offspring can survive any environmental shift. Male and female promiscuity is explained.
Male is more immediate, a female's, because of the time burdens and risks, it entails is slower, more projected in time/space.
To, first, ensure the propagation of their own genes, their heritage, males imposed a sexual limit to this promiscuity, upon both males and females, but mostly females, because the inheritance passes through the creator of ideals which is the male. Males create culture and then civilization, as a result.
Human reproduction strategy is R-selection, preeminetly now with the degree of sheltering. Promiscuity would be disadvantageous, failing to adapt, hence the misdirection toward satisfying sexual drives with unfit individuals. Jealousy is such a strong emotion these days as the means, namely, competition, to settle it has been repressed and suppressed, all of culturally, legal-poltically and economically.
_________________ Life has a twisted sense of humour, doesn't it. . . .
* * *
Last edited by Supra-Aryanist on Fri Nov 14, 2014 11:52 am; edited 1 time in total
Anfang
Gender : Posts : 3989 Join date : 2013-01-23 Age : 40 Location : Castra Alpine Grug
- Whitey being under more social pressure to behave with effeminate, which makes them less attractive.
Acc. to the girl in the video, he was not effeminate/'primal' enough...
What would the concept of White Primality entail in the healthiest sexual sense? Would he be a satyr? or...? anything else?
Quote :
- Rush of being 'naughty', 'dirty'
Then lets also add the factor of absent fathers again, and girls not being groomed at home even if the environment sets sampling standards.
The girl in the video seems to present all sorts of reasonings which make her choice look good according to 'her' standards - I stopped watching around the 2 minute mark. In a more general sense I think that the dating market is kind of strained for modern women. Many men dropping out, some being very effeminate - which I meant in the sense of restraining themselves due to social pressures and fears. So effeminate at least in their appearance, in the eyes of many of those women.
See that man over there in the shackles? That's a slave. Society calls him a slave. Average women see him and see the shackles, they see a slave. And that's the end of the story when it comes to their choice.
I don't know about white primality, a lot of whites are not my kind and never will be, it's diverging. Healthy would be to respect and take what is given and guide it with that understanding. It is not my nature to try and unify the divergence into a homogeneity with mimetic guidance. I can only make use of it to slow down the divergence.
About the absent fathers in girls' lives. This is a predicament. To have a father who is strong, who resists being just the mouth-piece of the society overall, is to be masculine - is to break apart this society. To break the feminization.
Last edited by Anfang on Fri Nov 14, 2014 11:47 am; edited 1 time in total
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37245 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
It will be disadvantageous in higher cognitive minds...not to lower ones...because of the extended, broader, deeper, perceptual-event-horizon. Here pragmatism puts a limit, a self-regulating restriction, on the mind.
A rich woman might want to fuck the pizza boy, who has all the markers of genetic health that her rich husband lacks, but her pragmatism makes this option irrational, because of the risks (costs versus potential benefits). All organisms, on a visceral level, want to reduce risk...path-of-least-resistance. Only those that can project (imagination bridging space/time), can consider the path-of-more-resistance. Not "most" but more. The evaluation here is based on predicted benefits, versus present costs.
Modernity protects most judgment that are wrong, and so persepctivism and subjectivity, become a candy-cane for infantile minds, and promiscuity and materialism and immediate gratification and spontaneity, and risk taking...and so on, become systemic virtues that all can enjoy. Everything becomes reversible, arbitrary, because it has no cost....and so it can be enjoyed with no risks. it can be a hedonistic escape from the past/nature...with no death to weight it down with gravitas. Nothing matters...all is plausible...nothnig is "that bad"...we can all remain cynical about EVERYTHING, so as to preserve what we've settled for.
And that is how ignorance can continue to me mistaken for courage/confidence, and nihilism can continue to be a viable, constructive, social standard...for internal consumption.
The [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] mode of thinking ascends in popularity, in utility...and those who practice it can remain safe form their won stupidity.
Because of this "value ontology" can claim reverence, and " beauty is in the eye of the beholder" becomes a fascinating, comforting, idea, and "equality" is plausible as a hypothetical, and pleasure can be an end, rather than a byproduct, of feeding needs.
It's all tangles up in a web of lies.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Hrodeberto
Gender : Posts : 1318 Join date : 2014-07-14 Age : 37 Location : Spaces
In this little thing I wrote, a while back, I describe the only way monogamy is possible amongst the upper 1% (intellectually speaking) of men and, primarily women. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
A cognizant male will not reproduce with a Neanderthal, knowing that the offspring will be the mix, which will be a lowering of him, and of his ancestry. The average female has no such qualms, but only surrenders to her instincts, her intuitions, her pleasures, having no other idea(l) or ability to project further, still, than what is required by her sexual specialization.... I've estimated this field of cognition, this perceptual-event-horizon, for the mediocre mind, but for the female, on that level, it usually fluctuates around 5-7 years.
Why 5-7? Because that's the amount of time a human offspring requires to reach a level of self-sustenance. a human female usually falls into heat, at that point. It's also called "the 7 year itch" by pop-culture, adapting convention to the female's cycles.
At that point the female "itches" to sample different genetic material.
The female, will also be restricted by the female's nature which also feels an intuitive, instinctual, attraction to males above her. The MRA's called this hypergamy, referring to this female attraction to genes of equal or higher, to her own, quality. Dependent, of course, on self-awareness and self-evaluation...know thyself.
In feminizing, sheltering systems, where value is artificially produced, or considered something preceding birth, as a "birth-right", this self-evaluation is inflated...creating entitlement, and a false sense of self-worth, in both sexes. One more reason marriages do not last and nobody is getting married any longer.
This I a hyper-real effect, where value, self value in this case, is exaggerated by an protective, artificial environment.
But that's another matter altogether... Attraction to what is above, for a female, is a natural method of ensuring that what genetic material she samples will increase in potential, not decrease. This increase is one of survivability, and is instinctive..no need for awareness. A woman is naturally attracted to a male that is above her in quality. If this evaluation of self is based on artifices, or on artificial conditions, then her judgment will be skewed by this. Therefore modern females, affected by this sheltering that raises their sense of self-worth, will never be attracted to a male who is genetically on her level or even above her. She will overestimate self, and demand something idea(l), within the environment her judgment is enslaved.
The truly superior female, in intellect, will also be burdened by this. For the upper 1% female, who falls within the upper 10% male, to find someone on her level or above it, without being tricked by pretenses, and without succumbing to the social and economic criteria of modern standards, is a formidable task.
In the past the male, the father, was the judge...and his judgments were based on social hierarchies. He "gave" his daughter to someone on his family's social level and within his family's genetic and memetic level.
The common female's ideal of a man is above her expectations based on her idealized self-image which is above her real value. Finally, when dissatisfied from unacheiving this idealized, fictional man, she decides to "settle down." She still believes she can do better than she was able to attain.
_________________ Life has a twisted sense of humour, doesn't it. . . .
