When we hear about the nesting instinct of females from a purely psychological, sociological, and evolutionary sense what we are seeing is the affirmation of females prostitution with the reasoning that men must indeed pay for it.
Can we then rationalize the sexes as being that of hookers and Johns?
Can we then deduce that all relationships are prostitution exchanges where children are just an after effect of the monetary transaction?
No, that's far too impolitically correct. It's better for authority and population control to baffle everybody with bullshit of fictional romances.
Last edited by LaughingMan on Sat Jul 12, 2014 11:15 pm; edited 1 time in total
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37263 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
I believe in giving women a taste of their own medicine from time to time.
If you're anything like me get in the habit of taking a cup of whiskey or beer and throwing it into the faces of rude obnoxious women in bars.
Make sure to spill the alcohol all over their expensive dress apparel.
Make sure to spill the alcohol all throughout their hair.
It gives their hair a nice fresh whiskey or beer fragrance.
They'll really like that.
Practice your spitting so that when a bitch gets out of line in a public setting you merely spit up a loogie right in their pretty little face.
When approaching a woman who has every intention of fucking their way into wealth like the prostitutes that they are go up to them and ask how much they're charging for rent per year. They'll like that also.
Use phrases such as.
How much are you charging this evening?
Can I get with you on a loan?
Do you accept cash and credit? Can I write out a check to you?
Have you found any prospective buyers this evening?
How much do you charge for the use of your pussy per hour? What's your hourly going rate?
Does my yearly monetary income have to meet $50,000.00 or more per year in order to receive any sort of attention from you?
Uh-oh, looks like we have ourselves a mangina in the thread accusing us of being insensitive towards women.
These types of guys will crawl on their bellies for a piece of poonani.
The cocker spaniels of women.
Your mind is one of extremist temperaments, and delusional projections that are needed to quell your own unbalanced perception to differentiate one abstraction from another. Only simple minds think in black and white binary logic, unable to decipher any hues that allow for a more precise agglomeration of the ideal that is being perceived.
The fact that you jump to one extreme conclusion to the next, shows how simplistic you are, and that you focus only on the obvious implication of a cultural anomaly, shows that you have no ability to look past the obvious, like a little kid that can't wrap its mind around one factor to get to the next, more revealing premise, this is why children take everything so literally. Like you.
Using the same feminine tactics of redirecting sexual oppression to the opposite sex is feeding into the same MRA victimology that economizes its own grievances and uses them productively. Just like antisemitism, only exacerbates the Jewish issue and further solidifies the Jew's memetic foothold over mass psychology.
Jews and women are not to be hated you stupid pathetic douchbag. They are to be understood, as shifting sociobiological entities from the nihilistic modern socio-political cancer turning everything on its head, including sexual roles. The masculine role is not to give into the naive pressures of impetuous logic from his decadent culture, but to counteract them and expose them back to their respective etymological state.
Walking into a bar and pouring whiskey on a woman out of cathartic spite, doesn't reveal anything about why women are petulant or why they act like sluts. For you, you would rather reduce yourself to a flaming jackass than maintain a calculating reserve that attains more lucidity about why women act the way they act. You shit-for-brains.
This is your logic: "They did this to us, so let's do it back to them".
Stupid faggot, women are guided by their natures, they are not aware of why they act the way they do, this is why they are not to be hated. Studying the source of what altered and/or subverted their natures is the challenge.
Your fixation on simplistic photos, and your attention whoring faggotry of posting your own "selfies" online says something about your own feminine nature that has a more childish and directive ring to it.
Here's an example of your own desperation:
Douchbag wrote:
Uh-oh, looks like we have ourselves a mangina in the thread accusing us of being insensitive towards women.
That you desire to refer to some ambiguous "Us" to make your own skewed judgments and obtuse rationales more inclusive and relevant, shows how much of a sad little mental dipshit you are. It also reveals, very plainly, to someone like me, how subconsciously you lack any real confidence in what you say, becayuse you must appeal to collective support. You are a disingenuous moron.
Last edited by stargazer on Thu Jul 17, 2014 12:30 pm; edited 2 times in total
perpetualburn
Gender : Posts : 955 Join date : 2013-01-04 Location : MA
they are not aware of why they act the way they do
What's "aware" in this context though? What's "responsibility"(in terms of her personal self-limitations...if she even feels any) for a woman in terms managing her affects? Isn't she very "aware" of what she's allowed? Is it just a different type of awareness vs a man, or is it so different you can't even use the same word? I think her very "awareness" of always wanting to give over to the limitless creates a lot of tension/antagonism with the opposite gender... especially since as a man, you can almost feel it, you're aware of her awareness in this respect... Like a subconscious mutual recognition of different limits.
_________________ And here we always meet, at the station of our heart / Looking at each other as if we were in a dream /Seeing for the first time different eyes so supreme / That bright flames burst into vision, keeping us apart.
they are not aware of why they act the way they do
What's "aware" in this context though? What's "responsibility"(in terms of her personal self-limitations...if she even feels any) for a woman in terms managing her affects? Isn't she very "aware" of what she's allowed? Is it just a different type of awareness vs a man, or is it so different you can't even use the same word? I think her very "awareness" of always wanting to give over to the limitless creates a lot of tension/antagonism with the opposite gender... especially since as a man, you can almost feel it, you're aware of her awareness in this respect... Like a subconscious mutual recognition of different limits.
Awareness on an immediate/ephemeral plane of perception, rather than on a consciously ordered objective perception, is what distinguishes feminine awareness from masculine. Erich Neumann, theorized woman as the negative darkness of "moon-consciousness" in that she is the more suspended chaotic abyss that absorbs the man's ego only to fill a void rather than direct it outwards to an ideal.
Both male and female nature move toward self-absolution but in separate ways. The patriarchal nature as a natural exigency of life toward an order out of the feminine dark consciousness. The female notices all too well the ego in man because hers is but a totally absorbed and lost and perhaps even greater ego in the universal whole of chaos. Man abstracts his ego and clarifies so much so that it becomes something brighter and more fascinating and more real, hence the opposite Sun suffusing ideological energy.
perpetualburn
Gender : Posts : 955 Join date : 2013-01-04 Location : MA
Can/should woman be considered "naive" though in her instinctual approach to life? While a philosopher/artist might continuously reconstruct the dynamic between genders for his own clarification, doesn't a "masculine" culture assert certain imperatives regarding female behavior... What would a masculine culture look like in the future...Would it even need imperatives(could balance be achieved without them)... How could it be "organically" attained (i.e. not fundamental Islam or macho Latin America)? Just throwing out questions.
_________________ And here we always meet, at the station of our heart / Looking at each other as if we were in a dream /Seeing for the first time different eyes so supreme / That bright flames burst into vision, keeping us apart.
I wouldn't say that women are stupid, or that they should be treated like nasty animals, like the douchbag thinks. They simply function by another form of intelligence, that of intuition, which is in many ways--as i've seen from personal experience and learned through study--extremely effective to perceiving more details than even many men.
There is a reason why females were selected to be sexual filters. It doesn't just apply to male superior genetic material, but to the world around them. They are more precise when it comes to sex given their designated natures toward that purpose, but they also apply this psycho-biological filtration system to the rest of the world around them, just not as effectively as they do towards the sexual game.
A female's mind is nomadic, they are curious and they restlessly drift from one idea to another. This gives them a kind of "enduring potential" to achieve greater heights of ideals, but because they do not, so normally, is because this endurance never reaches mitigation, a regrouping of energies is never given density, because it never finds a resting point.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37263 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
In nature women act as genetic filters, keeping all the inferior genes out of the gene-pool.
Their sexual power of choice is controlled so as to permit civilization to grow, by turning a genetically homogeneous population into a communally inverted one - eradicating the free-radical male by integrating him within the group. This is not problematic, because in social groups the alpha-male exerts a similar control over the females and males under his dominance.
In the wild a female can sample beta-male genes to maximize her broods potentials. She does this secretly. In modern systems where the alpha-male is an institution, no such secrecy si necessary - female promiscuity is permitted free expression, because male sexuality is, still, strictly controlled. Female empowerment becomes a byproduct of this. Females lose respect for males because the artificial environment permits females sexuality to express itself, fully, but does not permit male sexuality to do so. The end-result is artificially induced parity. Male sexuality must become feminine in expression and tactics - ergo we have the modern male, the metrosexual.
Later females become memetic filters, by easily integrating them into whatever cultural norms are present. The ease to which females take to power, or surrender to authority, makes them the perfect tool for controlling and enforcing integration.
In modern systems the easiest way to enforce control, by using sexual access is to first ensure female sexual choice - through string law enforcement - and to then integrate the majority of females into the principles you wish them to select for. An easy affair since females do not resist power, but give into it, gaining power through association.
Once accomplished, using cultural and educational methods, you then have a self-enforcing memetic filtering system, where any undesirable social, ideological, memetic traits, are kept out of the gene-pool, reproducing the type of human you consider ideal.
It's an indirect form of eugenics, whee the illusion of freedom is maintained.
Same method is used in corporations with their system of promotions, or in the democratic process and its system of vetting. Each step towards the symbolic representation of power is managed by the very members who share in the ambition. By the time an individual reaches a position of power, such as a news anchor, a president or CEO, he's been tested, and selected, from pool of potential candidates, by them - peer selection. The individual is reliable, loyal, and can now be permitted the freedom of choice...because his choices have always been evaluated as within the corporations, the institution, interests. At this point minimal oversight is required, just in case the individual has an epiphany, or has managed to remain hidden. The individual permitted to a position of power is free to choose, since his choices are already determined and predictable.
The rest are filtered out, along the way, with no explanation needed. This is basically how in democracies the illusion of freedom is maintained. one of the methods. The others having been explored elsewhere.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37263 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
The process is self-destructive, as all human interventions upon natural processes inevitably become. Man intervenes, for his own reasons, upon nature, and in then produces pollutants, or collateral effects which, in turn, must be intervened upon. The energies increase in exponentially until all energies are directed towards dealing with these collateral effects - self-maintenance. Here is where aging, or slow decay begins, as the the energies required cannot be accessed or harvested quickly enough. An organism is now getting old...like a culture becomes decadent and begins to decay.
We can say that European man's success, and his inability to remain hard, tuning soft because of his success, is to blame for this cycle of growth and decay. The biggest enemy of European man is European man, in the present.
We see examples of "Caucasian males" on KT and on ILP, and on every internet forum, of this European decline, due to European success, and the decadence it produced. Genetic pollutants spoiling everything they come into contact with.
Uh-oh, looks like we have ourselves a mangina in the thread accusing us of being insensitive towards women.
These types of guys will crawl on their bellies for a piece of poonani.
The cocker spaniels of women.
Quote :
Your mind is one of extremist temperaments,
Leave it to the fearful to call another an extremist.
Quote :
and delusional projections that are needed to quell your own unbalanced perception to differentiate one abstraction from another.
Delusional projections? Be more specific in your defamations please.
Quote :
Only simple minds think in black and white binary logic, unable to decipher any hues that allow for a more precise agglomeration of the ideal that is being perceived.
Ah yes, one of those I see everything in grey type personas.
How many excuses of various kinds can I expect out of you?
Quote :
The fact that you jump to one extreme conclusion to the next, shows how simplistic you are, and that you focus only on the obvious implication of a cultural anomaly, shows that you have no ability to look past the obvious, like a little kid that can't wrap its mind around one factor to get to the next, more revealing premise, this is why children take everything so literally. Like you.
More defamations without any substance. Seems to be a reoccurring theme from you.
At least explain your insults or accusations.
Quote :
Using the same feminine tactics of redirecting sexual oppression to the opposite sex is feeding into the same MRA victimology that economizes its own grievances and uses them productively.
A victim just sits there and takes everything that is thrown at them without the slightest fight back or rebellion. That's a victim mentality.
Retribution also known as revenge has nothing to do with a victim mentality.
Big difference asshole.
Retribution is a way of being assertive in the world fuck nut.
Quote :
Just like antisemitism, only exacerbates the Jewish issue and further solidifies the Jew's memetic foothold over mass psychology.
It always amuses me the collective mentality at this website where if anybody says anything that the dominant group doesn't like defamatory descriptions of Jewishness, Christianity, or feminism are articulated.
At some point it just becomes a bunch of useless redundant gobbledygook utilized by its users.
Quote :
Jews and women are not to be hated you stupid pathetic douchbag. They are to be understood,
Fuck your understanding and tolerance asshat.
Quote :
as shifting sociobiological entities from the nihilistic modern socio-political cancer turning everything on its head, including sexual roles. The masculine role is not to give into the naive pressures of impetuous logic from his decadent culture, but to counteract them and expose them back to their respective etymological state.
Noble elitism? Fucking delusional.
You think there will ever be equilibrium between the sexes? Idiot.
Quote :
Walking into a bar and pouring whiskey on a woman out of cathartic spite, doesn't reveal anything about why women are petulant or why they act like sluts. For you, you would rather reduce yourself to a flaming jackass than maintain a calculating reserve that attains more lucidity about why women act the way they act. You shit-for-brains.
You're accusing others of being Jewish or something of the other yet here you expose yourself for your own usage of Christian morals and sense of chivalry.
Fucking poser. Mull that over in your head asshat.
Quote :
This is your logic: "They did this to us, so let's do it back to them".
Yes, it's called being aggressive and enacting one's revenge or retribution on the rest of the world. The more men treat modern women like the shit that they deserve to be treated as more than likely we will begin seeing some kind of sexual paradigm shift. Not until then however.
Not until we get rid of all the pussy whipped bitches like yourself also.
Grow a fucking pair of balls. Oh wait, I forgot, you have none. Nutless bastard.
Quote :
Stupid faggot, women are guided by their natures, they are not aware of why they act the way they do, this is why they are not to be hated. Studying the source of what altered and/or subverted their natures is the challenge.
Fuck you asshat. Now women are incapable of having any responsibility and accountability for their own actions or behaviors?
It's because of fucked up men such as yourself that either puts women everywhere on a untouchable pedestal or shields them from all forms of harsh criticism that has degraded the entire world to its current sad pathetic fate.
Quote :
Your fixation on simplistic photos, and your attention whoring faggotry of posting your own "selfies" online says something about your own feminine nature that has a more childish and directive ring to it.
Here's an example of your own desperation:
Douchbag wrote: Uh-oh, looks like we have ourselves a mangina in the thread accusing us of being insensitive towards women.
That you desire to refer to some ambiguous "Us" to make your own skewed judgments and obtuse rationales more inclusive and relevant, shows how much of a sad little mental dipshit you are. It also reveals, very plainly, to someone like me, how subconsciously you lack any real confidence in what you say, becayuse you must appeal to collective support. You are a disingenuous moron.
I'm a feminine? Ha! You strike me as a domesticated queer that stares at the stars.
Go play in traffic some place....
Yes, I use the word "us" because on a forum you're addressing an audience of people.
If there was nobody to share or watch the posts that you create posting on a forum would be pointless.
I like putting on a good show where I have a flare for the theatrics.
they are not aware of why they act the way they do
What's "aware" in this context though? What's "responsibility"(in terms of her personal self-limitations...if she even feels any) for a woman in terms managing her affects? Isn't she very "aware" of what she's allowed? Is it just a different type of awareness vs a man, or is it so different you can't even use the same word? I think her very "awareness" of always wanting to give over to the limitless creates a lot of tension/antagonism with the opposite gender... especially since as a man, you can almost feel it, you're aware of her awareness in this respect... Like a subconscious mutual recognition of different limits.
Awareness on an immediate/ephemeral plane of perception, rather than on a consciously ordered objective perception, is what distinguishes feminine awareness from masculine. Erich Neumann, theorized woman as the negative darkness of "moon-consciousness" in that she is the more suspended chaotic abyss that absorbs the man's ego only to fill a void rather than direct it outwards to an ideal.
Both male and female nature move toward self-absolution but in separate ways. The patriarchal nature as a natural exigency of life toward an order out of the feminine dark consciousness. The female notices all too well the ego in man because hers is but a totally absorbed and lost and perhaps even greater ego in the universal whole of chaos. Man abstracts his ego and clarifies so much so that it becomes something brighter and more fascinating and more real, hence the opposite Sun suffusing ideological energy.
Females are entirely aware of their own actions and behaviors around men.
They're not naive or ignorant of the sexes. They know what is going on and they know exactly what it is they have been doing.
Fuck every protectionist piece of shit like yourself that tries to make excuses on their behalf.
Might as well call yourself a feminist mangina now.
Next this mangina will be reciting the feminist literature of Emma Goldman within the thread.
Quote :
I wouldn't say that women are stupid, or that they should be treated like nasty animals, like the douchbag thinks.
Typical Christian ideology. Thinks of human beings as a non-animal.
As a sort of special unique creation separate from the rest of nature.
Yes, we wouldn't want to be insensitive towards the poor bitches, would we?
]Only simple minds think in black and white binary logic, unable to decipher any hues that allow for a more precise agglomeration of the ideal that is being perceived.
Ah yes, one of those I see everything in grey type personas.
How many excuses of various kinds can I expect from you?
Not grey, douchbag. There are those who can see the appearance and those that can look beyond it. Being stuck in one conclusion is being unable to overcome what you have learned.
Douchbag wrote:
Quote :
The fact that you jump to one extreme conclusion to the next, shows how simplistic you are, and that you focus only on the obvious implication of a cultural anomaly, shows that you have no ability to look past the obvious, like a little kid that can't wrap its mind around one factor to get to the next, more revealing premise, this is why children take everything so literally. Like you.
More defamations without any substance.Seems to be a reoccurring theme from you.
At least explain your insults or accusations.
Douchbag, you are stuck in your teenage angst. You think sex is a mundane competitive game of "winner-loser". Where the modern cultural inversion of sexual dominance to you means only insolent behavior on the females part, instead of looking past that emotional jargon and realizing that female nature, and how modern memes influence it produces these behavioral aberrations your little mind witnesses.
Douchbag, You apply the same delusional anarchic world destruction mentality to women. You want to simply destroy them, hoping that a new, more "submissive" woman will arise from your dystopian ethics.
Douchbag wrote:
stargazer wrote:
Using the same feminine tactics of redirecting sexual oppression to the opposite sex is feeding into the same MRA victimology that economizes its own grievances and uses them productively.
A victim just sits there and takes everything that is thrown at them without the slightest fight back or rebellion. That's a victim mentality.
Retribution also known as revenge has nothing to do with a victim mentality.
Big difference asshole.
Retribution is a way of being assertive in the world fuck nut.
You are fucking naive.
Douchbag, vengeance is a symptom of resentment, it is a derivative of victimhood. To become vindictive is to utilize a subjugated thymos(spirit) by directing it against that which it feels it must avenge itself upon. The fact that you attempt to avenge your sorry sad pathetic sexually suppressed ego against women through aggressive and even violent means, no less, reveals that you feel women have victimized you. You are stuck in measuring yourself by the female's standard, you stupid fuck, not by any standard of "warrior" valor.
Douchbag, Revenge stems from first suffering a degradation, or in your case, a loss of pride. You are attempting to gain restitution for what you feel you have lost, what you have been victimized by.
Douchbag, vengeance is about getting even; about releasing libidinal energies upon the object of scorn. You wish to settle a score against women for treating you so cruelly. Feminine mockery is so powerful among feminized men these days.
You are one stupid douchbag.
Douchbag wrote:
Quote :
Just like antisemitism, only exacerbates the Jewish issue and further solidifies the Jew's memetic foothold over mass psychology.
It always amuses me the collective mentality at this website where if anybody says anything that the dominant group doesn't like that defamatory descriptions of Jewishness, Christianity, or feminism are articulated.
At some point it just becomes a bunch of useless redundant gobbledygook utilized by its users.
Douchbag, they are called standards. Standards to contrast behavior. A douchbag, like you, can only see this as arrogance or misplaced superiority, because you think like a woman, you emote your rationalizations and come to dismissive conclusions based on feeling.
Douchbag wrote:
stargazer wrote:
Jews and women are not to be hated you stupid pathetic douchbag. They are to be understood,
Fuck your understanding and tolerance asshat.
Douchbag, how spiteful. Hell hath no fury, like a woman's scorn.
Douchbag wrote:
stargazer wrote:
as shifting sociobiological entities from the nihilistic modern socio-political cancer turning everything on its head, including sexual roles. The masculine role is not to give into the naive pressures of impetuous logic from his decadent culture, but to counteract them and expose them back to their respective etymological state.
Noble elitism? Fucking delusional.
You think there will ever be equilibrium between the sexes? Idiot.
Stupid Douchbag, this is why i say you cannot look past the obvious. Who said anything about total harmony between man and woman? and where am i implying noble elitism?
You are so oblivious. I have to think it is a defective inherited gene at this point.
Douchbag, I'm talking about the intellectual responsibility of Man to resist becoming a product of his environment and instead to understand it. You want only to destroy it with your teenage Tyler Durden logic, or you want to simply submit to it by acting on the impulses it stimulates.
Douchbag wrote:
stargazer wrote:
Walking into a bar and pouring whiskey on a woman out of cathartic spite, doesn't reveal anything about why women are petulant or why they act like sluts. For you, you would rather reduce yourself to a flaming jackass than maintain a calculating reserve that attains more lucidity about why women act the way they act. You shit-for-brains.
You're accusing others of being Jewish or something of the other yet here you expose yourself for your own usage of Christian morals and sense of chivalry.
Fucking poser. Mull that over in your head asshat.
Douchbag, Another oblivious dismissing emotional response. You have no reading comprehension, sometimes i don't even think you read anything at all. You simply project those same simplistic notions, over and over.
Douchbag wrote:
stargazer wrote:
This is your logic: "They did this to us, so let's do it back to them".
Yes, it's called being aggressive and enacting one's revenge or retribution on the rest of the world. The more men treat modern women like the shit that they deserve to be treated as more than likely we will begin seeing some kind of sexual paradigm shift. Not until then however.
Not until we get rid of all the pussy whipped bitches like yourself.
Grow a fucking pair of balls. Oh wait, I forgot, you have none. Nutless bastard.
Little emotional Douchbag, you simply cannot fathom how a man who respects and idealizes his own ego, can go without harboring a hatred for women in this age. I don't give into conditioned emotions constructed by modern memetics. I am more stoic than that, more brooding, this gives me the ability to see past my own feelings and into reason.
Douchbag wrote:
stargazer wrote:
Stupid faggot, women are guided by their natures, they are not aware of why they act the way they do, this is why they are not to be hated. Studying the source of what altered and/or subverted their natures is the challenge.
Fuck you asshat. Now women are incapable of having any responsibility for their own actions or behaviors?
It's because of fucked up men such as yourself that put women everywhere on a pedestal that has degraded the entire world to its current sad pathetic state.
Douchbag, once again injecting your vituperative vitriol where your reason fails you. You are all emotion, blind faith and feminine vindictiveness.
Last edited by stargazer on Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:04 pm; edited 1 time in total
I pay attention and detect as many details as I can. I give my attention even to someone as degenerate as you. Although, admittedly, I stopped reading your bullshit seriously, after post 400-and-something. I can only tolerate reading the same redundant vapid drivel for so long before I realize its just not worth paying attention to anymore or taking seriously. I’m surprised I even tolerated it up to that many posts, but I’m a patient man.
That quote I provided comes from a mind exceedingly wiser than yours, and who was able to deduce patterns about human sexuality that you wouldn’t even begin to grasp in your sad indoctrinated little brain. The quote is seemingly and initially striking in its simplicity, but if one has the ability to THINK about it, which you don’t, one would understand that it touches upon many varying aspects of Man’s biological and psychical fluctuations in relation to his own sexual prowess and its own lacking; its own need.
You are an infant. Your intelligence extends as far as the hormonally inebriated, and adolescent aggressive logic, compensating for a lack of mental dexterity. It’s about intellectual balance, flexibility and you have none of it.
You spout the same “Fuck them skanks boys! Bros before hoes!”, modern, nigger/whigger bullshit.
Douchbag, what does your Nordic ancestry amount to if you think like a nigger or a common modern? THAT is the real and timeless decisive difference between races.
Ever hear of the radio talk show host Tom Leykis? You’d love him, hell, he should be your father figure, in fact, he is actually even addressed as “Father” by his male fans. He is a master of appealing to the feminized, disgruntled male, by harnessing their sexual frustrations in his narcissistic rhetoric, and then advising using it for hedonistic ends, such as the “hit-it-and-quit-it” man whoring lifestyle. But at least he always remembers to advocate usage of contraceptives, which gives him that ‘respectable’ touch.
He has no genuine desire to understand the male or female nature anymore than you do, he only wishes to add gasoline to the already out of control fire of perversion of human sexuality and culture. I even remember at one point, he went as far as to advise men to turn the tables and take advantage of women by taking THEIR money and resources, essentially to take on the same modern slavish female role, to become exactly that which men hate (what a fucking degenerate!).
But, he’s a cool clueless head-banging teenager at heart, like you, only older and with more monetary success and popularity. He likes to live the “High Life” and probably play warfare videogames.
Either way, as I can see, you are only useful insofar as a specimen of modernity, and maybe as a psychological case study, but then again, not so much, because in the end you are just a simple needy attention whore who then uses redirection as a way to cover it up or divert it away from people’s interest.
Now, make yourself useful and go post some more “selfies”. Be in your element. But please, make sure you keep it covered up, there is only so much douchbag I care to look at. And next time, if you complain again like the little needy faggot that you are as to why no one is looking at you, remember that it has nothing to do with you, but with everyone else.
Who knows, maybe in the next 600 posts, you will reach an epiphany about what your beloved post-apocalyptic world will look like. How many females will you dominate and turn into sex slaves? How many men will you overpower and kill, regardless of their size and strength? You are the king, remember that.
This is just some quality douchbag shit if I’ve ever seen it:
douchbag wrote:
If you're anything like me get in the habit of taking a cup of whiskey or beer and throwing it into the faces of rude obnoxious women in bars.
Make sure to spill the alcohol all over their expensive dress apparel.
Make sure to spill the alcohol all throughout their hair.
It gives their hair a nice fresh whiskey or beer fragrance.
They'll really like that.
Practice your spitting so that when a bitch gets out of line in a public setting you merely spit up a loogie right in their pretty little face.
When approaching a woman who has every intention of fucking their way into wealth like the prostitutes that they are go up to them and ask how much they're charging for rent per year. They'll like that also.
Use phrases such as.
How much are you charging this evening?
Can I get with you on a loan?
Do you accept cash and credit? Can I write out a check to you?
Have you found any prospective buyers this evening?
How much do you charge for the use of your pussy per hour? What's your hourly going rate?
Does my yearly monetary income have to meet $50,000.00 or more per year in order to receive any sort of attention from you?
Douchbag wrote:
The male tolerance of female whoredom across the planet has come to an end and reached a dramatic climax for men in nations everywhere.
Men everywhere need to start treating women for the materialistic whores that they truly are.
I say be rude, obnoxious, mean, and disrespectful to them in every public setting.
Give them no quarter or respect.
Make them feel constantly uncomfortable and even more force them to look at their own inner ugliness.
Let women everywhere know that men are not tolerating their assine bullshit anymore.
Let them know that their sexually manipulative ways no longer work where more and more men are becoming entirely immune to their petty bullshit
Make them feel equally disposable and expendable.
So full of sexual frustrations, and insecure projections and pathetic debasing countermeasures of sexual validation. This is a mind that has no awareness of what it is saying and no ability to think about what it is saying, which is why it reveals itself so easily; it gives into the first impulsive thought that enters its head. Any man who thinks taking douchbag advice like this to assert his authority over female sexuality, is not only reinforcing the biases of feminism, but he has hit rock bottom of his own nature. Any man who thinks its noble, to make a retard out of himself in the form of a public spectacle, or that accosting a woman with blatant sexual solicitation has truly actualized the highest ideal of modern mythological heroism.
The Greeks had Apollo and Athena, the Romans had Jupiter and Venus.
Americans have the Douchbag.
Last edited by stargazer on Thu Jul 17, 2014 7:58 pm; edited 2 times in total
Asshat Mangina:There is a reason why females were selected to be sexual filters. It doesn't just apply to male superior genetic material, but to the world around them. They are more precise when it comes to sex given their designated natures toward that purpose, but they also apply this psycho-biological filtration system to the rest of the world around them, just not as effectively as they do towards the sexual game.
A female's mind is nomadic, they are curious and they restlessly drift from one idea to another. This gives them a kind of "enduring potential" to achieve greater heights of ideals, but because they do not, so normally, is because this endurance never reaches mitigation, a regrouping of energies is never given density, because it never finds a resting point.
