Nihilism

Brotha just keepin' it real, yo.
Dis shit be deep, y'all.

GOOGLE GULLAG.
Internet Marxism.

The French-Canadian is waking up to the fact that the right/left political dichotomy is really a façade hiding the fact that both are part of the same nihilistic paradigm, representing two poles in a bipolar psyche.
Two sides of the same nihilistic coin.
Capitalism & Communism were only 'enemies' because they disagreed on method, strategies, hierarchies, labels, but not on the basic principles they both shared, and the goals and standards they used to judge.
Both equates 'progress' with supply/demand, and both worshipped 'progress', disagreeing only on tactics.

The post-war era was really a conflict over how to share the spoils.
The 'true' enemy, their shared enemy, was 'defeated', because it was a hysterical version of the original.
The dying breath of an old and decaying meme.
Nihilism won. Realism was buried, and its embers left there, awaiting to be rekindled.
Two variants of positive Nihilism competed over which one would take advantage of the dazed and confused masses.

A characteristic of nihilism is ingratitude.
It recognizes nothing earthly, so there's nothing to be grateful towards. It 'receives' its 'insights' not from a relationship with what is present, and real, but from an otherworldly, mystical source, so it is obliged to show gratitude towards this mysterious power, and to nothing and nobody else. It submits to a noetic concept, and to nothing pragmatic.
This is how it inverts shame to 'pride', and is prone towards the messianic complex and narcissism, as a compensating reaction to its own ploy. Such a mind is self-deceiving, but it intuitively feels its own hypocrisy and copes by over-inflating its ego to extraordinary proportions. Like a weakling who convinces himself he is 'powerful' but instinctively knows he is a fake, overcompensates with posturing, and declarations of power.
A cowards hides his nature with tales of courage and selective displays of bravado against those he knows will not challenge his pretences.

Nihilism is the reaction to an emergent self-consciousness.
Messiah is the figure representing the corporeality of the Idea(l), which is named 'God' in Abrahamic canon.
The secularization of 'God' is the 'one' the singularity, the idea(l).
The Messiah is converted from the synthesis of mind/body, to the synthesis of a contradiction in Hellenism, as cultural (meme) product of nature/realism, and Judaism, as the cultural antithesis to nature/realism that can only take the form of a theory, a concept, an abstraction, an ideology.
Judaism can only emerge as an antithesis to Hellenism, and this is why it has no equivalent in the east.
Secularizing the concept of a saviour, a Messiah, had to take the form of an absolute abstraction, based on numbers. The secularization of Jesus was money.

It's hard to deny the seductive power of money. It promises heaven on earth, a 'correction' of past, naturally selected genetic limitations.

The psychological 'power' of the idea of 'nil' is comparable to that of the 'one', if it does not exceed it.
If we accept the Abrahamic symbols and narratives, one = God, and nil = Satan.
Good/Evil correspond to One/Nil, Oder/Chaos....all ideas accepted as 'absolutes', vague/abstract, enough to remain malleable.
Satan is a more powerful figure in the psychology of the believer, the one trapped, or institutionalized/incarcerated, in the nihilistic binary, bipolar paradigm of absolutes.
Prison bars are a series of 'hard, immutable' steel', followed by gaps of space.
Those who understand human nature can appreciate the seductive power of being incarcerated in an institutional 'reality', limiting options but compensating for their loss with regimented, paternal, certainties.
In prison you can bitch and complain, dreaming of how well you'd fare, and happy you could be 'on the outside', but you are offered a comforting guaranteed meal, and schedule to give order you your confused mind.
You feel part of a whole, never alone.
The institution's 'care' replaces the absent parent, call him god.

Satan is self-deceit projected as an alien 'spirit' of evilness - projecting your own fears, insecurities, failings, upon some vague otherness, you can stand against and separate from, constantly 'denying' him power, in an act of self-abasement.
Secularized Moderns have upgraded their myths, along with their more 'positive' fellow psychotics.
The latter have upgraded the infantile concept 'God', with the abstraction 'one'. A very powerful idea.
The former, have not slacked, they've adopted the even more creative abstraction of 'nil'.
With it they claim to underlie the concept of 'one', as its necessary underpinning.

I've described it elsewhere, but here it is again:
With the 'nil' the 'one' is freed to be anything and everything.

The absence of absolutes, is what the 'nil' represents, and with it one can support any hypothesis, no matter how absurd - its creatively 'positive' power.
But its power to negate all threats is not to be underestimated.
The 'nil' also provides an excuse to dismiss all and every hypothesis - all within the framework of binary absolutes....one/nil, order/chaos.
Satan, we can say, is necessary to validate the concept of 'God', as the Arahamics define both.  
With no rational absolute omniscience, omnipotence, the criterion of 'judgement' can shift to desire and need, and it can also be used to justify all denial and rejections, of theories that do not offer absolute rational omniscience, omnipotence.
It's the method of a child, wanting to remain a child, always under the care of others, 'free' to explore, safe to 'experiment' and fantasize, nothing limiting its imagination other than the parent's 'rules' and 'regulations'.
It may complain but it will never leave, unless it is so naive that it has forgotten how unforgiving the world can be. The world fluctuating uncertainty cannot be endured without the absolute belief in the certainty of a 'one', or a 'nil'.

Plato correctly warned against popularized art.
He knew what the written word, also art, could do to the mind of men.
He knew how art can become fArt, and how it could be exploited by desperate degenerates through the ages.

We see what happens when vagueness is accentuated, either in Nostradamus, the Delphic oracles, or astrology, or even Nietzsche's aphorisms, using allegories to deny but also allowing every sickness to find in its metaphors its own 'meanings'.
We see it, also, in the biblical narratives, and in occult texts the world-over.

The desire to be misunderstood, by the many, shapes the degree of allegory you apply, masking the motive.
the same method can be used to manipulate and integrate the majority, also hiding motive, and ignorance, beneath occult innuendoes and allegories meant to trigger specific emotions...like modern painting of fArt can be used to hide a lack of talent, and insight, I confused garbage sold to needy imbeciles the world-over, with too much time on their hands, and too much money in their pockets.

The typical nihilist, whether he is aware of it or not, believes only in absolutes.
If it isn't absolute it isn't true, it doesn't exist.
His understanding of 'existence' is trapped within binary language, and he likes the feeling of being certain, in his black/white universe.
But, since all absolutes are human constructs he is forced to either accept another mind's absolute authority, if not God then some kind of communal mind (hive mind) practising group think and naming it with all kinds of self-flattering pronouns, or to be absolutely certain about his own opinions.

Whichever type you choose, in whatever stage you become stuck, narcissism underlies it.
Even the submission to an external will hides pretentious arrogance.
What happens over time is the individual is exposed to reality, which is relentless, and no amount of group sheltering can fully hold it back; God, the communal brain, and even his own mind fails him.
But he doesn't question his own thinking, the underlying principles in his own mind, but goes the other way, adopting the opposite extreme.
If not absolute certainty, then absolute uncertainty; if not 'one,' then 'nil'.
If not freedom, then slavery; if not absolute independence, then absolute dependence.
If not eternal life, then infinite death.
If not omniscience, then complete feebleness.
If not omniscience, then total ignorance.

From narcissist to cynic; from 'positive' to pure Nihilist.
All, so as to avoid gradations, hierarchies, degrees, and one's own culpability in one's own circumstances.

God, the concept, did not die, nor was it 'killed'; it was reborn, remade, reinvented as a 'one', renamed into 'whole', reinvented as unconscious order, only missing judgement but still omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, totalitarian....someone/something to compensate for an absent, and/or flawed 'parent', someone to give suffering meaning, and make the escape from suffering a singular purpose.
The crime was not one of 'murder' but a simple case of 'kidnapping'; a disappearance to create distance, and re-turn with a face-lift and new credentials.

The faith based belief that 'complexity hides order' is a modification of the idea that all is 'God', and god is in all; the singular explanation/representation for everything; a singularity manifesting as multiplicity - the whole contradicted by its parts and justified as mystical, as contradiction validating a 'positive' synthesis, the 'negative' subsumed in the 'positive'.
What trickery do Christians use to explain the contradiction in their own 'thinking'; how do they explain how 'evil' can come from absolute goodness?
They return to 'free-will', offered as a sacrifice to the one-god - a ploy, giving by taking away, and taking away with an offering.

Nihilism's multifariousness is the product of its disconnection from natural hierarchies and reality, and its complete theoretical ideological essence.
It can reinvent itself indefinitely, by renaming itself - baptising itself....updating its language.
The core remains intact, but the name changes.
Each Age necessitates a repackaging.
One age anthropomorphising the absolute, and another goes the other way converting the same absolute into an abstraction, calling it 'order' or 'one'...or simply 'absolute'.
Every reinvention an updated word-game, adapting to the median level of edumucation, access to information, and psychology.
The same psychosis renamed, repackaged and resold to the same desperate types.....feeding the same need, defensively covering the same wound.
Deep insecurity, a product of genetics or of a trauma, it awakens to its own nature and how it measures-up to 'others'.
The 'forbidden fruit', Christians called it. A taste of self, and how it relates to otherness.

Fragile egos hiding behind narcissistic over compensations, and defensive cynicism.
Inflate 'self' to supernatural proportions, or deflate the world, to manageable proportions, one can then laugh at and dismiss.
Every age reinvents the same concept, using words.
Absent fathers, missing mothers, inadequate parents...children unable to go through the ancient rites of passage, stuck in adolescence, hating the authority they then return to, time after time.
They think they've outgrown Abrahamism because they've changed the labelling.
They call themselves 'atheist,' when they have never dared abandon the core of the one-god, only overcoming their infantile addiction to the paternal figure.
They reaffirm their slavery, and call it nobility, because they refuse to leave the master's prison - only 'free' to remain enslaved.
Anything is better than the indifferent uncertainty of what lies outside the compound...but can these prison walls protect them from the world, or do they only provide a regimented order that comforts the eye in every direction they turn?
Why would you need physical bars when you've imprisoned the mind in concepts much more unbending and powerful?



They call it institutionalization.
Edumucation is part of the process.
Trapped in symbols/words for so long you can no-longer think of anything 'outside' of their comforting certainty.



Incarceration feels like a motherly womb, a noetic embrace, and like a caring, providing, yet strict, father, all in one.
From Abrahamism to Marxism.
Is it a coincidence the instigators of the Russian Revolution were mostly Jews?
They did not want to destroy Christianity with their atheism, they wanted to replace it, with their updated version...a more abstract 'one-god'.
Is this not occurring again, with the reinvention of Marxism as post-modernism?
Who are the psychologies they seduce and attract first?
The same types that ran to Christianity, during the Roman Era, and ran to Communism, during the Industrial Era, and are running to post-modernism, in this Information Era.
The same insecurities, manipulated by the same concept, no matter what word or symbol you attach to it.

In every Dark Age Messiahs appear, to exploit the same types.

If you reinvent the abrahamic one-god, by renaming it 'one' or 'absolute order', then you'll have to adjust the words you use to replace 'submission', 'worship', 'slavishness', to something more flattering, like 'affirming', 'accepting', 'admiring', 'acknowledging'.

How did Abraham prove his surrender to his one-god?
He accepted the order to slaughter his one begotten son.  
How did Job express his submission to his god's testing of his faith, his affirmation of god's will?

The idea of a one-god could only have evolved in a social organism experiencing the gradual emergence of self-consciousness - perception of 'self' in the third-person.
Whether it places 'self' or 'ego' 'outside' himself, determines if the projection is feminine or masculine.

The perception of 'self' perceiving is what developed into monotheism, coupled with the insecurity self-awareness produces.
We can now explain how Abrahamism could evolve into Marxism.

When the one-god, of the Abrahamics, was discredited, it was reinvented by the mind. Essentially the mind is both creator and destroyer, placing itself in the position of affirming or denying - one/nil, 1/0, positive/negative.
I've defined this as 'positive' or 'pure' Nihilism - the bipolar absolutes in the Nihilistic paradigm.
This is also how Cosmos is converted to Universe.

From one absolute pole to the other, the mind considers itself creator of worlds, or destroyer of them.
The Abrahamic god was a projection of the creator mind outside 'self'. When this projection was overcome it was replaced by the mind placing itself in the same role - it declared itself 'god-creator'/destroyer.
This is the modern obsession with subjectivity - each individual a 'god-creator' of his own private reality.
In the cynic this same mind becomes the 'destroyer of worlds', denying existence to anything it does not understand or approve of.

I can only speculate that this dualism is the product of a bipolar mind, a brain split into two hemispheres, each with its own specialized functions.

But the Abrahamic externalization of mind has not died. It still lives in the minds of new followers who have renamed it.
Many still believe in an externalized conciousness, and will, independent from mind/body.
They rename monotheistic tropes into modern ones - updating them.  
One-God is simplified and abstracted to 'one'.  
Universal conciousness is converted to universal will.

The method is a bit complicated because ti's convoluted.
How do we get from Cosmos, as the Greeks thought of existence, to the Latin based Universe?
The mind projects itself in a fantasy realm 'outside' reality. It creates an alternate 'reality', a pseudo-reality, and places itself in it. From this noetic there, it looks back upon world as a 'whole' a 'oneness'.
So, from a noumenon, it perceives phenomenon as separate, setting-up the juxtaposition required to make a value-judgments.
This method is useful, but if mistaken for more than a method it can lead to delusions, and conundrums, when the ideal is contradicted by the real, as it is in this case: a uni-verse, whole, is contradicted by the multiplicity of existence.
Intellectual dissonance founded on an error in judgement that has confused the noumenon for phenomenon, or has taken the noetic representation literally and not as what it is, a figurative construct (interpretation), a representation.

The mind becomes a representation of 'one' or of 'nil' depending on which part of the bipolar dualism it identifies with.
When identifying with the masculine 'one', compensating for a feminine spirit, it becomes creator of an alternate reality, usurping experienced reality = positive Nihilist.
Its own creations the 'positive' making the experienced world the 'negative' This was the original way Nihilism inverted definitions casting anyone who denies its projections of being a 'nihilist' when it was the nihilist.

When identifying with the 'nil', compensating for a masculine spirit denied expression, it becomes destroyer of reality - cynical destroyer, ashamed of its feminine subordination to the negative. It projects this shame as destructive energy, denying all order, dismissing every theory if it is not absolute.  

Human psychology can oscillate from one pole to the other, depending on circumstances and the age of the individual - every age adjusting internal hierarchies.

Think about what it implies about human consciousness, as it evolves through the ages.
Jaynes tells us about the Bicameral Mind and how a developing conciousness of 'self' was interpreted by proto-humans, as an external will; strange spirits in dialogue with an imitate 'self': conscience was mistaken for a dialogue with spirits.


Pagans converted this to gods.
As self-consciousness emerges and grows, the individual is exposed to 'self' in the third-persona, 'self' as an-otherness, making it possible to juxtapose 'self' with other - insecurity, vulnerability emerges....shame, the feeling of inadequacy etc.
Neurosis.
How does man cope?
He fortifies himself behind his own ego, his own subjectivity, projecting his mental abstractions as 'more real' than the experienced real.
This is Nihilism.
Abstractions (noumena) represented by symbols/words, 'theoretically transcending' phenomena, the apparent - semiotics usurping aesthetics.  

Now Abrahamism can be placed in context. It is not the first spiritual Nihilism invented, it is the most successful.
God, the concept, is externalized as an alien Will. It is 'absolute' because the mind can only conceptualize in absolutes - binary logic, 1/0.
In primitive allegories this becomes God/Satan, good/evil.  
Man continues evolving, requiring upgrades in his defensive ideologies.
God/Satan dualities no longer satisfy a modern mind, with access to superfluous nutrition, and knowledge: born and raised in excess for so long that it now takes it for granted.
Increasing literacy and access to information necessitated an upgrade in the nihilistic paradigm.

God has not died, but brought 'down to earth': he has been born a Messiah.
The universal Mind, placed in the skull - subjectivity.
Conciousness is now a vague energy permeating the universe, and the mind is its conduit - its instrument. The Abrahamic relationship of master/slave remains intact.
God is renamed 'Will,' not William....ha!!; renamed 'Order'. The absolute is cleansed of its earthly connections and it becomes pure, divine, noumenon - idea (abstraction).
Baptised in the pools of of Siloam.
Abraham's god has not been murdered, he has changed clothes and name, entering a witness protection program.
Can I hear a Hallelujah!!
His handler's designation, for the renegade informant, is 'One'...agent one...or 'Nil'...agent zero.
It all depends on the seeker's needs.  
One creates reality, despite appearances, and nil destroys it. They work as a team.
Nil clears the existent, and one fabricates an alternate existence.
Mind is not 'outside', but man is god, out of his mind.
When he feels exposed, and is threatened with being found-out, he hides in the nil; when he feels confident, cocky, and wants to flex, he comes out of hiding wearing the mask of a 'one'.
I have called this the see-saw method. A evasive tactic running from exposure.....because its all bullshyte.

This was the allegory of Jesus coming 'down to earth,' for a short while.  
In the Islamic/Christian canons, god is made flesh implies that the Will 'outside' the skull is now within it.
Man's mind is God - creator and destroyer of worlds.
Mother Judaism, still remains fixed in her obscurantism....because this would entail a loss of identity. Her absolute god can never be represented, or brought down to the earth, so that he remains a useful tool - vague enough to be anything, for anyone, at any time - a magic conjurers trick, sleight of mind.
Christianity and Islam are too tied up in their father's paganism. Jews are making an attempt to return to it, through Zionism, but their parasitic survival strategies have to be abandoned, and after thousands of years of practice and adaptations, this is difficult to accomplish.
Zionism is the by-product of contact with Hellenism.
There was cross-contamination.
Christianity on one side, and Zionism on the other.
Marxism was an intermediating stage, adopting Hellenic cosmopolitanism as the 'Workers of the world unite!!!'.
If Christianity is Judaism for Indo-European Pagans, then Marxism and Zionism is Hellenism for non-Indo-European, including Asiatic Semites.  
Jones claims they are Turkic. I remain sceptical.  

Nihilism is multifarious and adaptive.
Taking advantage fo increasing insecurity and the sense of vulnerability self-consciousness produces as the 'cost' for its advantageous 'benefits', it offers itself as a defensive coping mechanism.
it is seductive and popular among the masses of mediocrity, the feeble minded, and the cowardly....anything that seeks refuge behind semiotics.
In our time it is participating through the majorities in Democratic systems, manifesting in this crisis of identity - rebirth of Marxism, in a new guise, suing improved selling techniques.

This is inter-subjectivity. the comforting conviction that every mind, with the ability to use language (logos), is a conduit of a universal mind, so it cannot be wrong, only different.  
crypto-Abrahamism - Christianity 2.0.
all it takes is a twist of phrase, a new linguistic sequence, with new labels and definitions of words...or words with no definition, except the dictionary one, allowing each 'divine mind' to invent its own vocabulary, and with it destroy the sensually perceived, replacing it with its own construct.
American individualism: my freedom ends where another's begins, or my reality ends where another's begins.
even in this scenario 'freedom' is contained within a universal whole....even if each participant can understand it differently: as God, or universal mind, or State, or commune.

For life to emerge a distancing has to take place.
Skin, exoskeleton, membrane, representing a separation of 'emergent unity' from cosmic Flux.
For consciousness to emerge a distancing of mind from body.
For self-consciousness to emerge a distancing of ego from self.

When this separation progresses to a certain level, alienation begins.
Then a process of desiring to return to synthesis, as an antithesis to the process.
A desire to re-turn to the womb, to re-merge with mother.

We are born and live alone. No matter how many children we have, or friends we make, when we live and in our last moments, we are entirely alone.
Nobody will hear our dying thoughts.
In life we are distracted from our seclusion. Most cannot tolerate it, always seeking refuge in others.
God is the ultimate refuge.
How can we endure his death?
Like a child not yet mature, losing a parent, it imagines them idealistically, recalling them tenderly; it cannot let them go.
The orphaned child hears the parent echoed in its internal dialogue, it sees them moving in its gestures, hearing them in its tone of voice, smelling them in its own sweat.
It believes it is in dialogue with them in times of trouble and despair. Their words advising it, comforting, and guiding it.

How can a mind born and raised with the Abrahamic one-god, let go of its power?
The addict needs a new vice to overcome his addiction.
As long as there are children remembering a dead parent, the parent lives.
Could it be any different for gods?

An abstraction disconnected from reality, can only have an effect where it is created: the mind.
Noumenon, with no reference to phenomenon, can only have an esoteric, psychological effect, which can then affect body: psychosomatic.

It's why I say that Nihilism is political, and is impotent outside a mind, able to learn and be affected by semiotics: an organism that can be trained to associate symbols/words with phenomena is also able to be influenced by symbols/words that refer to nothing outside itself but trigger internal processes.
Nihilism's utility is the product of this detachment from a world the mind is gradually becoming aware of and itself, in relation to it.
Nihlism's impotence is exactly where it becomes seductive. Its appeal is its disconnection from world. It offers an alternative, a defensive mental block, against an indifferent world full of uncertainty and threats; its impotence is its gift to the stoic who has surrendered his will, and his fate to the unknown.

It's original meaning, given to us by the Russians who had submitted to Christianity and then to Marxism, was a world lacking the mental constructs of 'universal meaning,' 'purpose,' 'god': all projections of the absent absolute into a fluctuating world that could not be tolerated by the masses without them.
The motive is in the Biblical allegory of 'fallen man'.
The loss of certainty, of absolutes, expresses a desire to return to Paradise; a return to the simplicity of the animal condition, a pre-self-consciousness existence: conciousness facing outward, not burdened by self-awareness, not questioning its senses, not doubting its freedom to act and choose its own destiny, not trying to excuse itself from the consequences of its choices.
A state of innocence.

Denying free-will is cry for innocence; a return back to that primal state; regressing back to when life was brutal but simpler: either/or absolutes reflect this desire to return to the black/white, good/bad, animal state.    
Abrahamism and Marxism provide such a regression by projecting the 'negative' outside, externalizing it, cleansing the individual, who accepts/surrenders, affirms the dogma of its presence in-him - purifying him in the process. It casts the demons 'outside' the faithful, asking him only for loyalty and discipline, expressed as productivity in Marxist Utopianism.
Nihilism acts as a baptismal rite of rebirth; the individual regresses to infancy where things were obvious, simple, certain, reflected in its literal understanding of language and its use as a plaything, creating fantasies to live in, for a while, rather than as a tool, engaging reality.  
Humanity is purified, made divine, through nihilistic semiotics.
Humanity replaces God, when it is detached from its earthly identifiers, such as sex & race, and becomes pure noumenon, pure ideology, pure theory, a political concept; an abstraction that is so vague it cannot make anyone feel inadequate.

Nihilism is impotent. It cannot change anything in a world it is detaching from.
How can it justify a hope of changing what it denies existence to?
How can it intervene when it reject it as non-existent?

Nihilism's seductive power is found in its use as a coping mechanism, not as a world-altering philosophy.
It helps the individual cope with what it is unable to comprehend, or find the strength to react to.
It's a psychological crutch for the spiritually handicapped.
It's effect is primarily internal/esoteric, but this can accumulate into exoteric/external consequences.
It either surrenders to reality, or claims to have overcome it, as a ruse helping the believer cope.

You know what's funny about this mental-masturbation called Nihilism?
It actually works.
It is a coping mechanism that succeeds in preserving imbeciles the world over.

Thinkers, called philosophers, cannot submit to its absurdity, and so most die young, unmarried and child-less, but the average imbecile, his tiny brain full of its crap, is filled-up with its fermenting gas, and can bounce around the cosmos untroubled....well, until a hard prick burst his fart-bubble.
Then the noise and the stench is terrible.
A short loud bang, and then a fast chaotic, and yet eerily predictable, receding flapping into eternal obscurity.

The philosopher dies young, but lives in the minds of the worthy....the gas-bag has his day in the sun, and then he is forgotten just as fast as he rose on the wafts of his anal excretions. Up, up into the transcending stratosphere, closer and closer to the sun, like Icarus....then *POP!!!...and its over.

Nihilism offers an inconsistency in its world-view, based on the believe that the parts contradict the whole.
This contradiction is what Nihilism is, and the reason for its hedonistic impotence, useful only to escape and to self-medicate; popular among the masses who seek salvation in any-thing.
It is the conflict between noumena & phenomena, the ideal and the physical, produced when the organism organizes the fluctuating into forms it can process, translating the dynamic into abstraction by stripping it of all data (information) that cannot be integrated/assimialted into its organically evolved a priori forms.
This 'stripping away' is of dimensions, and dimensions refer to possibilities, which are probabilities when they are patterned/ordering.
Along with other data what the brain excludes from the mind is what it cannot process i.e. random energies, or dynamic fluctuations lacking pattern (random).
Abstraction is simplification/generalization. It reduces (interprets) existence by reducing it to a form it can process, and this is always based on its own level of complexity.
For this reason all binary codes, and the dualistic fabrications derived from them, place man as the standard - are anthropocentric.
Religions and myths could not have evaded anthropomorphism.

By 'man' I mean man's metabolic rhythms, his species median aggregate cellular systolic/diastolic cadence. It being the product of the synthesis of multiple patterns into a harmonious concordance we call a 'unity', or an organism.
A synthesis that is the manifestation of a relationship of attraction/repulsion - the very definition of harmony/disharmony...accord/discord...consonance/dissonance.  

This is in-keeping with the Hellenic understanding of energy (ενεργεια), at-work, in-process; momentum.
The Greeks attributed this momentum to the striking of a cauldron, some calling it Ananke (necessity) and others wanting a more intimate metaphor calling it eros, implying attraction/repulsion but emphasizing the more pleasant attraction factor, the very essence of life.

For recovering Abrahamics, Dualism is the necessary pretext of their theoretical intellectual openness.
Underlying it lies, hidden even to themselves, the singularity. No other answer will satisfy their craven spirits. They would rather believe in an absolute negation than live without an absolute, because even the negation has presupposed the ‘one’.

In practical terms the 'power' of the nil is on display in matters of human sensitivity, such as sex and race.
The all-powerful absent absolute is still lord and master over all slaves.

See, if no absolute evidence is provided, proving that races exist and that they are different, then the entire theory can be scrapped, yet, at the same time, a theory, founded on the flimsiest of evidence, or word-manure, can claim to be possible, because nobody is omniscient.
The absolute psychological power of the 'nil', can destroy any hypothesis (nullify it if it fails to meet its absolute criteria), and the same all-powerful 'nil' can be used to justify any absurdity create another man can imagine, because nobody knows everything so everything is possible.

This is why I call it a memetic virus, and nihilism is how one copes with this awakening to its absence.
An absence founded on an unfounded presupposition.
Where doe this comforting presumption come from?
From inside man's mind; from his own binary methodology - the 1/0.

The 1, a representation of the abstraction itself...a positive.
The 0, its negation.
The desperate degenerate gradually becomes aware that the thoughts in his mind do not always correspond to phenomena outside his mind.  
Some of his abstractions are combinations that find no reference in nature....or are inversions of the experienced.
This troubles the degenerate...but he is too much of a feeble coward to abandon his constructs.
Instead he doubles-up his risks, declaring his abstractions more real than the real, and the world void of them, a 'negative state', or a state that hides the truth under illusions and delusions.

For nihilists, obsessed/addicted to the 'one' to the absent absolute, the 'nil' is the very foundation of their emoting...only they've inverted meanings.

The nihilists demands absolutes, though there are none, and if none are given then he excuses himself from any other possibility, besides the one he uses to self-medicate his way through existence.
This is the cynics approach.
Laugh away, ridicule, what threatens the adopted defensive ideology, so that he can return to it, time and time again.

But this is also useful to the narcissist schizophrenic, who compartmentalizes his brain, into 1/0, placing the noetic pleasing concepts in the category of 'one', and the displeasing rest in the category of 'nil'.
It dos not matter whether or not his ideologies refer to anything observable, because, in his psychosis, emotion, ego, has replaced world as the measuring standard.
Nil, the absent absolute, becomes a reason to fabricate whatever flatters and inspires his feebleness to greater heights.

Imagine how desperately degenerate you must be, not only to lower yourself to adopt the 'negative' as a 'positive' argument, but to use some hypothetical future discovery, in order to discredit all precedent, and all theories you cannot argument against, nor offer an alternate hypothesis, challenging it.

Using this degenerate 'logic' every hypothesis under the sun can claim a coming future 'enlightenment' that will rove its veracity.
The level of duplicity, and cowardice, boggles the mind.
Some demand that 'proof of a negative' ought to be provided, so that their delusional theories can be discarded as absurd.
Well, this a progress in this kind of lack of integrity.
It claims a future, coming time, when the theories that cannot be proven, shall be proven once and for all.

If this is not stupidity, and evidence of human decline, then nothing is.

The dark Age is an age of nihilism - shadows, occultism, obscurantism, will reign for as long as this twilight of reason, continues.
In the last Dark Age we had to turn to the Muslims - those we now deride and look down upon - to rediscover what was lost: a period of superstition, of soap-box messiahs and of human degradation.
Mencken convinces me that it took the plague to snapped the west out of its lethargy - too much dead genetic/memetic weight had to be unloaded into the cesspools fo history before rejuvenation could even be considered plausible.

Times of affluence accumulate fat....dead tissue, that times of austerity rid themselves of.
Fat to fit.
This is the time of fattenning-up the bovines for the coming feast.

The sixties are the pivotal decade.
Nihilism took over the US, and through it the entire western world, during that decade.

Fatalism: the great depression of the European spirit.
The belief that all is 'written', all has been determined, and all one can do is affirm it, and stoically endure it.

Great historical figures come to us inflated through the sentimental eyes of the mediocre.
Most were barely above average, which would be enough to impress the average, and only displayed a superiority in pretentiousness and an arrogance that surpassed their quality.
The majority seems to be easily impressed by confidence that surpasses their own, even if it is rooted in error and psychopathic indifference towards any possible consequences.
The masses respond to paternalistic fervour, and a sense of conviction, emanating from their idols.

Bipolar Nihilism
The narcissist declares his will absolutely free and a master of his destiny.
The cynic declares his will impotent, and hides it by declaring all wills universally impotent, so as to make his own self-abasement less shameful.

As always, the real exists outside these bipolar absolutes: will is neither absolute master, nor absolute slave.
Choice is how its past is liquidated in the present.
The quality of mind determines how many options it perceives; the quality of the body determines how many of these options it can choose.
Sometimes an individual can perceive options it is unable to choose.
Every choice made affects all subsequent options.

To put it in economic terms, the ego liquidates and invest an inherited wealth, which it is not entirely aware of, and which it appreciates in relation to other.
Every investment increases and/or depletes this inheritance.
All investments occurring in an economic Flux, where other investors participate and are affected by foreseeable (ordered) environmental circumstances and/or unforeseeable, (chaotic) events, circumstances.

Choice is the expression of interactivity - past made present.
Ego is the aware tip of a larger fluid self. Ego refers to self-awareness. Self refers to the unconscious, automatic physical processes.
Body is choosing, along with mind, in accordance to its standards - these may conflict with the minds idealistic standards.
Self is a continuum (causal chain), held together by memory/experience.
Ego is the lucid part of this causal chain - its self-appreciation in relation to other.

Ego/Self is the 'hot' part of a lava flow, solidifying, over time.

Abrahamism worships destruction. Underneath their 'positive' rhetoric hides a desire to erase it all, as a means of saving themselves.
Marxism slaughtered millions when they realized their ideology was unworkable, and the masses could not be saved from themselves, using their naive methods.
Nihilism cannot correct itself, because changing itself would abandon its defence against reality – it would admit its noetic armour had a crack or was entirely made of smoke and mirrors; it never accepts responsibility, promoting any ideology that rejects accountability. All error is always the world's fault: there is always a ‘flaw’ in reality, because the flaw cannot be a product of self.
The dogma, and/or ideology, is never imperfect, but the world – meaning humans and their nature – seem to consistently fail to attain its level of perfection.
See, the narcissist cannot accept any flaw in himself; the flaw is always another's.
The cynic cannot laugh only at himself, he must laugh at the world, which may also include himself; he must bury himself in otherness to not expose his personal failings and responsibilities.
Narcissist/Schizophrenic & Cynical/Sociopath are the two socially selected by-products of Modernity.

Yockey, Francis Parker wrote:

The abolition of quality smothers the exceptional man in his youth and turns him into a cynic.