Abrahamism

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Wed Jan 29, 2020 6:19 pm

"Les actes malveillants, violents, envers les catholiques et leurs églises explosent depuis une dizaine d'années : ils sont pourtant rarement traités par les médias, encore moins par les politiques !"

Mon intervention contre la christianophobie, en [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— Stéphane Ravier (@Stephane_Ravier) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

There exists an undeclared war against Catholicism, and increasingly against Orthodox Christianity.
Judeo/Protestantism ridding itself of its family connections to Paganisms through the last vestiges of the Roman Empire - mostly cosmetic.
Nothing of the pagan must remain - not even in its Christian corrupted forms.
Islam is but a tool to be sued towards this end.
A double-edges sword, that remains entirely unreliable and unpredictable.
It's use to dilute European populations has not been permitted to cross the Atlantic where the citadel of the decaying empire still remains safely distant.
New World hoards threaten it. When you open the theoretical - anti-discriminating - gateways you cannot contradict yourself without exposing your intent.

this has always been a dilemma for nihilists:
How to remain true to their own dogmas, while surviving in a world they dismiss and contradict as illusory or superficial?
What I've states in my analysis of nihilism is that it unavoidably must self-deceive and lie, because the world does not care for human contrivances.
In self-deception it can succeed, but the problem arises when it lies to those who do not practice self-deceit.
That's when the paradoxes and pretences reveal the essence of the parasite, and the disease it feeds on.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Jan 31, 2020 12:23 pm

The believer and non-believer are two sides to the same coin of nihilism and of the same substance of the religious program of mass inoculation. Two extremes on the same opposing side of the spectrum. Globalism is only the continuation of the institution of the church; advancing from the base spirituality of individualism, to the modern forms of international technocratic materialism. This is why it succeeds. Because there have never been genuine believers in anything. The non-believers after all, are what its built upon; converts. When the mind has no belief system, It is absorbed into an artificial one.

The devout believers are neither relevant nor irrelevant. They remain as necessary components. The self-proclaimed non-believers, however, are invested in the future of the system, they determine its fitness. They take thier cue from institutional secularism. Thier indoctrinated pragmatic values take precedence over thier skepticism, as they venerate the "use" of all things for progressive purposes. They rationalize Judeo-Christianity as "useful"; a way to keep it close to thier hearts while keeping with the times of modernity, and staying modern and trendy. Politics and academia have superseded any critical thinking with a form of blind faith in the original utilitarian doctrine of acceptance of anything that serves the function of social 'historical' use. Its the "hive mind" mentality in other words, but with way more edumacation.

The ones who have the biggest stake in the future are the ones who bemoan or demean the future, because, given thier empty cynicism, they are more open to going along with what dominates. The most rational and pragmatic ones, are the ones given over to progressivism. It is the nature of unbelief that sets the self in a state of need to believe in whatever comes to them, especially if it has to do with preserving thier modern way of life.

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Tue Feb 04, 2020 12:10 pm

Franz Kafka wrote:: Martyrs do not underestimate the body; they allow it to be hoisted up onto a cross. In that way they are like their enemies.

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:43 pm

Urban environment is where parasites become infections.
As I've noted, Nihilism is impotent outside human minds, so it needs humans to propagate and increase its powers - its range of effect, otherwise, as an idea, it is impotent - cannot affect a world it denies or dismisses or usurps, or annuls.
It's conception of 'world' is as a universal consciousness - a cosmic will - alluding to a definition of world as humanity, and humanity as world.
It's "philosophies' and 'spiritualities' are entirely anthropocentric and anthropomorphic.
It's insights are entirely linguistic - semiotic, and so meaningless when applied outside concious minds, such as those what can be affected by symbols - semiotics - e.g., humans.

Notice that even according to their own warped historical interpretation - self-aggrandizing, self-purifying - Stalin is the one who 'purged' the Soviet Communist Party of the 'alien' components - i.e., the anti-nationalist, anti-Russian, anti-traditional, elements.
This is the only reason Stalin has been demonized by 'western historians', just as Putin is, currently. It's not his authoritarianism or 'fascism' or anti-democratic policies, but his anti-Americanism, i.e., anti-Judeo-Puritanism, represented by present day Anglo-Saxonry - ex.British colonies with a distinctly Anglo-Saxon history.
Putin became an 'evil' man, an 'enemy', a vile 'dictator', only after he kicked out and/or assassinated the so-called oligarchs.
Goggle their identity and heritage.
Stalin has become an example of an authoritarian dictator only after his purging of specific elements in the soviet power structure - even within his own people. The same is never said about other dictators and authoritarians that cooperate with the 'west', or American elites. These authoritarians are not so evil or anti-democratic.
U.S. elites - senators, or ex-presidents, for example, can even cooperate and come to life-long arrangements with them.
It was his nationalism that was unforgivable....and his assassination of the representative of Global Marxism, i.e., Trotsky - presently alive and well in American politics. See neo-con, and how Trump is presently an internal purging of their effect, proposing a more conservative elements in American elites that see in post-modernism a form of Messianic madness that can only lead to self-destruction.
The connections can be found in Heisman's 'Suicide Note', so I don't need to repeat them.

We are in the middle of an internal take-over, attempt, accompanied by an external rebalancing - New World Order, in the making, only this New World Order is not in accordance to the original plan.
The internal passions in American politics hints at a plan that has gone of-course.
That they blame Russia is not accidental, nor is it entirely unwarranted.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Sat Feb 08, 2020 6:40 am

Sen. Sanders: "We have a racist society from top to bottom impacting health care, housing, criminal justice, education -- you name it. And clearly this is an issue that must be dealt with." [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— ABC News (@ABC) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

There you have it.
All will be saved, and those rejecting being saved are evil.
Fascists and Nazis.
Uniformity of outcome will be the only solution. Anything that diverts from this is a product of an evilness - satanic man discriminating.
Nature will be made just and good, or it will be reduced to rubble - either/or.

Why does goodness fail?
Because there are evil people in the world - Nazis and Fascists.
People who have hate in their heart and not love, i.e. god = love.
Secular version: god = mankind - collective.

'Meek shall inherit the earth' = those at the bottom will be placed on top, one way or another.
The only reason they are at the bottom is because of man's evil nature - Nazis and Fascists, i.e., European males.
If they constantly fail to rise to the top, this indicates that 'evil' - hateful prejudice - is still at work.
Natural selection will be replaced by social selection - first we will redefine natural selection as always being social selection - a social construct. There is, in fact, no natural selection. It will be called a 'myth', a social construct.

Tom Steyer says he's the only candidate who will openly say he supports reparations: “Anyone who thinks that racism is a thing of the past and not an ongoing problem is not dealing with reality.” [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Sat Feb 08, 2020 7:24 am

Satyr wrote:: Tom Steyer says he's the only candidate who will openly say he supports reparations: “Anyone who thinks that racism is a thing of the past and not an ongoing problem is not dealing with reality.” [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"something wrong happened"

This sums up their mentality well. Yes. Something, somewhere, that was bad, that was hurtful, that was "inhuman" happened to someone, at some point in time, in some part of history.

Racism has taken on a form of "mystique and aura". It lurks around like a spirit, a phantom, looking to wrong someone, somewhere at some point in time. It can never be gotten rid of. It is something that is there, looking to hurt, looking to take away someones "rights". Nature is a systemic "something" that hurts people.

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Sun Feb 09, 2020 8:26 am

Franz Kafka wrote:: We are sinful, not only because we have eaten of the Tree of Knowledge, but also because we have not yet eaten of the Tree of Life. The condition in which we find ourselves is sinful, guilt or no guilt.

The ‘Purgatory’ of nihilism. A Taoist form of emptiness. To neither assent nor renounce. To be trapped inside oneself.

Franz Kafka wrote:: Ever since Original Sin, we are basically all alike in our ability to know Good and Evil; even so, this is where we seek a particular advantage. Actually, it’s only after Knowledge that the real differences begin. The appearance to the contrary is provoked in the following way: No one can be satisfied with understanding alone but must make an effort to act in accordance with it. He lacks the strength to do so; therefore he must destroy himself, even at the risk of not receiving the necessary strength; it is simply that he has no other option other than to undertake this final effort. (This is the meaning of the penalty of death for eating of the Tree of Knowledge, it may also be the original meaning of natural death). The effort is daunting; one would rather reverse the original knowledge of Good and Evil; (the term “Original Sin” refers to this fear) but what was done cannot be undone, only muddied. To this end motivations appear. The entire world is full of them—yes, the whole visible world may be nothing more than a motivation of man wanting to rest for a moment. An attempt to forge the fact of knowledge, to make of the knowledge an end in itself.

Modernity is the chance to absolve one’s soul of these misgivings, in the form of progessivism, to make of knowledge an end in and of itself, with no connection to anything other than the next phase of appropriation. What cannot be understood will only be used and exploited, including oneself; to submit themselves to the fear of the unknown, by bowing down before the messianic power of the future, in order to keep the past, the truth of oneself, in darkness, to continuously escape.

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Sun Feb 09, 2020 8:51 am

The "problem", for them, is choice, as it relates to self-awareness, i.e., the possible consequences of every choice.
It's a "problem" because it implies responsibility, which makes victimhood less potent - if the individual is partially accountable for his own fate, then how can he also remain 'innocent', even if ignorant?
The harshness of natural selection becomes a intolerable - especially for an animal with self-awareness.

It is for this human ability to choose, contrary to precedence, that they want to find absolution - a return to the previous state of "innocence" - to return to the animal state of being unaware of self, nor able to perceive the consequences of its choices, in time - projected into the undetermined future.
Man lost his purity - innocence - when he became aware of self, and able to project in time.
Ouroboros, is a conception of life as self-cannibalizing - when the concept of a whole is accepted.
In ancient-Greek mythology the same concept was represented by Chronos (time) - the Primordial God - consuming/devouring his own children - an allegory for temporal attrition.
Within Abrahamism the issue is the existence of 'evil' - the negative, or chaos - and how to justify its existence and preserve the one-god's benevolent goodness.
Man becomes the scapegoat.
It is man, and his free-will - his choice - which brings evil into the world - or allows chaos to corrupt god's absolute order.

This is the source of man's primordial guilt - what he must make emends for - suffer and repent for ever having exercised.
It is a narrative acting as a warning.

In Modern secular nihilism, there is no such possibility because all is absolute order - mechanical, according to universal laws - no need for stone tablets and Commandments.
Choice is illusory, so innocence is an innate stater of being.
Becoming has imploded into a singularity - Being - the new definition of the same concept of a one-god.
Universal authoritarianism - the monarchy of the one-god.
Therefore, all manmade autocracies are challenging the authority of the universal - blasphemy, or evil....chaos that challenges universal absolute order.

Abrahamism morphed. It never died....just as Jesus never died, never made a sacrifice....The Christ allegory is a farce. Everything went in accordance to god's will.
Satan was in on it....he was God's agency.......so man's original sin never actually happened. it could not have....nothing ever goes against god's will. The story goes round and round and explains nothing - it alludes to an explanation it then negates. Man never had a real choice.
All was symbolic - abstraction.
The Biblical story pretends to be offering an explanation for the existence of evil, or for man's suffering, but it is saying nothing at all. It simply distracts and justifies, within its own presumption - a way to resolve a paradox it creates.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:15 pm

Photographer John Taggart covered Harvey Weinstein's rape trial in New York. “It’s like the death of an empire,” he tells TIME [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— TIME (@TIME) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Power built on the pretext of weakness, and predation built on the hypocrisy of victimhood, always returns to hide in its original identity.
It can pretend to be a genetic type, a race, only if it is safe; when it is not safe it claims to be a memetic type, an ideology, a religion.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Feb 14, 2020 10:09 am

Discussion on the debate....

"Truth" is now another word implying an absolute - absolute justification, absolute existence, absolute knowledge.
It demands an answer to what it has already presupposed, for no reason at all, other than that the human mind needs final, concrete, certain answers.
The mind is baffled and threatened by an existence that fails to deliver absolute truths, or certainties, or ends an final complete, indivisible, immutable wholes.
The mind in in antithesis to the very existence that makes it possible - we must mention how Nietzsche's ubermensch has to do with this. Despite how morons have interpreted the concept as a power over others, this metaphor is about a future man, an ideal man, who has come to terms with the paradox of life, and consciousness being a product of the very thing which threatens it. Both God and Satan.
Chaos being what makes life emerge, and yet also what condemns it to an inevitable death.

*Notice how much jargon Dyer uses to cover up the fact that he's a moron with an idiotic self-serving superstitious position.
But Dyer is throwing out names.....using a method which I've experienced first-hand. the method of implying your 'correctness' your 'quality' using famous icons and idols of intellectual quality as proxies.
The more idiotic an individual is, the more he is inclined to use this methodology.

*Memory is what connects sense data producing a 'self'.
dyer is not satisfied with this. He demands more.

*Listen to the word-salads this moron is tossing about. He seems to be saying something deep and rational, and he is not.
He needs an absolute truth. A fluctuating cosmos of incomplete, imperfect, uncertainty terrifies him. He needs an absolute - a god.....a oneness.

*Laws of Logic, are methods of discipling the mind - which can think of any absurdity - to the perceived world - to connect the rules of human thinking to the perceived rules of natural order.
But an organism, being a product of order, can only perceive and appreciate order, and nothing that is not ordered, i.e., nothing which lacks a pattern it can process and abstract into feeling, sensation, thought etc.
Laws of Nature are descriptions of man's understanding of patterns and how they interact. They formalize a relationship between a living conciousness and an mostly unconscious non-living world, exhibiting some patterns that the organism also recognizes as being part of itself.
In my world-view chaos implies that energy can be and not-be, or can be a and b simultaneously - chaos being the very definition of inconsistency, and irrationality.
But life can only exist within order, perceiving only the consistent and valuing it because it needs it to survive.
Our experience of time is from the near-absolute state of order, towards the near-absolute state of chaos (randomness) - the allegory of a "fallen world" alludes to this falling away from order - the absolute state being conceptualized as 'god'.
Heidegger's "throwness" also alludes to this awakening to a momentum, a constant movement away from and towards. This movement is what we call 'existence', and it is dynamic, fluctuating....energy, i.e., in the process of, at work.....

*Absolutes are necessary presuppositions because the mind is a manifestation of order and so must begin with itself, as the foundation of this order.
All is relative to itself, even when it is unaware of itself.
Abrahamism goes a bit further and presupposes an idealized self as being a universal truth. It escapes its own imperfections and incompleteness, by projecting this idealized self as an external perfect absolute Self, it is but a part of.

*Man is the source of the laws of logic as he is the source of the laws of nature. Laws built over centuries of precedent increasing their certainty but never attaining absolute certainty.

*The laws of logic could not have been "any other way" in a cosmos where life emerges based on their consistency.
The idea that this cosmos, as it is, is the absolute end, the entirely, implies that life is inevitable.
A universe where the laws are not as perfect for the emergence of life,a s we know it, is incomprehensible from within a cosmos where this is not the case.

Can't go through the entire 2 hours of this.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Feb 14, 2020 10:55 am

I've gone from looking down upon Dyer to outright despising him. Not only is he a delusional moron, but also a charlatan. Another academic faggot, modern mind, corrupting philosophy to justify his own weaknesses and insecurities and stupidity. Infesting the creative consciousness with idiocy. The worst kind of mind. Id have more respect for him of he simply preached God all day and left philosophy and thinking out of it. But these rats don't do that, they must spread disease. Another peice of vermin scurrying around, looking for the next scrap of idealism to munch on.

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Feb 14, 2020 12:18 pm

Israel’s policies ARE racist ffs. They so clearly are. It is an apartheid state.

The hysteria around this has gotten so ridiculous that us as socialists are being asked to defend racism so as to prove that we are not racist. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— Si (@versaysea) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

It's only "racism" when European males do it....
In this context Jews are not a race. In another they will return to being a race with a tribal identity.
It all depends on what is best to protect their victim status.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:50 am

This is how the 'victimhood' weaponized.

Manufactured crisis: "Campuses are portrayed as hotbeds of antisemitism where Jewish students are physically unsafe, targeted solely because of their religion and heritage. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"No one is better at projecting hysteria over campus antisemitism than the Times’s own Bari Weiss, who laid the groundwork for her pundit career while a Columbia undergrad seeking to muzzle professors critical of Israel.
— Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Sat Feb 15, 2020 12:13 pm

Dyson's performance is an example of how gibberish, name-dropping and obscurantism, can be used effectively. A word-salad that can befuddle the most intelligent thinker, as Dillahanty is.
Abstractions supported by abstractions, theories used as foundations for theories - mountains of texts with no external reference - in fact negating the experience of existing.
Logos negating Interaction.

This is where nihilists thrive.
All is idealized.

Any concept can be mistreated in the same way.
Like morality.
Without grounding the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] to an external behaviour, activity, all can witness, and analyse the concepts becomes an endless debate about theories, with plenty of books and writers and thinkers to draw from and to refer to, implying depth of insight, or to defer to, to imply quality through association.
But no matter how self-consistent the convoluted obscurity is, or how talented the speaker yielding it is, its all nonsense if it cannot refer not to more icons and texts but to an action, e.g., the act of morality.

Once this first step is accomplished then all kinds of realizations ensue.
For one, that this behaviour is restricted to specific kinds of organisms, with specific reproductive and survival strategies. Morality unfolds, and reveals itself...and does not conceal itself.
This does not mean we stop there and are content, but that is the starting point to then advance towards the abstract and the transcending - it becomes a standard to construct a theory that never detaches from this starting foundation, but instead aligns with it, and finds support and validation upon it.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Tue Feb 18, 2020 2:06 pm

Imagine my shock!!!

Notice the word-games.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Sun Feb 23, 2020 9:32 am

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:58 pm

Kvasir wrote:

Of course it becomes dumbed down to humanism vs barbarism. Stopped at 15 mins. What a conceited word, 'humanism' to compare with 'barbarism', as if the latter is not human.

After about 10 minutes that audience, majority wise, likely started hearing everything he said as if a mystic - some ethereal chantings that cannot be experienced individually. There was wisdom in the idea of choice explicated and in the 'hardening of the heart' - because it is true, one develops character scar tissue from trauma of choices made past. Choices that get rid of visceral experiencing of 'unlimited opportunity' - and of a child's seriousness with play.

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:46 pm

Humanism is code for what is good for the real humans, so the Jews.

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:50 pm

Slaughtz wrote:: Stopped at 15 mins. What a conceited word, 'humanism' to compare with 'barbarism', as if the latter is not human.

I stopped as soon as i heard the Chess analogy, the chances are not equal, one side always moves first.

_________________
Once more, with knowing.

The meek shall inherit the Earth, but the Noble shall take it.

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Wed Feb 26, 2020 7:31 am

Part 1

Part 2 - more interesting....

Understanding Americanism as a synthesis of Judeo-Protestantism goes a long way into understanding why the world resists the USA and why it behaves in the messianic way that it does.
Catholicism and Orthodoxy were corruptions of Indo-European spirituality, and Judeo-Protestatism is allied in its rebellion against even this corrupted version, desiring to rid the world of any hint of paganism's naturalism, i.e., eradicate the physical (body) as a way of "purifying" mind (god), 'liberating it' from what remains of the phenomenon so as to allow the noumenon to acquire, in their degenerated beliefs, god-like powers.
In McGilchrist contexts the left-hemisphere (emissary) freeing itself from the corrective dominance of the right-hemisphere (master), inverting the relationship to one where it becomes lord and master and it is reduced to slave.
The body is despised and tolerated. Its needs and limitations a barrier to the mind's "divine essence", its god-like possibilities. Rebellion against natural or earthly order.
A seductive theory to the downtrodden, lost, ill, and desperate, acquiring, through quantities, sociopolitical power.

Desperation - need - leads to degeneracy - unsatisfied desire.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Feb 27, 2020 6:48 am

The younger of the Abrahamic triad. Brother to Christianity and son of Judaism.
The west is corrupted by these afro-Asiatic forms of spirituality, and through the west they also confront eastern civilizations, like India and China.

Their messianic fanaticism may prove to be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Feb 27, 2020 7:08 am

There are those Europeans (usually males) who don't like Islam but would be fine with pretty much any other group coming to his country. Those males are crypto-cucks. Maybe even more of a cuck than a soyboy liberal.

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Mar 02, 2020 7:49 pm

Cuddihy, John wrote:: For Freud, then the question of the genuineness of his originality entangled with doubts about the priority of his discovery of the role of sex in the etiology of neurosis. His obsessive concern over the race for scientific priority – who got there first? – is crossed by his anxiety over the nature of his scientific originality - who got where first? Has he merely rediscovered what Bauer, Charcot, and Chrobak had discovered earlier? Is his sexual etiology idea a case of cryptomnesia - that is, of unconscious plagiarism? Or is his priority simply a case of appropriating as his own intellectual property something everybody knew all along had the decency not to ventilate? (‘Am I the last to know but the first to say?’)
The Ordeal of Civility - Freud, Marx, Levi-Strauss, and the Jewish Struggle With Modernity

We are reminded of Einstein's claim that he had discovered a theory that already existed under a different name. Shameless appropriation appears to be a pattern of a particular method of survival; an antithesis to the aristocratic spirit that recognizes the ariston {αριστον} in another before imitation and inspiration can begin.
Respect is what is missing. Respect for the worldly replaced by an self-deceiving arrogance and submissive humility to the other-worldly, the abstract, the idea.
Perpetrators feel no shame in relation to that which they do not wish to belong to. Shame and decency appears to be a product of identification. An individual feels no obligation to remain decent before that which he feels alien or alienated from.
As I noted, respect is about anxiety concerning a potential loss. Where no loss is felt no respect and no shame is felt.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:11 am

_________________
Once more, with knowing.

The meek shall inherit the Earth, but the Noble shall take it.

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:32 am

Excellent find.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Wed Mar 04, 2020 11:42 am

Cuddihy, John Murray wrote:

Karl Marx’s father, Heinrich – his original name was Hirschel ha-Levi Marx – was a liberal, cultivated, ‘enlightened’ lawyer, a convert to Evangelical Protestantism. At his bidding, on August 26, 1824, his son Karl and Karl’s five sisters were baptized into the Evangelical Church. Shortly before graduation from the Tier Gymnasium, the seventeen-year-old Marx wrote a commentary on the Gospel of Saint John entitled ‘On the Union of the Faithful with Christ according to John XV, 1-14, described in its Ground and Essence, in its Unconditioned Necessity and its Effects’.
Chief among the ‘effects’ of this union with Christ, Karl Marx writes, is that heathen virtue itself is gentled; it is no longer gloomy, stoic, difficult, and dutiful.

Marx, Karl wrote:: Every repulsive aspect is driven out, all that is coarse is dissolved and virtue is made clear, becoming gentler and more human.

This early theological work of Marx, as important, in its way, for an understanding of Marxism as the publication of Hegel’s Theologische Jugendschriften were for an understanding of Hegel, is structured by the contrast between the highest achievements possible to pre-Christians – ‘crude greatness and untamed egoism’ – and the higher world, which ‘draws us up purified to Heaven’ made possible by the union with Christ described in the Gospel of John. This dialectic of ‘the crude’ and ‘the refined’ is central in Marx’s thought.

[The Ordeal of Civility]

The connection with Protestantism goes back a long way.
Cuddihy points to the difficulties integrating Protestant psychology, of a gentlemanly social image, privacy, reservation merging with the stetle, ghetto living among the tribe, where there are no secrets among the members of a tribe - herd psychology.
Psychoanalysis, as a distinctly Jewish project, was to psychologize crudity as a universal illness - not a Jewish neurosis but a human one associated with repressed sexuality.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Wed Mar 04, 2020 12:04 pm

Marx, Karl wrote:: “Let us consider the actual, secular Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.
Let us look for the secret of the Jew not in his religion but rather for the secret of the religion in the actual Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest.
What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Bargaining. What is his worldly god? Money.
Very well! Emancipation from bargaining and money, and thus from practical and real Judaism would be the self-emancipation of our era…
Christianity arose out of Judaism. It has again dissolved itself into Judaism.
From the outset the Christian as the theorizing Jew. Hence, the Jew is the practical Christian, and the practical Christian has become a Jew.
Christianity overcame real Judaism only in appearance. It was too refined, too spiritual, to eliminate the crudeness of practical need except by elevating it into the blue.
Christianity is the sublime thought of Judaism, and Judaism is the vulgar practical application of Christianity.
[On the Jewish Question]

The Abrahamic connection with Marxism is established - distanced and purified from its corruption of Aryanism/Paganism, via Catholicism/Orthodoxy, through Protestantism's rebellion against these 'heathen' remnants, retaining some warped connection to the experienced world.
Protestantism placed the divine within the mind, implying some alternate higher unseen reality that required no worldly mediation. God was accessible everywhere, because he had become pure abstraction. A believer carried it, the idea of god as absolute, with him and no longer required a specific place and individual as an authority.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Mar 05, 2020 9:33 am

Δείτε τι έλεγε ο Τσίπρας το 2015 όταν του επεσήμαναν τους κινδύνους από τις θέσεις του ΣΥΡΙΖΑ για το μεταναστευτικό.

Για να καταλάβετε πως φτάσαμε μέχρι εδώ. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— Ομάδα Αλήθειας (@omadaalithias) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This is the Marxist (((traitor))) responsible for the current immigration crisis in Greece.
After 400 years under Turkish rule, Christianity became synonymous with Hellenism, just as Judaism is now synonymous with Semitism.
Marxism is a secular form of Christianity.
This nihilistic disease displays the degeneration of the Greeks over the centuries. What spark remains is feint but not completely extinguished.
We can imagine what flame it would have been without all those centuries of nihilistic spiritual degeneration and barbarian, Afro-Asiatic, dominance.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Mar 06, 2020 5:55 pm

In Abrahamism - because it is nihilistic - it is language (logos) which is what differentiates man from animal, or that which has a soul to be saved from that which has no soul.
In agreement with my identification of nihilism as an entirely linguistic ideology - the more language based it is the more nihilistic it is.
Perfect nihilism is an word referring to another word - or an idea referring to one or more other ideas; the abstraction - noumenon - referring to other abstractions.
Completely circumventing the dynamic uncertainty of existence, which includes both order and chaos.
The external world where ideas are validated is replaced by vagueness or emotion, or more word-salad jargon, pretending to be saying something profound and so deep that it cannot be perceived or experienced, but must be presumed and felt.
Difference between pure and positive nihilists is that the former annuls all, placing the absolute nil as the standard, whereas positive nihilism redefines all into ideologies, placing the one at the pinnacle of its absoluteness.
Of course the one is no match for the power of the pure nil, because nullification is at the core of existence as a negation of other so as to produce self, or the non-negation of other as an affirmation of self.

Binary logic and dualism is founded no nil - either negation of other (0) or non-negation of other (1) - ego, "I am that which I am not" establishes self-awareness as a constant rejection of death or the return to the flux of interactivity - preservation of the continuum of self within existence.
Momentum is a given....and so preserving one's self is a constant rejection of other.
Affirmation is the non-negation of other - attraction.
Exoskeleton and skin - membrane - becomes the outward extent of this field of influence; a porous, fluctuating, external limit within which self has control and authority - agency - to one degree or another.

Free-will can be defined as a saying no (rejection, repulsion - 0) or a saying no to saying no (affirmation, attraction - 1).

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

Subject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Mar 09, 2020 6:15 am

Herd psychology is the mindset that sees itself everywhere; the psychology of the collective; the world-view that wants to see its own reflection as world.
Herd psychology, in regards to the human species, is humanism; the desire to perceive the cosmos as humanity and humanity as the cosmos.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν

» Abrahamism
» Linguistic Transition from Abrahamism to Secular Nihilism