Lessons in Conventional Language

A finite symbol representing infinity as a looping back into itself. A whole.
This is the "high idea" you get and I don't?

It's one symbol, right?
Complete, whole....total...absolute.
Right?

So whoever shares this conception of '"nfinity" shares the same meaning, right?
Whoever doesn't, thinks it is a meaningless scribble, or an eight on its side, or a snake eating its end - ouroboros.

Nah, that's me being silly.

Someone told you that in math this is the symbol for infinity, and the symbol became stuck in your head as a visualization of infinity.

Magnus Anderson wrote:

Nah, that's me being silly.

Oh, little boy....who is scared now?

That must be it.

Must...but I don't understand others...I'm autistic.

Satyr wrote:

Magnus Anderson wrote:

Nah, that's me being silly.

Oh, little boy....who is scared now?

Don't know what you're talking about it.
Let it be that I am scared.

I'll have to leave you know (because I shat in my pants.)

Satyr wrote:

Must...but I don't understand others...I'm autistic.

That's true.

I thought I smelled something funny.
More like menstrual fluids.

I got scared of your "high ideas"...and you had an orgasm.

Could be that. Too stupid to know.
I'll ask mama and let you know first thing in the morning.
Okay? Bye bye.

Sweetie...time for bed?
Must be on the other side of the pond.
Keep coming back to show me how complete and whole and perfect you truly are...and how you imagine the infinite, as a nice complete symbol.

I don't understand the meaning of "morning"...your conventional "high use" of language is beyond my autistic mind to fully and completely and absolutely grasp.
Come back...tomorrow I'm going to spend extra attention to you.
I know that is why you came....here.

My every word high and conventional...common....like you like them.
I'll read my dictionary to be prepared for your high vocabulary and ability to conceptualize infinity.

Having recently been diagnosed as being "autistic" by a brilliant Serbian thinker, named Magnus Anderson, I thought I could help him, help me sharpen my linguistic skills, and remedy my mental dysfunctions.
He's diagnosed Kurt Doolittle, inventor of Proprietism, so we know he's legit.
A magnificent mind if ever I ever came across one.

I now know that "one" is infinite.
So, 1 + 1 means one infinity, plus one infinity, equals...two infinities.
One bottle means an infinity called bottle, placed on an infinity called table.
Place another infinity bottle and you have two infinities of the same kind.

Infinity is ...one infinity.

We can only assume that "Will to Power" and "dasein" and "Will to life" and many other philosophical concepts are really balderdash, since they do not adhere to "high thinking", which is common use...conventional understanding.

Quote :

I don't understand the meaning of "morning" "meaning"...your conventional "high use" use of language is beyond my autistic mind to fully and completely and absolutely grasp.

That's correct. You've proven it time and time again.

So let's get back to what I wrote earlier:

Quote :

I am of the strong opinion that:

1. the word "existence" never implied interactivity
2. the word "one" never implied finitude
3. the word "thing" never implied immutability
4. the word "universe" never implied finite space and time

These are Satyr's inventions.

Everyone's welcome to prove that these are not merely Satyr's inventions.

Quote :

I now know that "one" is infinite.
So, 1 + 1 means one infinity, plus one infinity, equals...two infinities.
One bottle means an infinity called bottle, placed on an infinity called table.

The word "one" does not imply infinity either. In other words, it's perfectly fine (it's not logically contradictory) to speak of physical objects that are finitely divisible.

Again, you should start listening to other people and prove that you do possess narcissistic charm (since in order to be charming you need to be an excellent listener.)

So one is a thing in a universe full of things.
There must be a thing underlying it all.

There must be things these things are made of.

So, one does not imply infinite nor finite....it implies what?
A thing?

No, that's not what the word "one" means.

Tell me oh wise master...I am autistic.

Satyr wrote:

So, one does not imply infinity nor infinitude....it implies what?
A thing?

The word "one" represents a quantity.

Teach me the conventional way of thinking.

Ah...a quantity...this is complicated conventional thinking.
A quantity of what?

You've proven you can do the basic math.
You know that 1 + 1 = 2.

You didn't prove it but I believe that you can do advanced math just as fine.

I'm also sure you always knew that the word "one" represents quantity.

So you aren't THAT ignorant.
I've never claimed that.

However, there is one super-tiny but super-important thing that you fail to grasp and that is that the word "one" implies no finitude by definition.

In other words, it is not logically contradictory to speak of physical objects that are infinitely divisible.

Ah, so one now implies a finitude...and is no longer "infinite".
Excellent.
We are making progress.
It was neither infinite nor finite a moment ago. Now its finite.
Conventional understanding is that one is finite.
So the crap yesterday was you making a genius mistake, teaching me a subtle lesson in conventional thinking to break me out of my autism.

What is being divided, it being finite?

By definition, the word "one" implies neither finitude nor infinitude.

In the same exact way the word "human", by definition, does not imply specific skin color.

Ah, so it is neither and both.
See, now your brilliance is beginning to shine.
It is quantity of things.
Things being neither infinite nor finite....just divisible things.

What is finite yet can be be infinitely divided?

A thing?

Master also teaches us that some-thing being both infinite and finite is not really a contradiction.
He says so.
So, neither is something being mutably immutable a contradiction...in his non-autistic mind.
I'm ill, so I cannot know these "things". Which are not mystical.

The master's sacred text of conventional thinking, the Dictionary, says this:

Holy dictionary of Conventional thinking wrote:

one
/wən/
Learn to pronounce
number
cardinal number: one

1.
the lowest cardinal number; half of two; 1.
"there's only room for one person"
a single person or thing, viewed as taking the place of a group.
plural noun: ones
"they would straggle home in ones and twos"
synonyms: a single, a solitary, a sole, a lone
"only one person came"
single; just one as opposed to any more or to none at all (used for emphasis).
"her one concern is to save her daughter"
denoting a particular item of a pair or number of items.
"electronics is one of his hobbies"
denoting a particular but unspecified occasion or period.
determiner: one
"one afternoon in late October"
synonyms: some, any, a certain
"one day they'll come"
used before a name to denote a person who is not familiar or has not been previously mentioned; a certain.
"he worked as a clerk for one Mr. Ming"
informal•North American
a noteworthy example of (used for emphasis).
"the actor was one smart-mouthed troublemaker"
identical; the same.
adjective: one
"all types of training meet one common standard"
synonyms: only, single, solitary, sole
"her one concern was her daughter"
one year old.
one o'clock.
"it's half past one"
informal•US
a one-dollar bill.
informal
an alcoholic drink.
noun: one
"a cool one after a day on the water"
informal
a joke or story.
"the one about the chicken farmer and the spaceship"
a size of garment or other merchandise denoted by one.
noun: one; plural noun: ones
a domino or dice with one spot.

pronoun
pronoun: one

1.
referring to a person or thing previously mentioned or easily identified.
"her mood changed from one of moroseness to one of joy"
2.
a person of a specified kind.
"you're the one who ruined her life"

Settles it.
We are now enlightened.

So, one is neither finite nor infinite, yet divisible, and can be added and multiplied and subtracted, as a thing.
One is also neither mutable nor immutable.
It is neither something nor nothing.

It is everything?