A common trope among Desperate Degenerates is to caricature the opposition - the threat to their naïve romantic delusions.
For example, masculinity is caricatured as a primitive remnant of past cultures - a violent, irrational Neandertal, with big muscles, aggressive behaviours, closed minded, unsophisticated tastes, raping and pillaging....
Anyone who has read what is posted here on KTS, the definition of masculinity has been given and it has nothing to do with this leftist caricaturing of what they consider rightist concepts.
Peer pressure works on individuals over time. Brainwashing does not only occur through institutions and official narratives....it usually occurs through peers....working on individuals, pressuring them, seducing them, feeding them the narrative, day in day out. It usually happens with females being involved.....seducing young males with some kind of promise of sexual gratification...inclusion, acceptance....
We don't need to caricature our enemies....they display themselves openly....and increasingly more honestly. We simply post what they say, what they believe, what they think, how they act, what they hope for, what their objectives are... They do need to caricature us....since we have no power and our ideas are currently censored and criminalized....so we must speak in codes, allegories.... Our standard is nature, and nature becomes a reference for our ideals.
Their ideals are ideological, nihilistic....and so they must caricature. So what is their conception of our understanding of masculinity? An insulting caricature, implying a concept full of degrading implications that are meant to produce the feeling of antipathy to a modern cultivated young male born and raised in sheltering environments, playing computer games and working out in gyms to cultivate his masculine signalling to females who share their upbringing and cultural zeitgeist.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
And why are these Woke Desperate Degenerates always on the left of the political spectrum? Because their entire mindset is idealistic, naïve, romantic.....a caricature of nature....a selective negation of nature. Always subjective, because objective reality contradicts them.
Watch how they caricature femininity, or how they imitate what a woman is unable to define it; compare it to how they caricature masculinity, so as to degrade and then deny its existence...or to mock it. With no referent, the mind can fantasize about the unknown - and with no external limit it can change its fantasies, with no sense of shame,, adjusting them to trends and fashions...to popular conventional beliefs. With no experience of a concept an immature, needy, psyche allows emotions to guide its imagination.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
That's what Desperate Degenerated leftists do....they define words so as to ridicule them, or use them as weapons to exploit and manipulate naïve, needy men-children and women.
They've defined 'free-will' in a way that suits their ends. As they have with the concept of 'morality', 'value', 'love'. As they've done to the concepts of 'gender' and 'race'.
As they are doing with the concept of 'woman'. Words is all they have. Words that can only affect minds....so Humanity = God; God = Humanity. When they say 'world' they mean mankind. They can't change the world with words, but they can influence mankind - they mean eugenics or social engineering. When they believe in 'magic' they mean the way words can affect minds at a distance - inconspicuously. When they say 'esoteric' they mean subjective, emotional, of the mind, fantasy, psychosomatic....using the term to pretend they are rationalizing what they cannot justify.
So, when they say 'end of the world' they mean 'end of mankind.'
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Theories, concepts, ideas...abstractions can be shaped to validate or to falsify. In theory the concept can be detached from reality and then dismissed. In reality this is not possible. Words, referring to actions, cannot dismiss and negate the actions.
Appearances are sensorial - perceived and automatically interpreted actions.... When reduced to a theory, an idea, detached from the actions, the idea can be dismissed and negated....leaving the action itself unaffected.....but for the desperate degenerate the theoretical negation of a concept, using words, suffices to nullify the activity and tis consequences. Then, it attempts to explain away the consequences.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
The idea of how 'bad' or 'not so bad' things are, is determined by an individual's perspective and his objectives.
A realist objectively describes what is, attempting to eliminate all subjective, personal corruptions... How others react to this descriptions is determined by the subjectivity, or objectivity, of the one exposed to them.
We'll use the idea of a frog being boiled alive by slowly imperceptibly, raising the temperature. For the frog all si fine, until things are no longer fine. Acuity, and time, is a factor. Usually objective thinkers have a long horizon, describing a consequence which in the immediate present, among the degenerates who have a shallower event horizon, would seem incomprehensible, ro extreme....since the projected outcome is the accumulation of accumulated consequences which seem to be insignificant in the present. For the frog, in its limited event horizon, a slight increase in the water's temperature is not concerning. In fact, it may even feel pelassent.
As such genius has been described as a quality of mind that perceives existence beyond the immediate. We still discuss great philosophers, born in specific historical periods in specific cultures, because their perceptions when beyond those boundaries. they spoke of thinks that crossed temporal and cultural horizons, and are still relevant to us existing centuries after their death.
No benefit has no cost....no positive lacks negativity, just as no negativity lacks a positivity. What one considers positive/negative is a individual, subjective consequence of his upbringing, cultivation, cultural training, and his constitution, his genetic inheritance, adjusting tolerance levels, tastes, determined by his personal biochemistry, his organ hierarchies establishing a personality, his demeanour, attitude, personality. But we also share positive/negative assessments because we share a biology and we are of the same species.
Beyond Good & Evil.....beyond positive/negative.....to the real. Objectivity. Nothing is positive/negative....the concepts refer to an organism using itself as the standard....often corrupted by his psychosomatic limitations and cultural prejudices. People prefer to focus on the positive and to minimize or dismiss or ignore the negative. This is also dependent no their psychosomatic constitution. Here the difference between genius and madness is clear...and what, I think, the ancient-Greeks described as the philosopher being a cross between artist and monster or god....i.e., something alien, incomprehensible to the average man.
Perspective To a naïve romantic a realist appears a fascist, a cruel, negative monstrosity....an evil psychotic. To an extreme leftist anything approaching reality is contrary to his humanistic hopes and desires....a totalitarian, that leaves no escape, offers no yielding leeway....like nature.
To a true psychotic with evil intentions, - vindictive, self-destructive, bitterly envious - a realist is a romantic idealist, sugary positive.
The former is more likely....as the later is self-desctrictive and too difficult to sustain for a social organism like us. Social cooperative strategies necessitate some degree of pretences and lies....so social species, like ourselves, are inclined to adopt the 'white lie' the 'noble lie'....and to conceal the truth....self-deception is how the mind protects the ego from a truth it could not survive. The entire truth would be unbearable to a living organism....ergo philosopher's - the good and honest ones - must be some kind of inhuman monster, or god.
Back to how good ro bad things are... Neither. Things just are. Humans can adapt to anything. adaptation is a measure of fitness. Even the harshest conditions can be survived - within reason. For those born in such conditions they seem normal....for those born and raised within sheltered, superfluous, safe, manmade environments, those conditions would seem inhumane.....intolerable.
For a man with no muscles, 50 kg. is an unbearable weight. For a man that has become accustomed to lifting 100 kg. it is nothing.
Caricaturing what is being described - like saying that Americanism turns us homo overnight, to is a defensive measure....dishonest. Exposing a mental or psychological deficiency....that would also be attracted to supernatural tales, and stories about giants walking the earth, Atlantis spirits realms., etc. Superstitions indicate an intolerance for reality. astrology, for instance, has been linked to narcissism...and narcissism is a overreaction to a sense of insecurity, vulnerably, low self-esteem that must overestimate oneself to conceal how much it has underestimated itself in the past - an overcompensating reaction to an error in judgement, that can become self-destructive, suicidal. Like a man who feels so weak that he must build the external image of strength and power; so emasculated that he must exaggerate his masculinity.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
10 years ago...how many were talking about transsexuals? Now, they are everywhere...an increasing in number. They are inventing new genders to cover all angles of mind/body dissonance....and psychosis. A "spectrum" they call it, to erase inferior/superior, fit/unfit, healthy/unhealthy... a "spectrum" of normality.......where everyone is healthy in their own private, subjective, universe....and can find others of their kind to justify their new normalcy.
Spiteful Mutants.
As I've said....paedophilia will follow the same course towards "normalization"....and then beastiality/zoophilia....
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
A retard can't offer an alternate theory, ro explanation for what is being described, all he knows is the explanation given is not to his liking. He rejects it because he does not like it.....and uses the unknown as justification. "One day," the retard says, '...new information will arise to debunk this theory. One day..." the moron hopes "human understanding will prove this theory wrong and my theory right...." but he will not tell you his theory, fearing he may be mocked and ridiculed, so absurd and idiotic it is.....so naïve and childish his romantic idealism is...and he intuitively knows it. But he will not give it up. So, he will undermine and ridicule this theory that threatens him, finding imperfections to exploit..but never, ever, will he dare offering a better one.
And you know what this moron will call this tactic? Philosophy. Socratic method....but more simplistic.
JUST NOW AT FOUR SEASONS IN LA.: James O’Keefe Questions [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]’s Dylan Mulvaney on OMG Jailhouse footage showing women inmates testifying on being housed with male rapists claiming to be transgender.
The midwit mutants are realising that a 'great replacement' is happening and I get the impression they don't like it. 'Okay to advocate eugenics if we, the left, do it!' Or is it just the Rutherford's a public school airhead and doesn't think before he writes? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— Edward Dutton (@jollyheretic) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Eventually midwits sense that something strange is going on, but cannot pinpoint the causes. Their brainwashing prevents them form seeing the source of the symptoms, and they will never doubt the core indoctrination principles which they've habituated their own psychology with, e.g., gender and race are social constructs, for example, or critiquing Judaism...
Dimwits will never get so far. They will die entirely convinced of the validity of their delusional convictions. This is why they reject free-will and the idea that they could have judged and chosen other than what their brainwashing compelled them to judge and choose. For the dimwit - growing ni number in the Americanised dominion - the possibility that certain 'truths' may be lies, or false, never enters their mind, and if they come in contact with someone that exposes them to this possibility their reaction is defensive anger, using the usual trained reactions: nazi, fascist, anti-Semite, bigot, racist, homophobe....a litany of defensive accusation, full of emotional baggage attempting to silence the source fo their distress because they cannot offer any rational arguments to contradict it.
Again: Midwits and dimwits cannot truly empathize. They can only project. In their mind sympathy/antipathy is the only way they can empathize, or the only way they can make sense of a perspective they cannot comprehend, nor relate to. When sympathy is ineffective then antipathy projects their psychosis on that which threatens them, by challenging their "indisputable" convictions, or that threatens them by being incomprehensible, filling their with anxiety. this fear/anxiety is projected as an accusation upon the source of their distress. This is the extent of their "empathy".....related to their inability to overcome their subjectivity, and approach objectivity. The only way to comprehend it is as a nonexistent impossible myth, or a version of their own subjective interests, emotional reactions, personal motives....etc.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Desperate Degenerates cling to subjective projection, as a means of concealing their own subjective convenient imprisonment. Unable to understand objectivity they return toi subjective projection of sympathy/antipathy to comprehend another and his perspective. If they cannot project themselves in another;'s pain/suffering, to experience 'sympathy" then they will project their negative emotions and motives on the one who chalenges their world-view, and experience antipathy. In both cases the projection experiences oneself in another - via imagination of the most basic, juvenile, form - either positively sympathizing with another's pain/suffering, i.e., seeking to share and decrease its effect, or negatively antipathizing with their presumed motives, i.e., to exploit and/or increase pain/suffering. Such simple minds are incapable of objectively understanding another, and cannot comprehend an objective motive that neither desires to share nor multiply suffering, but only to understand and to report it for further analysis. Ironically, objectivity increases the probability of decreasing and/or increasing suffering. This, a subjective mind can intuitively sense and so it assumes that if the attempt to share and unburden another's from his suffering, is not clear and obvious, then it must be an attempt to increase and exploit this suffering. It can understand no other motive; it can perceive no other probability.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Jarno
Gender : Posts : 2282 Join date : 2015-08-27 Age : 32 Location : Finland
"Skyhooks" = mansplaning.....too intellectual. Over Karen's head. "up in the didactic pedantic clouds" = too abstract, too general...personalize it, dumb it down - emote. "Down to earth" = dumb it down to below 100 IQ - put it in a soap opera scenario context, where emotions can factor in, giving Karen an advantage - she thinks. "Nazi" = whatever scares Karen, and she cannot find an argument against it. "Good argument" = emotional and beneficial to her cause. "Dasein" = tabula rasa - thrown into the world where one is programmed with no hope of escaping the programming - nothing to do with Heidegger - another "nazi". "Objectivism" = whatever lacks emotional triggers. Too general, too abstract....too rational, too logical. Whomever does not drop their beliefs just because another is presented. To refuse to abandon your beliefs for any other, is to be a objectivist...a "fulminating fanatic". "Fulminating Fanatics" = all who hold onto their beliefs on merit, and do not abandon them and replace them with any other alternative no matter how absurd - the moment your own beliefs are proven to not be perfect, you must abandon them.....otherwise you are a fanatic - and Karen knows fanatics because she will fanatically say so, and then drop her disclaimer, "I may be wrong", at the end. But she can never be wrong about being wrong, because if it ain't perfect it ain't right, so it must be equally wrong as any other belief. "Autocratic" = too unemotional, unyielding to Karen's adolescent, psycho-babbling manipulations. "Stooge" = whomever she can manipulate but fails to undermine - trigger to help her maintain attentions, similar to her declarations of victory: feminine ploys. She taunts those she can manipulate into giving her attention, no matter how annoying and incoherent she becomes. "Click" = tongue poke - feminine method of maintaining attention and annoying her adversaries. A woman thing. "Note to Others" = appealing to the audience, implying she is having an impact, and they are on her side - another feminine, infantile manipulative ploy. "Wiggle" = implying that she's somehow trapped you intellectually, and you are now retreating in panic; taunting those who attempt to escape, frustrated by the infantile Karen manipulations - pulling them back and into her linguistic trap.....her hole from where she pretends she wants to escape (damsel in distress). In fact she wants to pull the world into her hole....her gaping snatch....her cunt. Her "formidable arguments" declare free-will to not exist, and that morality is imposed by the powerful upon the weak, and there is no identity, and sex is not for reproduction, and though there are breeds and species there are no human races, just because she says so - she can google some internet hack to support her delusions, don't you worry - and if you cannot explain how matter evolves into life and how it becomes conscious then her declarations stand as indubitable facts...so *wiggle wiggle away because that's all the evidence and reasoning you'll receive from her. She was born into her beliefs and this is a universal truth nobody can deny. We cannot learn and change our minds, 'cause we have no choice.....and this is fact because she says so.....then she'll pretend she's doubting herself..because she ain't no objectivist, *wink *wink
There's are more....but who cares.
Her goal is not to philosophize and share world views and opinions, or to debate - she has no clue about any philosophy, not even her neo-Marxism and postmodernism -....her goal is to undermine your very will to live, your spirit of being, your confidence....priming you to become a mindless minion in her utopian Marxist future world. She's a postmodern neo-marxist opportunist....and she don't know it. She is a puppet herself.
Christianity failed her; Marxism failed her...and now she's learned of a new more vengeful method...and she likes it.
Doesn't matter what you post....she'll pretend you said nothing, and that her "arguments" - her ploys, word traps - her posts remained unanswered. She'll return to them, over and over, no matter what has been aid, as if nothing has been said, pretending that her posts are formidable, that nobody can respond or give answers. It's all to undermine your confidence, your sanity...make you doubt yourself. If you cannot offer her an absolute - absolute certainty, absolute evidence, a complete perfect theory of everything....then it's all the same....all equally nil.
I'm curious to see how long it takes these dimwits to realize what a psychotic cunt Karen is....or do they secretly enjoy the entire exchange? I think a few of them are dimwitted enough to consider her "interesting", or they've got time to waste away. Anyway.....carry on.
Tik Tok....Tik Tok...
...has lead to this....
Quote :
Here are some rhetorical techniques that are very persuasive, if sometimes only self-persuasive. Do make these the core of your posting here, if you don't already do this. We've all done at least some of these at some point, if only implicitly. But when it is a central part of your rhetorical style, you've joined the pantheon.
1) Always say that you have demonstrated, proven or shown that X is true or Y is false. Even if all you have done is state or assert. Your assertions are proofs.
2) Don't respond to points made; restate in a new paraphrase what you've already asserted. Avoid justification of beliefs. See number 1.
3) Don't respond to points made; demand that the other person prove the opposite of your position.
4) Add links. Don't worry if they do what you claim. Don't bother reading them carefully. Later accuse the other person of having no evidence because they don't use links.
5) If cornered in any way, or just as a preemptive strike, insult your discussion partner. This may lead to an exchange of insults and any weaknesses in your position will be forgotten in the fray.
6) Don't respond to points made; accuse the other person of not having solved a related or unrelated issue.
7) Appeal to authority, and always imply that there is consensus amongst experts. Whatever you link to, the opinion expressed there is universal and objective.
8 Divide every issue into 2 possible positions: yours and the false/evil/irrational one. There are no third possible positions. You're either with us or against us.
9) Mindread. If someone does not respond to a post, say that they are afraid or have given up. If someone ignores you, say that they know they are beaten. If they are critical of a war, say they love the leader of the other side's leader. You get the idea. DO NOT justify these claims.
10) Call failure to disprove, proof of your belief. Oh, and it doesn't matter if they failed. They can even have mounted a solid argument. That has zero consequence.
11) Start new threads that are actually just continuations of current threads. Without saying it, this implies that you have the magic bullet. Treat all your posts as victories and nails in the coffin. This is an implicit trope for number 12's open one.
12) Claim victory. This can be done openly. Self-congratulate.
13) Claim you are the best philosopher - not just here at PN, but in general. Never aim low when making claims that you in particular cannot be convinced are untrue.
14) Claim that your assertions are better than other people's assertions per se: justify this via something that may seem easy to dismiss but is hard to finally contradict such as: you are from the future, you've changed your mind many times, you have no beliefs or you have a lot of files on the topic are some examples already used. Be creative in coming up with the reason your posts per se are better than other people's. The competition here is stiff.
15) Don't respond to points made; restate in a new paraphrase what you already asserted. This should be everyone's baseline rhetorical strategy. Again, this is the core of PN style.
16) Appeal to incredulity. Best done indirectly through mocking, especially with emojis. If you are ever conrnered, use a large number of moving emojis. This shows commitment and since it is not an argument, it is impossible to counter.
17) Treat the hypothetical as factual. You can even say it is hypothetical, then slide into referring to it as factual. Zero loss, much to gain.
18) REPEAT YOUR POSITION AS IF IT IS A RESPONSE: Regardless of what the other person says or points out that you ignore. Only true positions can be repeated. Commitment is truth. Your certainty should be their certainty
19) Remember anyone who dismisses you for any of the above, is showing that they fear the power of your posts. See 9 for some variations.
20) Write complicated non-responses that might somehow metaphorically relate but likely not. Unitelligibleness or inanis ultrices cannot be easily disproven or even argued with.
21) Use idiosyncratic and confusing use of capital letters and citation marks, and ask a lot of questions. Blame others for not understanding your idiosyncracies and ask many more questions. Be disappointed in their responses. Respond to any interpretation of what you said or disagreement with outrage. And ask more questions. Keep the onus on them.
22) Take up too much space with either unnecessary quoting of images, unique formatting or empty space. This creates extra noise in the thread and less signal.
23) Treat any topic as an invitation to one of your pet peeve issues. Do not be a respecter of topics.
24) Post such that it is unclear what you are responding to and even how you are responding to it.
25) Talk about another poster, but not with them.
26) Never simply say 'I disagree,' and then go on to explain why. Always demote the other person, label their thinking or be stunned by their ignorance and express this directly. For ex. 'you are weak thinker', 'Go deeper' or 'Such ingnorance!' Preferably a number of these in a row. Many people will do this on occasion when especially frustrated. An artist regularly reacts this way, especially in long disagreements. If you are missing opportunities, you'll never be a PN stylist.
27) Abuse terms that already exist by meaning something completely new by them. And make up plenty of your own silly terms. For example, instead of saying "Free Will", say "Andy Dufresne Syndrome", because you once saw a movie that sorta reminds you of this idea a little bit.
28) Rephrase what other people have said. Deny you made any significant change. Never consider that you may have done this. You may consciously choose to make a strawman or note, through patterns of discussion partner irritation, that you already have a gift for this. Never admit to strawman behavior. Hold the line. They have the burden of proof to show that you presented a false attribution. It is their job to show it is not right, not your job to justify the changes you made. Must one truly use the quote function. I mean, seriously!!??
29) Do not concern yourself with best arguments and rebuttals: dominate and get responses: Frustrating people - for example by not quite responding to them while quoting them - irritating them - see many of the above numbers - and putting all the burden on them, does several things: 1) you'll notice they do a lot of explaining while you don't; 2) you'll notice that they get upset, which means you are winning 3) some will stop communicating with you - this allows you to a) claim victory and b) take the high ground of never ignoring anyone - I mean, why ignore why you can frustrate, irritate and shift the burden to them? 29 is the strategy of the true geniuses.
(I will keep updating the list with my and your suggestions)
Like a booster shot...against a mental virus. Ironically she, my pet chimpanzee, mule....carried the booster there herself. This is how clueless she is. As long as someone is talking about her....she wins.
More precisely, it is like an analysis of Zombie behaviour to help us identify who is infected with this incurable psychological/mental virus.
What remains to be determined is how long will she be tolerated before they become tired of her Karen ways. There's some entertainment value, but is it enough to compensate for the garbage and its stench? Some people have fetishes and maybe this tickles their fancy. Who knows?
She, Mary "Karen" Land.... A female spirit trapped in a biological male body...is a metaphysical tranny.
Satyr wrote:
In the end what does Karen, even this Mary Land Karen, want? She wants attention. She wants to be respected by being given attention - positive or negative. Ignore Mary Karen Land, and she will be devastated. But she doesn't worry, 'cause she will taunt and annoy you, and obsessively follow you around until she gets what she wants. It's inevitable that she will get what she needs...one way or another.
In Karen's mind if you give her attention she's won.....because in real life she's invisible, and nothing she says is ever taken seriously. Nothing she expected turned out as she expected....because she was, is, and forever will remain, naïve and stupid. From Christianity, to Marxism, and now to Postmodern Neo-Marxism....her life's thread identifies her quality of mind Nature is indifferently unjust. Mary Land hates being ignores and dimissed....as nature did. What scares her the most is not being noticed. So, here's another handout to the needy. Enjoy.
She is relentless....like all zombies. How did that sexist comment go?....if I can recall it. It went something like... A man will hurt you, a woman will destroy your will to live.
She will undermine everything until nil is achieved. Resentment towards a world that failed to live-up to her expectations becomes vengeful.....but in the mind it justifies it as a desire to change the world for the better. The anti-philosoher failosopher...
Heh, I intuitively knew, but I had to confirm the iamafreak was not the author of that quote. He is not capable of writing that cogently and articulately.
It seems they have finally come to a degree of realization about his insanity on ILP. He is mostly ignored now. And it took those retards how long to reach this realization? A decade?
Well, all thats left on that forum now is two schizod addled crazies hashing out utopian delusions; one a dyslexic ill female wanting all 'selves' to disappear into an abrahamic oneness/otherness, and the other, a horny sexually frustrated mentally ill 40 year old incel, with a God complex, being cared for by his mother like a disabled retard.
A nutty Jewgirl and secular abrahamic missionary, dreaming of peace on earth through the elimination of responsibility and free will.
And a community chapel, that they all congregate in to pray, worship god and read the bible when the suffering of the world, and the perennial disappointment of philosophy becomes too difficult.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
The author is IwannaPlato on [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]..... Started developing the list after the cunt posted my "Karen speak" interpretations from 'Karen' Mary Land-speak to human.... The division is similar to the evolution of a different species of mind....living ni a ideological, language-based reality, rather than a reality based on actions....which we call world.
Existence = dynamic interactivity. In Karen Mary Land existence = words....words that can be negated with other words; words that can be defined in any way....Might is Right...in her lexicon. Might redefines words and then imposes them to the Mary Lands of the world, and then they rebel, dismissing words as being equally meaningless.
Words are magical forces that can reshape reality, or create it from nothing and then destroy it returning it to nothing. So, 'free-will' can be disconnected from the act of choice, idealized, and then dismissed as empty of meaning. Same as 'morality'....disconnect it from its actions, its behaviours, idealize it, abstract it, represent it with a word, and then negate it linguistically. Same with 'gender'....same with 'woman'... It's a linguistic method.
It is, as I've said, the anti-philosophy of the Last woo-Men.....
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]...from Alexis Jacobi... We are Legion...
And so, the linguistic trap has been sprung...using the 'damsel in distress' ploy, to expose 'Karen' Mary Land's learned postmodern semiotic cage - postmodern tropes, her proverbial pit. She is the bait....and there is no desire to exit the "hole" she has placed herself within - the whole, as it were: complete, absolute, indivisible, immutable. She has returned to the metaphysical womb....waiting for her fate to be determined. She wants to pull the world into it, with her. Resentiment masked as altruistic benevolence. Her "fractured fragmentation" is her mind/body dissonance crying out - a state of utterly comforting confusion. A "rabbit screaming in distress"....a victim calling out to victims - (see Thomas Harris quote, as the only rational reaction). Chaos is what she worships. Chaos - properly defined - is where all becomes uniformly the same; all becomes equally and simultaneously possible - metaphysical parity. She, like those who trained her, worship this theoretical nil. She is a self-castrated - self-circumcized, self-lobotomized - no-thing who has willfully swallowed her own severed testicles, and they've now settled in her lower stomach/womb, like two ovaries.....from where Tikkun Olam will be re-born. She is a divine bride birthing the coming no-thingness - 'healing the world from its multiplicity and diversity. All must become a social construct....humanity = god....humanity creator of reality. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]. No difference exists...all is the same....or ought to become so when the world is 'healed' and 'saved' from its 'fallen state.' She is but one of the 'chosen' to know how unfree her will is - a minion, an agency of divinity, 'chosen' to serve THE divine Will as it re-emerges and all is made one....in the nil. One/Nil being the two opposites sides of the singularity: one-god.
The end of philosophy - as all language is rendered meaningless - referring to nothing but more words - cosmic solipsism. She has no 'choice'...she was chosen to know this and to do this. She is innocent. She is divine bait....her Kabbalistic burden is to serve her master.
Ideology contradicting experienced reality - dissonance of mind/body, of the ideological and the sensorial, perceptible, i.e., apparent. First comes the word - logos - so words usurp sensory input....the perceived; rather than represent them they negate them. She acknowledges nothing perceptible....all words must be disconnected from their referents in the world. See [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] See [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
She is but one of many....especially in the American dominion. Emasculation is a symptom: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]. The degeneracy of a declining[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
******
'Objectivist' is the proverbial 'evil', Satan....Nazis....nature. Anything that contradicts this oneness - this final uniform nothingness of her projected dreams - including herself: we are all "sinners".....we are all "fallen." Any resistance to this oneness, in nil, identifies you as her nemesis - as Satanic, as an evil Nazi - negation of her negation; anyone that affirms life and existence is her foe. As contradictory and paradoxical as any of the Abrahamic scriptures defining good/evil. Controlled opposition. Divinity uses us all to manufacture its creation - demiurgeous.
******
Her mission is not to define words like 'morality,' 'god,' 'freedom,' 'will,' but to maintain them as undefinable - entirely subjective and ideological - representations of obscure abstractions with no anchoring referents in the experienced world. Her mission - and she's been chosen to accept it - is to disconnect from the world, from existence, and to take the world down with her. She tells herself, like all neo-Marxist opportunists, that she cares about the non-chosen - the objectivists - but in secret she knows her motive is vengeance against a world that failed to be what she wanted it to be. Moving across multiple versions of nihilism, from spiritual to secular....she was disillusioned by Abrahamism - her childhood Christian faith; turning to Marxism in her youth she quickly lost confidence in its lies; now she turns to postmodernism as her final hope, her retribution, her salvation in the nil. Her mission is to undermine and to destroy. She is the anti-failosopher subverting philosophy, to increase desperation and degeneracy: where vermin flourish.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Last edited by Satyr on Sun 30 Apr 2023 - 22:04; edited 3 times in total
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
To consider having a conversation - debate - with a coward, hypocrite, cunt, like Karen Mary Land, one would have to begin with definitions of terminology. Then with justifications for these definitions. Then ask the bitch which ethical laws will be the standard and why them and not others? If, for example, the cunt claims that morals are manmade, then let her define what morals mean, and who invented them. Then let her explain why moral behaviour exists in animals - why do all social species and species using cooperative survival and reproductive methods display what man calls 'altruism' tolerance, love of their own, a reluctance to kill their own, their neighbour, a willingness to place themselves at risk to save another, kindness, sympathy etc. Which men indoctrinated these species in manmade morals?
Then a explanation of the difference between an abstraction, a theory, and an action would be necessary. Is moral theory manmade or moral behaviour? Is free-will illusory, or choice? Do I need to understand a phenomenon to believe that it exists? Do animals need to understand fire to know that ti exists and that it burns?
So, does consciousness not exist because we do not understand it? Did the sun exist, for the men in the past, when they did not understand what it was or how it worked? Does anything we do not completely understand not exist, even if we can perceive it? What about life? We do not fully understand how it emerges....yet we experience it, we are it....does it not exist or is it an illusion?
Then ask the cunt why omniscience is a prerequisite to making any claim or believing that one possibility is more probable to another? Is this the scientific method? If omniscience is a prerequisite to even have an opinion you will not abandon, just because it is not based on omniscience, then how does knowledge and understanding develop?
******
The cunt throws words around as triggering bait.....she has no clue what they mean herself. She will direct you to a link, if you corner her, as if the link leads to her understanding. She'll mention Kant, or Heidegger, or Nietzsche, or Plato, but she has no clue what these men said or why they said it. All she "knows" is on google search.
******
Ask the cunt to define and then to justify her definitions without appealing to authority, but referring to a common experience. Morality ain't text in a book, or on a stone talet.....it is a behaviour; it is interaction.
******
The cunt, and many like her - they are increasing in the American dominion, and so this cunt is a specimen of a physic, mental disease - have issues with judgement. It has to do with man's self-consciousnesses, and how nihilism developed a linguistic protection for the ego to cope with this exposure to another source of suffering - perceiving yourself, objectively, i.e., as another perceives you. I trace what became nihilistic spiritual dogmas, - which then became secular - to this emergence of self-awarenes and man's perception of himself in the third-person. So, the cunt Mary Land, has issues with judgement...the judgment of others of her; or a loss of trust in her own judgement, after repeated failures or naively falling for absurd infantile, superstitious theories, like Abrahamism, and Marxism and now Postmodernism. Mary Land could never doubt her own naïve convictions....so she projects this as a universal fact.
Having lost trust in their own judgements - all those like Mary Land - they want to escape the implications in a collective, in a universal. They want to hide in another....in otherness They declare al judgements as the product of an external agency - if not god then a collective, culture, humanity. So 'Karen' Mary Land rejects free-will, because her will has proven to be feeble and unable to break free from the mental prison her upbringing and her impoverished genetic inheritance damned her to endure for a lifetime - ergo she cannot wait for Godot to come, and while she waits she'll have her vengeance.
******
If all judgments are equally subjective - implying that they are all equally accurate, because we are not omniscient - then how does intelligence evolve; why does it evolve, if it offers no advantage? Why do we even judge and choose, if it is illusory? Is 'natural selection' a lie? If not, then who is judging and selecting, and why, if it is all determined - in the way the cunt understands determination - and choice is illusory? Why does the farce even emerge, if it is impotent and vacuous and fake?
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
To consider having a conversation - debate - with a coward, hypocrite, cunt, like Karen Mary Land, one would have to begin with definitions of terminology. Then with justifications for these definitions. Then ask the bitch which ethical laws will be the standard and why them and not others? If, for example, the cunt claims that morals are manmade, then let her define what morals mean, and who invented them. Then let her explain why moral behaviour exists in animals - why do all social species and species using cooperative survival and reproductive methods display what man calls 'altruism' tolerance, love of their own, a reluctance to kill their own, their neighbour, a willingness to place themselves at risk to save another, kindness, sympathy etc. Which men indoctrinated these species in manmade morals?
Then a explanation of the difference between an abstraction, a theory, and an action would be necessary. Is moral theory manmade or moral behaviour? Is free-will illusory, or choice? Do I need to understand a phenomenon to believe that it exists? Do animals need to understand fire to know that ti exists and that it burns?
So, does consciousness not exist because we do not understand it? Did the sun exist, for the men in the past, when they did not understand what it was or how it worked? Does anything we do not completely understand not exist, even if we can perceive it? What about life? We do not fully understand how it emerges....yet we experience it, we are it....does it not exist or is it an illusion?
Then ask the cunt why omniscience is a prerequisite to making any claim or believing that one possibility is more probable to another? Is this the scientific method? If omniscience is a prerequisite to even have an opinion you will not abandon, just because it is not based on omniscience, then how does knowledge and understanding develop?
******
The cunt throws words around as triggering bait.....she has no clue what they mean herself. She will direct you to a link, if you corner her, as if the link leads to her understanding. She'll mention Kant, or Heidegger, or Nietzsche, or Plato, but she has no clue what these men said or why they said it. All she "knows" is on google search.
******
Ask the cunt to define and then to justify her definitions without appealing to authority, but referring to a common experience. Morality ain't text in a book, or on a stone talet.....it is a behaviour; it is interaction.
******
The cunt, and many like her - they are increasing in the American dominion, and so this cunt is a specimen of a physic, mental disease - have issues with judgement. It has to do with man's self-consciousnesses, and how nihilism developed a linguistic protection for the ego to cope with this exposure to another source of suffering - perceiving yourself, objectively, i.e., as another perceives you. I trace what became nihilistic spiritual dogmas, - which then became secular - to this emergence of self-awarenes and man's perception of himself in the third-person. So, the cunt Mary Land, has issues with judgement...the judgment of others of her; or a loss of trust in her own judgement, after repeated failures or naively falling for absurd infantile, superstitious theories, like Abrahamism, and Marxism and now Postmodernism. Mary Land could never doubt her own naïve convictions....so she projects this as a universal fact.
Having lost trust in their own judgements - all those like Mary Land - they want to escape the implications in a collective, in a universal. They want to hide in another....in otherness They declare al judgements as the product of an external agency - if not god then a collective, culture, humanity. So 'Karen' Mary Land rejects free-will, because her will has proven to be feeble and unable to break free from the mental prison her upbringing and her impoverished genetic inheritance damned her to endure for a lifetime - ergo she cannot wait for Godot to come, and while she waits she'll have her vengeance.
******
If all judgments are equally subjective - implying that they are all equally accurate, because we are not omniscient - then how does intelligence evolve; why does it evolve, if it offers no advantage? Why do we even judge and choose, if it is illusory? Is 'natural selection' a lie? If not, then who is judging and selecting, and why, if it is all determined - in the way the cunt understands determination - and choice is illusory? Why does the farce even emerge, if it is impotent and vacuous and fake?
Objectivity - not Rand's Objectivism (Mary Karen Land is obtuse, she knows not what she speaks of) - is 'evil' because it approaches reality without subjective cares, emotions, self-interests, and this challenges her subjective perspective. This is what she means by "context" - or to "bring it down from the conceptual clouds" - dumb-it-down.....place it within scenarios where emotion can prevail. Objectivity is evil in that it is without sympathy, without care...it lacks emotion, where females, like Karen, believe they have an advantage. To speak with Karen you must think and feel, like her. She's a woman, she knows nothing about that man stuff....those "pedantic contraptions" she once tried to read but could not comprehend. No, you must emote....place it in context, in a soap-opera, tear-jerker scenario, with a moral dilemma: Jane got pregnant form a man she thought was 'the one.'It turns out he wasn't. What's Jane to do? Boo-hoo....poor Jane was fooled, ro made a msitake. Shouldn't the collective absorb the costs and the negative consequences so that jane is not hurt? Shouldn't moral collectivism not redistribute the costs of jane's bad judgments?
Cultural Marxism - only now negative consequences of bad judgmen-calls, bad choices, are to be redistributed across the collective, so that Jane doesn't have to change. It's not her fault, anyway....she had no choice....it was determined that she fuck that bad dude and become fertilized with his bad semen. Ought it not to, also, be determined that we all pitch-in and protect her from her idiocy and naivete? Here a contradiction is found...and she will pretend she didn't read it...as if it was never written....retuning to her cut & paste mantra, repeated like a prayer groveling for salvation.
*****
To speak with Karen Mary Land you must speak her lingo. Dasein doesn't mean 'being-there, it is a mix with Locke's tabula rasa. A conceptual trojan horse, sneaking in that pile of crap, hoping nobody notices. While you sleep, let it open the gates of your unconscious, so that in the morning you are conquered by her emotinoal appeals to your heartless reasoning.
*****
Judgement is her problem.....judgement expressed through choice. Judgment is not her problem exactly, ti was made her problem by those who infected her - judgement is their problem; human judgment and human rational choice. this si what resists complete indoctrination and assimilation into a world government, with its priestly class to manage the human herd of zombified minions, with no biological identities....no cultures, no choice. A uniform herd of nobodies - outis. So judgement must be negated, undermined, slandered...shamed, dismissed as non-existent. Silenced. Se why she rejects free-will? Choices are determined....man is no different than a stone, rolling down a cliff....impotent, will-less, lacking all agency. We are all nothing. Only she was 'chosen' to know it, whereas we were not. Straight from the Kaballah.... The link between her "progress - if we can call ti that - is evident. Christianity (Abrahamism) - then Communism/Socialism (Marxism) - and now Postmodernism (Frankfurt School). Can you find the common thread connecting them? She's never veered outside the nihilistic paradigm; she's never embraced nature, accepted reality, attempted to adapt.....no she's always been anti-life, anti-world...using words/symbols to detach rather than attach to existence. Nihilism is Linguistic - semiotic. infecting the mind, influencing it using its weaknesses - then taking it over....like a [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]. To be more precise, we are dealing with a symbiont: A virus (nihilism) carried into the host (European paternalism, heathenism, Hellenism), by a foreign parasitical agency that has established a 'covenant' with it - where all tribes rejected this 'god' it embraced it. The linguistic virus soften the host's autoimmunity, allowing the parasite to enter, conceal itself, as belonging to the host organization, and then take it over from the inside - esoterically. Google Parasites, and watch vids on how they zombified the infected hot....and what zombification means: self-destructiveness, behaviours that contradict the host organism's original objectives....etc. Here...let me help
******
Mary Karen Land's motives is not to engage you ni philosophical debate, it is to undermine your confidence in your own judgments, destroy your trust in your own reasoning. Prime you for infestation from her virus - nihilism. She is totally oblivious to it....selfish-gene leads to selfish-meme, just as genetically based parasites lead to memetically-based parasites, and natural viruses lead to manmade linguistic viruses. She, like those proverbial movie Zombies - is a carrier. Her compulsion is to spread her dis-ease - infect as many 'healthy' minds as possible....then, she tells herself, her paradise on earth, her utopia will become a reality. The world will be healed - Tikkun Olan.
First she must destroy resistance....morals, values, principles, ideals, based on nature, on reality,....so as to then replace them with ideological emotionally founded alternatives: replace aristocratic ethics with slave ethics; replace nature based divinity, with abstracted divinity that contradicts existence altogether.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
What are the movie [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] driven by....what are their characteristics? I'm well aware that Zombies do not exist, and are fictitious, but here is a case of life imitating art......or ideology determining evolution. Natural selection subverted by social selection. All must be made a social construct - the objective is hidden in their convictions. The ought to be, in the what is. Fractured and fragmented...is the objective - mind/body dissonance: mind detached from the tangible, the physical, the existent, and immersed in abstractions and ideology is the goal. Skyhooks await. Nihilistic inversions. Recall biblical text - 'first came the word...'....is this fact or an objective? In nature words proceed, extend, connect mind to the world....but what if your superstition demanded that the word becomes a world-creator, as it is prophesied, as it is written? Eugenics.....social engineering; husbandry of humans? Prophesies are exposed as a plan...what ought to be - using steps. If this then that .....if this is achieved then the next step is achievable.
Basic traits of zombies: disconnected from reality; they recognize no kin, to race no gender no family; they are driven by the smell of uninfected blood, metaphor for bloodlines, genetics; they are individuals but act as a uniform herd, using the simplest of means: sounds and scents...their needs/desires; they have no race, no sex, and their flesh is decaying, they are the walking dead - mindless need/desire identifying only with satiation - hedonism (Americanism).
*****
Allow me to use another movie metaphor....because the enemy is watching and what is being exposed is verboten forcing me to speak my mind using these more slanted methods....ironically the enemy is adept at them....but plausible deniability is maintained and you must fight fire with fire when water is criminalized...
Simplicity....what does our hungry nemesis want? What drives it? Need, Desire? Yes. Resetiment....yes. It is, you see, itself infected....this is its 'covenant' - a symbiosis of the virus of nihilism with its own vengeful human, all too human desire for power. the virus propagates, spreading linguistically from mind to mind, and the parasite's parasitism becomes more effective, completing its own cycle. Weakness becomes a building block for power - the victim uses victimhood to become a more insidious scavenger...a super-parasite....working from the inside-out. Let us leave Karen Mary Land behind - she is but a vermin, an oblivious Zombie, and let us focus on her dis-ease. It is all she is. Who 'bit' and infected Mary, all those years ago? Who taught her to use words to disconnect and to taunt and to annoy...and to subvert and undermine confidence? Her family was infected, yes, but she was exposed to a more advanced varient later in her life; who trained her in these updated feminine ways, converting her to a Zombified super-Karen? Her mission....to destroy confidence in man's judgement, setting the stage for her utopian one-world, one-mankind hive mind - the Borg? Another movie metaphor. They hide in plain sight. Who controls America's media and Hollywood...and now politic? Who can use information, and movie magic to shape the minds of the youth? Zombify them before they've even developed a identity?
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
How does a rational man determine what exists, outside of texts? I can find a definition of 'freedom', does freedom exist because I can find a human definition of it? I can find a definition for unicorn in a dictionary, do unicorns exist? I can find a definition of free-will, does this mean it exists?
I can redefine man, does this mean men cease to exist? What if there is no word for undiscovered parts of existence....do they not exist because man has not defined them in a dictionary?
What is the standard outside language that limits its use?
Language is a mediator, a connector. Defining is the first step....and it must be based on actions - on something external, independent, apparent to all. Doesn't matter if it hasn't been defined properly or has been defined improperly, the phenomenon exists without human language, and all that it carries: prejudices, emotions, hopes, desires. and it exists even if it is ignored and not named, or intentionally corrupted by language. If my culture chooses, for whatever reason, to rename horses unicorns, do unicorns exist now?
Act precedes language. First was the act...not the word.
So, free-will refers to an act....choice. Morality refers to certain actions, not to dictionaries and words in text. Beauty refers to something active, experienced, present...the apparent. It cannot be negated or redefined out of existence....it cannot be redefined as ugliness, or to fetishism. beauty refers to something independent form human needs/desires....shaping them, not being shaped by them. I cannot invent something by imagining it and naming it; I cannot erase something by renaming it, or erasing the name of it.
It is not a social construct. Dictionaries refer to social, collective methods of communicating abstractions. These may exist or may not exist. So when I say 'define a word' I mean define it in a way that refers to something observable; when a nihilist uses the term 'define a word' it means in reference to a dictionary, or some text in a book - like the Bible, or some other popularly approved pseudo-intellectual authority that has written a book, or posted on-line.
Nihilists want to make all words abstractions that refer only to text in books, in dictionaries....because then they can change them at will. Their objective is to make beauty, race, gender, morality a social construct.... It is their ought to be. Their nullifying ideology.
****
If I disconnect free-will from the act of choice....I can negate it or redefine it out of existence. If I disconnect women from the phenomenon of a biological female, I can then redefine it, and then negate it. If I disconnect morality from the acts of tolerance, love, sympathy cooperation, tolerance etc., and simply connect them to text, in the bible or in a dictionary, then I can revise my dictionary and rewrite my text to negate these actions. If I redefine love, does love disappear...the act of love, not the theory, the abstraction....the action, or the actions.
They did so with gender, morality, and race...why not advance?
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Alexis Jacobi's"American Scene" refers to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] and to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]on KTS...
As these freaks and degenerates continue to refine their linguistic ideological spin-doctoring, to appeal to more "rational" and "normal" people, they will continue to be taken seriously amongst those academic minds who cannot use their own sensible, self-evident judgment to discern whats real and whats not, whats healthy and whats ill. They rely only on something being objectively true, lending credence to the rest of the crazy, or at the very least, respecting it as interesting. Their edumacational training has stunted their lucid thinking. Trapped in intellectualism, they lose their connection to reason, trapped in rationalism, they lose their connection to truth. The problem with a scientist who spends all his time studying specimens in solitude, is that he may begin to believe they are more than what they are. From so much time mentally indulging in their nature, he may begin to let his mind run wild, imagining and attributing characteristics to them that they do not have, and so he loses touch with what they are.
So if a midget happens to land a lucky blow against a 6'4'' man, than we should take that one incidental occurrence as "unique", we should "look beyond" its height disability and see something special in him; that he transcends his smallness, that perhaps, deep down, he is really a 6'4'' man as well. This is how sane people become insane.
Anfang
Gender : Posts : 3989 Join date : 2013-01-23 Age : 40 Location : Castra Alpine Grug
Americanism is normalizing every mutation that does not threaten the whole immediately and obviously.
Power corrupts.....and it starts to believe that ti can absorb every negative consequence....so it tolerates - power and wealth is generous, because it can afford to...so it splurges, carelessly spends its accumulated capital, until all the wealth is spent. The US is at a point where it has convinced itself that it can tolerate and endure any human sexual deviance, any human mutation... It is now in decline and only a few of tis elite - those represented by Tucker and Trump - who ware pushing the breaks, realizing that this moral generosity is destroying them - Wokism was supposed to erode cultural resistance in the world, but it is imploding the foundations of American power....the family.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Gender = cultural integration - using signs, words, symbols - of sexual reproductive specialized roles.
Now gender is becoming a communal performance, disconnected from reproduction and physical markers. The real must be 'corrected' and shaped to agree with the adopted idea, the preferred concept, using technologies, and demanding that all participate in validating the performance.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
The Polish autistic maggot [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] assumes he knows what I am saying....and his response proves that he is, as always, clueless. 90 IQ has its drawbacks. Full of condescending remarks and insults...but no warning no censorship by f-Jesus....because he's just another retard, attacking the baddie satyr...so who cares.
Polack assumes that I've replaced 'god' with 'nature' like Spinoza, perhaps? He cannot understand 'facilitates' but twists it to mean what he wants it to eman....so that he can then critique what he cannot understand. His obsession with Satyr is obvious....like a little girls with a crush following the boy around making fun of him so that he can look her way.
No stupid Polack, facilitates does not mean intends... It makes easier....it increases the possibility (probability) of a positive outcome to emerge. Morality makes it easier for heterosexual and cooperative survival and reproductive strategies to continue....it is useful...it offers an advantage.... Get it dumb Polack?!
Like race...it isn't a certainty, an absolute, it is about inherited potentials. Inherited potentials that may or may not be cultivated to their fullest. A median - about a specific population. Like species. Species is also about inherited potentials, manifesting mental and physical traits. Appearances interpreting presence of a type. A pattern or a a synthesis of patterns.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37368 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Obviously, nature has no intent....no will. Humanity is not its end...nor is intelligence. The Polack is evidence enough, but almost everyone on ILP serves as evidence of how disinterested what we call nature is... A artistic allusion to nature as an individual; that a stupid Polack may grab unto in his endless quest to avenge himself against Satyr.
Life, on the other hand does have an intent. It's primary primordial motive is self-preservation, and propagation is a form of overcoming mortality..... So what is selected by females, naturally, are traits that facilitate specific methods of surviving and reproducing.
So, nature has no intent, but a female organism, in relation to nature, does have an intent, and chooses accordingly; usually unconsciously, intuitively, instinctively.
Intelligence itself is a group of traits that facilitate survival and reproduction....yet, under sheltering environments intelligence is rendered less decisive less important....leading to ILP and Americanised insanity.
Had to respond to this piece of excrement. Beyond sad. Feminine exhibitionism. A need to be seen, admired, appreciated, validated. Also, a need to be accepted as “normal”. To show he is normal, like everyone else because deep down he knows he isn't and that he comes off as creepy and offensive.
I have to believe he is a flaming queer, or obviously extremely effete and emasculated.
