Things to Watch

How is an explanation of life that presupposes the existence of life explain it?
Might as well stick with Abrahamic God.

Mitosis is part of Evolution Theory.
First reproductive method was the easiest, the simplest - one organism dividing and creating a nearly similar copy of itself.
But this has drawbacks because it copies the same, with small mutations occurring in the process, and the environment is quicker in potential changes.
The organism would face extinction in the event of a sudden environmental change, caused by a meteor hit, for example.

Evolution via technologies is an extension of human evolution - biological.
Man makes himself extinct, or superfluous.
Machines as copies of self, will be almost perfect copies of our understanding of ourselves, or the parts of ourselves we appreciate highly.
Appreciation, judgment, can be corrupted by emotions.....self-interests, ego, making it over-under-estimation.
Judgment is also limited by knowledge and, more importantly, understanding.
Knowledge = data - accumulated interpretations of stimuli.
Understanding = how this data relates to itself, or an appreciation of the patterns the relationships between data.

DNA = memory encoded using biological simplifications/generations. .
When we construct a machine, by using our-self as a standard, we are copying what we prefer, or what we know of self.
We erase all extraneous knowledge, lying dormant in the genome.
We imperfectly copy what we perceive and what we appreciate highly.
We make a partial and selective copy of how we understand the processes at work in ourselves.
A copy missing centuries of genetic code, or of data, of memories.
An idealized copy of ourselves.

It doesn't explain the emergence of life, true.

So in short, the new genetically enhanced people will be the best consumer drones.

Is it only a coincidence or is European society becoming a bazar and the bazar being the ends of European dominance connected to the bazar dwellers flowing into the lands?

I don't understand JF's ideas fully, but as far as I can see, he is drawing parallels between the evolution from RNA to DNA and humans to AI. The technological singularity would be a milestone on the evolution of life, to the point where humanity becomes incorporated into the new organism/unrecognizable, like the humans in the real world in the Matrix, but further: these "humans" would be altered/domesticated by the AI to the point where they could not rebel and the actual matrix itself would be unnecessary. Humanity would be mitochondria in the cell of the AI, just another component of the larger organism.

It's the cyborg inverted to make biology a part of a prosthesis of the mechanoid.
Technologies no longer enhancing biology, but biology enhancing technology.

I don't know about the technological "singularity" but man becoming servant and integrated within technology is already happening in modern society. It's basically feminisation of man. Technology being used to better domesticate man.

After reading Heisman and Marshall McLuhan and Niel Postman, i've come to understand the "technological singularity" as it relates to the idea of "transhumanism". I consider smartphone addicts and other modern techies alike, to fit the definition of transhumanists. Smartphone addicts are the most subhuman and degenerate humans ive ever seen. They are hopelessly plagued with psychological disorders, and nervous disorders and behavior dysfunctions of all forms relating to being more efficient with the standards of technology and its speed of performance. Humans without identities, but only functionality and performance output behaviors, engineered by the technological culture. These are all the initial stages of the disease of nihilism in the context of technology's synthesis with biology. The "Cyborg" would be the logical conclusion; the pursuant ideal that it would lead to.

Heisman, philosophized this synthesis by correctly understanding what the idea of "equality" would inevitably have to become in the world of AI. "Rights" will be given to those of "non-human" origin, as is already occurring from an article i read somewhere with a model robot in Japan.

That without value, is given every value: Democracy's formula.

The message phone-addicts, as you call them, want to and is that they are 'networked', connected and in the midst of things.
What they are inadvertently saying is that their immediate environment, their life is not enough. It does not hold thir attention, it does not suffice.
This is an indirect consequence of sheltering.
The mind is liberated from basic needs and so it becomes bored with itself, seeking in others a distraction.  
Most of the time these goofballs are sharing inane commentary, gossip, second by second reporting on their existence...as if they want to tell the world that they exist, and that they matter.

What is occurring is the evolution of a Matrix-like hive-mind.
the real world is a hindrance to complete immersion in cyberspace reality where sex, race, the body is inconsequential, and symbols/words are all that matter.
This forum and forums like it, is a previous version of the same.
Baudrillard called it "hyper-reality".

It's a noetic space/time...a mental alternative world.

Letters, numbers, language, symbols are what this alternate hyper-reality is made of.
In this reality your body parts are like clothes.
Words do not have to refer to real phenomena, but trigger emotions, sensations, inspirations.

Hyper-reality is Nihilistic reality. The real is negated by the construct.
I said it as human = world.
World = humanity.
When a modern speaks of 'world' he means humanity.
For him world is a social construct because humanity is presently immersed in social symbols and conventions.
Natural laws do not apply to humans of this order.....natural order does not apply in this realm....this magical world.
Here symbols create world....like code creates cyberspace.

What is god in this hyper-reality?
It's the symbol ONE....1/0 is the code this reality is built upon.
Christians called it 'love'. a more simple expression of 'positivity' and thought of it as a singularity.
Other Abrahamics choose words like 'value', or 'spirit', or 'soul', or 'self', or any positive word disconnected from reality and redefined to mean whatever they want it to mean.
It's positivity is supposed to trigger positive emotions and therefore make it more palatable, more seductive....and its alternate application is supposed to hind at a secret, occult, power, a hidden knowledge only a few know of....it attracts those who desperately want to belong and to feel special, because they have lost their heritage, their connection to their past, or they are shamed of it wanting to forget it and find another....and those who cannot distinguish themselves within a collective without contradicting the principles they need for protection, or because they simply are not anything unique, or extraordinary but mundane and mediocre.

There will always be some people who are shameless about getting attention and sympathy.
What has been changing is the kind of response that particularly people in leadership positions show. Their sense of justice is not European. The expression jewdicial system fits rather well. It's also matriarchal.

It's quite fascinating. Imagine being in the crowd of those mostly white soldiers. You'd have to buy into this idea of collective racial guilt to not be enraged by those false accusations.
And I think that's part of feminisation. You won't get up to that guy and punch him because he has support of an institution of mindless or equally trapped drones. So you sit there and your mind "makes sense" out of it and if you don't want to feel anger and humiliation there is the alternative for you to accept this notion of collective racial guilt.

It's okay to listen to if you are interested in how the anti-racist (((sceptic))) thinks but what was worthwhile to remind myself of starts at 39:50.

The (((half-breed))) may be against the Muslim invasion of Europe but only so far as he sees it as a threat to his status as an important victim class and as an "important mind", "ruling" those goyim he depends on for validation.
Kraut'n'Tea is not the only one who shows this brittle narcissistic (((ego))).

I've been following the drama here: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
The guy is not interested in science. He's (apparently) part-jew and more concerned with organizing online smear campaigns against people he disagrees with.

Part 3 of Metokur's Trout series where the conning of "conservative" youtube personalities by (((BasedMomma)))is described.

Let's see if load times stay fast if more videos get posted with this new tag...

The rest of the Trout series:

Thanks for your work Anfang...and.....this shit you posted is incredible.

Drama....so much insanity.

Satyr wrote:

Thanks for your work Anfang...and.....this shit you posted is incredible.

Drama....so much insanity.

Thanks, yes, if the Trout had any shame he would stay away from the public sphere for a long time but I doubt it. I think the best result is dividing the people. It's inevitable anyway, the only way out is to have some selection, some division. Just the opposite of what the current (((sociologists))) preach.



This was about the most watched Youtube-Stream at the time. Haven't watched much of it (yet) but it's interesting how the latest humour offensive is working out in getting new listeners.
It's not bad to have this popular outreach but it's important that there are elites who keep it truthful and grounded in biological reality and who keep the attempts at (((subversion))) at bay.

Pitting one version of positive Nihilism against another, is what Atwill claims the Romans did when they invented Christianity, by adjusting Judaic dogma to their needs. I realized a long time ago that you cannot fight against the hordes of imbeciles this psychosis exploits and manipulates....it's like fighting against a swarm of bees.
Quantity drown quality in enclosed environments, like this planet Earth....with no accessible frontiers.

A mighty warrior cannot defeat a cloud of mosquitoes, stinging him relentlessly.

Best thing is to immunize yourself, to isolate yourself, and to pit one against another of the same kind.
Nietzsche and Schopenhauer, and many others did so. They were reclusive, unable to deal with the daily crap, and the infinite amount of stupidity out there.
Selective socializing....keeping to your own.
But this leaves the problem of the dis-ease still to deal with.
viruses die out on their own...they eventually kill every host and return to their inert state.
It's part of the viral cycle.
Another method is, again, making one variant of the virus attack another, or invent a strain that is harmless.
Like a bee with no stinger.
Harmless and still useful.

What does a memetic virus use?
Language.
Immunization is linguistic clarity.
Let them play with words...like on ILP.
See one viral strain in dialogue with another version.

I was there for the live debate. It was very good actually. They got up to 12,500 viewers on Youtube, got #1 worldwide and were receiving hundreds of dollars in donations.
Sargon was very poor, he got very badly triggered very early on and never really recovered. The real debate was between Spencer and Styxhexenhammer666, they had a very interesting back and forth which was unfortunately interrupted a lot by the others. I hope they arrange another debate with only Styx and Spencer.
Spencer is very theatrical in his mannerisms and subject, has the sort of pretentious Nietzschean/Evolian philosophical aristocrat thing going on, which was completely lost on the audience. Styx is a basic consistent libertarian/libertine. Sargon is a guy who made a name for himself a few years ago to do with sjws in video games journalism; he should stick to that as he's out of his element with this.
He did an interview with Jared Taylor previously and although he doesn't get as upset you can see that he can't deal with this subject:

Part 4, the last part of the Trout series.
Gives an insight into the slavish personality type and how he accuses others of being and feeling what he is and feels himself. And what happens if such a type has some level of self-awareness? - He begins to claim that others are projecting, as he does project himself, no matter what, the other has become a reflection of himself.
The "dark side" of the "Aren't we all the same?" people.

These fucks convince me that this Feminism Abrahamic dis-ease will be a cleaning house.
Sick morons.
Centuries of sheltering and Abrahamic nihilism has allowed the gene pool to be corrupted by these degenerates.

Using nihilism to weed out the feeble-minded gullible, emasculated ones, will be a good thing.
I support all dogmas that offer a messianic alternative to the left-overs.
God is dead, let us welcome the next Messiah, the next fisher of men-children to clean the cesspool from bottom dwellers and vermin.

Romans used Christianity....we need spiritual nihilistic dogmas, like that, because in every decline there's an excess of herd to deal with.
When a herd of herbivorous is protected from natural culling they devastate the land until they consume themselves to death.
They need some messianic farmer to gather them all up and corral them in a pen.

One additional reason not to bother with places like ILP.
They are doing us a service by gathering in one place all the men-children, retards, degenerates and insane cucks.
There they can "debate" their arse off, speaking of magical places and alternate realities in their heads using empty of meaning words.
The next Abrahamic revision will come.
It's inevitable in out present world with no accessible frontiers.
Not only is it inevitable it is necessary to keep morons placated and inebriated with bullshyte.
The real world is not for the many.
The many need some mystical tail to chase, to pretend they are advancing, progressing, making ground,, when they are running in circles.
They need a symbol/word to play with, like a puppy with a plastic ball, or a kitten with a ball of yarn.

How fuckin' retarded can they be to think Sargon is a leader?
He couldn't even debate Spencer.
But, admittedly, these fuckers are at a disadvantage. They live in la-la-land, and can only sample reality to support their naive, infantile, effete, ideologies.
A chimpanzee has an advantage over them...it, at least, does not doubt its own senses, and does not convince itself that what looks like a banana is really a cucumber "inside", and they don to stick either in their anus and call it an alternative way to digest nutrients, and a progressive lifestyle.

I've always believed that 'LESS is MORE'...that's why I never wanted KT to be about a large membership and popularity.  
My participation in these forums, before KT, was as fishing expeditions. To put these ideas out there and attract those rare few that have not been infected by the memetic virus.
I was never naive enough to believe I could change the minds of the already infected, and un-recyclable, nor did I want to.
Most are scum. No dignity, no nobility, no pride.
Just listen to these fuckers in the vid Metokur made.
Attention whores, cucks, degenerates....who would want to belong to any group that would include them?
Better to be utterly alone than with them at your side.

Actually, it's a good litmus test.
If you buy into the naive crap, or are seduced by word-games, or are, in any way, drawn to nihilism, then you ought to not be with us.
You ought to be exactly where you belong....waaaay over there, where I can see you, but not smell your stench.
This isn't about wanting to change or save humanity....defined as world.

At least that wasn't even my intent.
My goal was to explore and categorize the environment I am forced to exist within.
Like any biologist or explorer, I had to observe the different life forms in it, categorize them by behavioural patterns, and then find a way to exploit, avoid, or find some other use for.

Then I realized some were like me, or like me at a younger age...so I wanted to give them a chance to survive this terrible mental dis-ease.....for my own sake.
I participated in forums like ILP, and before it, in a very combative, insulting, way so as to weed out the garbage that could not be immunized, because it was brain-dead and nothing was left to preserve, from what still had a chance.
This usually meant the young. The old have too much time and ego invested and even if in their mind they feel like they were believing in lies, and that their entire lives were based on bullshyte they have been tricked into believing, they could never admit it publicly.
I realized that this was a matter of life and death, for many.....because though they could not defend their views and had to resort to mind-games, they needed them to tolerate the world.
There's no talking reason to a coward who knows he will go mad, or commit suicide if we accepts the world as it is, and he abandons his idealistic, mystical safety harness.

This is not only about being smart.
This is also about being courageous. A genius coward will be a moron.

I'm not convinced of that. Quantities matter, because quantities define the shape of a society and if you simply allow them to be led any which way it may end up in a state of profound destruction.
This thing with the Romans supposedly creating Christianity to manage and control jews: if that actually is the case then it backfired badly - the Romans fully embraced their own method of control.
If people like Sargon have their way, then Western Civilization is reduced to an atomized individualism divorced entirely from past and heritage. Like Peterson; groups, races, nations are collectivist and a violation of "individual rights", hence evil. Sargon reacts so violently to the alt-right because he fundamentally agrees with the SJWs he opposes. This form of nihilism is based upon the demonization of European group consciousness at base and the only direction it will lead is in the extinction of the European people.

apaosha wrote:

I'm not convinced of that. Quantities matter, because quantities define the shape of a society and if you simply allow them to be led any which way it may end up in a state of profound destruction.
This thing with the Romans supposedly creating Christianity to manage and control jews: if that actually is the case then it backfired badly - the Romans fully embraced their own method of control.

Yes it did backfire.....or the targets responded by infecting the host through the method it used to deal with them.

But, also, in many ways the roman tactic is still effective, because the Christians are the most vocal antagonists of the dis-ease.

What is occurring, in my view, is an internal fragmentation.
Nihilism produces variations and is not cohesive, because it is not restricted by an objective world - but exists in an internal subjective alternate reality.
The only thing unifying nihilists is their animosity towards what is real, or natural - past.
This substitutes tribal identifications, and natural ones, with ideological identifiers. They become tribes within a tribe, and their only identifiers are superficial.
Then you get cunts like cAnus advocating an end to ideological conflict, because in their warped mind it's all subjective and therefore a matter of ideology.

Quantities matter in a closed world - or one with no accessible frontiers.
But what we tell the masses ought not be the same as what we tell ourselves.
The many need lies, because they cannot tolerate truth beyond a certain level.
You cannot integrate such psychosis by speaking the truth about the world. For them it's a matter of life & death. Reality is an attack on them.
In the midst of a herd of cattle you cannot reveal yourself a wolf. They are big and dumb, and many, and will trample you with their bovine mass.
we are trapped in thir midst, whispering to not be heard by them....hoping among them there are other wolves in bovine attire masking as cattle.
But there is no 'outside' the herd. No frontier to distance ourselves from them - only internal ones.  
Our strategies should be adapted to these circumstances.
If it means we only speak a partial truth, or let them understand what we are saying in whatever self-flattering way they need to make it tolerable, then we should not try to change their minds, but only direct it.

apaosha wrote:

If people like Sargon have their way, then Western Civilization is reduced to an atomized individualism divorced entirely from past and heritage. Like Peterson; groups, races, nations are collectivist and a violation of "individual rights", hence evil. Sargon reacts so violently to the alt-right because he fundamentally agrees with the SJWs he opposes. This form of nihilism is based upon the demonization of European group consciousness at base and the only direction it will lead is in the extinction of the European people.

If Sargon and his kind have their way, then the individual is rendered harmless to the State. An automaton to easily exploit and manipulate.
These types are obsessed with law, because they have the numbers.
Marxists use societal laws in their favour.
Open democracies is where they thrive. The weak and stupid will always outnumber the strong and intelligent.
Democracy equalizes quantity with quality, and they exploit this artificial equalization.
The only method we can use is exploiting their idiocy.

The Romans made the Jews worship the Caesar by converting Jesus, the saviour, into an icon of the Roman leader.
The Jews were not going to submit. They were willing to die for their dogma....so he tricked them by using their own obsessiveness, and superstitions.
That was Atwill's conclusion.

Did it backfire?
Yes and no.
It worked and is still working, but it did not completely convert the Jews, so they changed their strategy into secular judaism - Marxism, Frankfurt School etc.

All parasites exploit the host's weaknesses.
Usury exploited western greed and vanity.
It is continuing to do so.

The weakness can be sexual, emotional.
This is the point of entrance into the mind.
The memetic virus enters the mind and begins to grow in there.
Eventually the host becomes a Zombie under the parasite's control.

This is a follow-up on the Spencer vs. Sargon video, with Styx vs. Ryan Faulk--aka Alternative Hypothesis,
aka NewEuropeANP, aka Fringe Elements...oh, the sweet memories!  Back when even Satyr was active on YouTube....

Sargon vs. Spencer was a nice cockfight I guess, but...I'm getting too old for that shit.  Agree with Apaosha, Spencer comes off too enamored of the Continental-style "spirit"-mongering language.  He's boring and vague.  Even if Sargon were more intelligent the two of them would have a hard time getting to the point.  

Styx vs. Ryan was better for people who were unsatisfied with Sargon vs. Spencer. Still, Ryan didn't go on the offensive, which he really should have.  He allowed Styx to nitpick too much.  

Now, I'm watching this: Styx vs. Greg Johnson. I've been waiting for something like this for a long time. I haven't watched it yet. But I'm hoping that in the figure of Styx more and more people can see this ethereal, egghead, non-aggression principle (Rothbardian) libertarian silliness held to the flame of real scrutiny and get to watch it squirm some more. Kudos to him for getting into these discussions, I always wanted him to get involved because he's an astute and observant guy. I want him to grow out of this libertarian cult of self and contribute something.

Had a friend like Styx... looked the same, wore the same sort of a too small, tight leather jacket with scarcely anything underneath, had the same hair, similar glasses and though it was in rural Poland he certainly had an Asian(local Tatars) genes(squinted eyes, no facial hair etc.), spoke in a similar fashion and too held onto these ridiculous theories that made no sense to a retard and he was no retard for sure... makes me think of the Polish philosopher Elzenberg who wrote extensively on the will---intellect dynamics and concluded that the will is an independent entity that dictates what the intellect does and the latters' role is largely overestimated within the humanist movements etc. as to propose that organic makeup can be overcome by 'thinking and reading the right things' and human animal can be fully domesticated as desired. These discussions are a great way to expose the theories and ideas to potent individuals within the broad audience but anybody who thinks a guy like styx or some other white man who married a nigger and believed feminist and equality oriented philosophies his whole life can be 'turned around' using words and arguments is in my opinion very, very naive of human nature.

Cold Weasel wrote:

This is a follow-up on the Spencer vs. Sargon video, with Styx vs. Ryan Faulk--aka Alternative Hypothesis,
aka NewEuropeANP, aka Fringe Elements...oh, the sweet memories! Back when even Satyr was active on YouTube....

Gave up on YouTube before all this censorship took-off.
It wasn't an efficient use of my time.
Those vids take time to make and they can be flagged and taken down in a few minutes.
I wouldn't mind recording some of my positions if another does the editing and the uploading, in a conversation-like format.
Don't like speaking into a microphone, without having someone to bounce off of, and my mind is prone to going off into tangents so I need someone to keep my on-topic.
Tried to use a script but I sounded mechanical.

Anyway...YouTube is still the only way to reach a wide audience, but I'm not so sure, anymore, that this is a good idea.
Other than the obvious personal risks, as displayed in the vids about the douche-bag festival staring Kraus, there's the factor of no payback, if it isn't monetized....and that not possible anymore.
The first issue is more crucial for me, because I really do not care for making money speaking my mind.

polishyouth wrote:

Had a friend like Styx... looked the same, wore the same sort of a too small, tight leather jacket with scarcely anything underneath, had the same hair, similar glasses and though it was in rural Poland he certainly had an Asian(local Tatars) genes(squinted eyes, no facial hair etc.), spoke in a similar fashion and too held onto these ridiculous theories that made no sense to a retard and he was no retard for sure

I've noticed that humans fall in some general categories, and it shows.
Their internal psychology is reflected in their external appearance and dress choices and mannerisms.

There's only so many ways to cultivate DNA sequences.
The environment streamlines the process by promoting and inhibiting this inherited cultivation, so individuals fall into some broad categories....psychological types, attracted to particular philosophical and political positions.
DNA being encoded memories can be triggered, by environmental stimuli or not, reining dormant.
Potentials are limited by environmental conditions, in this case socioeconomic factors, cultural, memetic factors....so they are forced to express themselves in specific directions.

This makes imbeciles believe that all are social constructs.