- mannequin wrote:
- What exactly is the masculine energy responsible for the creativity?When it exists in some and doesn't in others?
It's the masculine drive to prove itself worthy, to replace authority, To be the leader, the done in control, by questioning and challenging its premise; the creative, imaginative, drive to outperform the other by discovering a secret, a method, he is not aware of.
- mannequin wrote:
- In order to create a functional code out of this energy it would have to have the ability to capture the very essence of this energy.
If not, then where is the measurement process? How would this code, the energy and creativity evolve?
Genes are encoded, ordered, energy, formed by the past and passed on into the future - matter is a slower form of activity and what we call energy a faster form of it - relative to the observer.
A code is a set of rules, an algorithm, directing processes, as these have been established through generations of natural selection - trial and error.
A code contains the sum of all expriences - knowledge which wrote upon the genetic code.
- mannequin wrote:
- Perhaps, it will be regularly updated in relation to the natural energy being expressed in its natural setting. Perhaps the code will be one step ahead or always one step behind.
Yes, and then it ceases to be part of the original intent.
The environment affects and infects it - it may even eliminate it as being unnecessary.
Manmade environments, like the present one, are human interventions upon processes - artificiality.
They produce superfluity, safety, pollution, sheltering, boredom etc.
Particularly this environment is anti-nature. Everything about it is contrived, particularly its morals and values.
The more detached form reality they are, all the more utopian, comforting, promising, hopeful they are to the many - because the many are born and remain alive because of them.
Superfluity:Nature is frugal; human environments wasteful.
Obesity is proof that our bodies evolved within austere environments.
Boredom, drug use, addiction to escapism to entertainment, is evidence that our minds evolve for more challenging environments.
Pornography is evidence that sex evolve in more threatening circumstances, acquiring value due to its shared enterprise. Now it becomes a plaything, a distraction, a hedonistic release, with almost zero value, except an emotional one which remain shallow because there is no severity to it.
Safety:Natural environments are full of danger, uncertainty, randomness, unpredictability; humans produce regimentation, predictability, order.
They are masculine in essence, and only a male mind would create them.
This is more of a competition between bloodlines, or between an infection and a heritage now on the decline.
This is why minds suffer from ennui and why they value spontaneity, the adrenaline rush.
Minds feel alive, totally aware, when in danger ...because the brain evolved to serve that purpose.
Only now it is selective, contrived, artificial, just as everything else.
There is only the illusion of danger, otherwise we would not enter into any activity. The threat is manufactured to keep us engaged, totally distracted by it.
- mannequin wrote:
- Would there ever be a complete detachment from the human masculine energy?
Only if machines, institutions, artificiality, took over this role, as is occurring in these times.
At that point all would be made, like bees/ants, female in attitude, demeanor, thinking.
But does the curtain and the machine hide a Wizard?
Imagine, if you will, a method where a male bloodline discovered a feminine way to remain in power, by essentially disappearing, and eliminating all masculine energy that could oppose it.
In Democratic Capitalism a buffer was created - the middle-class - to protect the elites from the poor. Up to that time they had to deal with uprisings - see French Revolution, Russian Revolution etc.
With the middle-class envy, from the underprivileged, could be directed towards this intervening class, and the rich could disappear into anonymity - remaining inconspicuous so as to not raise the ire of the others with their luxurious, privileged lifestyles.
Remember that the mob, in the United states also used this method of conspicuous power.
The early dons were shy and avoided the limelight, and it wasn't until the bigger ones went "legit" that the smaller ones had to face the law, because they flaunted themselves publicly.
The "let them eat cake" became a pretense that they were just like everybody else.
In modern-days only the performers, the flamboyant fortunate and hype-masculine wealthy, of show-business, are tolerated, but frowned upon by "old money" with their ostentatious displays.
So, this was a growing phase. A period where the elite learned how to maintain power and to manipulate the masses.
They disappeared, retreating into the background.
I think Goethe said that"The greatest trick the Devil played on humanity was convincing them that he did not exist."
In early capitalism the elites retreated into the background, like the mafiosi, of old did.
Now they place institutions, black Presidents, faces they place in symbolic power, representing the real power, and they disappear into the crowd, as citizens with more money.
Remember, this is about masculine competitiveness. Liberty and feminism, and racial equality, homosexual rights, and MRA are the method of dealing with any competition: take away the females from a tribe and you take away their future.
Train them to be ashamed of their own judgments, and sensual awareness; make them appreciate emasculation, and you have ready made surrogate females.
The target here are Europeans.
European males, to be exact, because females have always been part of the resources males acquired through conflict.
The most powerful creative force in history have been the Indo-Europeans - the so called, Aryans.
They created the methods of their own demise, because of their competitiveness.
Once the means were invented, anyone with an average intellect, could use them.
- mannequin wrote:
- If so, then will the code have the ability to evolve itself, if so, then how can it be sure it would of went into that particular direction ..
And that's where I, and many others like me, enter the scene, I humbly say.
I am one of many who is trying to take it to another direction; adapt it to these manmade, artificial, hypocritical, realities.
- mannequin wrote:
- Is the natural environment important enough to develop the strength and effectiveness of that code..is the energy only accessed, expressed and evolved through a certain environmental platform?
"Necessity is the mother of all invention", no?
Where there is safety, superfluousness, comfort, there is stagnation.
One does not innovate or create or act, at all, if (s)he has no pressing need - the law which follows the path-of-least-resistance applies, as only the willful, those with a strong will, can self-motivate and think beyond the immediate.
The average remain in the comfort and easiness of the immediate.
This, too, is a method of population control: a happy cow is a productive cow, but also a cow that will never run, even when the gates are left wide open. She will return to the barn where she is warm, and feels safe, and taken care of.
