Postmodernity

Postmodernism cannot compete with realism, with anything founded on empiricism, so they must reduce everything to its own methodology.
When they level the playing field by accusing all ideologies of being socially engineered then they can shift the criteria for evaluating their merits.
From empiricism to emotionalism, manipulating human existential anxieties, preaching justice, fairness, inclusivity, love, compassion....from objectivity towards subjectivity.
The criterion for evaluation is internalized, made esoteric, subjective, so that every individual can find his/her own justification for believing, for validating a theory.

The grounding shifts from empiricism - objectivity - to moralizing - subjectivity.

Postmodernity is an example of memetic evolution, only it is protected from the severity of its own failures so sheltering or collectivized responsibility and moralizing is essential to its survival.
Nihilistic spiritual dogmas and secular, political, ideologies must self-contradict in order to survive so it must find an excuse, some external agency to accuse, and unload and explain its failures.
Self-deception - via linguistics - is central to Abrahamic deceptiveness, and their preservation.
Marxist adopts this to explain its own inability to produce tis desired utopian state, and postmoderns evolve this into a sexual and racial accusation - or systemic racism, positing the Caucasian heterosexual male as the replacement of Capitalists, or infidels.

Nihilism is a spiritual - religious - doctrine changing the symbols words associated with tropes that remain stable from one iteration to the next.
It is a coping mechanism.
Nihilism reaches its peak when it openly worships the absolute nothing, shifting away form the absolute oneness of Abrahamism and the State as the absolute authority of Marxism, i.e., totalitarianism, all is nil, and all can only be a construct of the mind - subjective - ergo the ideal is to collectivize the creative process - inter-subjectivity.

The conviction is so pervasive that not even these speakers dares to challenge their "logic". Their issue is with it going "too far". The "logic" has been followed to its absurd end.
Notice how they do not claim that race is a social construct only that racism is systemic, and they openly challenge sex as being a social construct because this erodes the foundations of a civilization.
The deception is now threatening the survival of its own lies.
Protestors/Rioters take advantage of this deception by following the lie to tis logical conclusion.
If race and sex are truly social constructs then continuing performance disparities between sexes and races must be systemic.
They are now pushing back on the gender issue, having given ground to the racial issue.
Sex threatens a group's survivability in an obvious way - short term - whereas lies about race are more long-term and so less obvious.

Pushing this disease to its own logical end reached the sex, whish began to challenge the propagation of society.
Whereas the negative consequences of the race lie could be absorbed and collectivized the negative repercussion of gender uniformity were immediate and profound.

"Standpoint" is what iamretarded, of ILP, calls "Dasein".
All is ideology. W are born - thrown - into reality as a blank slate and we are then programmed to a particular perspective, from which we can never escape, other than through social conditioning and "proper de-programming". iamretarded tried to use the Socratic method and cultivate uncertainty, so that the opponent is gradually brought to submission by eroding his confidence in what he knows.
"I only know that I know nothing" and no-thing is all I can ever know for certain. It is the divine that one must surrender to.
Admitting it is a form of acceptance of the sacred. Now the individual is "humble" enough to be socially malleable, to be good - he/she has self-cleanes, erased the previous programming, a clean slate, absolved of sin, and is now ready to be integrated, into the divine collective.
His/Her will is ready to submit to the divine will - the nothingness. He is no longer an individual but part of a collective constructing a shared reality within the void, emptiness, of reality.
Abrahamic to the core.

*He mentions Calvinism but shies away from the more obvious example of Judaism a dogma that believes in predetermined salvation that cannot be changed - hard determinism. One is either born into the chosen or is destined to suffer the fires of Armageddon and permanent annihilation.
One of the many connectors on nihilistic dogmas, other than this either/or absolutism, utopianism, fallenness, or paradise lost, is Messianism.
All have some kind of salvation myth and claim to be on a divine mission which must include everyone. All are either saved or all are damned.
There is no in-between. No gradations. No probabilities. All is a final, complete, certainty.
If not absolutely one, positive, then it must be absolutely bad, evil, negative.

Memetic diseases evolve, just like gene based, physical diseases.
Like some diseases meme-diseases - nihilistic - are often carried from hos to host by a parasite - [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
A symbiosis between disease and carrier.
See Abrahamism, and its roots.

The disease produces zombification, a gradual disconnection from reality via linguistics.
It exploits a host's weakness, like its reaction to reality and how it compares - relates - to others within reality.
Ideology is how it evolves - ideas given logos. Mutating with every transmission, gestating differently from mind to mind.
Words referring to words, and the infected host gradually losing contact with the experienced world - see transgender, and the identity crisis.
No objective truth means no reality - all is created by the mind for the mind - if not the individual then a cosmic, a universal mind - God.
See why free-will is denied?
It is crypto-Abrahmism or the evolution of the same disease into secular forms, like Modernity, then Marxism, and then Postmodernism.
Host dies, and the disease goes into an inert phase emerging in a different form - using different symbols/words but maintaining its core identity. It appropriates and corrupts from every host, as part of its concealment - a memetic wanderer moving, constantly changing, adjusting - linguistic it never anchors itself to the soil but is of the air - airborne. when it settles upon the soil, the tangible, it takes on its inert form, as script, waiting for a new host to begin tis cycle of destruction again and again.
When a new host is found it begins to evolve acquiring traits from the host to help it conceal itself. Imitating the host as if it belong to it, but never integrating, never being absorbed - ergo being hated is part of its self-preservation, its self-identification.

She explains how the current variant of this disease evolved, but she does not explain the source or how it is transmitted.
Only I've attempted such a feat. Even Nietzsche diagnosed, remaining within psychology and offering nothing more than symptomology focused on Christianity - never daring to seek out the source.
Like a biologists, or virologist, would seek out the carrier of a virus - see how Covid was traced to bats.
I can speculate as to why he failed to go further, but never know the true reason. Let's say the same forces at work today - censoring and threatening - were at work then, and the added motive having to do with his priestly father, may have been the cause. A boy coming to terms with the devastating disease and how it had affected his family.
His resentment of Christianity is obvious. In all other matters he remains poetically vague.
Perhaps, the reason we've heard of him was because he made certain those that threatened were never certain about who and what his critique was directed.
I offer my own [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
A work in progress, because this disease is memetic is is quick to evolve, to change, to morph, appropriating from every infected host an additional trait. Unable to create on its own, it appropriates and mutates.

Postmodernism will destroy the U.S. and its dominion.
all those nations that had experienced American soft-power for decades after the end of the last great war will be devastated but many have historical and cultural traditions to return to. the U.S. has none of any note, and what it had has been undermined by an alien culture, and its immigration policies in the last 20-30 years.
The 60's were the beginning of the end.
America's European, technologically sophisticated civilization cannot be sustained by peoples that never managed to develop or sustain any on their own nations.
The process will be gradual, almost imperceptible - like boiling a frog by gradually turning up the heat in a pot full of water.
The most affected of America's dominion will be the Anglo-Protestant - Judeo-Puritan nations, easily identified as multicultural, multiracial, open markets, liberal, e.g., U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and Great Britain, the mother SuperState of England and its dwindling dominion.
Brexit sealed Britain's fate.
Postmodernism will destroy these nation States unless they return to earlier stringent, and racially aware, immigration policies. highly unlikely because this would necessitate a contradiction of tis own states ideals, a factor being used against the US by all those peoples that are now being a-woken to America's duplicity by tribes that have a historical precedent in undermining and appropriating cultures.

We notice the different by how nations such as Poland and Hungary are reacting to Americanism having been protected for the majority of America's dominance by an Iron Curtain.
Brainwashing - indoctrination - has not cultivated the mindset which is now destroying the so called "western" countries.
Hollywood is on a rampage, sensing a coming end, producing film pushing the same postmodern Marxist (nihilistic) ideals, propaganda films and degenerate music and art (cRap, fArt) even if they are losing money.
Media is being exposed as what it always was, and they are still being supported by "deep pockets", despite losing huge shares of viewers.
Air of desperation.

Like I've been saying for a long time...
Postmodernism, Marxism, Abrahamism, all variations of nihilistic defensiveness, emerging to cope with self-consciousness and how a subjective individual compares, relates, objectively with another, with the world.

A secret self-hatred, resentment, seeking salvation, i.e., freedom form the perceived, experienced world, form the tangible, the real, the physical....the body.
A underlying desire to become pure spirit, pure idea, pure mind, i.e., eternal, immutable, indivisible, whole, complete, one or none....any version will suffice, to become or return or be included into an absolute.

And you know there are deep pockets behind it all, because they don't care how much money they are losing, they continue producing this crap.
In Hollywood, in TV, in comics, in media everywhere.
Undermining the host is reaching a feverish pitch.
Making a profit is not the goal, pushing the agenda, as the U.S. comes spiraling down, is now their only objective.
Its existential. All about appropriating and corrupting, exposing an modus operandi that can be traced back to the ancient times.
Follow the money.
Money = salvation.
Flesh and blood of the saviours.
Divinity made tangible.

Every version of nihilism, from spiritual to secular, from Abrahamic to postmodern, has its own specialized lingo, detached form anything tangible, anchored to nothing but more words.
Though some are related, creating a school of thought with its own special jargon each has its own vocabulary.
Reality is no longer the limit, the reference.

For nihilists words ought to only refer to other words - to collectivized scripture, to conventional understanding.
Never to the real world.
This is its escape utility. This is how it copes with a world it wants to dismiss as a social enterprise, this is how it preserves a conscious mind that cares when the one-god of Abraham has been discredited.

The postmodern psyche applied.

Though rarely openly and clearly stated, survival of the fittest is the "evil," and all inclusivity - expressed as respect, replacing love - is the "good".
No perspective is to be permitted to perish outside the protective fold.

There is no "fittest" - there is no objective world.
All is subjective, all is perspective deserving to survive because it was spoken, it was born into existence.
No objectivity means there is no world which remains indifferent to human pain and suffering, and it is pain and suffering which makes all worthy of inclusion within the one-group - the one-group, in-group, is divine, i.e., the one-god of Abraham.
Of course, some would say that there are some privileged few who enjoy a birth right, setting them above the rest of the "victims", but most adopt a Commuun-al perspective of parity, or equity of outcome, and so accept no differences, no divergence, no inclusive/exclusive criteria placing some above the rest, within the one all-incusive group.
All are part of the in-group if they show the proper deference to the whole.
There is no room for free-radicals, exceptions - except superficially - there is no place for rebellious ness against the one in-group.
The one-gropu is in a constant state of rebelliousness against what threatens its unity , its uniformity, its sameness.

All theories, all perspective, all opinions, will never face the harshness of natural selection. Never judges outside the one-gropu's collective interests.
Submit to he one-divinity of the one-group and there's no suffering, no pain, no conflict....only love, acceptance, safety....immortality.

Amen

In practical terms what this means is that all opinions are equally valid, and the absurd ought to be considered, equally, with the more sophisticated. the idiotic enjoying equity with the genius.
The terms themselves are the remnants of bigotry and a world no longer applicable.
Nature has no place in manmade worlds.
Its indifferent amorality will find no place among the caring and moral humans, creating alternatives inter-subjectively - collectively, communally.

For the postmodern nitwit the real, the truth, is about which perspective will dominate the collective.
Will it be the product of a democratic process, a Marxist process or will it be fascistic?

Which perspective of the real world will dominate the group, not which perspective is closest to the real, which is superior, which is more accurate, which will produce the best predictions.
The typical postmodern simply, wants the collective to protect him from the negative consequence of his delusional perspective, his naiveté, his stupidity, his bad judgement.
Morality is simply a way the individual ensures that the collective will share the negative consequence of individual idiocy, of individual weakness, of individual impulsiveness.

For the postmodern nitwit what is true and what is false, what is accurate and what is not, is not the objective.
The only objective it knows is will its perspective be respected, will it be considered, will it be accepted, or dismissed, and will it be protected from the consequences.
Feminine.

Respect of perspective, no matter how absurd or idiotic, is evidence that its own will be tolerated, endured and included by the collective, despite its quality.
One group means nobody is ever excluded - ostracized, denied participation.
Feminine.

For the postmodern nitwit competing perspectives is cruelty.
He cannot offer a challenge to a perceptive that makes him feel unwanted, or bad.
All he can do is use feminine methods to undermine and plead, and bribe and coerce his way into the group.

He offers no challenge, he only implies imperfection....because all is imperfect, incomplete...not certain.
He can offer no superior perspective, he can only undermine the superior perspective - Abrahamism.....feminine warfare.

Postmodernity remains on the moral level, the feminine wheelhouse, because it has no rational arguments to challenge.
It must make all subjects a moral issue.
Not what is most probable but what ought to be considered to be most good, most just, most fair...
It must reduce it all down to a moral question.
But to do this it must eliminate objectivity, nature, as a source of validation, because nature is indifferent - when Abraham's one-god loses influence, and objectivity is too hash, too unjust, too masculine.
To return all subjects to the subjective is to place them within the feminine, where emotion, instincts, primal need/desire dominates.

As I said:
Words/Symbols - language, art - detached from reality, i.e., empirical, sensual perceived, must be attached to other symbols/words, solipsism, or to emotions, viz., to organic impulsive reactions to reality.
I've described what the two types of art are: Art/fArt. Representational, representational of a reaction towards the represented.
Art that attempts to connect with the world and fArt that simply projects, externalizes, internal states of reaction towards the world; nihilism desiring to disconnect via fArt/cRap, via symbols/words.

Secularism via Globalism is the core component of propulsion for Postmodernity and the Postmodernists, always was. The advances in communication and travel have only sped up. So Cosmopolitan Egalitarian (as the moral framework), combined with Abrahamic Nihilism, has changed how the masses interact with the social, cultural, political, and economic elites. Mechanisms for Control, of the world population, evolves along with everything else.

The "Brave New World" is more than just a phrase. The Old World meets the New. The two are still distinct, but the Old is attracted to the Young, as the Young become more wiling to take risks than previous generations.

Bioweapons as global warfare is yet another symptom of trends for increased Globalization. The desire for worldwide Communism, under the Authority of a World Government "New World Order", is no longer conspiracy "theory" but conspiracy Reality.

See [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] & [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] (who has interviewed me here at my home) & Alex Jones who is quiet & listening) to Joe Rogan calling the media reporting on the Rittenhouse case- a left wing cult. Thoughts on Rogan’s comments? Appreciate all opinions. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News (@unhealthytruth) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

It's not simply a "cult".
It is a cult formed around a survival motive.
Mutants defending their "right to exist".
Mutants protecting other mutants. Sexual deviants protecting their own secret or admitted sexual deviancy.
If we could interview a sample of these riot mobs we would find a variety of freaks practicing all sorts of weird shit.
Most are, obviously, drug users, but that's just a side-effect of something deeper.

Cultishness develops because these freaks gather in the same places and share their deviancies and addictions/obsessions. They begin to dress alike = ghetto chic - and to use the same terminology - ghetto jargon, cRapping for example - as this coping mechanism is transmitted linguistically from mind to mind like any virus would spread in a herd of bovines.

All three Abrahamic religions began as urban cults.
Just take Christianity.
It orally spread among the Roman underclasses, slave class, because it offered pride in their shame, a new definition of strength in their powerless state, a new health in their depravity.
That it then infected the upper classes is to be expected if one truly understands the human condition and how and why existence is a "problem" for all life, and how ennui replaces stress, and "boredom is the devil's playground".
Liberate the mind from its cares and it will become restless, anxious, needing distractions, something to expunge its accumulating energies.

To put it another way....
When libidinal energies originally kept on standby for the fight/flight mechanism, and then for the reproductive, sexual, mechanism, accumulate easily and consistently they need an outlet....
Sexual deviance is such an outlet.
Among penguins homosexual pair bonding only occurs when there are not enough members of the opposite sex to go around...not a lifestyle choice, nor a first choice....and among humans fetishism, sexual deviance, is founded on the same desire to expunge accumulating libidinal energies.

Denial of biology expressing a rejection of the physical, like race and sex but also mortality and need/suffering, has become the new religion of our time.
Americanism it is called.
It is no different than the rejection of primordial sin. A sign of self-purification indicating worthiness to be saved.

Postmodernity and its proponents, Postmodernists, are making their Political, Social, and Cultural (Marxist) moves right now, across the world, to implement their dreams and delusions as to what the future of Mankind "should be".

The films discussed years ago, Technocalpyse was the most accurate forecast of what's to come. This P(l)andemic, forced "vaccinations", etc. are all mere signs and symptoms of the society they wish and hope to create.

A society where all are forcibly inoculated, with the technologies, syrums, or poisons, of their choosing. Those disobedient to these Futurist Technocrats, will be sterilized or euthanized. A "New Nazism", and one that may very likely succeed, at its current rate of implementation. Currently there is no significant nor organized Resistance capable of beating them back, since they were wise to secure and 'lockdown' the means of Communication, through MSM, and next the Internet, which will increasingly and exponentially become Censored/Banned.

The thing about humouring insanity is that when yo give to one crazy, batshit, perspective, then it's a slippery slope down into the insane asylum.
It's not about intolerance or wanting to force your ideas on others its about having standards.
If you respect transsexuality then you must accept flat earthers because you've already abandoned reasoning and empiricism, so why would you then discriminate between two batshit perspectives; what standard would you use to humour one and not the other?
Don't back down to these desperate degenerates.
If you think it'll cause you too much personal trouble don't speak, keep silent and move on, ignore them if you can, but under no circumstances should you humour them or make it seem like their insanity deserves respect, or that they are making sense.
Don't agree to disagree. This only makes them feel like their insanity is reasonable and just as possible as any other.

Perspectives ought to measure themselves and each other in relation to a shared standard which men of the west have established to be sensually perceived reality.
What we see is not arbitrary nor illusory, otherwise we would not have survived to this point. It may be an interpretation but an interpretation of something present.
Don't  allow them to make you lose trust in your own senses.
What appears to be different is so.
Every form, colour, scent, sound, texture is relevant and important. It reveals essence.

Death was, and is, how conflicts of perspective are settled in nature. If not so severe then being excluded from the future, which is a kind of slow death.
Postmoderns want the collective to intervene so that nature's severity is decreased to an infinitesimal level, or inverted, so those that would be excluded from the future inherit it - the meek shall inherit the earth, rather than the bold.
Meekness is perpetuated in space/time, but can it endure when it is no longer protected from the negative consequences of its weakness, its inferior judgments, expressed through bad choices?

Hardly.
This is why like all utopias - including Marxist and postmodern - it exists forever in the distant or near future.
Like paradise existed in a beyond space/time - outside existence - it continues on in the minds of believers who hold it as imminent, yet forever failing to be present, for as we approach it noetically the more improbable it becomes - like a singularity requiring increasing energies, and its finalization demanding infinite energies.

Postmodern ideology - like all forms of nihilism - is its own worse enemy. If it remains true to itself it cannot be realized, but if it does remain true to itself it cannot survive. 
Its principles undermine its existence outside the mind that holds them as principles, as theory as idea/ideal.

When gene meets meme, only gene can survive, otherwise both perish together.
When the real meets the ideal the real survives, no matter what, because it exists independently from the mind where the ideal can only exist.

Judaism claims to be god's chosen, and you must be born into divine privilege; Islam disagrees and claims you must convert to Islam and follow them to become chosen; Christianity disagrees, says one can simply repent and ask for forgiveness and they will certainly be chosen; Marxism says that's claptrap, and you must work and share the fruits of your labour fairly before you are accepted as one of the chosen; no, no, no say the postmoderns, you are already chosen but you don't know it, and you just have to wake up and claim your inheritance by destroying the system that tried to deny you it by keeping you asleep.

It's all about belonging...to the divine, and knowing it - some as children, others as concubines, and most as slaves, I mean devoted servants.

Postmodernity...neo-Marxism adapting its opportunistic methodology.

Abrahamic anti-rational superstitions pushed to their mystical limits.

“So you see, all the French want no more immigrants.”
At this point the moderator jumps in and says, “It’s not all the French.”
Zemmour replies, “Polls say 67% of French believe the Great Replacement is taking place.”
And here you see Moreno’s reaction: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— malmesburyman (@malmesburyman) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

If a European speaks like this they call him a Nazi.

Years ago I had predicted that after transgenders they would be normalizing paedophilias.

Abrahamism to Marxism and then to Neo Marxism and finally Postmodernism.
A slow detachment, i.e., alienation, form the tangible, physical world - physis, nature.
Detachment from the body is a separation form the past, and need/suffering.

With no past there is no perception of patterns - degeneration of consciousness to a pre self-consciousness state.
With no past man becomes encased within the present, projecting the future without the inhibiting interventions of historical and prehistorical precedence. The only precedence is experiential, engulfed within socioeconomics, i.e., popularity, trends, fashions, hedonism.

Chaos gives birth to near-absolute order, starting the cycle that may, or may not, produce life.
If the order is sufficient life will emerge and may develop sufficiently to produce self-consciousness and culture.
In its effort to arrest chaos, or to turn back time, i.e., to preserve and increase order, life contributes to chaos, beginning the civilizational cycles of waxing and waning civilizations - every time the order will be of a inferior duration and of a higher quality than the one before, enhanced by technologies.

We have cosmic near-absolute order, i.e., incomplete singularity - not complexity - moving - "falling" - towards near-absolute chaos, i.e., infinity, producing the consciousness of linear time - past/present/future.
Near absolute chaos means all is simultaneously possible and nothing is probable, making the emergence of near-absoltue order inevitable, beginning the cycle once again.
Within the cycle - aeon, cosmic age, universe - if the conditions are sufficient, life emerges as an ordering resisting and sublimating order, striving to complete what has remained incomplete order, and in tis striving contributing to the conflicts, multiplying frictions, interactions producing chaos.

The nihilistic mind/body detachment Satyr often speaks about.

The reason for the incessant reference to Nazi Germany as the great example of all things evil and wrong and insane, should be obvious enough by now to anyone with half a brain. That aside, the function of postmodern rationalism is to deny all biological impulses or psycho-spiritual drives of human behavior; only the subjective, the abstract and the theoretical can apply. Therefore things like 'passion' 'national pride' or any display of natural instincts, or group hierarchical behavior, race tribalism, are now taken as 'incorrect human behavior', looked at as 'freakish' or 'alien', something that should not be part of human nature or something that must be 'corrected' by the use of the right rational methodologies.