Things to Watch

They do not understand why Anglo-Saxons refuse this Alt-Right awakening.....
We've already explained this here on KT.
Protestants and Jews have a common psychology due to historical factors, and their shared victim psychology.

Jarno wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Even a cunt like Sargon can be used against degenerate Zombies.
Like canon fodder.
Christians can be used against Jews, one variant of nihilism against the other. Muslims as well. .
Narcissistic degenerates can be used to filter out the needy, lost men-children... sort-out the filth from what can, still, be salvaged.
I use ILP....and is is enormously useful.
Not for finding gems, not at this stage of the game...not anymore.
Things have gone beyond that, as the present state of YouTube proves.  

Everything can be used.

Sargon is a cunt, but Metokur is a cynic.
Both are very useful.

Since the human species is a social species, using cooperation as a survival strategy, the individualism and collectivism ought to be determined along degrees, where the line of division merges in a vague point.
Individualism places the individual first, and in relation to the group.
Collectivism places the group first, and in relation to the individual.

This is easier in genetically homogeneous groups, where the individual is a representation of the group.
In heterogeneous groups, such as those promoted by modernity, this relationship is absent, and replaced by an idea(l) - a noetic construct.....it can be 'freedom', or 'love', or 'god.
Whatever it may be it is ideology with no necessary pragmatic basis.
With libertarians it seems to be a spiritual definition of the concept 'human'.
God is converted to Human, and retains its non-corporeal, racial sexual identifiers.

Satry wrote:

They do not understand why Anglo-Saxons refuse this Alt-Right awakening.....
We've already explained this here on KT.

Do you mean Anglo-Saxons most of all, among others?  

One thing the Anglos have in America, at least, is the 1st Amendment that their ancestors handed down to them, for better or worse.

France seems to be doing far worse, in remaining willfully obtuse and refusing to countenance anything other than universal humanism.  Would you say that's just for a different reason than for Anglos?

Sargon is in no way shape or form useful. He is part of the problem.

Cold Weasel wrote:

Satry wrote:

They do not understand why Anglo-Saxons refuse this Alt-Right awakening.....
We've already explained this here on KT.

Do you mean Anglo-Saxons most of all, among others?  

Anglo-Saxons have a psychological similarity with Jews.
Their culture was humiliated and destroyed.
The US and most Anglo nations are multi-cultural.

Cold Weasel wrote:

One thing the Anglos have in America, at least, is the 1st Amendment that their ancestors handed down to them, for better or worse.

Yes, its a good theory, a nice principle, on paper.
All theories are good on paper.

Cold Weasel wrote:

France seems to be doing far worse, in remaining willfully obtuse and refusing to countenance anything other than universal humanism.  Would you say that's just for a different reason than for Anglos?

France's geographical position and her WW2 choices are what is responsible for her present fate.
I have to say that I am hopping that there still remains that old Franc spirit, as it still must in the Germans, and this is a cover to not be noticed by the only power that is.
Governments are puppets....the strongest hand controls them.
The only hope, I see, other than a full out war, is a gradual European confederation that will eventually permit those, hidden undercurrents to expose themselves, openly.

I see a coming future where the US will have its hands full with the challenge China poses.
They'll have to make compromises, like allow more European independence, to gain their alliance.
As the US declines, Europe can ascend.
The Faustian spirit can then openly come forth.

What shall become of Slavs in your opinion. Currently Poland shifted from pro-EU party of whores and thieves to a rightist one that whores itself to USA, we as a nation at least never accepted slavery and domination and always rebelled but Poland was always inferior to Germany in all aspects and the latest history left a psychological wound that is easily observed and exploited by politicians for their ends(foreign ones).

Slavs have been infected by Abrahamism.
Their Christian resistance is what makes them resist the dis-ease as it is growing in the US, and other Anglo nations.
Christianity was a stage towards post-modernity, and it will be a fall back position.
In the US the only people openly speaking against the (((powers that be))) are Christians....it's a family squabble, that goes back to Roman times.

Europe has an inferiority complex in relation to Germany. Germany has been infected with shame, to keep its spirit down.
A psychological shift in self-identity, in self-consciousness, will have to take place where the common blood is rediscovered beneath the centuries of infection.
Europeans will have to find themselves in their ancestors before the dis-ease took over, and Rome was split.

EU is presented as Globalization, and it could be if it is under the guidance of the US, the only true Globalizing entity.
Globalization is covert Americanization, using American individualism as an ideal of resistance.
Nihilism always plays both sides, like during the Cold War.

If Europeans do not see how EU unity can seem like a part of Globalization but it could be a scheme to unite, allowing for the ancient blood to rekindle.
The Americans want Europe united but only as a economic puppet state to harvest resources....mostly minds, to deal with their own populations dumbing-down.
Eastern and Central Europe is, in many ways the only source of hope...Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Austria.
I think it's because of their communist past and the Iron Wall, that kept American propaganda from converting their brains to mush.
They know of soviet style, overt, propaganda, but are still immune, partially, to Bernays style American marketing and more subtle, seductive, political propaganda.
Soviets used thymos, the Americans use eros.
Ego is what is manipulated in the west.  
Hollywood is infecting them, as is American culture-of-no-culture - populism and pop-culture.
But they're less spoiled than the western Europeans are, after decades of peace, prosperity, and brainwashing.

I'm not optimistic....mostly because the infection, once it takes hold for a few years, cannot be extricated from the host - the host will die.

Like with the metaphorical zombies, you have to let the dis-ease take its course, and protect some, immunize as many as possible, to save the family tree.
Like the Ice Age almost made the European extinct, and the Black Plague, so too this mental virus, will bring European culture to the edge of extinction.
This will clean the gene pool after centuries of dis-ease reproduction, and sheltering.
Only a very few will have a chance to survive - the strongest, the most clever, the smartest of our tribes.
Some tribes will vanish.
Those that survive this plague, this psycho-somatic virus, will be part of the future re-emergence of European dominion.
We've always thrived on war....
I wish I could give you guys a battle plan, but a good general knows when to attack, openly, and when to pull back, and conduct clandestine, defensive, operations.

Those YouTube characters are evidence that the dis-ease cannot be defeated using reason, theory, or direct conflict.
They are simply too many, and they have been given too many rites, been protected for far too long.
Like a domesticated cat, born and raised in a house, de-clawed and pampered, it will fight tooth and nail to not leave. It may become violent if it is forced out.

The Free-speech idea and practically culture in the USA rests on the Anglo population.
As they dwindle in power and influence it will disappear.

I think a main motivation behind this free speech idea is that the Anglo wants to best you with his talking.
Who has the best silver tongue, who is the best Protestant preacher, the best sales pitch-er,....

Let him talk because we must know who is best at talking (also known as who has the 'best' ideas).
In reality, who gets the most applause -> Mass appeal.

For a long time the economics have been to maximise mass production, eventually this quantity over quality principle will lead to ever decreasing quality until pushing quantity can't keep up with the deterioration of quality.

Free speech implies that all speech is equally valuable....all who have a voice and can speak should be listened to.....not quality, judged on merit, but quantity.....chatter, like internet forums debating inanities like the Abrahamic god, for decades.
It's a method to drown-out clarity with information overload. Data flood, to wash away the gold, along with the dirt.  
But it's backfiring, so they are now clamping down.

Look at what happens to forums that allow all to enter....it all reduces to the lowest-common-denominator.....like having a child in the room when adults are trying to discuss life or politics.
like having a rule that all will finish the race, forcing the fastest runners to slow down to accommodate the slowest one.
All it take is one imbecile to reduce all topics to infantile character.

There has never been any real free-speech.
You can speak more freely if what you have to say is mundane, stupid, or part of the popular narrative.

Enoch does very well here, especially considering it's a 3v1.

Sargon will be content if he manages to keep Whites atomised. That's the thing about those principled universalists, at the end of the day they have an audience and they only preach to this audience. Doesn't matter if all are supposed to be atomised at the end of the day he mostly preaches to Whites and they eat up that message.

Enoch is fine but not aggressive enough, and doesn't go too deep (though maybe this is just a tactical decision on his part). He also gets rather emotional, which I found hilarious, and I'm not the only one - just look at JF when Enoch is having his outbursts, what a shit eating grin lol.

I like how Enoch destroyed that Logan guy at the end, he's pure cancer and contributes nothing to the discussion.

I posted an interview a year ago with that journalist, I think zizek is more interresting of a speaker but what I love the most is the feminine gossip of males under this and other videos of this kind. They take ravange against the females and their pimps Jews through him, unaware that both he and they play on the same team with their supposed enemy.

The last man type vegan had a vasectomy btw.

I imagine the future of the last man like giant soy farms spanning the horizons, feeding a population of the vegan slave race who think of themselves as free and liberated while doing their shopping.

The core belief of the anti-natalist is suffering must be abolished.
Life isn't perfect, it's lacking and so it's not good and we must destroy it.

Vegans put a moral universal on killing/suffering. Therefore, killing a human or killing an animal are equivalent. They don't analyze this further, or ask whether humans and animals are equivalent.
We evolved to eat meat because it's a useful nutrient resource. We evolved to not eat other humans because humans who did do that had a higher chance of producing viable offspring, because they weren't preying on their own kind.
JF did another debate with a different vegan where the vegan was stuck on the "inconsistency" of killing animals but not humans, they have difficulty with judgements or actions that are not moral absolutes. They're fanatics in a way.

Meat allowed for the evolution of bigger brains. the brain being the most resource draining organ in the human body.
Meat was also a way the male proved his value to a group.

Our species, like the chimpanzees, is omnivorous.
We are not carnivorous, making our modern daily consumption of meat excessive and a cause of disease.
We live sedentary lives, when compared to ancient times, and we consume more organic fats and sugars.
Vegans have a spiritual attitude when it comes to their diet.
For each one there is a different reason.
This vegan who supposedly also had a vasectomy has issues with overpopulation, or the replacement of natural environments with artificial, human ones.

In a way it makes sense that he would have no problem with killing humans.
He's a closet misanthrope, but also a modern who thinks all humans are the same - equal.
He can't pinpoint why mankind is overpopulating the planet, and he doesn't want to discriminate, because of what it would imply about him, so he just makes a symbolic gesture that takes himself, through his possible future offspring, out of a world where humans overrun nature.
It's a symbolic suicide.
His vegan diet is also symbolic. It implies cleanliness, purity, goodness.
He can't accept that humans are born different so he chooses to believe they become different through the choices they make.
His choice is meant to display his self-respect and superiority.

The simple fact that hierarchies are naturally hardwired into the human psyche, as they are for other species, is now a subject generating much debate.
We are regressing.
The state of modern thinking, represented by philosophy is like a hamster, running on a hamster wheel, trapped in a glass cage.

We are now debating over simple fact....like the fact that memes don to suddenly appear out of thin air but evolve, like genes do, and are extensions of genes.
Moderns are now debating if there is such a thing as a male, or masculinity, or a specialized genetic role that is applied in a system as gender.
The same topics over and over, if not this regressive masturbation, turning the brain into porridge.

The best we can do is find a few douche-bags who have read a ton of books, and listen to them regurgitate and refer, and defer in an endless cycle of pseudo-intellectual image building, and projecting.
The worse is to find some needy nit-wit who discovered an ancient Abrahamic methods of insinuating superstitions by word juggling, manipulating and exploiting the morons that are multiplying daily.

We're not even discussing the world.
We are mind-farting, or diving into script debating who best understood which famous thinker, and who is the superior thinker, of the famous ones.
It's gossip for scholarly nerds.

And where you find the cattle there will be found the egrets feeding on parasites that trouble these poor creatures.
Parasite ridden bovines are always accompanied by parasite eaters.

A human parasite is nihilism...and there you will find bird-brained symbiotic organisms that exploit this source of nourishment.
But that's not exactly right, because this is a symbiosis that is mutually beneficial.
This is more like a deadly mental virus, a memetic virus, that consumes the host from the inside out.
I would call ti parasitical because the host experiences its infection as euphoria.
This virus triggers the host's body to release serotonin.
It's effect is to make the host oblivious to the world it occupies.
The host has no idea what is happening to it....it simply feels a pleasing disconnection, an increase in its indifference to what once caused it distress.
The host behaves in ways that are self-destructive...some memetic viruses cause numbness...a state of calm and bliss overcomes the host....while others produce excitement, energizing the host, causing it to behave in irrational ways.

Head bobbing, kneeling, a crazy smile on an face with an empty gaze...as if ti were seeing beyond the world into some fantasy world.

The problem with releasing the host from its viral ecstasy is that the host cannot endure the world as it is.
It has to find an alternate virus, or it surrounds itself with material, with pleasures,, as if it wished to make the world livable without its virus.
If the virus is not killed quickly enough the host becomes damaged - addicted to its new viral state.
Too dependent on it to return to its earlier healthy state.
Time atrophies the brain...it can no longer return, because ti has failed to develop the traits it needs to deal with reality.
Without the virus, it feels vulnerable.
One of the methods the virus uses to attach to the host's nervous system is to flood it with mind-numbing or mind-accelerating chemicals.
Th host becomes addicted to them.
It's previous state would feel too bland, or too distressing.

Of course it's not specifically young European men.

Women raising boys to think like girls, and married to emasculated men who cannot be real fathers but only be surrogate mothers, taking care of the States children.
Like Joseph, cucks, who lend support to Mary who has been impregnated by an abstraction no longer names god, but institution.
if this new god wishes to test their loyalty, like the other ONE, did with Abraham, then they will take the knife to thir own son, who is not really theirs but is only in their representative care.
The mother doesn't care...she's married to the institution, to the State. She's taken care of, protected from Joseph's nastiness, and she can fornicate with whomever, if she so chooses.
She has no mind to doubt the institution's good will, or the ideology she's been spoon-fed ever since she was a little girl.
Her motherly instincts will not question authority, if she benefits from it.
She raises good cucks, in the image of Joseph - supportive, meek, men, who live in their heads, because there they can escape their reality.

Satyr wrote:

In a way it makes sense that he would have no problem with killing humans.
He's a closet misanthrope, but also a modern who thinks all humans are the same - equal.
He can't pinpoint why mankind is overpopulating the planet, and he doesn't want to discriminate, because of what it would imply about him, so he just makes a symbolic gesture that takes himself, through his possible future offspring, out of a world where humans overrun nature.

He is genuinely confused because JF doesn't always automatically assume the equality of all and everything.

"Well, well, if you don't want to be killed yourself then surely you wouldn't want any animals to be killed (as long as they don't violate the libertarian Non-Aggression-Principle, of course)."

Let's say you have a chicken coop and during the day you let them out to forage for food and at night they all come back to the safety of their coop (which they actually do on their own for the most part) and there is one  chicken which doesn't get back because it's a careless dumb chicken.
Do you care for that dumb chicken and catch it every evening to force her into the coop so that it keeps laying eggs for you, or, do you accept the stupidity and let nature take its course and find the remaining feathers and blood the next morning?
I don't even pose this question with an obvious answer in mind. It's also an expenditure of time and energy to always catch the dumb chicken every evening. That chicken was born to be a rebel, so be it.

Christianity is about the 'lost lamb'.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
The weakest, dumbest, is the one the master expends energy, risks the entire herd, to save.
It's what makes Abrahamic spirituality so attractive to the meek.
They feel that no matter how feeble and inferior they might be that the group will not abandon them.
Victimhood is based on playing the victim so as to garner the most attention from the parental authority.
The baby that cries the loudest gets the bottle first.

Virtue signalling is about appearing to be the most pure, innocent, clean.
I would say that veganism, for some, is virtue signalling to the unknown forces of natural selection.
It has something to do with Buddhism and wanting to be reborn in a higher form, until one is not reborn again, by causing as little suffering to other life forms as possible.
Plants do not feel pain....have no nervous system to experience pain as mammals do.
To not cause distress to the nervous system of any life-form is presented as a calming effect for existential anxiety.
The less distress you cause in others the less you will be born into the form of distress in the future.

It's the butterfly effect, pushed to a temporal extreme.
If you remain as quiet and peaceful and harmonious with environment as possible, you will not stir up storms, and suffer their effects, or be distressed by them in-turn.

The first time you make the mistake of identifying with the weakest, they can perpetually cash out against your integrity. The successful twisters of social tolerance, rip open the gates in the name of moderation.

The vibrating/oscillating pattern can be frozen into a point, in space/time (particle) by measuring the (inter)action between it and the medium we are suing to perceive and measure it - to evaluate it.
The 'point' of (inter)activity is as wide or narrow as our measuring tools and the medium used, allows.

Measuring light, by using light as a medium, involves light vibratos contacting and (inter)acting from different direction - or from different dimensions.
Where/When they (inter)act become the 'point' we name particle.

The dimensions are limited by the sensory organ and/or tool, such as a camera existing in four-dimensional space/time. or rather, only capable of perceiving (inter)actions within four-dimensional space/time.
It is a technique/technology imitating biological methods, and processes, such as how the organic eye works.
It is designed starting from this point of view, and may be designed to be more or less wide/shallow, fast/slow, to accentuate the biological organ using technologies and techniques.

Our medium, light, will then be projects to (inter)act with the pattern we wish to measure, perceive, evaluate.
Theretofore we can only perceive and measure (inter)actions within a given arc of space/time, so our particle will have the 'shape' of this dimensional arc.
If we imagine Energies as vibrations/oscillations of space, then this pattern has a consistent rhythm that covers dimensions in sequences - oscillating between them.
Space being possibility, and order being probability, commonly called matter/energy, with a small E, to differentiate it from Energies that also include non-patterned vibrations/oscillation - random fluctuations.
So, the 'point of contact, we name particle, or (inter)activity, has to occur within the dimension the measuring pattern and the measured patterns overlap, or share.
Furthermore the measuring organ, tool, has to be designed, or has to have evolved the ability to sense (inter)actions within those dimensions.

It is possible for no contact to occur, such as when a vibration/oscillation is so fast that the pattern we wish to measure, being slower, or of a different sequence, may pass 'through' with no overlapping, and so no (inter)action.

This noetic theoretical 'edge' is both exoteric and esoteric.
It is where superstition and nihilism fabricates its 'theory'.

The organic brain needs these complete wholes, because ti can only deal with absolute order, or rather, because it can only process order it considers it absolute.
Even the idea of an 'edge, an end, is based on how the human brain works, and it has evolved to work in the most necessary, minimal, way to ensure survival.
Our brains were not meant to process these expansions, or possibilities, just as it cannot process relationships over a limit which has been calculated at about 150 - [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
It compensates using metaphors, but metaphors on these scales stop referring to anything experienced and so inevitably become noetic, or theoretical.

We can see how nihilism is inevitable, and too seductive to blame only one tribe for it.
That it has come to be associated with a specific tribe is a historical consequence and only in the west.
In the east the same thing evolved in association to other tribes and is known as Buddhism.
Buddhism is to Hinduism what Abrahamism is to Aryanism.

Expansion in populations and in human awareness of self and existence, resulting in a reaction - inward or outward, explosive or implosive.

Mistake...after listening for a while.
Women do not willingly choose beta-males....they do so because of paternalism and monogamy.
Monogamy is a Paternalistic invention.