Desperate Degenerates

Most Desperate Degenerates don't understand the idea of "reasonable doubt".
It's over their empty skulls how and why something could be possible, even if highly improbable.
They have no clue what the scientific method is about.
They think its either/or.
Either something is absolutely true, or it must be absolutely untrue.
The term "absolutely" indicating absolute certainty, implying omniscient, omnipotence, whole, complete.
Their gradual descent down to madness begins with their disillusionment with previous absolutist convictions.
Their certainty eroding, their confidence degrading, until they reach the absolute conclusion that everything is meaningless, well, anything that implies anything about them in any way.

Some few are simply hypocrites. They know but prefer not to know, because knowing is so unflattering, so painful, so distressful.

Truth for them is anathema. It has to be positive, otherwise what good is it, especially when it is gradually exposing them to truth's negative repercussions.
If truth can't be absolutely good, a source of hope and benevolence and a way towards finalizing existence in a complete, perfect utopia, then it must be absolutely evil, and a source of pain and suffering, leading to a hell on earth.
It must be negated before it causes trauma.
Let's dismiss truth as another human contrivance.
You know, since the absolute - indivisible, immutable, complete, certain, whole, oneness - is absent then all must be rescued by the complete, immutable, absolute nothingness, the sanctifying void, the certain peace of oblivion.

Probability exposes them to too much of the pain and suffering they find deplorable, unjust, and cruel.
They aren't really interested in existence, if it is this.
If there's a possibility of the probable to not be so then they must take that chance.
It's a matter of self-preservation....unless madness is the only true escape, before the void takes them into its dark, peaceful abyss, and they are finally rescued from an existence they were never suited for and could not endure, even though they never managed to make sense of most of it without the help of some guru, priest, or expert, with the pay grade above their own.
Marxist may bitch about capitalists but money making is impressive to them, a stamp of collective approval.
If there's one expert out there, offering a possibility, however small, then it's good enough. What's better is if the "expert" also has a following and enjoys systemic sanctioning.
Anything that adds to a possibility's probability - like popularity.

Those who envy want to be envied, and may accuse others of envy to explain why they are disrespected and despised.

Natural selection terrifies a Desperate Degenerate, even in the area of competing ideologies or theories.
A masculine approach of offering a alternative that challenges is beyond his feminized mind.
All he can do is use feminine methods of undermining what he cannot respond to nor offer a challenge. the only approach towards a direct confrontation is via a proxy, an iconic figure with, hopefully, a popular appeal and a large following, hiding behind and never before.

Don't understand Tucker's issues with paedophilia.
Probably paedophobia.
If he had been born and raised in a culture that considered paedophilia moral he would have been praising this poor man, who simply expressed his paedophilia in a culture that considers it immoral and sick to have sexual intercourse with ten year-olds or five year-olds.

It's sad that mankind is still so undeveloped that all sexual expressions are not accepted creating contexts of us against them, my way or the highway.

Rosenbaum - no relation to the chosen - had anally raped a few boys....and?
What's the issue with consent?
It implies choice, or a free-will, and we all know there's no free-will so who is truly ever giving consent?
Think about it.
It was fated, i.e., determined that these fortunate boys would be chosen to be raped by this fine human being...or would be given his tender, sweet, love for free, without their consent...as if the universe requires them to consent for anything....like being born, or where or when.

It was then determined that Rittenhouse - sounds Nazi - would gift Rosenbaum a bullet through his soft, tender, generous loving heart...why all this ritualized court case when it was all inevitable, and could not have been otherwise?
Just sayin'

The fact that millions of dollars are being spent defending his right to life speaks about the state of the US and West for itself.

The Prosecution also revealed themselves when they said this:
"Everyone takes a beating or gets in a scuffle sometimes, that doesn't mean you can just start plugging people with your rifle."

They inherently know that the mob usually only has power in hand to hand confrontations and wish to remove all forms of technological compensation that might aide individuals with the will to kill.

They would rather see you beat to a bloody pulp and yet still have your life intact to live a broken existence than to end the existence of some of the most unfit mutations with your health intact.

This is why i say that bullies who just "beat up" are similar to contact combat athletes, who while being good within the limits of their arena, would be largely ineffective in a world where they had to compete against those free to use firearms, shields, swords, or some other form of tool that requires discipline and art to master and is lethal.

I recall from somewhere mentioning that the progenitor of martial arts in the east was originally a woman.

We'll need context, of course.

White male getting a beating is not the same as a white woman or a black man getting a beating.
Victim hierarchies.
If her were sematic then it would be case closed....that identity trumps everyone on the victim scale.

Oh, and your obviously a Nazi.

A picture is worth a thousand words! [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Read The Signs (@Semiogogue) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

We be artists, yo.

If A claims that eating faeces is just as valid a perspective as B claim that eating fruit is healthy then there's only one way to decide the matter for imbeciles, yet for higher minds there's an alternative that does not require them to eat shit.

Shit eaters may demand that the collective be o standby, just in case they get sick or poisoned by their "perspective" being put into practice, but most are cowards and they will never ever apply their bullshyte, they will only talk about it theoretically, as a way to justify why their inability to find and pick fruit.

If disagreements were settled with an agreement then science and philosophy would end.
Disagreements are settled with a indifferent standard which both are held accountable to.
This standard is called "empiricism" in science, and reason, in philosophy.

Agreements of disagree are social contracts - feminine duplicitous settlements - that postpone and convert them into insidious occult conflicts using undermining and reputation to settle them. They become part of Sigmund Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents....eating away culture.

Person B believes the earth is flat. Person A that it is round.
Person B is a nihilist and a postmodern.
He wants his beliefs to be respected and given the benefit of doubt, since nobody can ever be absolutely certain about anything and nobody is omniscient, now that the Abrahamic version of the one-god has lost credibility.
Person B wants Person A to agree to disagree....and each can live their own lives in accordance with their own convictions. He doesn't want to fight, nor a debate, because he is clueless and his beliefs absurd.
But that is not where it ends.
Person B insists that Person A come to his rescue if he chooses to live in accordance to his flat earth convictions and faces negative repercussions from this irrational conviction. Person A ought to bear some of the burden of Person B's idiocy.

This "moral logic" is what can be applied to any conviction....see abortion, see feminism and racism....and everything.
The idiots want the collective to protect them from their idiocy so they can continue living in the delusion that they are the equals of others.
Postmoderns are moral Marxists having failed to produce a Utopia with the previous material Marxism.
The superior must accept the moral duty to accept a portion of the negative consequences - each in accordance with his needs and his powers - of the inferior ones poor choices, founded on their poor judgements.
This moral duty is often believed to be divine in origin, or inevitable, fated, part of universal order.

It's worse than that now.

Person B formed a political organization, and now comprises 51% majority of the US government and its world influence. Person B votes themselves more money and political leverage than ever before. Person B begins teaching Flat-Earth curriculum in the public schools in the 1990s. Person B declares, that if you threaten school boards, then you are a domestic terrorist. Person B passes $4 trillion of spending to Flat-Earth Theory, anybody who disagrees is also a domestic terrorist. Person B is next looking for Judicial superiority, so that more judges, lawyers, and prosecutors can punish those who "speak out" against FET.

If Person B's feelings are hurt, then s/he/it/they/zhe may make an Emotional Claim support to the government to pay for s/he/it/they/zhe's food and lodging. Person A must be taxed for this. Person A must pay for FET. Person A's guns must be confiscated. Person A must be removed from social media, for speaking out against FET. Person A must be sent to a re-education camp, and be vaccinated for Anti-FET sentiment.

How a 1970s "social experiment" in the heart of Copenhagen became one of the world's oldest communes.

More from Witness History: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— BBC World Service (@bbcworldservice) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Reminds me of ILP...Micro of a Macro.
Even the name is appropriate. A slight modification of a common source.
Even those who claim to be atheist or Marxists, are still true believers in the same concepts.
Name changes do nothing but self-deceive.

I don't care what Desperate Degenerates - spiteful mutants - do with their bodies and time, or why they do it, or why they think they do it, or how often they can do it.
What I care about is being expected to directly or indirectly support and help them do it, and then expected not to notice, or moral grounds.
What I care is how what they do affects what I do.
That they demand the collective to help them continuing doing what they do only tells me they wouldn't if there was not this support - this is what drug addicts do. They expect someone to help them to continue, and then to resurrect them and help them recover so that they can do it again.

Entitlement?
Juvenile?
Say no more, it's impolite, it might be immoral to say such things, to notice them. 

Don't care if Mary is a slut, or has bad judgment or is impulsive and cannot control herself around hot guys...what I care ifs that she expects me to help her, in some way, to continue being a slut....eliminating nature's way of limiting feminine promiscuity - correcting nature by intervening.
That's not going to help Mary to stop being a slut. She'll only live out as a slut and be forever remembered as being one.
But why OUGHT I pay for it, or pretend that she ain't a slut?

Calling Mary a "slut" isn't a moral condemnation it is a statement of fact, concerning her sexual habits. 
Like calling John a glutton isn't a moral judgment it is a judgment concerning his eating habits, in relation to his physical needs.
Low discrimination over how much and what quality of food is consumed. John eats junk - using his mouth - and Mary fucks - eats with her pussy - genetic garbage. 

Gluttony leads to obesity, which may lead to heart failure, diabetes etc.
What does promiscuity and being a slut lead to?

Well Mary wants access to contraceptives and abortion clinics, funded by the collective, which would be like John demanding appetite surpassing and cholesterol pills and access to stomach stapling and fat removing clinics, and then a heart transplant....funded by the collective.

Where does this story end?
Is Mary or John healed, or happy....no.
The underlying reason why she's a slut and he's a glutton remains.

Will mother's love help, or is it time for daddy's tough love to take over....if either Mary's parents are not sluts and John's are not gluttons?
I know death solves it....but why OUGHT we all to die with them?

So called “research” carried out exclusively by cis people, I see. Not like they (plural) are going to be biased or anything. 🥱 [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Edward Dutton (@jollyheretic) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

As I had predicted years ago...paedophilia will be the next paraphilia to be "normalized", or "brought out of the closet of shame" and made "proud" of its sexual dysfunction, its unfit mutations.

If this process reaches the levels of transsexual normalization, and homosexual normalizations, the next paraphilia to be normalized will be bestiality - it is unjust to stand in the way of a loving relationship between a human and his animal companion. Perhaps, the idea of a family will be adjusted to include multi-species relationships recognized, by law, as a family unit.
I don't think this insanity will ever reach that stage not because humans will come to their senses but because the system will collapse way before it reaches that level of degeneracy.
It's already crumbling after decades of homosexual normalization and with transsexuality being currently in the process of being legitimized as another genetic defect that must be legitimized.
Spiteful mutants are rising and exacting vengeance on those that shamed them for so many decades.

Ageism will be the "prejudice" to be overcome, and then speciesism.
It follows from the "logic" that biology cannot be the source of identity.
Those who resist them will be called Nazis, fascists or pedophobes....and those who resist bestiality will be accused of hating animals, or non-human life.
Luckily postmodern nihilism cannot reach that level of insanity. It will succumb to those who remain sober.
An insane asylum cannot organize and withstand the invasion of external forces that retain their sanity.
The U.S. forces are already being undermined by these degenerates.

An example of excellent historical pseudo-intellectual spin-doctoring and revisionism, for the chosen ones, is a delicate science that requires years of suckling on the teat of political correctness. Self-deception is necessary to achieve this level of it. It's become a whole world of competitive expertise for these intellectual parasites. Who can sell it in the most convincing way.

Stellar doublethink tactics.

Even if its true, then it should be negated anyway because the interpretation of it is unacceptable. It has to be the 'correct' interpretation, and if not, then the one interpreting is the problem, not the truth of the matter.

Feminization of Man

Random mutations - chaos interacting with order - accumulate under conditions of sheltering - domestication, husbandry, institutionalization - resulting in Dutton's "spiteful mutants" and my "desperate degenerates".
As a consequence nihilism becomes the only way to remain blind to their own condition - self-deceiving. This leads to Abrahamism and via Marxism to Postmodernism and its political power. these "mutants" become unable to tolerate existence outside some form of linguistic self-deception.

Recall how I trace nihilism - both positive and pure - to the emergence of self-consciousness, or to the ability to be objective, rather than remain, like animals - entirely subjective, i.e., outwardly focused.

There's a subtle yet distinct difference between autism and hypermasculine.
Both are masculine in essence. the former, i.e., autism, a mutation that is incapable of developing feminine traits, while the latter, i.e., hypermasculinity, an overcompensating reaction to emasculation, i.e., feminization.

There's a reason why adultery, consensual or not, has been made unethical in our culture - I separate gene based morality from meme based ethics.
The reason has nothing to do with a god, or divine rules, though they are used to discipline the masses of mediocrity that are prone towards hedonism when given the opportunity.
A simple yet decisive reason which stabilizes human systems.
When this reason is ignored or dismissed it is usually at the end of a civilization, when it is crumbling.

Paglia, and many others have commented on the fact that degeneracy and hedonism is a sign of a declining civilization. Something all empires experienced before their end.
Mediocre minds only recall this end phase because they cannot, or CHOOSE not to, recall the Empires when they were at their height.

Normalization begins with an attempt to make it a part of nature.
What is born is of nature, ergo deserves to exist.
A victim of determinism - what has been determined before fertilization, gestation, and birth.

See how the rejection of free-will fits into this victim psychology.

An individual awakens - is thrown - into circumstances that determine the fitness of his paraphilia, his genetic mutation manifesting a sexual dysfunction.
Sex has to be disconnected from its original function, reproduction, and given a modern, updated, postmodern adjustment, hedonism.
Hedonism is the foundation of degeneration and desperation for a means with no end cannot gratify the mind as much as it can satisfy the body, for a while. .
Pleasure becomes defining, not as a means but as an end in itself.
Just as asceticism is reinvented to be an end, not a means, as it is in Hellenism.
The bipolarity of pleasure/pain, as a return to the simplicity of an animal, reinventing man as a mere manimal.
A manimal no longer concerned with ends, but as means as ends in themselves.

What does a dog know of feeding or fucking. All it knows is that it feels good.
But there's a difference between animal, exiting in nature, and a manimal born and raise din modernity/postmodernity's manmade environment.
The difference is predation, natural selection, the intervention of the herd on the consequences of a particular mutation so as to make all mutations equally fit.
In nature animals are born with mutations the give an advantage, are neutral or offer a disadvantage to the primary motive, survival and the secondary motive reproduction - not known by the animal itself. Animals do not know why they act, why they do what they do, they simply do it.
They are action and nothing more than actions.

But man is self-aware and so he must justify his actions.

I recall this film Woodsman, which promoted pedophilia.
Using emotionally infused semiotics to humanize the character. Just like they did with racial equality and multiculturalism in the move Crash.

Normalization of paedophilia has begun, as transsexuality is already being normalized in the US.
Where else?
The same degenerates, from the same groups.
Jones called the pattern "revolutionary spirit" - a revolution against reality, a rebellion against nature.
Nihilism is such a rebellion.
The one-god - singularity - is such a rebellion against existential multiplicity.
Death is a rebellion against life.

Did anyone recognize the freak on 6:25, "Fadius"?

I posted this but here he is again, with Hicks.

Κορίτσια σας βρήκα Γαμπρό [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— CANEA (@CANEA49) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Tikkun olam.

Heal multiplicity, heal diversity, heal conflict....create the singularity, uniformity, make multiplicity superficial.
Worship the nil.

Just another very normal, sane leftist terrorist. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This is the consequence of compounding mutations protected from natural culling processes.
If this degenerate manages to procreate all that genetic garbage will be given one more generation.

Come again? Raised what you said? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Adam Green Know More News ️ (@Know_More_News) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Aren't they all?

I give up... [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— HvB (@HAWTToys) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This is what Putin is fighting against...this is why Americanism must fall, before it spreads further and there's nothing left.