- Poison IV wrote:
-
- Satyr wrote:
- The complexity is overcome by evolution.
Depends on what you're considering complex or non-complex.
A non-complex black person might consider it non-complex and unworthy of delving into, while someone who is in fact more complex, will pick-up on more.
Complexity is, therefore, a subjective term having to do with the individual's ability to perceive and to make sense of the
(inter)connecting relationships and
(inter)actions.
To accuse an other of
simplifying things when he is saying that
appearance matters or that
race is not totally a superficial designation is an easy way to dismiss the
complexities involved in assessing what appearance represents and how race comes about.
We
begin with the knowledge that the senses do not evolve to
trick us or
mislead us....nor are their methods of generalizing and simplifying without
merit, since they have
successfully served the survival and domination of the organisms that depend upon them.
So, we begin with the recognition that appearances do matter and that they are more than simple and illusions....they are
crucial and necessary.
- Poison IV wrote:
- It is the person who recognizes that there is indeed complexity that becomes complex. Recognizing that there are things which we are still unaware of is positive thinking that leads to evolution. Those who lack curiosity will not overcome.
Obviously to be capable of knowing one must first admit that he is
ignorant.
Complexity is a term describing a level of (inter)activity which in
relation to the perceiving mind is too intricate to find
patterns in ans so is incapable of using: placing within a larger
world-view.
- Poison IV wrote:
- Social language becomes smoother and intricate, as do our physical features, the more complexity we integrate within.
There are certainly complex beings, Satyr. Whether we have awareness of this complexity or not has no bearing on the complexity; it does help us to develop into the complexity that we tune into.
Like I said, the term complexity is used to indicate ignorance or an inability o find pattern within the (inter)activity...we also call this
chaos.
What makes individuals complex is the fact that they are more than their individual experiences and
lifespans but are the product of generations upon
intertwining generations all with their own experiences and relationships. Nevertheless, the individual appearance, the presence, is the sum total of all these complex (inter)actions and it is up to the perceiving mind to decipher the
clues and to piece them together.
An eye for detail and an ability to construct coherent mental models is essential to this process of understanding or knowing the other.
Most of this occurs
automatically, due to an evolved methodology based on
a priori concepts.
for example, scientists have discovered the basic formula for beauty, symmetry on the physical plain because mental symmetry is more difficult to perceive and it usually becomes apparent after-the-fact or with more subtly. This is because although physicality is the
accumulated experiences of the past, the mind is its ongoing manifestation.
So, with Greek sculptures they discovered that there was a mathematical formula involved in the placement of the eyes in relation to the nose in relation to the sloping of the forehead.
When a man sees a beautiful woman, in the prime of her fertile stage, he does not require an computer, an expert, some chemical analysis, a measurement...he picks up on the symmetry, the relationship of hip to waist ration, the harmony in the face the shine in the hair. The appearance is deciphered and the past is
intuited.
But some minds are not
content with just intuiting things;
feeling them. They must know why and how...they must
understand. This is a power
desire. To know is to have power over that which is known. Some call this deconstruction or
demystifying existence.
- Poison IV wrote:
- Many do not. They walk around cluelessly, with nothing natural about observing aspects of human nature.
It takes an already present level of complexity and intelligence to notice the extent of another's.
Indeed, and this is why I've said that you can fake being clueless but you cannot fake being wise or intelligent. When someone is faking it he must fake it
downwards....this in itself is a
power relationship. Because to imitate is to
possess and possessing is a power relationship.
- Poison IV wrote:
- If we were each endowed with the same sensitivity to body language, there would be a lot more philosophical discourse on the matter. No one knows what the hell it means, even if they can sense it just a little, they can't define it.
This is more true today where technologies can be used to mask a deficiency. One can get
plastic surgery and cover up a physical defect; one can own books and a computer and pretend to be more knowledgeable that he is; one can purchase a good education,
parroting it and pretending that he is more intelligent than he really is; one can compensate for being short by purchasing a big car or by becoming wealthy.
More than this, social rules that
restrict human behavior also contribute to this illusion of
uniformity.
We all behave in accordance to the same general rules in etiquette; we all sample from the same cultural reproductions; we all learn the same things in the same ways and then repeat them verbatim; we are all expected to behave in the same, general, ways, never overstepping the
social rules.
This lends itself to the illusion that we are all the same or that we, at least, only differ in small ways.
The only divergence allowed is one acquired
via the system itselff. The other
rises to the top because he has played within the rules or has proven to be more useful to the system he has surrendered to...and then he is expected to remain
humble and polite and offering hope and assistance.
To be elected
President, for example, is to convince the most people who are by and large intellectually inferior to you that you are one of them or that you, at least, are not
threatening to them.
- Poison IV wrote:
- Yes, and we're hinting towards something slightly more telling than 'just' a smile. Obviously any moron can see a smile, but can they see through a smile?
When we speak of trickery on this level we are talking about more than the moment.
To fool the other is an evolutionary advantage...and to pick-up on it follows along. But some are very good at it, for a short spurt.
What is involved in seeing the fake smile is memory.....and this is where
genius comes in, for it has to do with retaining an image in your mind as clearly as if you saw it recently; to then compare it with the immediate appearance and find discrepancies.
If, for example I meet someone and I remember his
gestures and
facial expressions then if I meet him again, at a much later time I can compare and find divergences which may require an
explanation. The explanation might come with further contact.
- Poison IV wrote:
- How about people that talk and talk and talk without the perception to know when no one is listening or doesn't want to listen. They're the type that thinks everything is just honky dory and wants to know about their day and their car troubles. They're simple- the type that listens to every little drama as if it mattered.
Excessive talking means someone wants to be noticed; to be listened to. Having nothing interesting to say (s)he might repeat trivialities.
- Poison IV wrote:
- A cretin can call the world non-complex, does that make it true?
So could someone who is not so silly, and does that make it true?
Again...complexity is a relationship of mind with that which it perceives.
To a
monkey a
spoon is complex. To a
cow a
fence is far too complicated to make sense of and to deal with.
You can draw a circle around a chicken and then let it lie...it will not move, though nothing is holding it down.
- Poison IV wrote:
- Telling yourself or others that the world is not complex can be very comforting, and also very useful.
No, the world is complex because most of it is not perceived and unknown.
The majority of humans, on the other hand, are simple, but they like telling themselves that they are too complex to box in and too unique to comprehend.
If this were so
marketing would be impotent and political
propaganda would be laughable.
- Poison IV wrote:
- We're each gifted...with the same gifts etc etc
Already 'evolved', aware...
Very tempting, very dangerous to those who believe it.
No equality is implied.
A
horse is gifted with senses and a form of
consciousness, as well.
- Poison IV wrote:
- These women are often not very complex. They think about muscles and cock and bling. Do you really think they can smell the difference between a nigger or someone of their own kind?
They can sense a difference but they cannot bring it into
lucidity.
- Poison IV wrote:
- Yes, it's sold to them, but they are still already inadequate, numb, dumb. True instinct overrides.
That's slick, that's smooth...I like that, am attracted to that, I want that is advanced sexual selection.
It also works for a person's imitation. To admire what one considers above them, and slowly progress towards it is betterment. So many have no real desire to reach a state of higher culture.
To understand humans, in all their
simplicity, is to understand their basic instinctual drives as these adapt to the current
environmental conditions.
for instance, an ambitious man, in the areas of social status and wealth, is a man driven by a basic instinct to have access to the most and the best quality females.
To forget this makes you surprised that Tiger Woods fucked around.
To forget this makes those pseudo-intellectual fag feminist men perplexing. Once you've dismissed nature, as most
liberals do, human behavior is too complex to understand and it is always disheartening and confusing and hurtful.
To understand the modern
feminist male one has to study primate behavior and in particular how
beta males or males dominated by an
alpha act and what they do to gain access to female
sexual possibility.
To understand female "complexities" the ones that
baffle the
average man one has to understand what the female's
sexual role is.
- Poison IV wrote:
- Blacks are especially prone to wanting to be what they are not because of this constant feeling of inferiority, but they also have the most room for evolution since they carry the most amount of genes.
Blacks can reach high social status, and often do as a way to prove themselves.
Yes, and this is because in the current cultural environment we are
reverting back to more
primal sexual behaviors. the emancipation of the female and her
acquisition of her
natural sexual power means that male behaviors adapts accordingly.
Women are becoming more
promiscuous, under the protective eye of the
institutionalized alpha male (the institution
AS alpha male), and so all biological males adapt, taking on
beta-male behaviors and sexual tactics. Blacks are more
primal and have less to deal with; the role comes naturally to them.
- Poison IV wrote:
- Whites are obviously naturally inclined to behave in such a fashion, and Jews are the best at the games we play.
Whites tend to be more 'pretty' and petite, delicate, avant garde. The women are dollish type cats.
Yes, but many whites have more awareness to deal with.
I've found blacks to be more focused on intercourse and more willing to defer and to flatter and to run after a female...any female.
The
nice guy is a typical beta-male strategy.
