Observations and Thoughts too short for their own threads - 1

The priest tells his congregation that all man is guilty of not bringing about heaven on earth.
The congregation feels guilty but they are less guilty than the man on the street who didn't attend church so they preach to him about man's guilt.
And so you arrange the pyramid of guilty men and you bind them all together via narcissism, the beautiful soul.
We all deserve heaven on earth and we are all guilty of not living up to the ideal society.
We all are ideal souls suited for that heaven on earth, if only we would work hard enough to make it all good, to make everybody good.

And they won't have it any other way, they can't have it any other way.

Why would they feel/be guilty for not bringing heaven on earth, does not their god say ''my kingdom is not of this world.'', we've other kingdoms to rule.

The priest is not necessarily teaching in an old-style Christian church.
He could also be a priest on Twitter bemoaning the injustices of modern bigoted society.

Few have seen that, at the bottom of knowledge, all philosophy, all culture, all weltanschauung, all communication, lies myth. Myths are the stories embodied by acts; assertions, and acceptance.

Freedom…
Freedom is being a dead body floating down a stream.
Going with the flow, all resistance gone.
The Anglo soul floating downstream.


A country at war is about having the junk-food-glibertainment lifestyle for the majority who show their moral indignation over what makes that lifestyle possible.
This is not war and their indignation is not anti-war.

What is shameful and sad about degeneracy and cowardice is not only the ugliness of the coward themselves, nor only the shame they bring upon their ancestors, but also the humiliation they allow of their ancestral enemies. Their weakness is an insult to not only the man of centuries past that made them, but also to the many noble spirits who died by their hands.

A man's might, majesty, and power are forever limited by the woman he must redeposit himself within, to give rebirth to such traits. Thus a woman limits mankind. But a woman's greatness is limited by her grace, humility, and dignity. A woman always lacks in imagination and ideals, and these traits can never be cultivated enough by mankind. In such a way man and woman are complimentary, and the strength of one must embolden the other.

Only a great woman can complete a great man.

For power and control:
The freer the memes, the more restricted the genes. And vice-versa.

Immigration is being turned up to 11, criminally so, because the internet has enabled greater access to alternative viewpoints and narratives. They do not want a white nationalist faction rising up against their power structures. They are working double time to disenfranchise white people from political and economic influence, because their narrative is collapsing.

The Terminator movie

This idea of a robot coming back in time and saving you from death (because you're a hero in the future) is another instance of Judaic coming-utopia thinking. The future idea(l) is what will save you from your present and so, also, save you from your past.

The same can be said to those who wait with hope for anything to happen. Such as an old man to come 'rescue you' and guide you.

What is the difference between hope and patience, then? Something I may explore later..

While waiting, instead of being offered coffee or tea, there will be asked if you would like to know the password for the WIFI connection.
While conversing, there will be a hold in movements because someone wants to make a photo.
Looking at all those people in the supermarkets, how much has changed in the mentality of searching and gathering, without the hunt and necessary preparations, you see them absorbed in their own worlds without fear for enemies wanting to overtake their resources but only a ''be the first to get it and stand in line''.

It becomes exponentially difficult, impossible, to believe in anything after toiling in the manure, fertilizer, soil, and foundation from which all ideas originally sprouted.

Any meme, any idea(l), can only grow to the potential of the particular genes, the body, the brain allow. Only the noblest souls and strictest purely bred europeans can "give birth", procreate the greatest ideals of humanity. Do not cast pearls before swine! The lower levels of humanity cannot withhold nor withstand great ideals, a superior education, the highest knowledge.

Of Philosophy.

Man is rendered utterly predictable by his sexual impulses and deviant (suppressed) compulsions, so much so that his return to society (women) is inevitable. A man has no future alone and excluded from all societies, in the wilderness, lest he has kidnapped a woman already by force and stolen her away from society.

And so too are women just as predictable as men, but inversely by their complete lack of sexual compulsion. A woman's sexual desire is the opposite of a man. Instead of the male drive to 'own' a woman, to 'have' her, she desirese to be owned, to be had, to be taken, to be dominated.

If her beauty, nobility, grace, and dignity (virginity) is high enough then she will tempt every man who crosses her path, igniting his sexual drive. No man can deny a True Beauty, a regal, a queen. A woman who the males of a nation would gladly fight for (to represent the chance, although most improbable, for procreation with her).

One of the more difficult challenges I've ever taken up was to try and prove the efficacy of swords and shields without ever using them. This is essentially how it is to go about trying to prove your interests matter while beholding yourself to a massive (universal) social framework such as morality and its logical ends. The larger this framework, the less representation you will have and the less you will be able to effectively argue for your position within it (that is, the less people will care for your group if other groups within that same one are larger).

Connecting this nihilistic conception of universal morality to reality becomes a social or, specifically, a sexually defined framework - as humans become defined by sexual reproductive ability (typically; more elitist individuals have more qualifiers). However, even this qualification was destroyed due to homosexuals and neutered individuals. By disconnecting morality from the real world interests of the actual species which uses it (such as disconnecting it from whether one is disabled or not) it becomes open to exploitation by bias and interpretation, which may frame it anyway it wants.

How? Because morality becomes about pain - about who had their feelings hurt or who suffers the most. The way to drive moral or political change then becomes about awareness - which means the people who control this change are the media. Whomever is reported/interpreted to be in the most trouble/suffering becomes the beneficiary and whoever is the "oppressor" becomes the "evil". Ignoring newsworthy events which may vindicate certain groups the media organization doesn't want vindicated is one such way of bias. Likewise, the under reporting of violence from some group is a means of ensuring they're not demonized.

Got to love the bureaucracy.

Here most of the job ads are made by recruiting companies...So these recruiting companies offer services to the other companies by "selecting" possible employees they need. So you don't even directly get interviewed by your possible boss, no, you get interviewed by the fucking recruiting company and THEY "introduce" you to the boss if you are chosen. So often you have to go to a job interview in another city (20-50 km), since the interviews takes place in the recruiting company.

So they get government funding by just selecting employees for other companies and they don't even reveal the name of the company before you go to an interview. There is no good explanation for this other than they are profiting from it. This one fucker at the employment agency tried to explain me that the reason why they don't reveal the name/address of the companies is because the companies would otherwise get "bombarded" with calls and emails asking for jobs.

It seems like a lot of people either have hard time pretending that their jobs matter, others fool themselves and think that they matter and are doing an important job. So this worker at the employment agency had to justify his own job by saying that recruiting companies matter. I don't know how delusional you have to be to believe in this. It seems like people who have these "safe jobs" just live in their own world and admit this different "reality", they just keep pretending that there are a lot of job opportunities and that their jobs matter even though they are employed just because there are a lot of unemployed.

Three Modes of Human Reality:

There is the world as presented to us falsely.
There is the world as presented to us truthfully.
There is the world as it is without re-presentation.

The first mode is most common. Idealistic, Humanistic, Nihilistic. Modernity is full of lies. Most manimals are stupid, representing an average and below-average intelligence. These types are easily confused, contradict themselves often, and themselves cannot navigate through life and society without 'Authorities' holding their hands. These are the types on ILP, who need dead philosophers to hold their hands for them, intellectually.

The second mode is uncommon. Realistic, Objectivity, more Scientific. Above average intelligent humans and Moderns are attracted to "the way the world is", but cannot access it. They feel uneasy, that something is wrong, a "glitch in the matrix" of their social programming. They are slightly curious about Truth and Philosophy, but don't know what to do next. They recognize that authorities are often times false, wrong, lie, and err. However this group lacks the "full" move to objectivity. Remaining a little oblivious, not intelligent enough, or not courageous enough, they are on the periphery of humanity. This group has Potential, the types that can be "saved", plucked out of the Matrix.

Then there is the World as it Is. This requires the most energy, effort, intelligence, and sacrifice from those who dwell within Humanity and Modernity. However Truth, Objectivity, Reality crops up from time to time in human history, through war, spouts of crime, violence, when the human animal temporarily breaks free from his chains. Because Instinct, Reflex, Nature cannot be denied. Death cannot be denied forever. Inevitability comes for us all. And to remember this, to tap into it, to honor and respect it, will lead you directly back to the source of life and reality. This third group is rarest.

Human Women generally and normally give birth to a female, a daughter, before having any sons. It is much rarer that a human woman gives birth to a son as her first progeny. It is rarer still that a woman will give birth to many sons and only sons. This is a genetic and biological function. And if I were a studied Geneticist then I'm confident it would be very easy to identify and exhibit this function. Females beget females first to maintain the status, health, and re-production of its own (humane) specie.

Males come later. Males are an 'excess', an extension of the specie. According to R/K-Type Theory, only one male is Necessary within a society. Therefore the birth of males and sons is by definition Unnecessary (resulting in the Expendability of the male specie). Having a son is a biologically risky chance that rarely rewards itself. Thus it is immediately beneficial for a woman to birth "her own kind", a female, a daughter.

Other species, cats, dogs, cows, lions, deer, wolves, and lower...will have different manifestations and patterns of birth rates and gender.

Perhaps every specie in existence generally has 'female' progeny first, as this represents a type of "Asexual" reproduction, of its own kind. Male gender and specie comes later, as a result of Sexual Evolution. Males are the essence and manifestation of 'Evolution'. A risky and chance method of sexual reproduction, represented by male expendability. A male is not necessarily supposed to survive and persist as a female population does (females representing Security and Stability of a population).

White-Male-Only (WMO) Spaces:

It seems with the advent of technology, computer, and communication that white males ("Nerds/Geeks") have built the Internet (Matrix analogy, Cyberspace). As a young white male, I was unaware of this social phenomenon at the time, but WMOs have a natural instinct to "seek our own kind" out in the world. WMOs are rare because whenever there is a WMO group, non-whites and females seek to infiltrate and invade it. The world is adamantly opposed to WMO-groups.

Let's reconnect this phenomenon to history, notably the early Catholic Order. Originally, and it appears visually today, the Catholic Order, Priests, Bishops, Pope were white-male-onlys (WMO). As such the early manifestation of Christian Churches offered an outlet for this phenomenon, that, white males seeking "our own kind" would concentrate around such organizations (resulting in a Cult, Culture).


But today in Modernity there is a different manifestation, represented by "The Internet", and also video-gaming. It is video gaming that I want to introduce here. Young white male-onlys concentrated around video-gaming in the western hemisphere, usa, and now it has spread throughout the world. Also prevalent in East Asian technologically developed nations: China, Korea, Japan. Again the phenomenon is clear: "WMOs" or even the 'yellow' east asians, young males flock around video gaming. And the appeal should be obvious: an outlet for privacy, imagination, idealism, a mental (utopia) world created and projected almost entirely by its adherents (WMOs). And thus WMOs, "nerds/geeks" especially, have created the rapidly growing phenomenon of video gaming, MMOs, and all other visual realities and outlets of fantasy: Sports, Television, Movies, all derived from a simple need.

Of white males to associate with our own kind, which is increasingly difficult as time passes. And 'foreign' types, non-white males and any female, work harder and harder to infiltrate and "be included" into any WMO that forms.

Recently the past couple years this phenomenon manifested as the "Gamer Gate" news story.

Æon wrote:

Human Women generally and normally give birth to a female, a daughter, before having any sons.  It is much rarer that a human woman gives birth to a son as her first progeny.  It is rarer still that a woman will give birth to many sons and only sons.  This is a genetic and biological function.  And if I were a studied Geneticist then I'm confident it would be very easy to identify and exhibit this function.  Females beget females first to maintain the status, health, and re-production of its own (humane) specie.

Males come later.  Males are an 'excess', an extension of the specie.  According to R/K-Type Theory, only one male is Necessary within a society.  Therefore the birth of males and sons is by definition Unnecessary (resulting in the Expendability of the male specie).  Having a son is a biologically risky chance that rarely rewards itself.  Thus it is immediately beneficial for a woman to birth "her own kind", a female, a daughter.

Other species, cats, dogs, cows, lions, deer, wolves, and lower...will have different manifestations and patterns of birth rates and gender.

Perhaps every specie in existence generally has 'female' progeny first, as this represents a type of "Asexual" reproduction, of its own kind.  Male gender and specie comes later, as a result of Sexual Evolution.  Males are the essence and manifestation of 'Evolution'.  A risky and chance method of sexual reproduction, represented by male expendability.  A male is not necessarily supposed to survive and persist as a female population does (females representing Security and Stability of a population).

Are you seriously still trying to categorize women as a separate species to men? Didn't we go over this? And I thought male babies outnumbered female ones except in times of stress/austerity where it is more likely that a female child will grow to successfully reproduce their genes. Where do you get this idea that most first children are females?

It's foolish to expect me to respect your questions when you never, not once, respected mine.

Fuck off.

Æon wrote:

It's foolish to expect me to respect your questions when you never, not once, respected mine.

Fuck off.

As I recall I gave you multiple opportunities to flesh out your ideas. You declined. Now you use that as an excuse to not answer further questions? Wow. You are interested in Philosophy you say? Could have fooled me!

Carlin wrote:

Wow. You are interested in Philosophy you say?

With whom? You?! Not necessarily....

I'm interested in philosophy with those who can return on my investment. "Give and take" is the rule. I don't mind even giving out more than I receive, or even giving away for free. But I feel inspired to produce thoughts, insights, observations, knowledge, wisdom, conversations, arguments, when all of these are returned to me. Sometimes they are, but, often times not. It seems that few are up to my level. And those that are, I do respect, admire, and hope to uplift.

...You?! Not so much. What have you done for me lately?

Æon wrote:

Carlin wrote:

Wow. You are interested in Philosophy you say?

With whom?  You?!  Not necessarily....

I'm interested in philosophy with those who can return on my investment.  "Give and take" is the rule.  I don't mind even giving out more than I receive, or even giving away for free.  But I feel inspired to produce thoughts, insights, observations, knowledge, wisdom, conversations, arguments, when all of these are returned to me.  Sometimes they are, but, often times not.  It seems that few are up to my level.  And those that are, I do respect, admire, and hope to uplift.

...You?!  Not so much.  What have you done for me lately?

He inspired you to show how generous you are.

Nothing is free, there is always a cost and a gain. The gain might not be the one you want and might not coalesce for years or even lifetimes but there is a gain.

I remember our previous exchange, and while i might not post often, i do use the insights here to attempt to live a more noble life in whatever way i can and spread the seeds here to those i see with the potential for nobility.

If its a challenge you want then why don't you limit your interaction to those on your level?

One dead ape, one roughed up kid: bad parents! Baaaaad parents!

Henry Quirk wrote:

One dead ape, one roughed up kid: bad parents! Baaaaad parents!

I hope they have to pay for the loss of the ape.
- Or they get less money from the government to make up the difference.
Though I think they will get away with their carelessness unscathed.
They probably gonna sue the zoo instead for lack of safety.

Making the population dumber one safety measure at a time.

Protecting the weak is a good, positive, and beneficial tendency....when it exists between Mother and Child.

But when an adult needs or demands such protection, especially an adult male, then everybody must wonder about the current state of affairs. A man demanding "Rights" is no man at all. Thus the "Men's Rights Movement" and "Men's Rights Advocates" are ironic. You cannot be both a man and claim "Rights" based on your gender. That makes you less than a man. But you ought to understand why that does not make a woman less than a woman. A woman needs rights from men, as a child needs rights from a mother. Protection, Security, Coddling, Care.

The Modern state is wrought with hedonism, and so, the populace acts as an eternal child that needs coddling. Nobody is "allowed" or especially encouraged to become an adult (Man). Independence is not truly a value of society, a social value. Because to become independent socially would, necessarily, separate and divide the population.

Æon wrote:

Protecting the weak is a good, positive, and beneficial tendency....when it exists between Mother and Child.

But when an adult needs or demands such protection, especially an adult male, then everybody must wonder about the current state of affairs.  A man demanding "Rights" is no man at all.  Thus the "Men's Rights Movement" and "Men's Rights Advocates" are ironic.  You cannot be both a man and claim "Rights" based on your gender.  That makes you less than a man.  But you ought to understand why that does not make a woman less than a woman.  A woman needs rights from men, as a child needs rights from a mother.  Protection, Security, Coddling, Care.

The Modern state is wrought with hedonism, and so, the populace acts as an eternal child that needs coddling.  Nobody is "allowed" or especially encouraged to become an adult (Man).  Independence is not truly a value of society, a social value.  Because to become independent socially would, necessarily, separate and divide the population.

So a woman claiming victim status doesn't make her less of a woman?

perpetualburn wrote:

So a woman claiming victim status doesn't make her less of a woman?

No because that is precisely the "Right" of a woman that a man cannot have, without being less of a man.

Also consider how it is used to insult and slander to call a man "womanly, feminine, emasculated, a girl, a pussy (a coward)" but there is no inversion for women, to call a woman "manly, masculine, masculated, a boy, a dick (courageous)". Since there is no equivalent, then this proves a one-way street, a one-way relationship. It is accepted as commonly derogatory that a man is "womanly" but there is no derogation that a woman is "manly". Thus there is no shame in a woman being other than what she is. In fact there are very few ways that a woman can be other than "womanly". Because a woman acting as a man, is pretense, and does not truly fool people or adults.

Then you have to look into the causes how and reasons why, in the first place, a woman would want to pretend to be a man.

A daughter trying to mimic and pretend to be, the biological father she adores and worships more than anybody else.

The parent-child relationship.

Pantomime:

The Modern has great difficult distinguishing "Mass Media" and the "programs" consumed by the majority population. Nowadays more than ever people cling to, and consume, electronic entertainment. Music, Movies, Media. "Plays". Theater. Consider that 90% of humanity is more Subjective and lives in the strictly Human world. Thus it will be exponentially difficult for moderns to separate the silver screen (movies) with "real life". There is even the 1990s television show "The Real World" and now "Reality TV" that further demonstrates the irony. Or the popular "Matrix" movie series.

The irony of course, is the developed dependency which moderns have for Mass Media, to interpret reality directly for them. So it is unsurprising how a mental illness of Autism can explode, when, the modern becomes estranged from his/her neighbors next door. The modern must run to the television for an interpretation, an update, of reality.

Walking outside and opening your eyes is not enough anymore. Moderns become addicted to the middle-man.


The world has truly blinded itself by this metaphor. A world of the blind, leading the blind. And this blindness, dwelling in Plato's cave, is the modern, who has put on the "rose-colored" glasses as a child, and educated to choose a color. A preference, a specialty, to live life by. The sun becomes too bright to endure when, as an adult, those rose-colored glasses are taken off.

These are the prescriptions of modernity. The theater, the movies, the plays, are confused with a "new" reality. A virtual reality. The "hyper-real".

Æon wrote:

Protecting the weak is a good, positive, and beneficial tendency....when it exists between Mother and Child.

But when an adult needs or demands such protection, especially an adult male, then everybody must wonder about the current state of affairs.  A man demanding "Rights" is no man at all.  Thus the "Men's Rights Movement" and "Men's Rights Advocates" are ironic.  You cannot be both a man and claim "Rights" based on your gender.  That makes you less than a man.  But you ought to understand why that does not make a woman less than a woman.  A woman needs rights from men, as a child needs rights from a mother.  Protection, Security, Coddling, Care.

The Modern state is wrought with hedonism, and so, the populace acts as an eternal child that needs coddling.  Nobody is "allowed" or especially encouraged to become an adult (Man).  Independence is not truly a value of society, a social value.  Because to become independent socially would, necessarily, separate and divide the population.

G+ wrote:

Laws have protected you, not me. The truth is, without laws, I'd have killed everyone around me and lived alone. I'd have killed you and everyone you know. Without laws, you would be dead. Thus, the laws protect YOU, not me. So your stupid little ass should be a lover of the law and the police. I'm the one born outside of it all. - Rassisten

They need rights to have pathetic value.

"Philosophy" in the modern university, today, is little different from computer programming. It all works within a binary system, the human (brain) system, of 1/0. That is, it has become as restrictive a "profession" as a computer system. You only need to replace 'hardware' with human minds. It strives for uniformity of thought - as a computer strives for being without bugs.

However, in this analogy, you know also that the computer is programmed according to some programmer for an intended purpose and the actual computer does not care whether a bug occurs or not. The computer does the computation, the designer tells it what that computation should accomplish.

In Western society, what is it this 'thought' is supposed to be moving towards? What are the human minds told (either to themselves or by others) to move towards and make 'bug free'? Those here would say nihilism, others say utopia/(destruction of evil) and the 'philosophers' say truth itself.

The consequence is the ignorance of appearance and chaos within philosophy departments. The destruction of ambiguity to the point of unreality. If you were to see 'philosophy' as a body or advocate of chaos (the greater power), then you may see the modern philosophers' task as a robbing of all mystery/chaos from order itself. That is a generalization. There are those few who try to rescue the balance between the two - mostly within the realm they call "naturalism" which they associate with physicalism/scientism.