Abrahamism

Hoffer, Eric wrote:

The saviour who wants to turn men into angels is as much a hater of human nature as the totalitarian despot who wants to turn them into puppets.

Absolute solutions - positive and/or negative - offered to cope with absolute issues only serve to expose a mind seeking in others absolution from itself, having failed to find it in reality.

Money is the one true Messiah.
A tangible representation of the intangible ideal.
All others are frauds, feeble by comparison, or second-rate challengers to this one 'true' saviour.
It can "buy love", consciences, conscientiousness,a new and improved identity.
It can change the past - erase it completely - rewrite history to accommodate rather than inspire and confront.
It can remake truth according to any desire and need; deny it completely.
It is the symbol of subjectivity, in the hands of the true believer. With it the objective world can be modified at will.

Money, symbol of faeces, requiring an anal spirit to accumulate, collect itself, creating an internal, intestinal, source of fertilizer where a man can plant his subjective seeds, and grow his own private Garden of Eden.
The sphincter is heaven's gate.
An impotent cavern of hedonistic pleasure, with few repercussions - other than one's pride.
Rid yourself of shame and pride is left over.

The only source of shame, for the modern, is Christianity - they are told.
"Overcome" sorrowful shame and you only have 'gay pride' to look forward to - cynical laughter expunging stress in fits of spasmodic orgasmic convulsions.
Pleasure's ecstasy with no conceivable price....because nothing is invested, but only spent, and wasted; splurged on the altar's of the present, i.e., a certain and immediate payback.
Anal pleasure....it hurts until you loosen up.

Doesn't a contraceptive convert the vagina into another cavity for expunging excrement, or an orifice for consuming, self-preserving - anally?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] says....
Study the kinds of movies Weinstein produced.
Two main themes.

What better way to "schtup shiksas" than with a Negro....who also harbours vengeance against "da man".
Outsourcing retribution and compensating for physical insecurity, all at once, via a proxy.
Victims communing.

Worship of the singularity will "progress" from a worship of the one-god - idealization of man - to the direct idealization of one-mankind - humanity - and from there towards the idealization of the idea of 'one' itself - singularity.
This will be considered an "advancement", as is everything which negated body - physis, physical, corporeal, tangible - and surrenders to mind - idea, ideal, abstraction.
A slow receding from the world - exoteric - into the mind - esoteric.
All semiology will reflect this gradual disengagement and detachment from the world, and a reattachment to ideas/ideals, externally manifested only as symbols or as technologies/techniques, i.e., art styles, symbols, images, gadgets.
The world will be slowly displaced with these projections....what Buadrillard called simulations of simulacrum.

This will be the last phase in American man's slow implosion into itself, reflecting the process of dying - the organism losing touch with its surroundings,a s it slowly slips away, falling into its own mind where it's entire life - through stored memories - are relived, as a dream, before the darkness falls.

An end of the biggest empire man has ever known.
It's cadaver will nourish up-and-coming new SuperOrganic structures, ambitious to replace the fallen by selectively absorbing it into their own semiotics.

During this last phase the dying body is riddles with parasites and diseases that suddenly become triggered and appear, when they remained inconspicuous when health and vigour kept them at bay.
This is a part of the dying process.

Another validation that Islam is related to Judaism. this time straight form the mind of a philo-Semite, who in his hate to prove that Jews and Semites are not synonymous - in an attempt to ridicule anti-Semitism - serves as a valivaiton fo my own positions.
Judaism is, in fact, an ideology - a dogma - an abstraction.
Semites are a sub-racial group - a tribal kinship referring to afro-Asiatic origins.

We know of Kalergi from his other ideas about the European plan.... [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]. So, we know he isn't a friend of European identity.

Coudenhove-Kalergi, Richard wrote:

CHAPTER IV
JEWS IN NON-CHRISTIAN COUNTRIES
I. Mohammed

WE shall now consider the relations which existed between the Jews and the non-Christian nations. Our investigation has shown that the Anti-Semitism of the Greeks and the Romans was due to the behaviour and the conduct and also to the opinions held by the Jews in those days and that their opinions were exclusively the result of their religion. In the history of the relations existing between Jews and Christian peoples I have proved that the persecutions to which the Jews have always been subjected originated exclusively in a religious fanaticism.
It now only remains for me to study the sentiments harboured and shown towards the Jews by the non-Christian nations in the Middle Ages, sentiments which are still being harboured in modem times. We shall first of all consider the history of the Jews in the Moslem countries and then that of the Jewish communities in India and in China.
In a previous chapter of this work I have already referred to the spread of the Jews in Arabia. The Jewish tribes differed but little from the numerous heathen-Arab tribes in the days before the appearance of Mohammed.
Mohammed has borrowed the greatest part of his teaching from Judaism, and it may safely be asserted that Islam is nothing but a reformed Talmudic Judaism plus the Divine mission of Mohammed. Mohammed has borrowed the principal contents of the Koran first from the Talmud, then from the Torah and the Gospels, to wit, the Apocryphal Gospels. His earliest doctrines in particular bore a thorough Jewish colouring. At the beginning of his great career the prophet left no stone unturned in his attempt to gain over the Jews. He gave them to understand that he was anxious to further the spread of Judaism in Arabia.
On his arrival in Jathrib, the later Medina, in 62.2, on his flight and escape from the Koreishites of Mecca, he concluded a formal alliance with the Jews. For their sake he declared Jerusalem as the Kiblah, that is the direction to be observed during prayer, and he fixed the Jewish Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) as a Mohammedan fast day. At a closer acquaintance, however, the Jews grew more and more disappointed. Mohammed's insatiable sexual excesses, his sensuality and his epicureanism in particular, aroused doubts in the minds of the Jews as to the genuineness of his prophetic mission. "By heaven," said the Jews, " no dish ever satiates him and he cares for nothing but women." The circumstance, too, that in the opinion of the Jews a true prophet of God could manifest himself only in Palestine, and also the fact that Mohammed partook of the flesh and the cheese of camels, repulsed the Jews and alienated them. Mohammed's chief opponents were Jews Pinehas Ibn Azura of the Kainukaa tribe, Kaab the Ibn Asharaf, the son of an Arab father and of a Jewish mother, and the poet Abu-Afak, a centenarian, all the three of whom mocked the prophet and did their best to render him hateful. Mohammed made the best of a bad bargain and at first bore the contempt of the Jews with apparent equanimity. Several passages in the Koran even contain a friendly keynote with regard to the Jews. When the latter, however, began to snatch away his faithful and when the believers urged him to state his views on Judaism, telling him that if the Torah was a Divine Book, they ought to observe its commandments, Mohammed felt compelled to state his principles. He revealed several Surahs, among them the second Surah, Bakarah, called the cow, in which he reviled the Jews; he fixed Mecca instead of Jerusalem as the Kiblah, abolished the Ashura-fast on the Day of Atonement, and declared that he had been announced in the Torah as a prophet, but that the Jews had falsified and removed the passages in question.'

Anti-Semitism-Throughout the Ages

Later Kalergi offers more damning evidence about the real animosity of the Jews for Europeans - siding with their fellow Semitic tribes, the Arabs, agaisnt Byzantium. An animosity that is still present in its dominance of the U.S. Puritans/Protestants.

Coudenhove-Kalergi, Richard wrote:

z. The Arabian Caliphate

When the Arabs attacked Palestine the Jews were everywhere helpful to them and in every way facilitated their conquest of the country, for they were only too happy to exchange the Byzantine rule for that of the Arabs. In 636 Ornar took possession of Jerusalem, but did not permit the Jews to reside in the city. He decreed that the Jews were not to build new synagogues nor were they to repair the dilapidated ones; they were allowed to celebrate their Divine services only quietly and secretly. Jews were not permitted to hold any official posts, to administer justice to Mohammedans, to ride on horseback or to make use of a signet-ring, and had furthermore to wear their own particular dress and pay a ground and poll-tax. In spite of all these restrictions, which were extended to Christians as well, we find the Jews on the side of the Moslems in all their fights with the Christians; everywhere the Jews welcomed the Moslems as their deliverers from the Christian yoke, and in several Asiatic and Egyptian cities they opened the gates to the new conquerors. Under Omar, Bostanai, a scion of the house of David, was even recognized as the prince and head of the Jews, and Ornar gave him to wife Dara, a daughter of the Persian King Chosroes,
It is superfluous to point out that the motives which had given rise to the Anti-Semitisrn of the "Semite" Mohammed and his followers were of a religious nature.
It is a magnificent example of an Anti-Semitic Anti-Semitism.
Gradually the position of the Jews under the Caliphate improved considerably. In his History of the Civilization of the East, Kremer writes as follows:

" We shall now proceed to the Jews whose spiritual head, the Prince of Captivity, also resided in Bagdad. According to Benjamin.of Tudela, who visited Bagdad about A.D. 1770, the Prince of Captivity as the spiritual head of the whole of Jewry enjoyed the highest respect. Rabbi Daniel ben Chisdai, a scion of the House of David, held office in those days. Under the authority of the Caliph he had the supreme command over all the Jewish congregations, a command with which the Caliph had invested him by handing him over the seal of office. Everybody, be he Jew or Mohammedan, had to rise at his approach. Whenever he betook himself to the Caliph for an audience he was accompanied by a suite of riders, while he himself was arrayed in an embroidered silk garment and wore a white turban ornamented with a diadem. Heralds rode in front of him calling out: 'Make room for the son of David.'
His power extended over Mesopotamia, Persia, Khorasan, South Arabia, Diarbekir, Armenia, and Georgia as far as the Oxus, nay even India and Tibet. To all the Jewish communities he granted the permission to elect their own Rabbis and officers of the Temple (Synagogue), but it was he alone who ordained them and gave them the permission to exercise their respective functions, for which he received precious gifts from the most distant countries. This Prince of Captivity owned manor-houses, gardens, plantations and vast tracts of land in Babylonia which he had inherited from his ancestors. He also received an income from Jewish inns and markets and levied a duty on all merchandise. A great number of Israelites daily fed at his table. At the moment of his investiture, however, he had to pay vast sums to the Caliph and to the princes of the latter's house. The appointment and confirmation of the Prince of Captivity took place in the palace of the Caliph where the latter laid his hands upon the nominee, whereupon the Prince of Captivity, accompanied by musicians, returned to his own residence where he, in his turn, laid his hands upon the members and chiefs of his vast congregation and thus consecrated them."

Anti-Semitism-Throughout the Ages

According to Kalergi the Jews rejected Mohamed not on dogmatic grounds but because he proposed a more lascivious, hedonistic, approach to scripture....also explaining why the Arabs chose to castrate their Negro slaves - a cruelty unmatched in its brutality by Europeans, and yet nobody ever mentions it. not even when promoting immigration from Muslim countries.

With friends like him, who needs enemies?
Ha!

Kalergi correctly identifies anti-Semitism as an ineffective hatred for a people, and the difference with Judaism.
A confusion that persists to this day. We define anti-Judaism as anti-Semitism, which would include the Arabs and other Semitic tribes.
We now understand why Muslims are part of the method of destroying European civilization - European masculinity, to be more precise. Casually called "whiteness" so as to confuse the issue with trite skin pigmentation.
Just as they reduce to a ridiculous concept the idea of race by equating sub-Saharan Negroes with blackness. Dumbing-down by redefining concepts - reducing them to a skin pigmentation or hair texture.
In this context many Sri Lankans are included in the concept of blackness, just as many Semites are included in the concept of whiteness.
A genetic category is now converted to a memetic ideology. Simplified and generalized down to meaninglessness.

Coudenhove-Kalergi, Richard wrote:

CHAPTER VI
EMANCIPATION AND ZIONISM

A THOROUGH study of the Old Testament by Edward Reus would be a radical remedy for both Christians and Jews. But it is precisely the orthodox Jew who will be the quickest of all to run up and snatch the torch from the hand of the scholar, because he believes that only by faith in the Torah and by the observance of the Law salvation and the Messianic era can be brought about as if by magic. The disease therefore is incurable, and both Jews and Christians are responsible for it. An orthodox Jew is not even permitted to eat at the same table with a non-Jew, while orthodox Jews and believing Christians contract no marriages one with the other, mensa, connubium negatur. What is the result? . . .
But what is true is the fact that the Jews are a nation for themselves which needs must hold together and which has been ill-treated in such a way that as long as there will be a Jewish religion and a Christian religion, it will be quite impossible to expect the Jews to pardon the Christians for what the latter have done unto them. Therein, of course, lies a great danger. By tremendous detours and indirectly Anti-Semitism has produced a good effect, for it has called the attention of both Christians and Jews to the impossibility of bridging over the contradictions as long as both of them are clinging to their respective faiths.
A further effect of Anti-Semitism has been its success in making it clear to the non-Jewish population that in order to be able to compete with the Jews it must, first of all, become as sober, as industrious and as economical as the latter are.
Anti-Semitism has also in so far acted as a beneficial incentive. Nobody will blame the Christians when they energetically fight with the same means against the Jews wherever the latter unite and monopolize commercial branches and form corners. It does not, however, follow from such a fight that the Jews are really hated and
despised or that every social intercourse with them is being avoided.
"The best definition of the Jews," says the great Schopenhauer, "still remains that of a nation." A nation still continues to exist even if-as it is natural-ever so many of its members have left it and attached themselves to other nations; it also continues to exist even if ever so many new elements have been received in it. The Jews, of course, lack one of the factors which constitute a nation, namely, that oflanguage, for they possess no living common speech. They converse in the respective languages of the nations in whose midst they are dwelling or have dwelt, viz. in German, Spanish and Arabic. But the sacred languages, Hebrew and Aramaic, compensate for this lack.
Further factors are their common customs and practices which again have their origin in the Jewish religion. As for common characteristic traits, only very few of them can be proved to exist among the Jews on account of the great diversity between the various Jewish groups. These characteristic traits, too, originated in their religion. The most zealous Anti-Semite would despair of discovering and proving any common characteristic traits, independent of religion, which exist between the Spanish and the Arabian Jews-the Sephardim-and the German and Polish Jewsthe Ashkenazim-between the remnants of Chinese Jewry, which are still to be found in Honan, and the black and the white Jews on the Indian coast of Malabar, then again between all these groups and the Jewish Falashas in Abyssinia. The German and the Polish Jews are well known for their chaffering and commercial spirit, but quite different are the Sephardim in the East, and the Arabian, Indian, Chinese and Abyssinian Jews. What Anti-Semite will venture to try the trick of bringing all these Jews under one and the same label? I should like to see him do it.
Suppose, although it cannot be admitted, that all those bad characteristic traits and infamies which the AntiSemites reproach the Jews with be true, namely, everything that is enumerated in the chapter of the Anti-Semitic Catechism quoted above (on p. 24), then the reproaches would only apply to the Polish and German Jews, that is to say to one fraction only, but not to the whole of Jewry.
This is so clear and self-evident, is such a logical truism, that it requires no proof. Should, however, the AntiSemites be forced to admit it, then I ask them whence this difference comes? Why should those Jews who have lived for centuries in the countries of Islam and in non-Christian lands be so different from the other Jews who have always remained in Christian countries? The reader will admit that it is precisely this question which is the focus of the problem. Whence, I ask, this difference between the various branches of Jewry, whence the diversity and dissimilarity between Jews who have lived in various periods of history?
The Jews to-day are for the most part what the nations in whose midst they have lived have made them. If the Jews once possessed good and noble qualities and virtues which they now no longer possess, if they have contracted vices and habits which they had formerly not possessed, this is merely the effect of the influence which the nations have exercised upon them.
What are the Jews in reality? They are an artificial nation, a compound of numerous nationalities brought about by a common religion, formed both by a voluntary and a forced separation from the other nations and by the prohibition of mixed marriages, all of which have been the result of religious principles. This exclusion or rather separation, together with a very definite mode of life prescribed by their religion (circumcision, marriage, dietary laws and so forth), and also the constraint under which they lived and which forced them to develop only in one fixed direction (commerce, chaffering, usury and so forth), have developed in this nation a distinct and definite physical and moral type. The definition applicable to the Jews would therefore be: "an artificial nation created by religious rules and ordinances and compounded of numerous racial elements."
This definition fits all Jewish groups, the Polish Jews as well as the Falashas, the Indian as well as the Chinese Jews; this definition alone explains and accounts for the alleged Jewish characteristic traits and for the physical type so different from ours. For about one thousand years Jewry has, of course, not absorbed any foreign elements, but. on the other hand, streams of Jewish blood have ever since flown into the Christian nations as a result of conversions.
Renan says expressly that there are several Jewish races. That there is no unique Jewish race I have already proved in the first chapter of this work. Those who are absolutely decided to apply the term " race" to the Jews can do this only with the express reserve that by this term they wished to indicate an artificial nation consisting of numerous races which began to exist at the moment when Jewish proselytism (conversion of the Khazars) had ceased -and has preserved itself pure in consequence of the prohibition of mixed marriages, of exclusion and seclusion.
Considering the comparatively vast quantity of foreign blood it has absorbed, a very small fraction only of this artificial nation can be said to be related by blood to the ancient people of Israel. If we now leave out the small quantity of old Jewish blood and ask what remains of modern Jewry the answer will be: nothing more than a religious community which, in consequence of religious ordinances, has developed into several new races during the last twelve centuries. But those who are speaking of a Jewish race are always thinking of the descendants issued from the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, for the other ten tribes had already completely disappeared with the fall of the Israelite Kingdom in 772. B.C., that is to say had been absorbed by other nations, just as the hundreds ofthousands of Jews who had been forcibly converted to Christianity and Islam have been. When we speak of a Jewish race the term can therefore have some sense and meaning only if the word Jewish is not taken in either an ethnographical or an anthropological sense, but merely connotes the Mosaic faith which has created this new race. One should always bear in mind the fact that already in the times of Christ the number of non-Jewish followers of Judaism was greater than the number of Jews authentic by blood, and that under Titus and Hadrian perhaps one-half, if not more, of all the. Palestinian Jews had been exterminated. From what has been said above it follows that the quantity of Jewish blood flowing in the veins of the Christian and Mohammedan nations in Europe, in Western Asia and in North Africa, is larger than that which flows in the veins of the modern Jews.

Anti-Semitism-Throughout the Ages

 

Remember, Kalergi speaks as a philo-Semite, defending them from the anti-Semites of his time. In the process he exposes the deep connections of Judaism with Christianity and Islam, the origins of Semites, and the memetic (ideological) essence of Judaism. This obliterates modern political propaganda which often intentionally and methodically convolutes Semitism and Judaism - genetic and memetic identifiers. This would be like synthesizing Christianity with Hellenism, or confusion being a Communist in the Soviet Empire with being Russian.
He then proceeds to correctly identify the source of Jewish emancipation as the French revolution - just as for the Negro their emancipation can be pinpointed as the period of the American Civil war....the latter being a direct consequence of the former.
In both cases freedom was given, on principle, and not won.

Coudenhove-Kalergi, Richard wrote:

2. Emancipation

The emancipation of the Jews by the French Revolution, a measure which was soon emulated by the majority of the other European nations, seems more and more to reveal itself as a fiasco. In a speech delivered at the Zionist Congress at Basel, Dr. Herzl rightly said:
"I must utter a few painful words. The nations who emancipated the Jews were under an illusion with regard to their sentiments. If the emancipation was to produce its full effect it ought to have originated in sentiment before it was expressed in law. Such, however, has not been the case, and the contrary is true. The history of the emancipation of the Jews is one of the most remarkable chapters in the history of European thought. It is not the result of discernment, of a realization that a tribe had been grievously wronged, that a horrible treatment had been meted out to it and that it was high time to atone for this millenary injustice; the emancipation was solely the result of the geometrical, rectilinear mode of thought of French Rationalism in the eighteenth century.
" This Rationalism was based solely on logic, without any regard for any vivifying sentiment; it was based on principles of a mathematical axiom, and it insisted upon raising a fictitious structure imagined in the world of reality. 'Rather lose the colonies than abandon one principle! ' runs the well-known maxim which fully expresses the method of applying rationalism to politics. The emancipation of the Jews represents as it were another automatic application of the rationalist method. The philosophy of Rousseau and of the Encyclopedists had led to the declaration of the rights of man, and from this declaration the rigid logic of the men of the great Revolution deduced the emancipation of the Jews. They drew up a regular equation: viz. every man by nature possesses certain rights, the Jews are men, and consequently they, too, possess the rights of man. And the equality of rights of the Jews was proclaimed in France not out of a brotherly sentiment for the Jews but because logic demanded it.
The sentiments of the people often resisted against it, but the philosophy of the Revolution commanded it that logic should be put above sentiments. I hope that I shall be forgiven for saying this, for my words in no way imply any ingratitude, but the men of 1792 emancipated us out of pedantry."
I may venture to add that the emancipation has for the most part been carried out with a view to annoying the Church which, I dare say, is to-day laughing into its sleeve at the comical issue of that measure.
"The Jews are men," proclaimed the liberals of the emancipation period, "that means in a manner of speaking,"
resounds to-day the refrain of the Anti-Semites. " The Jews possess equal rights with all the other citizens of the State," proclaims the law, "that means to say on paper," is the answer of our enlightened age. For in reality official heads and principals of departments bang the doors in the face of Jewish candidates wherever they can do it, and the professional posts open to Jews are growing less and less numerous.
The emancipation came at a moment when it was already too late. When the emancipating States burst open the gates of the ghetto and proclaimed the equality of rights of all citizens the whole of Israel exulted and uttered a shout of joy. Perfectly happy, the Jews threw themselves into Christian society, and a great many of them, the assimilators, heartily and gladly did what they could to resemble as much as possible their Christian fellow-citizens in dress, customs, manners, deportment and fashions. It became for them a question of ambition not to be taken for Jews in society; they were ashamed of their origin and of their race, and many of them even became Anti-Semites, Jewish Anti-Semites, which is nothing else than a nee plus ultra of meanness!
But how these Jews have been deceived! To-day they are openly given to understand that whether baptized or not, whether speaking correct German or like a Jew, they will always remain despised Jews, be they rich or poor, good riders on horseback, cavaliers, good dancers, good shots, or Philistines-no matter, " Jew remains Jew! You do not belong to our society."
Formerly the liberal Christians were quite willing to admit the Jews into their society. Why are they no longer so to-day? The Jew has become exceedingly unsympathetic to the Christian, even the most liberal Christian. How is this to be explained?
As a result of their mutual religious prejudices Jews and Christians had lived for centuries completely separated one from the other. On account of this separation and seclusion a definite Jewish social type developed in the ghetto, a caste with specifically peculiar habits, dialects, gestures, movements, manners, customs and usages, with different conceptions of honour and of tact. Moreover, as a result of the Jewish dietary and purity laws and also of the fact of their having been penned up in a dirty ghetto and of their sedentary mode of life, the Jews also developed a physical type which in many ways differs from that of the Christians. The assimilators among the Jews had at first imagined that it only needed their willingness and that they could at one stroke strip off their Jewish nature (Jewishness) and exchange it for that of Christian society.
Therein, however, they have been mightily mistaken.
The external marks of a certain civilization cannot be taken off like an overcoat and exchanged for those of another civilization. In the ghetto the Jews had spoken their own peculiar jargon. This accent, of course, all those who had spoken the dialect in their childhood had retained, and only the de-Judaized Jews lost it, that is to say the Jews who had grown up and been educated in non-Jewish circles from their earliest childhood. It required new generations, at least two, that is several decades, to eliminate and to efface the jargon and also an early separation from the members of the Jewish race. The same applies to gesticulation.
In the ghetto the Jews, both by birth and by education, had acquired certain gestures, movements of hands and fingers, which, as is almost always the case, are closely connected with the mode of life and of dress. In these gestures heredity and atavism undoubtedly played a part.
They cannot be abandoned at will and others assumed in their stead. Everything must be learnt, as one knows, even the manner and mode of walking, sitting, sitting down, saluting, entering a room and a social gathering or leaving it, the manner of eating and drinking, in a word, all the innumerable shades and nuances of daily social life. Those who have lived long in the countries of Islam and in Eastern Asia know what trouble it costs to acquire the customs and manners of an alien civilized nation. A European will probably never learn to imitate the graceful mode of saluting among the Japanese; the Japanese dress, too, is required to execute gracefully this salutation which in European dress would only be grotesque and ridiculous. To be able to behave like a Moslem in Arabic dress requires several years' practice. This applies also to Chinese and Corean etiquette. Chinese and Coreans look upon Europeans as churls on account of their manners and gestures, although the former themselves behave in society and even at table in a manner which we consider to be the culminating point of a boorish behaviour. Similar things we notice in the Islamic East. Now in their ghetto the Jews possessed their own rules of social conduct and behaviour. This behaviour was entirely Asiatic and dignified. I have myself had many an opportunity of observing this as a guest in the houses of orthodox Jews in Bosnia and in the Bukovina. The etiquette there and the behaviour of the children towards their parents, of the subordinates towards their superiors, of the young towards the old, was very dignified, ceremonial, decorous and respectable, but totally different from the behaviour customary in modem Christian houses.
The gates of the ghetto had been pulled down, and the Jews with their habits and customs entered Christian society. One portion of them, the better and cleverer, retained their Jewish dress and their dignified Asiatic deportment, although it was frequently interpreted as cringing and servility. Another portion, however, was anxious to imitate the Christian population. They assumed and copied, as well as they could, Christian dress, Christian manners and behaviour. The first emancipated generation naturally failed lamentably in its endeavour, the second succeeded in a very small degree. and again only those few who had from childhood been brought up and educated like their Christian fellow-citizens. Just as the European, arrayed in Arabic, Chinese or Japanese dress, who tries to imitate the manners of the respective foreign nation only cuts a ridiculous figure in the eyes of that nation, so it also happened with the Jews. First of all they dressed very badly and tastelessly, enthusiastically donned top-hats of the most incredible shapes; in short, they dressed as unpicturesquely as possible. With frock-coat and tail-coat they retained their movements and gestures which may have been in tune with the long caftan, and thus produced a disagreeable impression upon their Christian fellow citizens.
Particularly did the dancing motion of the feet, so frequent among the Jews, the lifting up of the outwardly turned palm of the hand with outspread fingers to the height of the shoulders and the frequently bowed carriage, disconcert the Indo-Germans.
One may easily observe that people who do not know how to behave in society, and are greatly embarrassed, frequently grow pert, saucy and insolent, in order to hide their embarrassment. Thus it frequently happened with the Jews at their first entry into Christian society. At first they never succeeded in hitting off the right tone, and where should they have learnt it? Surely not in their ghetto.
They thought it right to talk in society about subjects which but little interested the company in which they happened to find themselves. Frequently, when they were at a loss for a subject of conversation, they put questions or touched upon subjects the mention of which produced an unpleasant and even painful effect upon the others.
It is well known that in the different civilized and cultured circles and gatherings there are various topics which are either permitted or tabooed. It is, for instance, considered impolite in the Mohammedan East to make any mention of the female members of the family when conversing with one of the family. In other countries,
talking about the head of the State or to mention his name is tabooed, and so forth. To exhibit curiosity with regard to the family and the fortune of a person addressed, but with whom one is not on intimate terms, is considered to be impolite amongst us, but is an act of politeness among the Chinese. All these are social nuances of tact and manners which even among European nations vary considerably.
What a difference there is between the social life, the rules of behaviour and the manners, in Russia and in England. One may therefore imagine what social blunders the poor Jews must have committed when they left the ghetto for the first time and were admitted into Christian society.
It is amazing that they should not have committed more such blunders and that they should have managed to assimilate themselves even so far as they have done. Today, of course, the young generation of Jews which has grown up outside the ghetto and has been entirely educated in Christian fashion, a generation which practises gymnastics and other sports, especially in England, France and America, can scarcely any longer be distinguished from the Christians. One more generation, at most two generations, would have sufficed, and Jewry in Western and Central Europe would have melted away and been dissolved among the Christian nations like sugar is dissolved in water.
But this was not to happen. Anti-Semitism suddenly flared up anew, drove the Jews from Christian society and compelled them more than ever to cling together still more closely.
The Jews now understood it quite clearly that they were not wanted, that people refused to recognize them as Germans, Frenchmen, Austrians, and so forth. They now return to where they have come from and call to the Christians: " You will not recognize us as members of your race, you tell us that we are aliens and Jews; very
well, then let us be Jews as you proclaim us to be." Zionism is the inevitable result of Anti-Semitism, Both phenomena arise from the same root and have the same nature, being only different expressions for the same thing, although, of course, there is not a shadow of understanding between the Zionists and the Anti-Semites. Foreign, distant and cold, the two groups face one another, and it is precisely the Anti-Semites who look upon Zionism as upon a ridiculous Utopia. One has only to read on this subject the interesting publication Rabbinism and Zionism by the learned Anti-Sernite, Professor Dr. Adolf Wahrmund.
The Jewish emancipation proclaimed by the French Revolution has declared its complete bankruptcy, and as victors in the field there remain only the various Christian Churches; they can now split their sides with laughter at the failure of their opponents. For the present!

Anti-Semitism-Throughout the Ages

Then we uncovers the root of Zionism in Judaism.

Coudenhove-Kalergi, Richard wrote:

3. Zionism

We notice how all over the world both religious and national fanaticism are flaring up anew; we see how the latter is availing itself of religious particularism-as in the " Away from Rome" question, in the Huss-cult and in the numerous measures which the Government of the Tsar had many years ago taken against dissenters. We also see vice versa how the various religious bodies avail themselves of the folly of nationality for their own ends and purposes, and we had an instance of it in the attitude adopted by a portion of the French population during the Drefyus affair.
Very frequently it is even difficult to say which is the driving force, whether politics or religion. Where, however, as is the case with the Jewish question, oppositions cannot be reconciled and the vehicle gets so entangled and stuck in the mud that it can no longer be dragged out, where hatred and aversion, in spite of all attempts, are continually increasing, there separation is best for all parties. This separation the Zionist movement intends to bring about. The aim of Zionism, a movement which has now spread among the Jews all over the world, is to make it possible for the Jews in all countries to emigrate and to form a united nation and a Jewish State in Palestine. This is the one and only radical remedy possible for the present, for considering the small degree of enlightenment and of humanity to be met with to-day, it will take a long time before one may count upon peace and justice. "Out with the Jews" is the cry resounding everywhere in AntiSemitic camps. Very well, but whither? "That is not our business," reply the Anti-Semites, " that is for the Jews to decide; it is their concern where they go-but it is nothing to us." No, I say, it is very much the concern of the AntiSemites, for the neighbouring States, too, shout: "Out with the Jews," and when one State ejects the Jews the neighbouring State sends them back and avails itself of the opportunity offered to smuggle in its own Jews and then one is just as far as before. The question " Whither with the Jews" is therefore one which every State must seriously think how to solve, and it is worth their while to take counsel together and to arrive at a common decision. Once a country has been found and all the Jews have been proclaimed citizens of that country, then indeed they will be aliens and strangers among us; then, for aught I care, the desired specific laws may be promulgated without trampling under foot progress and enlightenment, humanity and Christian charity; then, without being cruel, one may behave against the Jews in such a way as to make them sick of and disgusted with a sojourn in a foreign land. Then Anti-Judaism will no longer be cruel, although certainly narrow-minded and unwise, particularly very, very unwise.
For it must be borne in mind that the Jews are one of the most highly gifted and talented nations in the world. In the first place, this is due to cross-breeding and to an intermingling with foreign blood which was so frequent among the Jews, a circumstance which always invariably results in a talented progeny. Secondly, their situation during the Middle Ages had forced the Jews to exert their intellect in the highest degree in order to be able to live. The latter circumstance, thanks to heredity and training, has frequently resulted in the development of a stupendous intellectual capacity of production, to which should also be added their diligence and sobriety. What a host of great and famous men in all stations of life the Jews have produced, in spite of the oppression which weighed so heavily on them! I will mention here only the following: in music, Bizet, Halevy, Brull, Meyerbeer, Mendelssohn, Offenbach, Rubinstein, Goldmark, Auer, Joachim and Remenyi ; in dramatic art, Sonnenthal, Sarah Bernhardt, Dawison, Ascher, Rothmul, Robert; in painting, Jacoby, Junker, Liebermann, Oppenheim, Sichel, Kaufmann, Possart and Horowitz ; in poetry, Heine, Borne, Auerbach; in literature, Herzl, Nordau, Saphir and Wolff; in science, Halevy, Derenbourg, Geiger, Goldziher, Graetz, Neander, Lazarus, Mendelssohn, Vambery, Grunhut and Emin Pasha; in statesmanship

Anti-Semitism-Throughout the Ages

If we accept the inheritance of identity, as this is believed in Judaism and contradicted by Aryanism, then we can place it within Abrahamic lore.
Just as the Christ was born of a Jewish mother, and an Roman father, adopting both identities and merging them into Christianity, so too, in theory, an individual born to an Aryan mother and a Jewish father, lack both identities, no principle; belonging to neither. An anti-Christ.
In modern times, one of myriads. Even in this a contradiction to the singularity of Jesus, as the Abrahamic one-god made flesh, redeeming the sins of the lowly.
Liberating them from the body that reminds - aletheia.

When tribal identity is contradictory, such as in the case where it is inherited from the maternal line, merging with one inheriting it from the paternal line, then only a loss of both is the outcome - seeking a resolution in a synthesis that is contradictory.
this is clear in the case of Jesus, who was born to a Jew mother, inheriting his tribal identity from her, and from a European male, inheriting another from him - two opposing and contradictory memes - one Nihilistic (Abrahamic spirituality) the other Realistic (Aryan/pagan spirituality) - like trying to mix oil with water.
Christianity resolves the dissonance in a clever trick - the body (genetics) is rejected and replaced (reborn) as pure spirit - the ambiguity of the concept of "spirit" obscures the contradictions and absorbs them into an ambiguity - in the darkness all merges into a uniformity.

The other possibility - from the duality of male/female reproduction - is to be born to a Abrahamic father (Semite), and a European mother (Aryan), in which case the offspring is lost to both sides.
Once more obscurantism can be sued to manufacture the intellectual abstractions necessary to synthesize dissonant spiritualities.
A state of intellectual bastardization....with unforeseen psychosomatic effects.
To Christ's synthesis of opposites to the Antichrist de-synthesis of both.
This remains within the Abrahamic paradigm.
Outside of it - within Aryanism - the issue is a non-issue - in the light all is made clear.
Divergence is not clouded over and covered up, but exposed - revealed.

Abrahamism built its victim-status in relation to a totalitarian entity - God.
Marxism in relation to a totalitarian state.
Moderns secularize further, they are "victims" of a vague abstraction - singularity - absolute order, called universe.

They are manifestations of their own victimizer - self-flagellation, or victims by proxy - stoically enduring a fate imposed upon them by a unity they are included within.
Sounds Christian they were "victims by proxy" as well. Suffering for the deeds of another, who is also their progenitor - indirectly, victims of themselves.
Typically solipsistic.

Self-regulatory....who will dare exercise free-will without the consent of the authoritarian other - the collective?
Who will dare choose contrary to the collective will's rules?
This was the message.

In a post-war Europe and in the Judeo-Protestant Anglo-Saxon world - remnant of the British Empire, the issue is an internal conflict between competing factions of spiritual nihilism.


Here, we Aryans, must step aside and let them expose themselves to each other, and to those who are outside this paradigm.
Russia is currently formulating an antithesis - via Dugin and his anti-Liberalism (Americanism) Euro-Asiatic plan - and china, with its Buddhist foundations, remains unaffected.

Afro-Asiatic spirituality.
Meditations on semiotics and superstitions built upon symbols - words/numbers - and their triggering effects on human minds.
A versatile spirituality because it is entirely symbolic and psychological, with no realistic - physical, tangible - connections to limit how it can be mutated to fit into any other spirituality or non-spiritual political system.



Mysticism implies concealment - the opposite of aletheia which implies an un-concealment.
The "power" of the concealed is in its insinuations - it cannot display its power it can only imply it, allowing the seeker to imagine whatever is most effective to it. The seeker, essentially, is freed by the "secret" to find whatever will influence himself psychologically, with no external guidance to restrict this search - the search is internal, esoteric, ignoring, as much as possible, the exoteric, the external, which would impose natural order as a limit to this search and to the imagination.
Such superposition spread among the masses - the average mind - as a method of coping with reality; this multiplies in periods of socio-economic and political decline.
So, as stress from the world increases the mind seeks relief internally - in the "mystery" of the self.

Desperation leads to degeneracy; degeneracy cultivates desperation as a necessary aspect of its degeneracy. Ergo, victim hood is a continuous cultivation of desperation, promoting degeneracy as a relief, which simply increases desperation.

All three Abrahamic religions associate "purity" with what is completely out of the physical - what is completely of the mind - they often call it "spirit" and/or 'soul" - and describe it as they would a idea/ideal - a meme.
Their pure ideologies are completely and totally noetic - of the mind - and have no reference to the "negative, evilness" the "soil", the dirty tangible, physical.
Evil is of the body; good is of the mind. A mystifying mind that imposes its will upon the body - a reference to their allegory of a God-creator.

Even secular political offshoots, like Marxism, believe that man can impose their ideology upon the world, which is a human construct. So they substitute what they believe is a human construct  with another.  
It's all subjective...therefore to impose your will upon the world - meaning humanity - is to be a god yourself.
In their minds humanity Is world; world is humanity. a sing of institutionalization and self-referential psychosomatic sheltering.
An ideology that implies the magical power of semiotics.

Messianic = to save man is to save the world from man's physical nature, by converting him into an idea, represented by words/numbers. Codification of man's past, as a cosmological shift. Inverting gene to meme, into meme to gene...and gradually eliminating the gene part, i'e', rewriting the DNA code, or usurping the continuum of memories and replacing them with a select few (degeneration, degradation...forgetting).
It's how a man believes he is trapped in a woman's body. His body contradicts his mind's assertion, so it is the body that must be changed to agree with the mind....or completely eradicated to free the mind from its limitations.

A reply to Stefan Molyneux.

Arius Augusta wrote:

Wait until you find out that the Young Turks (who committed the Armenian Genocide) weren't even Turkish, and that this same group is in Charge of Saudi Arabia, UAE and most of the gulf countries.

What awakening has Stefan Molyneux received since last I watched him.
Haven't followed him for over a year, and I just found him on Twitter. I hardly recognize him.

Why does the US media so despise Putin?
Can't understand it, myself.
This is what Peterson could not bring himself to deal with...knowing the consequence. He could speak of gender and sex and identity confusions, and he could reference Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Carl Jung, but he would not go further.



Who are these "perpetrators"?
Peterson doesn't want to "go there".

More evidence that Zionism is losing on the left. It used to be standard Jewish rhetoric to carefully distinguish anti-Semitism from anti-Israelism. Now they are purposely conflated, trading on the horror most people have of being called an anti-Semite. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Another example of how nihilism conflates the meaning of words...like the moron who thinks abortion, contraceptives and miscarriage are the same.
It's all about reducing language to nonsense....so that their nonsense is no longer distinguishable.
like believing that homosexual behaviour is the same as homosexuality.
All prison inmates are fags.

Or those imbeciles who think race is about skin pigmentation.
All Sri Lankans are Sub-Saharan African Negroes, and Semites are Europeans.

Okay...that's racist...if Jews were a race; anti-Semitic....if all Semites were Jews and all Jews were Semites.

Could it could be ideological?
Disallowed in American Liberal nihilism. But you can bash Christians all you want...and Europeans. It's open season on them.
I wonder why.
Could it be because Europeans are a race that must be e-raced...converted to an e-product?

A political, cultural designation referring to a racial and linguistic family called "Indo-European"....with the Europeans being the western branch.

My article showing "conservative" Steven Pinker is wrong claiming the Enlightenment was about making the West a "universal civilization" for the amalgamation of diverse races was translated into Polish, [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Enlightenment men were naturally white identitarians.

— Dr. Ricardo Duchesne (@DuchesneRicardo) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

You may take the Semite out of the Levant, but not the Levant out of the Semite.

I resolved [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ‘s dilemma in The Wandering Who. Jews Identify as a religious group, as ancestry and politically. While the first 2 are innocent, the third one is contaminated with racial exclusivity...the problem is that these 3 categories are not mutually exclusive. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Gilad Atzmon (@GiladAtzmon) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Straight from the horse's mouth.
I said this years ago:

Satyr wrote:

Contact with Hellenism, via the Romans, splintered Judaism in three.
A- Orthodox Branch – Original Jewry, i.e., Nihilistic spiritual ideology (dogma). It awaits the ‘true’ Messiah that will end the world – Armageddon. Orthodox Jews believe they have been ‘chosen’ to facilitate the ‘end of times.’
B- Political Branch (Zionism) – Hellenic tribalism triggering Semitic revival. Returning to tribal identifiers Zionism tries to re-establishing a cthonic relationship with the earth; a return to pre-Judaism Semitism. Having lost contact with Semitic traditions Zionism fails to entirely abandon Judaism, producing a conflict between ideology (meme) and genetic dispositions (gene); Judaism is an ideological detachment from natural order, therefore this attempted reattachment, without abandoning the Jewish identity, produces mind/body paradoxes, viz., a] strength based on weakness, b] ideology detaching from natural order reaffirming itself through it. Israel is a product of Zionism.
C-Cultural/Social Branch (Communism) – Hellenic cosmopolitanism warped by Marxist ideology. Globalization of Jewish spiritualism; Communism is, essentially, a secular version of Judeo-Christianity. Abrahamism’s rejection of natural identifiers is held as a sacred principle, replacing them with socio-economic identifiers, i.e., nature based hierarchies replaced by economic hierarchies.

The last two are convoluted, because culture and politics are intertwined.
Cultural Marxism employs politics - and Zionism aims at a cultural return to pre-Jewish tribal identities - Semitism.
Judaism is the ideological extension of these 12 Semiotic tribes....ideologically excluding all other Semitic tribes.

Judaism is not a racial category.
It is an ideology.
It is a meme that wants to become a genetic category, taking the inverted path.
Not from gene to meme, but from meme to gene.
They've been trying this for centuries....with religiously (dogmatism, ideological) based eugenics.

He says England and America is more Jewish than Israel.
HA!!!
But this is because Anglo-Saxon Puritans have been infested by this ideological, memetic parasite.

He says...Zionism is an anti-Jewish adventure.
I don't think he realizes that this is all based no what happened over 2000 years ago.
Contact between Hellenism and Judaism was a historical event - two opposite world-views coming in contact, like matter and anti-matter....pro-life and anti-life.

An explosion occurred...a cognitive eruption, that created Christianity - corrupted Paganism, warped Hellenism - and splintered Judaism into three parts.

Notice the pattern.
All recovering Abrahamics become Universalists, a.k.a. Marxists, or Liberals.
Even Gilad Atzmon. He rejects Judaism and becomes a Humanist.
Ex-Christians become Marxist....because of the affinity. Marxism is Christianity minus the crap about God, or universal consciousness.
They replace the same absolute concept with other terms, like Universe, Absolute, or One, or Nil.
The exact same traits as the Abrahamic one-god, but without the anthropomorphism - entirely abstract, conceptual - secular Abrahamism.
They haven't given up on their god, they've simply killed him, crucified him, so to reanimate the same concept as pure idea.
This is the story of the Bible. The corporeality of the on-god, is crucified so that it can be reborn as pure noetic concept, pure abstraction, pure idea.
The nihilistic idea sheds its last vestiges of tangibility, and becomes pure idea. Unsoiled, divine, because it exists only in the mind, and so it is eternal, immortal, and omnipresent.
Where there is a mind that believes the idea lives.

We can, now, appreciate why their words must remain abstract....and not be defined in ways that reconnect them to actions, experiences, the corporeal, the material world.
Words must remain abstract so that they can mean anything to anyone at any time - subjective.

“You could easily spot any Religion of Peace. Its extremist members would be extremely peaceful” ([You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]).

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

1969.
Ο G. Edward Griffin εξηγεί πως αντιμετωπίζουν τους ιδεολογικούς αντιπαλους οι κομμουνιστές.
Σας θυμίζει κάτι, παλιοφασίστες? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— The Duke (@john_wayne_gr) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Protestant affinity with Judaism
These are the main reasons the Puritan Anglo-Saxons are presently so closely allied with the Jews; finding their highest synthesis in the U.S.A. This goes beyond Heisman's positions concerning historical resentment, avenging itself upon those that victimized them, essentially destroying their culture, finding a natural alliance with the quintessential people who identify with being victimized, embracing it as a 'positive validation’ of their 'choseness' – their exclusivity.
The English having found pride in conquering most of the world – boasting that the 'sun never sets' on the British Empire – pillaged and repressed peoples to maintain their global empire. Not only violently repressing local populations, appropriating their natural wealth, but pillaging their cultural wealth, as well. Much of it still in British hands. This conduct could only have produced, in a spirit dominated by Christian ethics, a sense of guilt. A guilt the Jews inverted to pride by inserting into the Anglo-Saxon psyche the idea of 'divine mission' – Messianic Complex.
The Jews had to explain, to themselves, why they have been so persecuted by so many tribes – every tribe they came in contact with, eventually develops an antipathy for them. In public they claim envy is the reason, but in private they must have wondered what it is about them that causes such a reaction in others – not one, not ten, but all the tribes they ever came in contact with.
Parasitism can only partially explain it, because the Gypsies also practice parasitism but are not persecuted on the same level. They, the gypsies, may feel superior to the host culture they refuse to integrate into, but outwardly they remain hypocritically self-deprecating, failing to arouse ego-based animosity towards them; arousing pity, instead, which is part of their victim-based parasitical strategy. This is not the case with the Jews. Their refusal to integrate, and their parasitism, is accompanied with a public declaration of superiority; pronouncing themselves as the "chosen" by God, as his sole representatives on earth. This Messianic Complex was transferred to the Anglo-Saxons, inverting their Christian shame into a form of divine pride.
The U.S. prides itself as the nation on a 'holy mission' to bring Democracy, Liberty, Liberalism to the peoples of the world - salvation myth – and under the pretexts of this 'divine mission' their actions are justified, as it is not they, but God's Will, or Natural Order, which they represent; they are but an agency of something higher.
In effect the Americans want to 'liberate' peoples from their culture, just as the Anglo-Saxon culture was destroyed by the Norse, whether other peoples want to or not.
Anglo-Saxon pillaging of their British colonies can now be converted to a 'protective mission'; they are 'preserving cultural wealth', and holding onto them so that they are not destroyed by the very people whose ancestors created them. Their thieving is really a benevolent act of protection, on behalf of humanity, or god, or universal order. Anglo-Saxon shame is inverted, with the aid of Judaism, into a divinely inspired pride. Their sacrifices – of themselves and others – the pain and suffering they produce, the torment they've bestowed upon other peoples, the raping and pillaging, are all part of a sacred mission to liberate (save) mankind from itself. Their own cultural destruction is now integrated into a spiritual context. They were conquered and assimilated by the Norse, so as to then bring conquest and assimilation upon mankind; a global mission of Globalization.
This reaches its peak in the U.S. and its 'manifest destiny', as a 'shining city on the hill', destined by cosmic forces to liberate mankind from its evil tribalism, and its "inferior spiritual and cultural traditions".
Another factor to consider is the one that condemned the Spaniards and the Portuguese to a gradual decline from which they never recovered. The factor of miscegenation. As the British Empire spread across the world it gradually assimilated foreign DNA, often-times inferior blood, into its own, consistently diluting the spirit that conquered with the spirit of the conquered. It was often the most courageous, creative and bold that found themselves on the frontiers where temptations abounded and opportunities were overwhelming.
A slow but consistent mixing with locals eventually reduced its boldest most talented bloodlines to mediocrity. This is nowhere more evident than in the U.S., where it produced the Christian ethos that liberated the Negroes and is currently slowly mixing with it. The solution of importing vigorous, still relatively pure blood (transfusion) was, and still is, a temporary solution; one that necessitates the exportation of desperation. Inevitably this produces resistance and animosity, externally, and internally it inevitably produces a de facto caste system founded on money, rather than blood; or rather money is a means for elitism to seek its own exclusive choseness within a seemingly undiscriminating social environment that never materializes, because like all nihilistic ideologies, it cannot usurp natural order with its man-made pretences.
Protestant hatred for Catholicism is a subconscious resentment for what has been corrupted, and assimilated, by Catholicism, and by Orthodox Christianity – the latter not producing hatred because it has no far-reaching power (Russian emergence still developing); it is the authoritarian symbols Catholicism retains as part of its historic appropriation and corruption of Rome and Hellenism, referring to natural order, which they protest against. Protestants protest against Catholic authoritarianism, and its claim on natural order, via the one-god, finding in Jews the rebelliousness against natural order and the desired inversion of shame to pride; natural order inverted into divine order, where their lower status is now the highest – flipped on its head – and its anti-Christian behaviour towards other peoples can now by justified as being of divine origins – ergo no free-will for men, for all men are agencies of a divine will. For this inversion to work, for it to remain valid, there can be no personal responsibility and purpose – no human motive – only god's; all violence, thieving, brutality, can be justified as being part of god's will, or part of a universal plan – fate.
Therefore, it isn't the U.S. which is forcibly bringing 'liberty & democracy' to the world, but the U.S. is merely an agency of divine will, a cosmic plan – it is inevitable. In this context the Anglo-Saxon's shame, and its subsequent brutalities and taking resources and cultural wealth away from the control of other peoples can be justified as being part of a Divine purpose; a holy mission – just as Anglo-Saxon assimilation by the Norse was not due to a weakness, but it was part of a universal plan.

This is an internal conflict between three factions of the same spiritual nihilism, i.e. Abrahamism; extended as secular humanism, and Marxism.
Another symbol of empire decline.
The very spiritual fabric is being untravelled through internal conflicts.
American spirituality, superstition, mysticism, is in turmoil.

Now we know why Putin is returning to Orthodoxi...and why China is immune.

Without superstition there is no American identity.
the ideological term 'liberty' is exposed as being void of meaning.
some do not even believe in freedom, others cannot define the concept.
It's an intangible, vague, mystical concept....each believes in his/her own way. this is fragmentary, if it is shared. It was never shared because this is American individualism, i.e., the 'right' to believe in whatever you want, even if it is absurd and nonsense.
This is subjectivity. To believe and to do whatever you like without being judged....if it does not limit another 'right' to do the same.
Pockets of zombies living in their own private worlds.

All trained into their Abrahamic minds as mysticism. To believe in what you cannot define, describe, not justify; to use words to cover up your own ignorance and confusion, or to cultivate an implied knowledge and understanding using meaningless word-salads - genius through the insinuating occult alluding to a sacred and secret gnosis.

Listen to this lecture to gain further insight into what the US is, and why Protestantism is now in a symbiotic relationship with Zionism....more of a parasitical relationship.
Jones animosity towards this symbiont, and the symbiont animosity towards Catholicism, is clear.

American individualism is also clarified as rooted in Martin Luther, and Puritanism.

Abrahamism is anti-life, anti-nature, but Catholicism and Orthodoxi, proposes a mediator - an earthly authority representing the divine - which is rejected by Judaism and Protestantism.
Each giving a different solution to the void this produces.
Narcissism is a by-product.

Paganism lies outside this absolutist paradigm. The divine is not perfect; it is not absolute.
Man's mind cannot create reality nor does it surrender to it, under the moniker of 'god'.
Man is both part and against natural order. He does not create reality in his mind, but he can manipulate it using his mind - his cleverness.
This is clear in how the Greeks approached their own gods, i.e., not as infallible beings, but as fallible ones, that could be tricked and that would yield to Ananke, need.
Remember Ananke and then Eros were the gods of the cosmos - primordial gods that proceeded the Olympians.
This transformation form Ananke, to Eros, can be considered a decline from greatness towards obscurity. That Eros was included among the primordial gods, replacing Ananke, was a symptom...a sign.

Kanye West goes from paraphrasing Nietzsche to worshipping Jesus. A typical Abrahamic dynamic, having to do with power and how the powerless seek empowerment, anywhere they can find it.
The slave needs a master, but one that will not embarrass and lower him in the worldly. So, a supernatural master to submit and remain a slave.
Herd psychology needs a farmer, a herder, a keeper... that will not shame it with its reality, overbearing its presence.

First of all, I seriously, SERIOUSLY doubt this degenerate nigger has ever actually read a word Nietzsche ever wrote. That particular maxim by Nietzsche has been popularized by mainstream culture and the entertainment industry. Masses of idiots have probably picked up on it in some Hollywood movie featuring caricaturized action villains. Lord Acton’s maxim “power corrupts, but absolute power corrupts absolutely,” is another widely popularized one. Moderns are attracted specifically to these epigrams of power, because power is precisely what they do not have. The weak and desperate who have been led to believe they are strong and superior by a weak and desperate culture, will latch onto sentiments which feed into their ressentiment; It’s only natural to their egos.

Notice the nigger’s preening arrogance after he is introduced, his moment he relishes of beaming narcissism which everyone conveniently ignores. When he says, “arrogance, confidence, cockiness, are now in the service of God”, that profiles his whole canard. In other words, he has discovered his weapon of choice to justify and exalt his narcissism and excuse his degeneracy, the bedrock of the Christian psychological sickness, but also the custom of modern success culture. He has found his talisman, his good luck charm; like a hacker who has finally calculated the correct code to crack a system. He is a “success story” now you see. He is a blank slate. The prodigal son wandered back to his father of progressive religiosity. Modern progressivism, after all, is an offshoot of the Judeo-Christian nihilism of elimination of one’s past, through slavish submission, only in this case through the culture of self-godhood, rather than God. How many times did God kill off his tribes to cleanse them of transgressions, over and over? Wiping them clean again. It’s a very seductive idea. What weak culture, filled with weak minds wouldn’t find greatness in that? Especially when one of their own leaders, a degenerate nigger, encapsulating their weakness and aberrations, shows himself as a redeemed soul.

The paradox of the slavish mind, empowering itself, through the power of something else, is the most effective delusion of self-sufficiency and social control.

This Christian from the "truther community" sheds some light. The viewpoint from thier camp.