Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 Language

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3
AuthorMessage
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Language Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:45 am

Communication is not an exclusively human ability.
What precedes language (logos) are a variety of data sharing.
Both animals and plants communicate their reactions, to phenomena, and their memories, or previous interactions with phenomena.
Using atmosphere and light as a medium to deal with time/space distances, they convert these reactions and interactions into a code.
The binary code is the easiest to evolve because it does not require higher cognitive abilities,. nor a brain, as in the case of plant communications.
They are built upon the attraction/repulsion interactivity, expressed in organic context as on-off triggering.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Language Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:22 pm

Human language is a method of communication that builds upon the pre-existing plant and animal communication methods, which are adaptations of the attraction/repulsion (inter)action of patterned and non-patterned energies.
There are three levels of data exchange:
The physical (body language – gestures expressions etc.), nervous system (patterned vocalizations), mind (innuendo, metaphors etc.).

When externalized, through a different medium (ink/paint, marble/stone, electromagnetism/light etc.) an additional layer of meaning can be added on-top of the previous one – a pattern over or underlying the patterns.
This is often referred to as "occult", and is used to imply depth which may or may not be present, or may or may not refer to phenomenon beyond the minds sharing the data, or integrated into the method if interpreting data.
Written language replaced body-language and innuendo using tone, rhythm pitch (sarcasm, mirth, cynicism, sadness etc.) with a layer of code within the code that is supposed to transmit data that adds or subtracts, or contradicts the data it is inserted within.  
Reading between the lines’ refers to data that is unintentionally passed through the intentional text – replacing the previous mentioned unintentional and/or automatic physical exchange of information/data.
The choice of words, their placement in the text, the sequence and frequency transmits data the writer may not intend, or may intend to be deciphered by a specific person, or type of persons. We may include specialized language, or language requiring particular and/or specialized knowledge, and or specialized deciphering interpreting of patterns – specialized understanding based on a way of interpreting data and phenomena – world-view.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Language Mon May 07, 2018 12:10 pm

A people born for the hunt differ from those born as victims, preferring peace and comfort, stability, after centuries of environmental conditioning.
They differ in their use of language.
Hunters use words to gauge distances, define and determine friend from foe, pinpoint the target, chart out an attack, and a defence; a course of action, and a fall-back point to muster.
Words refer to world.
For the warrior words map-out the battleground, and their precision determines their effectiveness in battle.
For the feminine minds words map out their psychological relationships with others – they use them to find their place, to ascend, to gauge intent, to fabricate illusion and to gossip.
Words refer to intuitions, emotions, sensations, group dynamics, and group energies.
The first is direct, clear and masculine.
It's a matter of life and death.
Words have gravitas.
The second is vague, implying, coy, and feminine.
It's a matter of pretenses, of judging and projecting intent, and adjusting self to it, promising, without wanting to give more than necessary; flirting, negotiating, with flattery, superstition, innuendos, playfulness using obscurity to speak without saying anything clearly, or anything at all; pretty words, funny punch-lines, charming narrations, mind-twisting, triggering, in others, feelings, images, libidinal energies – seducing the hidden beast with occult insinuations.
Philosophy, is the art that best exposes the user's essence, in the way he uses language.
As femininity ascends in dominance philosophy acquires a feminine energy, expressed in its use of words.
As it declines, and more masculine spirits are needed to deal with worldly conditions, philosophy changes accordingly and this is expressed in words.
Safety, peace, produces atrophy, and a more relaxed use of language. Language becomes erotic, orgiastic in intent. Vagueness is the realm of eroticism – low lighting, to hide imperfections, to lose sight of where one body merges with another – words of passions exchanges, breathlessly, grunts, slurs, they become background noise along with the sounds of bodies slapping, pushing, pulling, grasping and inhaling.
There’s no need for clarity here…it would break the spell.
Eroticism requires mists and shadows.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Language Mon May 07, 2018 7:32 pm

Triangulating Judgment
How is a disagreement on the interpretation of text resolved?
Do the participants 'agree to disagree'?
Do they agree that all interpretations are equally valid because it's all subjective, after all?
Do they each live in their own understanding of the text – in their own private world?

If only it could be so easy, and forgiving.
How a disagreement on text is resolved is by comparing it to the shared world both interpreters inhabit.
How many references does each interpretation have to the experienced?
A simple triangulation will do. Interpreter, text, world – triad corresponding to mind/thought, nervous system/semiotics, body/physical.
Mental abstraction is externalized, by a mind, as text... but the triangulation can occur by using one's own abstractions, the definition of the word/symbol, and, again, the standard is the experienced world.
The post-modern absurdity of subjectivity is shattered.
There is no ‘agreement to disagree’ and the ‘all is subjective’ cop-out.
There are two, or more theories, perspectives, opinions, about the world, or about someone else's opinion of the world.
One is superior, the others are inferior.
This is classic evolution, survival of the fittest.
If the disagreement remains theoretical, philosophical, the resolution is more difficult, because it demands minds that have integrity, and courage.
But where no disagreement remains intact, is when the theory is applied; when the thought, theory, is returned to the external in the form of actions, resulting in consequences.
A theory can be triangulated using world as the standard, but this triangulation becomes more obvious when actor/perspective/world tests the actor and the perspective against the world.
Consequences are costs/benefits, in relation to the projected objective – the expected. A triangulation, once more = cost/benefit/objective.
If the actor fails to remain honest and has no intellectual integrity, he will fail to evaluate the consequences accurately, repeating the same errors.
If he evaluates as objectively as possible, beginning with his own culpability, he can make slight modifications to his perspective, and apply again; adjust and apply again, until his theory begins to harmonize with world – dynamic interactivity.
But he must do so quickly because the world is in flux, so the circumstances are constantly changing. Time being the measurement of change.
His methodology will be effective only if he is efficient. His mind quick, honest, courageous, and relentless.
Evaluating ‘self’ and world, as objectively as possible, will result in an accurate judgment of the relationship of ‘self in world’.
Triangulation is between self, world, and objective – past/present/future.


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Language Tue May 08, 2018 7:37 am

Language differentiates between the mundane world of experiences, the physical, phenomenal, and the spiritual world of incorporeal, abstractions and noumena, calling the second 'divine' and placing there everything man can think but not prove, nor define and justify.
Abrahamism is the noumenon usurping, ‘in theory’, the phenomenal, and, as such, it is Nihilistic.
It negates the experienced world using symbols/words, shaped into metaphors.
Nihilism is the negation of the experiences world by the noetic esoteric abstractions existing as ideas in the human mind, and nowhere else.
This is the meaning of 'occult'. Theories, ideas, accessible by a mind, via another mind.
The very definition of conspiracy and codependency.
The participants become entrapped in a cult, sharing concepts, defined by specialized words that cannot be perceived but only shared using language, in secret rituals, designed to trigger psychosomatic effects.
A noetic tribe, that has, in theory, transcended physical identifiers; the flesh and bone of organic life.
Therein lies the concept of 'eternal life' or 'life after death', the individual's memory lives on in tribal lore. He is brought to the collective mind, where he can be resurrected at will, as symbol – he can be named.
This division is the product of a corporeal division, of mind from body, and begins and ends along the nervous system, where energies merge with flesh and blood.
The nervous system gives them form, converts them to art, and externalizes them using a medium.
This is where ambiguity can be translated into surrealism, linguistic innuendos, symbolism, with no reference.
This is where the noetic merges with the phenomenal in a cloud of metaphorical insinuations that can be translated subjectively, into anything and everything that offers gratification; that satisfies a need and/or a desire.
The difference of need from desire, has been clarified as being one of direction.
Need is the sensation of the body's lack, caused by temporal attrition.
Desire is a by-product of the first, and is the sensation of accumulated excess that has to be expunged, or directed towards growth, reproduction and art.
Art is the product of excess.
Energies accumulate and stored, when organic needs are satisfied, are stored as reserves for the fight/flight mechanism. These energies then become libidinal, in more sophisticated organisms. They become sexual desire, the drive to copulate.
Growth is externalized in a fetus.
These energies become the foundation of the artistic impulse.
To create rather than procreate. To externalize, via a medium as other, thoughts rather than flesh and blood.
Gene to Meme.
Language is the mind spermatozoa.
Sentences are its noetic DNA. Genes expressed through semiotics.

In the mind, freed from natural order, anything is possible.
Concepts like 'absolute', 'perfect', 'whole', and ‘one’ can become literal:
visualized, given an image, an icon/idol.
In the mind the will is supreme authority. It can create and destroy.
In the mind words lose meaning and are given a new one.
In the mind symbols can be manipulated and used to effect body.
In the mind there are no limits, other than the individual's imagination.
In the mind the symbol/word comes first.
It is what Divine means, in the nihilistic sense of the word – inverted.
What is the noumenon?
A representation of a phenomenon.
Nihilism is its inversion.
Phenomenon is the representation of the noumenon. The thought is the 'real' and the real is an illusion – its shadow.
Mythos no longer metaphorically describes existence, through logos, but existence literally describes mythos, through logos.
Logos – the word – becomes the link between mind/body where the inversion takes place.
Logos is the nervous system's expression.
Art no longer imitates life, but life imitates art.
Words no longer refer to world, but world refers to words.
This is the dis-ease the west is infected by.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Language Tue May 15, 2018 10:05 am

Every claim, every perspective, every translation and interpretation of text, every opinion, judgment, assertion, declaration, can and should be validated by experience.
How does a rational man validate any and every judgment?
Triangulation.
He places the judgment, beside his own, and then compares both to an empirically accessible, sensually perceived world.
It does so many times - at least three - to compensate for any sensual corruption.

It then compares its own finding with those of others, again triangulating.
His cost/benefit analysis, juxtaposed with another's cost/benefit/analysis compared to a third's or the objective, the ideal itself.

First thing to evaluate is the objective, the ideal itself.
Is it realistic? Is it attainable, or a fantasy?
Is my own appreciation of it accurate, or corrupted by overestimation/underestimation?
Then one evaluates self in relation to the objective, the ideal.
How attainable is this objective for me? What are my weaknesses and strengths in relation to it attainment?
How can I compensate, if I can, to increase the odds of attaining my objective, of living up to the ideal?

Every perspective spoken, or written can be evaluated against world.
It does not matter where it was written, how long ago, or by who....all text, and all spoken language can be tested against reality.
It does not matter how it is understood, how it is translated, by others....the world, not other minds, is the final standard.
Every text ever written, every claim ever spoken, can be tested against reality, by each and every one of us.

*********************
Self is a triad = body/nervous system/mind, corresponding to past/present/future.
Past is nature.
Present is nurture.
Future is ideal, objective, motive.

Body = organ hierarchy, producing personality. Past made present, perceived as appearance - phenomenon.
Past establishing potentials.

Nervous System = Body interacting with world. Nurturing. Nervous energy, activity/behaviour, making itself apparent to other conscious minds. It is presence manifest.
Potential cultivated or atrophied.

Mind = precedent, probability projecting possibilities.
Orientation by projecting past, through presence, as possible future - objective.
Idea/ideal, theory used as orientation for the will's focus. Mind is will focusing on objective.

*********************
Objective is the projected, used for orientation and to focus the will, in a world in flux.

How can it be evaluated?
By comparing the mental abstraction with the phenomenon, if it exists outside the mind.
If it does not then the objective is theoretical - idealistic.
Possible but not necessarily probable.

One uses one's own experiences or those of others - knowledge - to triangulate and gain understanding.
In the knowledge/experience data patterns are discovered. These are the mapping of the world, transferred internally, - translated as abstraction, mental map.
Meaning refers to this relationship between phenomena, as these are evaluated by the mind.    
The mental map may or may not refer to an external geography of phenomena. If it does not, it is theoretical, idealistic, and/or representational, metaphorical, artistic.

Individual compares its evaluation, appreciation, of the objective, with those of another, and then, if possible, with its attainment.
Here the 'be careful what you wish for' applies.
How we imagine the objective differs from it when and if we attain it.
Cost/Benefits tend to inflate positively, so as to motivate....the benefits exaggerated and the costs minimized.

Objectively judging the objective by using those who have attained it, without being affected by thir claims, is a useful strategy that circumvents your own application, and the possible risks.
Usually the one attaining an objective will exaggerate the benefits to justify his costs. Depending no how large the costs were, in time and resources, the lie will be inflated.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Language Sat May 19, 2018 11:54 am

Three levels of communication:
Direct-Intentional - dictionary references, built over centuries into a shared convention of communication.
Subconscious-Unintentional - physical gestures, tone, rhythms of speech.
Indirect-Intentional - innuendos, metaphors, insinuations, speculation, judgments, approximations.
 
Mind/Body funnel data through nervous system, where they merge/synthesize.
The intentional and the unintentional combine into a song & dance - performance.
The individual may unintentionally be saying more than he desires, or he may unintentionally contradict his intention.
The three can either combine and accentuate one another (harmony), or they may contradict one another (disharmony).

Mind draws from external (exoteric) sources to construct its abstractions - simplifying/generalizing them by reducing their possibilities (space/time).
Body draws from internal (esoteric) sources and uses the mind's abstractions to represent them.  

Depending on the psychology of the actor/communicator one form will dominate the others in his expression.
Depending the psychology of the observer/listener one form will be the focus dominating the others in translation.
Body is honest and direct.
It hides nothing.
Mind can be dishonest and indirect; it covers the body to hide its potential contradictions of what it lies or tries to hide.
Nervous system is where this takes place.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Language

Back to top Go down
 
Language
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 3 of 3Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3
 Similar topics
-
» Body Language
» THE LANGUAGE OF THE HAND by CHIERO
» Comical Quotes About the Confusing English Language
» The Korean language thread.
» Top Reasons Why You Should Learn a Foreign Language

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: