Desperate Degenerates

Normalisation as a method of dealing with the collateral effects of sheltering

At some point in the not so distant future, and if this process continues - which I doubt it will survive that long because nature has her own self-correcting methods - there will come a time when children will be born with physical mutations, and not only mental and psychological ones, as they are currently.
Children born with 4 fingers, or three arms, or two noses, will be the manifestation of accumulated unfit mutations.
The post-moderns of that era will claim that there is no "right or wrong" human configuration, and that being born with two heads is just as "normal" as one, because there is no "human nature", and it's all subjective; communists will chirp in that normality ideals are the product of power relationships imposing the outdated four limbs, one head, one nose, two eyes, configuration, and that it is time to revolt against such "archaic" obsolete physical ideals.
The mutants will cheer and attack anyone that calls them "freaks", judging them by primal notions about human nature, and all that jazz.

Fortunately, humanity would have already gone extinct way before that point, unless technologies are invented to compensate, absorbing the current psychological and sexual abnormalities, allowing genetic mutations to compound and to survive despite their disadvantages.

It is easier to normalize the consequences of your meddling than it is to undo them.
A typical method of dealing with unforeseen negative consequences is to claim that it was all intentional, and had been part of the original intent.

Desperate Degenerates accuse others of imposing their views and values upon them because they want to conceal the fact that they expect and demand for others to share in the negative consequences of their poor judgements and bad choices.


In Marxism shaming, accusing capitalists of exploitations, was meant to conceal personal failings and an inability to take risks, or for the inheritance of bad, ergo nil, fortune, conventionally called "bad luck".
The accusation was meant to impose a Judeo-Christian morality of sharing in the rewards while rejecting the costs.
When such tactics failed the next steps were blackmail and threats to tear down the system and rearrange it along moral standards they had adopted from Abrahamism; specifically the more cosmopolitan Christian moral system: Luke 3:11.

Satyr wrote:

Normalisation as a method of dealing with the collateral effects of sheltering

At some point in the not so distant future, and if this process continues - which I doubt it will survive that long because nature has her own self-correcting methods - there will come a time when children will be born with physical mutations, and not only mental and psychological ones, as they are currently.
Children born with 4 fingers, or three arms, or two noses, will be the manifestation of accumulated unfit mutations.
The post-moderns of that era will claim that there is no "right or wrong" human configuration, and that being born with two heads is just as "normal" as one, because there is no "human nature", and it's all subjective; communists will chirp in that normality ideals are the product of power relationships imposing the outdated four limbs, one head, one nose, two eyes, configuration, and that it is time to revolt against such "archaic" obsolete physical ideals.
The mutants will cheer and attack anyone that calls them "freaks", judging them by primal notions about human nature, and all that jazz.

Fortunately, humanity would have already gone extinct way before that point, unless technologies are invented to compensate, absorbing the current psychological and sexual abnormalities, allowing genetic mutations to compound and to survive despite their disadvantages.

Heisman’s idea of liberal equality coalescing in transhumanism and his “technological singularity” theory plays into this.

Mitchell Heisman wrote:

Modern equality began by dismissing the importance of biology. Ultimately, it leads to the removal of all biological factors from the equation of life until the achievement of death. The logic of equality leads towards the elimination of all forms of hierarchy that separate life or biological priorities from the larger physical world. Self-consistent egalitarianism leads to self-consistent materialism: humans and other life forms have no inherent basis for viewing themselves as chunks of “superior matter”, with special rights above all other material things. The idea that biology has any special privilege whatsoever over non-biology is in its very conception anti-egalitarian, and to fulfill and achieve the enlightenment project is to engage in rational biological self-destruction. Modern egalitarianism can be viewed as a symptom of a larger process of economization. While in its common use, “economics” refers to trade, money, supply and demand, etc., “economization” is a far larger phenomenon that ultimately amounts to the translation of biology into technology.

Liberal psychology concerns itself with emotions and feelings of the individual for a reason. Because of the decreased intelligence of the average population, the average degenerate, feelings substitute thoughts and ideas. The sensation of emotion offers a form of transcendentalism that they rationalize as an enlightened state. This is what the 60s counter-culture was all about. Deifying one’s emotional chaos as a superior ‘intellectual’ state of mind which appointed itself the new future of “evolved” beings, when what it really was, was a worshipping of primitive impulses and the inversion of inferior intelligence levels among a lower collective class of people and the glorification of these impulses, into an idealized elite political class; one that would surpass all human flaws of irrationalism and “evil” and discrimination through the absolute idea of “love” for all. They were obsessed with love as a way to level every distinction down to the lowest denominator based on an idea of absolution to save them all from themselves and their inferiorities. Love is their go to ideal they use to level any differences between groups and races and individuals. Reason is evil because it recognizes distinctions and realities, emotion is good because it is something everyone can partake in and is part of a greater collective, more welcoming. Once the establishment of a memetic identity on absolute equality was in place, it began to branch out to the physical, to the biological--postbiological; taking equality to its logical conclusion.

Interventions produce the expected benefits but also expected and unexpected negative collateral effects.
Like pollution.
These negative collateral effects necessitate further interventions which, in turn, produce the expected benefits and, once again, both expected and unexpected negatives.
So pollution produces more pollution when trying to recycle or burn or deal with it in some way.
Ad infinitum.
At some point the system that emerged from the first intervention has to sacrifice more resources to deal with the negative repercussions of producing resources.
At this point the system is entering its dark phase beginning the process of collapse.

No, a creative way of dealing with this problem is to simply declare it a new norm.
For example, if you cut down a forest to create a garbage dump, and then you realize you need to cut down more forests to expand your recycling and garbage dump facilities....with no end is sight....what solution could be better than to simply declare the garbage dump a park or a natural preserve.....as if it was always like this, and there is no norm, no natural order.
Your urban setting, necessitating land fills are renamed "nature reserves"....and a new norm is born.
It's all subjective.

Now shift this from memetics to genetics and you get the idea.
Unfit mutations, after compounding unfit mutation, creating psychological and physical issues, are eventually "normalized" when they become too much to handle, to reverse, or to compensate for.

Logos...
Magical logos.
Just rename shit into deliciousness, hoping some moron will convince himself to cultivate a taste for shit.

"Spiteful Mutants", a.k.a., Desperate Degenerates must lie to survive, to cope, to tolerate their own existence.
Self-Deciet is how linguistics are applied, first to amplify one's own convictions, to make them more effective externally, via others.
Obviously words are impotent outside brains that cannot process them, so they needs collectives and they need a following, a group, to convince and to validate their own convictions.
Language shifts in utility from engaging reality, attempting to know and understand the world, into a form of propaganda, attempting to convince, to coerce, or to seduce others.

World = Humanity
The world is indifferent to human subjectivity, i.e., human fears, needs desires, human contrivances, and human negations, so world must become human-centric, must become humanitarian, must be humanized.
If not Abraham's god then humanity will serve as creator-god, as the divine.
The universe must be given consciousness, must be made to care, must be vulnerable to linguistic please and threats, must yield to human pathos.
This is why nihilism is logo-centric and always immersed in human inter-subjectivity.
Nihilism must maintain reality as an entirely ideological construct.    
It must be detached from the physical - body - from the experienced, the perceived, from the lifeless, from the corporeal, and be made spiritual, ideological, idealistic....like Christ reborn as purified ideal bringing "salvation", i.e., freedom in the name - logos - of god; the absolute, the universal one - freedom via submission, i.e., fatalism.
Nihilism is full of such linguistic paradoxes.

A lesson they learned from the Jews and have adapted to their needs
When it suits them they are a genetically identifiable group, and when it doesn't they hide in the memetic, and claim to be ideological, just another religion, denying what before they felt safe and confident enough to express pride in.
concealment is a survival strategy.

Genes to Memes
So, too modern nihilists adjust this same exact strategy...sometimes fleeing into generalities and then hiding in particulars as if generalities no longer apply; sometimes evading through large groups, sometimes through denouncing all groups.
Sometimes all is about vague and obscure, i.e., complex, categories, e.g., species, tribes, then it is personal, individualistic, subjective where generalities no longer reveal.
No cohesion required only need, only necessity.
Sometimes humanity is the all-encopassing idea that unifies, then the individual cannot be integrated or defined by any such category; cannot be placed within any generalization.
Either/Or...either absolutely one or absolutely nil.
Motive
It's not about seeing and knowing it is all about concealing and hiding. It's about surviving in a world where survival of the fittest imposes a particular tactic of deception and evasion.
The prey feels vulnerable to being detected by a predator, feeling unsafe in being perceived - it wants to blend into the background as if it was not there.  [see how many species evolve a uniform appearance]
Being single out would mean death. To be perceived as either a group or an individual belonging to it, would decrease survivability.

Genes to Memes
When it comes to matters of survival no reasoning no argument will suffice to abandon the adopted strategy.
The standard is not integrity, not reason, but the reverse; if it serves the end of survival at all costs then there is nothing that cannot be sacrificed. If unreason serves survival then the modern degenerate, in his/her desperation, will surrender to irrationality.
There is no shame in what one does to cope in a world it cannot endure without deception.
All is sacrificed for the sake of living on.

Degenerates and philosophy:

***Words are never limited by the experienced, tangible world.
If they can seduce, manipulate, comfort, or empower, then that is their only standard of evaluating their veracity, i.e., utility.

***Sometimes philosophy is about grand all-inclusive generalizations that apply to all, and exclude nobody, then, at other times, when what is revealed is threatening, i.e., negative, no generalities apply; all is personal, and a separate and subjective philosophy has to be invented for each and every individual.

***If not god, or any other version of the absolute positive, then man is the creator of his own positive absolute.
Philosophy need only create a self-consiustent plausible alternative, and the only criterion is not reason or integrity, but feelings and pleasures.
If it feels good, or can potentially produce such payback, then it is 'true"; if it feels bad, and no potential for a pleasing return is distinguished, then it is "false".  

Feminized philosophy, for young & old women, getting older, and for young men-children refusing to grow up.

If I'm forced to pay for an abortion, or for counselling after a beating, or a rep, as would be the case if my daughter was a slut, then I demand to have a say over how she dresses and what bars she frequents and finds these losers that knock her up and/or knocked her out.
If, on the other hand, nobody expects or demands that I should pay for another's idiocy, then who cares how they justify it or explain it?
I could not be bothered, let along insist that they abide by my rules or that they respect my opinions and judgments.
But that's not the case, is it?
Desperate Degenerates insist that their poor judgments calls, and bad choices, be validated and bank rolled by a collective so that they never have to reconsider any conviction they picked-up in their lifetime of retardation.
They intuitively know that they are idiots, that their own judgments cannot be trusted, and their choices are what inevitably lead to their endless suffering....but their ego cannot accept it, so instead they play these mind games trying to make everyone like themselves so that their stupidity no longer stands out, shaming others into accepting their Judeo-Christian based ethics that demands that I be my "brothers keeper," where "brother" means anyone who speaks and belongs to the same species s I...but not to the same race, because that's just racist...no its worse its Nazism, the new code word that replaces Biblical code words like "evil" or "Satanic".
We're all one race, biatch!!! the human race - *read with a homo lisp
It is my "duty" to pay for the bad judgment calls, bad lifestyles and bad life choices, because not to do so would deny imbeciles their "god given right" to remain as they are: carefree, content, and safe, i.e., infantile cherubs endlessly exploring their untapped potentials without ever, ever, having to grow the fuck up.

*Addendum to the above

Natural selection does not coerce, convince, nor seduce.
It is indifferent.
It exacts the costs for any choice, unprejudiced and with no motive.

Degeneracy quickly faces the consequences of its own degeneracy.
No god, no courts of peers....natural selection.
Human memes that contradict or divert from natural order - as it manifests through human genetics - are nihilistic, and such ideologies perish if left to their devices if and when they remain true to their own principles and ideals, which they never do, because fi they did they would die.

This is the beauty of Timocracy and its citizenry of hoplites, or soldier producers.
A farmer need only red mother nature's signs, adjust to them and then hope for the best - annually leaning and adjusting his thinking to her ways.
This breeds a kind of humility and pragmatism that cultivates an ideal citizen.
Those that fail are not excluded by human political machinations, but by nature herself. He who fails has proven himself unworthy not to his peers, but to her ways - represented by the gods.

The aware nihilist - woke - is a desperate degenerate that has passed through the phase of idealism, being repeatedly disappointed and disenfranchised and has given-up, i.e., lost trust in himself, his own judgments and his own ability to perceive.
An embarrassing awakening he can only deal with by trying to pull the world, i.e., humanity, down to his level of desperation.
Pure nihilism comes as a traumatic disappointment in positive nihilism - a maturation which cannot escape the paradigm but, instead, must dedicate itself to collectivizing desperation and degeneracy.
In bad faith such a creature dedicates himself to spreading desperation and degeneracy, so as to reduce the world, i.e., humanity, down to his level, so that he no longer feels embarrassment for his own naiveté and inability to perceive and judge.
Resentment is pushed to its logical extreme.
Lacking the time to make amends and start over, or the courage to admit and accept his own failures, he must, instead, universalize his own failure.

Self-awarness is, once more, the source of this suffering, and self-deception is the medication, the pharmakon.

What is fascinating to me is not that recovering Abrahamics are now adopting "Nazism", and "Racism" and "Sexism" to describe their new-age "demons" that confront and threaten them - representing reality - but what is more fascinating is how many of these Desperate Degenerates try to protect their Abrahamic past - their family heritage - while dreaming of themselves as heathen warriors, integrating Nietzsche and Heathenism in a new kind of Christianity, so as to make it stronger, more resistant to Nietzsche's critique and to Heathenism's, i.e., Indo-Euroepan spirituality, foundational realism.
A feat of enormous complexity because it requires new and improved convoluted word-games, more subtle obscurantism and more updated forms of mysticism....yet they cannot reinvent the wheel so they resort to reinventing what has worked in the past in Islam, Christianity and, most often, Judaism, with a long heritage in such practices.  
What they covet is Christianity's success, believing that by integrating Nietzschean critique and updated forms of mysticism they can be this age's new Saul.

Degenerates love cynicism for important reasons that have to do with saving them from themselves. Cynicism is an encapsulation of a mentality that caters to different aspects of both the intellect and the emotions. First, of the intellect-skepticism. Skepticism contains a mode of rationalism, while negating anything which may or may not suit worldviews or preferred held opinions that reality contradicts, based on this same approach of doubt. This creates a sense of self that subsists in a kind of world-weariness and despondency felt from this intractable doubt against all things, an internal emptiness, a lack of trust in oneself to know anything or to trust their own judgement because they know it is inferior. The self-redirection of this approach acts as absolving them from the risk of being exposed as lacking those things they doubt, and the responsibility of having to live up to any truth about themselves, a protective shroud of pretentious reason. Second, of the emotions-resentment. Self-hatred, vindictiveness, hatred, spiritual impoverishment etc, can be contained within the notion of resentment. As all these impulses are contained in it, it produces an emotional condition which is imprisoned in a constant state of defensiveness and retaliation. These modes of lashing out are subtle but constant, because the self-hating negative energies are constantly suffusing from them and so to be functional, they take on subtle forms such as mockery, feints and sarcasm. What defines the degenerate cynic is their need to conceal themselves, to hide, to evade, to use euphemistic language, to do everything they can to keep the other from knowing their true nature. Cynicism is versatile enough to give them an outlet of any negative expression they need to release, while keeping them under the self-delusion that they are powerful; a delusion they never ever openly admit, knowing it is the main ultimate lie they live with, a lie that must be kept safe under the comforts of cynicism.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

The modern/post-modern, secularized version of "evil", and of the "primordial sin" - the source of evil.
Usually adopted by desperate degenerates who have embraced Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil" to break free from Abrahamic religious narratives, and from responsibility, imposing collective "guilt" and shame.
But not really.
They've simply found new terminologies to selectively maintain their Abrahamic beliefs - updating them for a modern/post-modern age when nihilistic dogmas will dominate - Dark Age.

Nihilism inverts....white is the new black, light is the new dark....

Desperate Degenerates hold others accountable to standards and morals they, themselves, cannot abide by.
When their hypocrisy is exposed they try to conceal it in a uniform denial of all objective standards and morals, only exposing themselves further.
But they have a response to this, as well. They feel no shame, believing that shame is a remnant of their original standards and morals.

In the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], it's not your accomplishments that let you ascend a hierarchy, it's your victimology. If you're not the top [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], you manufacture a victimhood story! Prof [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Worlds Apart (@WorldsApart_RT) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

>>>I wonder who first "weaponized shame"....
Given the ethnicity of the participants, it may prove to be ironic.

>>>Gad Saad goes through the litany of shaming accusations...Islamophobic, homophobic, misogynist...and...which one does he neglect...anti-Semite, of course. Some controlling shame has to be preserved.
When too many victim categories are manufactured then what value does the primary, the original victim-calss possess? When everyone is a protected category then power of victimhood is lost.

>>>"The parasitic mind"? Now that is ironic. In fact, it is the meme that is parasitic - selfish genes give rise to selfish memes, i.e., self-proagating, self-destructive, ideologies, world-views and spiritualities.

>>>"Identity politics" is the logical end of ideals that go back to the French revolution.....no, that go back to Moses. Like cancer cells they remain dormant within a body until weakness or some environmental factor triggers them to start their multiplying destructiveness.
When you reduce identity to an idea/ideal, detaching it from the body, then identity politics is the "logical outcome", just as the idea that the soul is eternal, and an afterlife makes suicide a "logical option" for the true believer.

>>>"Persona agency", i.e., free-will....responsibility. Desperate Degenerates fleeing from the consequences of their own bad judgements, and life choices. Which dudes invented post-modernism, I wonder....what ethnicity did they belong to.....to the man? Is this coincidental, or is it natural continuance of the mindset, the psychosis, that religion produces?

>>>"Diabetes" and "heart disease" are indeed symptoms of mind/body dissonance...or gene/meme disparities.

>>>Interesting that such discussions are now occurring on RT and nowhere on US media....

Modern psychology is about being caught in between the mind/body dualism and lacking the ability to harmonize both cohesivley to form a healthy identity. This is why the Stoics were so concerned with ascetic reason and the strength of the mind. Because it is in consciousness where the conflict between self and nature must reconcile, where it must order itself. Everything comes down to, and depends on our responses to externals, and how we order them within ourselves. The entire crux of suffering which plagues inferior minds is simply that they lack the capacity for consciousness, that is, self control. All that they do against others is a redirected flogging of themselves. What they lack, they must possess from another. This is what constitutes the nature of envy and why they are immersed within the social world and of humanity and its codes and values. There they find a surrogate self to adopt as thier own.

Dutton explains why Desperate Degenerates, spiteful mutants, are inclined towards [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]...

Also part of my own gene/meme thesis.
What was, under natural circumstances, an advantage becomes a disadvantage or as Dutton calls it "maladaptive".
Appreciating beauty was an appreciation of symmetry - metaphysical approach towards divinity - and proportionality - pragmatic functionality sacrificing perfect symmetry for the sake of functionality within a fluctuating cosmos...but when sheltering allows unfit mutations to propagate and accumulate natural criteria no longer apply and are replaced by social criteria that contradict natural order to varying degrees.
The height of which is nihilism which is a complete overturning, i.e., nullifying, of natural order, replacing it with man-made order that may not value genetic health, especially when it is governed by anti-life, anti-nature ideals, such as those we've inherited through Abrahamism.

I have just watched an excellent film about the spiteful mutant and how it survives and replicates. It is called Vivarium.

— Edward Dutton (@jollyheretic) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This is how philosophy and the great minds who succeeded it, is corrupted. How it is turned into a coping mechanism for simple minds who need a reason to justify their own slavishness and cowardice. This is why modern idiots will come to associate Stoicism or any other form of philosophy with "self-help". They reason that philosophy is for "everyone", making it humanitarian, egalitarian and all-inclusive. The moron even goes so far as to assume Marcus Aurelius was a liberal because he cannot think outside his own cattle pen of modern ideological domestication.

Lower minds do have self-awareness; not in introspection or mind, but within thier instinctual recognition of others as thier identity and the anxiety and needs of survival this produces. It would be inhumane to infect them with an idea of selfhood, that is how they destroy themselves and others.

The underlying anxiety of desperate degenerates is not only to be perceived as what he/she is, but to be known by another, more than he/she can ever know himself/herself; the idea that he is predictable to someone who can see the patterns of his behaviour.
He/She wants to be mysterious, incomprehensible, deep, complex...free.
But then, some of them deny free-will, so they seek concealment in uniformity, in universality. He/She may be seen, and be known, but he/she is as complex as the divine, or part of a universal uniformity.

It's the anxiety a zebra would feel on the Serengeti.
To stand not want to stand out when a lion pride is on the hunt, but then want to stand out when no lion is on the prowl - survival and reproductive motives in conflict,, especially when it comes to males. A herd male would despise being perceived, as distinct, when in danger, and would also despise not being perceived, as distinct, when looking to pass on his genes.

The middle finger was bad enough and then my eyes picked up the two ladies in the background. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Alan H Jamieson (@AlanHJamieson1) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Is "beauty in the eye of the beholder"? 'Cause I want to tear mine out when looking at this pic.

Dutton explains "witches" in the context of "spiteful mutants".
Shedding light on how un-culled mutations accumulate over time producing monstrosities.

His analysis also correlates with how [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], or how semiotics reflect genetic realities, because they are extensions of them, i.e., externalizing internal balances.

A hopeful new year's message from the man who understands desperate degenerates.

"High mutational load"...

Natural selection is replaced by social selection, governed by a collective ideology.
If the ideology is nihilistic - negating natural order - then the populace will be dominated by an anti-nature, anti-life, anti-gropu psychology. For the majority, i.e., the spiteful mutants, desperate degenerates, this will be psychologically comforting because they know that in natural environments - Darwinian circumstances - they would not survive nor have a chance to pas on their mutational loaded genetics, so they prefer social selection environments where they can manipulate the circumstances, through mas movements, to adjust them in their favour, viz., towards leftist, communist, ideologies.

Is narcissism a by-product of desperate degeneration?

Similar to homosexual behaviour in Penguins - as an example - where the absence of mates forces them to direct their libidinal energies towards what is available, and this would only be a member of the same species and the same sex.
Why is lesbianism associated with high self-esteem?
I would think that a high masculine energy would be prone towards self-esteem. Humans are combinations of feminine and masculine libidinal dispositions. "Highly masculine males," for example, would be males with low feminine attributes.

What does Dr. Dutton have to say about narcissists and narcissism?
Let's listen to his analysis...


Genes to memes...
Just as there are genetic combinations, nurtured and triggered by environmental circumstances, developing narcissistic personalities, so too can there be ideological combinations that, when and if triggered, can develop a collective national narcissism, such as Messianism, or a sense of national self-importance...

Though "spiteful mutant" is a better term - because I am a bottom<>up thinker, and my terminology "desperate degenerates" focuses on the effect and not the cause, nevertheless I will continue using the term to describe what Dutton is more succinctly describing.

A characteristic of desperate degeneracy is its focus on pleasure, e.g., if it feels good it is true, if it feels bad it is false, like animals can only comprehend the immediate reward of pleasure when they feel the impulse to hunt, or graze or copulate. they have no clue why or how, they just feel it as an irresistible spontaneous need/desire that can be gratified and they feel this gratification as pleasure.
Moderns are reverting - under feminization pressures - to this state of manimal that reduces all to the simple and certain cause/effect dynamic, viz., when feeling bad then one ought o seek ways to feel good. The focus is on the positive certainty of the pleasure reward, and nothing else matters.
It's simple and primal, and therefore comprehensible to the simplest minds. No complex theories and philosophical considerations....only primordial cause and effect.

This is dumbing-down in practice, i.e., reduce a people to the binary of pain/pleasure and you can control them by adjusting need/desire levels and their access to their gratification to manipulable their thinking and acting and choosing.