Existence...

When the waves touches the sky [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— SlavicWarrior️ (@q_slavic) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Life is riding the waves of existence.
Water = energy.

Surfer = mind
Board = body

All three are fluid.

Preliminary note:
It's interesting that all these traditionalist, new-right wingers are slowly revealing themselves to be god-believers, in the abrahamic sense of the concept "god".  

*Multiverse need not be simultaneous but it can be sequential, one version of the universe birthing the next, it birthing the next, each not exactly like the one before, due to chaos, defined as chaos (random energies) rather than as complexity (concealed, occult energies).
Luck (chance) would be a non-factor since the emergence of a universe that would be stable enough for life to emerge would be inevitable.
In such a model the "fine tuning" necessary for life to emerge would only be a matter of time, and time is infinite since it represents and/or measures change, i.e., interactivity...and ass I've said existence is defined as a state of constant, dynamic, interactivity, making non-existence a abstraction of the negation - inversion - of existence, viz., the static, inert, immutable, indivisible etc.

*Mathematical explanation alludes to my own positions in that math is a representational language, and the only thing it can represent is what be be observed or becomes observable, i.e., what is ordered, patterned.
1 = rep[resenting different kinds and different combinations of patterns, whereas 0 represents that non-perceive and imperceptible, whether it be because it is complex or chaotic.

*The central trait of god is its agency: intentionality, consciousness.
So when we speak of fine-tuning or creation, we usually refer to a willful conscious creator.
The factor of choice is not evaded, as god, as was noted in the vid, chooses to create a universe where life is possible, rather than the infinite other universes he could create.
Here morality is evoked and so Woods could not escape using morality (goodness) to explain why such a omnipotent, omniscient one-god would create this universe and not any other. He does it because it is good and god is presumably, a good god, and so must create such a universe, which restricts his free-will in the form of what alternate options he has no choice but ignore, reject, to choose this "good" one.
The creator god is not only free-willed, i.e., with agency, and conscious, but must also be good, for this position to hold water.
Now, in my position both consciousness and morality emerge within existence, and are not prerequisites - necessary to beings but not to being, since existence has no objective and no end, i.e. telos. They are necessary in that they offer an advantage to life and would be naturally selected as essential to life, when and if it emerges within the cosmos.
If not for consciousness - real time awareness and reactivity - and some form of morality - organic tolerance, cooperation, harmony, congruence - life would not survive existence.

*Woods dismisses the hypothesis of localized order, where other parts of the same universe are not "finely tuned"...or the hypothesis that this fine-tunement, within the same universe, could be a part of a phase, gradually changing to a state where the conditions are not sufficiently tuned to allow life to continue existing - movement form near-absolute order, towards near-absolute chaos.
In this model if we accurately defined order/chaos as patterned/non-patterned or as probability/possibility, we envision a state where near-certainty - Big Bang, where a dualistic state existed and could not merge not a singularity - would be in a state of constant instability (conflict, contradiction), a state of continuous disharmony that could not be finalized, one way or the other. Such a state of interactivity would explode (expand, inflate, multiply), due to attrition.
Chaotic energies gradually eroding, spitting, reducing ordered energies to multiple lower patterns. Creating linear time, i.e., movement towards absolute-chaos.
Now, this state - if chaos = possibility - implies expanding, multiplying possibilities towards infinite possibilities.
Within this state the emerge of a near-absolute singularity would also be inevitable, beginning the process anew - new version of a universe.

*Due to random energies and how they interact with ordered energies determines if and when life emerges within each universal cycle.
The balances are so delicate as to make life improbable in most universal cycles and only in the ones where it life emerges and survives long enough to reach the level of sophisticated sentience would there emerge a consciousness to feel awe, apreciaiton and gratitude for it all.

The cause of existence must be sought within existence.
To seek such a cause without is to seek it in-non-existence, through the non-existent.
And so there is no primary cause.

Cause being what precedes and participates in determining an effect; effect being a cause participating in what is to follow.

@WendyDarling
Saw the SF post...just now.
Was exploring the old haunts.
They stopped talking about me around 2011....
Now I know why that member asked me to delete him/her....he/she was from there.
Ha!!!
I was wondering about that.

---------------------------------------------------
Is space a "vacuum"?
It has a measurable temperature.
Why?
Because it also is energy.
All that exists is energy.
Energy that vibrates far too fast or slow for our biological senses to perceive, so the brain interprets this absence as void and "black".
But that's not all.
Energy may not be patterned and so it cannot rise to the level an organism can perceive, and it cannot be perceived because organism evolved only to perceive patterns, or what is ordered.

Two kinds of chaos" are defined as "complexity"  and "randomness" - both interpreted by organic brains as void, black, absence.
So, modern moderns define chaos as "complexity" implying that everywhere there's a hidden, occult order - this is Abrahamic in origin - God is omnipresent.
The idea of randomness - lack of order, absence of patterns - is terrifying to organic life.
It offers no hope.

Satyr wrote:

The cause of existence must be sought within existence.

Another name for this: idolatry.
To believe the universe made itself.
That all that exists is only that which is sensible to us.

How do you determine the limits of this existence... when humans themselves are so limited?
You can't.
Therefore your cause will always fall short.

What is before, after, below, above...any word pointing to some alternative, points to non-existence - back to the mind where it exists as a neural cluster - ....and by definition non-existence is non-existent.
There can't be an existent non-existence...no matter what name you use to conceal it essence - re-definnig it so as to self-deceive.
Cal it magic, god, paradise, 'reality'...paranormal...whatever.

What is this non-existence, then?
It is an abstraction. An idea.
Mind conceptualizes existence as a thing, a whole - by projecting itself "outside existence - it calls it 'one', contradicting the multiplicity of experienced existence.
Then it inverts this idea, negating it, because the mind uses binary codes and can only think in dualities - especially a simple, primitive mind, like Timmy - ....one and nil.
Good/Evil...edible/inedible...friend/foe....fight/flight....dark/light....all useful simplifications of existence.
It is all an organism requires to survive and propagate.
Nature is frugal.
So oneness is an abstraction that projects mind in some imaginary point outside space/time, and from this abstraction - positive - the mind can imagine its opposite - its negation - an abstraction negating an abstraction.

Now, more sophisticated minds that understand what language is and what abstractinos are, can think artistically in that it realizes that the art is not the real, but a representation.
Abstraction = simplification/generalization, i.e., cutting away dimensional possibilities reducing the phenomenon to a form it can process - losing much data in the process.
Lost in Translation.
The simpler the mind the more data is lost; more complicated minds perceive nuances, details - they also don't misconstrue the representation for the represented, just as an animal confuses a painting, or a picture of a dog as being a dog.
Here the factor of objectivity factors in.
A sophisticated mind can perceive itself and other from a third point, without confusing this as a real disconnection - like when the mind projects itself in some imaginary point outside space time being confused by this and believing that it is channeling divinity.
Mind becomes god of Abraham, for this reason....or this is the first reason
The others have to do with vanity and anxiety.

This is why self-consciousness is confused, by simple minds, as an external agency - god, spirit, ghosts whispering in tis ear, communicating with it from some other dimension etc.
Jaynes Bicameral Mind comes in handy to understand this.

Consciousness of consciousness confuses the simple mind.
It's why free-will is denied....as if some other is acting or choosing or judging - mind/body dissonance.

Transsexualism is rooted in this...as is anything that claims to transcend the physical, the tangible, the experienced world.
A form of self-induced schizophrenia - compartmentalization, what Orwell referred to in his writings.
This sense of detachment from your own actions - claiming you are innocent from what your body is doing.
This also protects the ego...as I've repeatedly said.
For one it is a linguistic defensive shield, protecting the lucid part of consciousness - let's call it ego- from the unconscious, i.e., body.
The ego can now claim it is not responsible for what it has chosen, unconsciously.
Denial of self.    
To the point of negating it completely.

Compartmentalization also allows the mind to hold two contradictory opinions, standards, simultaneously, without suffering any discomfort, or pangs of guilt.....and not forcing it to create a cohesive model.

Can chaos order itself?

WendyDarling wrote:

Can chaos order itself?

Good question.

Yes...and this is the foundation of my cosmology.

We said patterns interacting produce friction that diminish and may eradicate patterns...producing chaos.
This is why chaos is increasing and order decreasing.
We experience this as linear time - movement towards near-absoltue chaos - infinity which never actually becomes infinite.
All is a movement/momentum towards and away - attraction/repulsion.
But, chaos, by the fact that it is random - not complex occult order - can also randomly produce order/patterns - but not at a rate that would counteract increasing chaos, we experience as expanding space/time.
Which I claim also means dimensional fragmentation.

So, space can be thought of as possibility - field of expanding possibilities. Expanding space/time; Expanding cosmos.
Matter/Energy can now be understood as probability - a limit of possibilities; reduction of probabilities.
Life requires this reduction otherwise it cannot survive. We need order - we feed on it and find it attractive - we are inspired by higher order.
This is why we find order beautiful - when it is rare or superior in comparison to our own. We perceive space as possibilities and are awe struck, and a bit intimidated.
We find women or men attractive because of their symmetry and proportionality, indicating health and higher probabilities.

So, as chaos increases the possibility of a singularity emerging multiplies - meaning in the field of expanding possibilities probabilities arise....and one such probability is the near-absolute or the duality of Yin/Yang - a near-absolute singularity emerges and absorbs possibilities, spewing them out as a new Universe...another Big Bang.
That's one hypothesis.
The other is that the expanding field of possibilities - chaos - eventually produces enough order to slow down and then begin to decrease...Big Crunch....all the way back to the near-absolute singularity, beginning the process over and over again.
Each time the cosmos is different....due to chaos.

Timon wrote:

Oh, sweetie...you fucked up.
Strrrrrrrriiiike three...you're out!!!
Couldn't control yourself. Swinging away at the ghost in your mind - where I will live forever.
You needed attention from your master.
Your resentment got the better of you.
Posts with no content....just mockery to compensate for a terrible inheritance.

You were just too formidable a mind for my ego to endure.
You know how much I value my on-line image.

Parting is such sweet sorrow.
Now use the other moniker...you know the one.
Starts with an 'S'....methinks.

Ta, Ta,

p.s.
Not banned demoted.
We don't ban on KTS
You can still log-in and remain a silent member.

How does chaos become anything other than chaos?

WendyDarling wrote:

How does chaos become anything other than chaos?

Chaos and Order refer to energy - different kinds of energy.
Patterned (ordered) and random (chaotic).
String Theory - a vibrating string....which is simply vibration.
A vibration/oscillation with a consistent, repeating, sequence, is a pattern/order....a vibration/oscillation with no consistent repeating sequence is chaotic/random.
A chaotic vibration can be ordered through interaction - its random vibrations becoming a consistent sequence.

Is chaos repulsion to order?

WendyDarling wrote:

Is chaos repulsion to order?

Yes....and this is why it remains imperceptible. It cannot form complex unities that can reach a size to become perceptible.
Chaos remains the smallest possible energy...interacting with order and through order becoming perceptible as unexpected, novel, unpredictable change.

It is why free-will is necessary, to deal with this.
If all were ordered and determined there would be no need for life to evolve judgement and choice.

Can the opposite be true that order is attracted to chaos, overcoming it?

WendyDarling wrote:

Can the opposite be true that order is attracted to chaos, overcoming it?

No, there is no motive.
Patterns repel anything that is contrary to them....and this means all chaotic energies are repulsive.
What attracts is what is in harmony, or least contrary....reducing friction.

Look what I found
Haven't watched it in its entirety....

Uploaded August 5, 2022...today.
HA!!
Bottom<>UP they say...My approach.

*Mind is activity; not a thing.
Bingo!!!
So is existence. So is Cosmos.

*Different kinds of consciousness.
Bingo!!!
Multiplicity not singularity.
There is no cosmic consciuosness...no god....there are different kinds of consciousness facilitating different survival and reproductive strategies.

*Self-Consciousness is not unique to humans.
Bingo!!!
Humans are animals. We are not spirits, divine...we are organic, we are organisms - organizations of different kinds of patterns.
Our language is an advantage but it also can be used to deceive and confuse.
We are what we do, not what we say.

*Minds process patterns.
Bingo!!
Brains are patterns - cells, particles - dedicated to processing patterns.

*Network configurations...what I call neural clusters.
Neural networks.

*Resonance..
Bingo!!!....this is like they've read my thesis.
Two melodies synchronize.
Harmony.
All is energy.

*Mental Representations.
Bingo!!!

*Brain is modular.

*Sensory data is translated...
Bingo!!!
Two streams of sense data - internal/external synthesized in the brain as image, sound, feeling, taste etc.
Sense data  - stimulations of patterns - is converted to a form the body, and then the brain can process.

*Society of Mind.
Yes...neural clusters interconnected, interacting.

*A mind isn't binary in the sense that a vibration is not a pendulum but a sequence, but thinking is binary, because it is the simplest kind of interpretations....like colours are combinations of hues of light vibrations producing a spectrum, but light/dark is the foundational binary.
sounds can range from  20 Hz to 20,000 Hz but sound/silence is its foundational binary.

*Super Mind....SuperOrganism I called it, incorporating mind/body. This is from Spengler.
Cultures are race/tribe specific, because they emerge from the interaction of a specific people with a specific environment.
Memes are Gene specific, but can be transmitted semiotically.
Hive Mind. Collective Unconscious - Jung.

*All life is conscious.
Not all life is self-conscious.

All that exists, or that can ever exist, is dynamic and itneractive....including thoughts, and ideas, and concepts....
Yet, the existent representation may not refer to anything existent outside minds - and so nihilism - in all its forms - must proselytize, coerce, seduce and/or bribe minds into the same convictions.
These ideas can only exist in minds, and so depend on minds to continue existing.
But what is of nature - preceding the emergence of minds - requires no conviction, no believers, no minds, to continue existing.
In fact, non-believers, deniers, are the ones risking non-existence if they remain true to their nihilistic convictinos....but few ever do.
Nihilists must contradict their own convictions fi they hope to survive in a world they deny existence.
They do so in a variety of ways....and despise those who expose them to their self-deceit.
Nihilism inverts....and it is a defensive reaction to existence, so it attracts all those who seek relief - salvation.

A basic tenant is mankind's exclusivity, or special status within existence.

There is no abyss, no void, no emptiness, if by these terms we mean non-existence.
All is energy.
What exists is interactive, dynamic....energy.
Existence is. Non-Existence does not exist, but only as an idea in the human mind - which inverts what it perceives and translates into images, abstractions.
We call abyss what we cannot perceive a pattern in ( complexity ) and what lacks a pattern ( chaos ) - All moves, as Heraclitus said.
Cosmogony beginning with an abysmal state, a void, expresses a state of near-absoltue chaos.

The concept of nothingness is based on this absence of 'thingness' which is a mental construct; an interpretation of a pattern.
So, 'nothingness' indicates a complex pattern the brain cannot process or the organism's senses cannot perceive, or a it indicates the absence of patterns to be translated into 'things'.
In fact 'things' only exist in brains, and the cosmos is indeed nothingness - no-thingness.
Some-thing, refers to some kind of pattern, interpreted as a 'thing' - abstraction.

Our Universe Has 11 Dimensions, According To Quantum Physics

Expanding space/time means dimensions will continuously fragment - multiply.

Satyr wrote:

Expanding space/time means dimensions will continuously fragment - multiply.

That guy made physics easily understandable, my kind of explanation. Did you watch the entire interview? I did twice.

Dimensions are inhabited by frequencies. Do frequencies fragment? The guy said they(atomic frequencies)pop in and out of dimensions, but that doesn’t seem like fragmentation. Does error correcting code fragment? I dunno, but my guess would be no.  The interviewee said that linear time only exists in our dimension, that other dimensions witness the past, present, and future simultaneously. Uh, maybe he was only referring to higher dimensions because he really didn’t say much about the lower dimensions. Are we the lowest dimension? Am I gonna need to watch it a third time, ugh.

WendyDarling wrote:

Satyr wrote:

Expanding space/time means dimensions will continuously fragment - multiply.

That guy made physics easily understandable, my kind of explanation. Did you watch the entire interview?

No...I rarely do.
So much to read and watch.

WendyDarling wrote:

Dimensions are inhabited by frequencies. Do frequencies fragment?

They deteriorate.
Frequency is but an aspect of pattern.
Speed, being another.
Rhythm another.
All these factors are interpreted as sensory data: as sound, as texture, as colour, as solidity, as scent, as taste etc.

WendyDarling wrote:

The guy said they pop in and out of dimensions, but that doesn’t seem like fragmentation. Does error correcting code fragment?

For me this "popping in an out" corresponds to a pattern's frequency and how it vibrates/oscillates across dimensions - representing the probability of interactivity.
Slower, more solid (matter) patterns oscillate across more dimensions; faster ones across fewer, reducing the probability of interacting.

Like the speed of light....refers to a type of energy that vibrates/oscillates only across a few or a couple of dimensions, and so can only interact there and nowhere else.

WendyDarling wrote:

I dunno, but my guess would be no.  The interviewee said that linear time only exists in our dimension, that other dimensions witness the past, present, and future simultaneously.

Life can only exist in a towards increasing chaos world.
Past refers to what has been determined, manifesting as presence....and so cannot be returned to and altered.
This makes choice crucial....as is every act.

I don't believe in time travel.
Past no longer exists, if existence is defined as interactive and dynamic.
Past manifests as presence, interpreted as appearance - in that sense past is always present in the apparent.

Time is a measure of change, i.e., interactivity.
Change cannot be stopped nor reversed - this would be a negation of existence.
I consider space as an expanding field of possibilities; matter being a probability within this field.
Dimensions refer to spatial possibilities for interacting - multiple dimension representing multiple possibilities, depending on the type of energy.

Satyr wrote:

WendyDarling wrote:

Satyr wrote:

Expanding space/time means dimensions will continuously fragment - multiply.

That guy made physics easily understandable, my kind of explanation. Did you watch the entire interview?

No...I rarely do.
So much to read and watch.

WendyDarling wrote:

Dimensions are inhabited by frequencies. Do frequencies fragment?

They deteriorate.
Frequency is but an aspect of pattern.
Speed, being another.
Rhythm another.
All these factors are interpreted as sensory data: as sound, as texture, as colour, as solidity, as scent, as taste etc.

WendyDarling wrote:

The guy said they pop in and out of dimensions, but that doesn’t seem like fragmentation. Does error correcting code fragment?

For me this "popping in an out" corresponds to a pattern's frequency and how it vibrates/oscillates across dimensions - representing the probability of interactivity.
Slower, more solid (matter) patterns oscillate across more dimensions; faster ones across fewer, reducing the probability of interacting.

Like the speed of light....refers to a type of energy that vibrates/oscillates only across a few or a couple of dimensions, and so can only interact there and nowhere else.

WendyDarling wrote:

I dunno, but my guess would be no.  The interviewee said that linear time only exists in our dimension, that other dimensions witness the past, present, and future simultaneously.

Life can only exist in a towards increasing chaos world.
Past refers to what has been determined, manifesting as presence....and so cannot be returned to and altered.
This makes choice crucial....as is every act.

I don't believe in time travel.
Past no longer exists, if existence is defined as interactive and dynamic.
Past manifests as presence, interpreted as appearance - in that sense past is always present in the apparent.

Time is a measure of change, i.e., interactivity.
Change cannot be stopped nor reversed - this would be a negation of existence.
I consider space as an expanding field of possibilities; matter being a probability within this field.
Dimensions refer to spatial possibilities for interacting - multiple dimension representing multiple possibilities, depending on the type of energy.

How can we have a discussion about a video that you haven’t even watched?

Who said anything about time travel?

WendyDarling wrote:

How can we have a discussion about a video that you haven’t even watched?

The discussion is not about a video but about certain ideas concerning existence - not about what another said about existence.
If the video covers these ideas then the one who saw them becomes its representative.
Everyone becomes the representative of every book, every video, every piece of data they were exposed to.
Otherwise everyone would have to learn from the same sources to have a discussion about reality.
Reality is the common ground, not someone's take on it.
I never have a conversation about another's perspective of reality...unless it touches upon my own and then only in passing - as support or challenge.
Have you ever seen me debate someone on what Nietzsche, or Schopenhauer, or Plato said about the world?
No....
I never debate over what another said about a world I am a part of, but only use them as references, if I must.

After watching this 10 minute vid, I already regret it, since it says exactly what I expected and I've seen a hundred times before.
You just wasted 10 minutes of my time because you had to discuss this particular vid not the ideas.

What is described as "temporally simultaneous" sounds like chaos.
I've heard it before.
No, one cannot go into the past, nor see the past....nor the future since choice determines it.
If you haven't made the choice, participating in the determination of the future, there is no future to see.
But you don't believe in free-will do ya? Of course not...you are an Abrahamic slave mind.
You insist on this Abrahamic god version. As expected.
And you found a Negro "expert", to boot.
Ha!
You cannot get over a world with no god, or no singularity. You desperately want to belong and be part of a unified oneness - absolved of all responsibility.
Insecurity? Guilt?
Don't know....your personal life may reveal the cause.

I won't waste my time with another one of your new age mystical bullshyte vids you fish out of the internets and adopt as fact.
I was wondering how long it would take you to obsessively inject into your posts the usual god idea.

In short: past no longer exists because it is no longer mutable - interactive.
Future does not exist because it is being determined in the present.
Only presence exists....what we call the 'here' and the 'now'.
Past becomes memory, manifesting presence which is now mutable as presence.

There are no absolutes: no indivisible, immutable, singularity.

The dropping in and out of existence I agree with because it corresponds to my conceptions of patterns and how they participate, sequentially, in dimensional fields of possibility.
When I speak of vibration or oscillation, I mean exactly this....a patterned energy has a probability of interacting in a sequence across dimensions - if no interaction occurs, nothing is perceptible, but if an interaction occurs then an observer will witness it as a point in space/time...movement is the perception of such interactions across multiple dimensions.
For humans three, plus that of movement.....sequential interactions. Other dimensions are imperceptible to man.
Chaotic energies lacking such sequential continuity would appears as dropping in and out of existence, at random.

WendyDarling wrote:

Who said anything about time travel?

 

Quote :

The interviewee said that linear time only exists in our dimension, that other dimensions witness the past, present, and future simultaneously.

In the other dimensions one can move from past to future....no?

Impossible.
Energies participate in determining the future....living agencies participate via choice.
The future has not been determined beforehand....unless, like you, we adopt fatalism and an all-knowing, all seeing godhead clothe in pseudo-scientific jargon and metaphysical mysticism.
As for past....it does not exist as per my definition of existence.
Past manifests as presence, but is no longer dynamic, interactive as past....so we cannot perceive what no longer exists as past, but has become presence....where the future is being determined.

Dimensions do not refer to some magical place existing beyond space/time....they literally refer to space....with movement referring to time.

The Negro, WendyDarling, the stupid twat, used as her reference, which she insisted I watch...


Now, normally, a Negro "expert" on anything intellectual would be a red flag...but not for this Americanized twat.
For her, race, and her own gender, are but superficial...."social constructs".


Patterns.....for the Olympian god's sake....patterns.
The minute WendyDarling - whatever her real name is - says anything on anything, caution should be the first reaction.
A retard posting stupid superstitious twaddle will not, suddenly, break the pattern and post anything of any value.

Need......Desire....
This is why these nitwits deny freewill. Their own will is entirely enslaved by their needs/desires, therefore it must be a universal fact.
This enslavement to their primal needs and desires must be a submission to god, to divine will - a negative must become a positive.

Nature refers to the ordered- patterned - part of existence.
Existence is dynamic interactivity.
Therefore, the language of nature is not world but actions...appearances being an interpretation of nature's interactivity. 

Logos is man's attempt to decipher nature's dynamic language, converting it to semiotics.
Natural Laws are such human interpretations.

The deeper we look the more chaotic things become.