Nice....except for the fact that Jews are matrilineal. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
We may say that the Semites, being Indo-European were originally patrilineal, and then became matrilineal, when they adopted Judaism to overcome their slavish inheritance and to reassert their identity as belonging to the king of kings. A mono-god is the only father permitted so all males become surrogate females, raising the alpha's offspring, begotten by the female from the MALE God. Lineage is also ideological, in their case, because Jews are not a race, but an idea(l): those chosen to suffer on behalf of god, until Armageddon. Circumcision must have serve a practical purpose, to avert infections in a low water environment, and to symbolically separate themselves from all other tribe by ceremonially castrating males shortly after birth. We see this in the traditional clothing of Orthodox Jews....they seem so strange, intentionally signalling their distinctiveness as the 'chosen'.
We, also,see this tradition passed on into Christianity with the Biblical tale of holy inception. Jacob was essentially a cuckold, of the mind. Patrilineality had to be preserved in tribes that could not go to the extreme to signal their mental castrations. The current liberation of females is the outcome of this loss of patrilineal lines. The females belong to the State, and the children belong to the state, and are under the parent's care....mostly the mothers. the father is a sperm donor and then must become a surrogate mother. His rights over the child are minimal. They do not actually belong to him, and his traditions. The state is cultivating them, educating them to become idea(l) citizens for the State.
Jesus was technically still a Jew because his mother was so, even though his father was not. He chose to bridge the Hellenic and Judaic bloodlines, and this got him killed. You cannot mix such contrary world-views. One loves life and nature, and the other hates it. One believes in many gods representing natural forces, and the other believes in a singularity that contradicts the multiplicity of nature. Judaism must have adopted matrilineal inheritance to signify their separation from thir Semitic paganism. Like with Christianity they must have preserved some of their traditions but corrupted them, connecting themselves to a past they wanted to reject in words/symbols only. Christians did the same....converting the gods and heroes to saints and apostles, the rituals they corrupted into Christianity, changing the names so as to forget their origins.
The reason why Christians did not want to totally forget their past is because their past was a glorious one. Wars had to be fought to make them forget. Pagans had to be slaughtered, names of children made illegal, churches built over ancient [pagan temples and so on...all to make the pagans forget their past. this was no so for the Jews. they wanted to disappear into the host they found themselves among. Changed their names, married into their bloodlines to become immersed, except for the very religious and still true to the original teaching of Judaism that despised life, nature and the world, and wanted to end it....and still does. In this case the desire is to forget...to adopt the outer appearances, follow the traditions of the host. There is also a political movement that wants to return to a Semitic tribal identity - Zionism.But it does not let go of its Jewish more recent past. The entire history of their 'suffering' because this is the only identity they now have, after so many thousands of years. The identity of 'victim' is too ingrained. Secular Jews, humanists, Marxists, want to destroy all tribes so as to forget their own.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37193 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Just as we classify animals and plants of the same species into different groupings, we can classify humans according to racial criteria. It should be noted that Coon does not rank the races but merely draws attention to the fascinating variety of human groupings in the planet with different racial traits. In this manner, Coon's system is the best suited to this chapter's objective, identifying the movements of the European peoples throughout the development of Western culture. According to Coon, there are three main sub-species of races (Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Congoloid), with four more races identified. He also draws further divisions within each of these main racial types to take account of important additional morphological differences, geographic variations, and the ways in which different environments engendered cultures which 'profoundly' affected the character of the races. The following succinct statement by Cocoon is worth quoting:
'A race is a major segment of a species originally occupying, since first dispersal of mankind, a large, geographical unified, and distinct region, and touching on the territories of other races only by narrow corridors. Within such a region each race acquired its distinctive genetic attributes - both in visible appearance and its invisible biological properties - through the selective forces of all aspects of the environment, including culture. After having become differentiated in this fashion, each race filled out its space, resisting, because of its superior adaptation, the entrenchment of outsiders with whom it mixed, from time to time if not continuously, along its borders.
Hart, Wade, Cochran and Harpending offer an up-to-date scientific definition. Hart is the most succinct in pointing out that races are 'not unique to the human species', since many animal species consist of more than one type, though these types are called subspecies, or breeds rather than races. This is his definition:
'A race...might be defined as a large group of individuals - all of them members of the same species - who have formed a partial or completely isolated breeding population, for a significant peiod of time, and who consequently differ statistically from the rest of the species in various heritable traits by which they can be recognized.
Hart emphasizes geographic isolation as the major factor that caused humans to be differentiated into races. Breeding populations that are geographically separated for a long time will experience an accumulation of genetic differences between them, both by natural selection and by genetic drift. It has been imperative for those that believe that races are a social construct to insist that humans have been interacting and amalgamating since since they evolved into Homo sapiens, for they know that the theory of natural selection cannot support the existence of races if human populations across the earth were isolated for thousands of years. This is down to a simple fact that a human population will experience different selective pressures in different environments. In turn, this will result in the evolution of distinct genetic traits, which is itself the basis of the argument for different races. As Wade observes:
'The ancestral human population of 50,000 years ago differed greatly from the anatomically modern of 100,000 years ago [...]After the dispersal of the ancestral population from Africa 50,000 years ago, human evolution continued independently in each continent. the population of the world's major geographic regions bred from many thousands years in substantial isolation from each other and started to develop distinctive features, a genetic differentiation that is the basis for today's races.
By 'ancestral Wade means the humans of the Upper Palaeolithic who evolved in Africa and then began 50,000 years ago to spread into every continent. Hart believes that four principle races evolved in the major continents: Mongoloids, Negroids, Australoids and Caucasoids. He divides the first two races into the following sub-races: 1)Mongoloid: Amerian Indians and Asian mongoloids. ii) Negroids: Negroes, Congoid Pygmies and Khoisan. He adds that there are also major population groupings which are admixtures of the principle races, that many of us today are hybrids and that within each of these races and sub-races one finds multiple ethnic groups classified according to a whole host of cultural markers. hart neatly sums up some of the key physical differences observed between the races under the following categories: ' surface differences' (skin colour, hair colour, shape of nose and lips, shape of eyelids); 'existence and susceptibility to various diseases' (sickle-cell anemia, measles, malaria); 'rate of physical maturation' (age at which children can turn over, crawl, and walk); 'reproductive' (age at menarche, gestation period); 'body build' (height, stockiness, width of hips, lung capacity, fractions of quick-twitch muscle). hart also addresses 'behavioural differences' in studies of contemporary racial groups in terms of aggressiveness, impassivity, divorce rates and finally differences between races in r-K survival strategies. The latter are related to the interval times between births, offspring per female, parental care, onset of sexual activity, and infant mortality rates. However, as I indicated above, the main focus of Hart's book is on racial differences in intelligence and the role these differences played in the cultural development of different civilizations. ---Faustian Man In a Multicultural Age
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
Excerpt from a longer video I already posted here, but evidence of Africans and Non-Africans being different genetically when compared to other species like Neanderthal.
For some reason I had got the idea that there was no Neanderthal admixture event. It appears, though, that there still might be, but just that that particular idea about admixture being responsible for the differences between Africans and Non-Africans is not correct since Denisovans exist. Story isn't complete.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37193 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
What concerns Conrad, however, is the promotion of a history in which the diverse cultures of the world can be seen as equal participants in the making of the Enlightenment. Conrad wants to carry to its logical conclusions the allegedly 'universal' ideals of the Enlightenment, hoping to persuade Westerners that the equality and the brotherhood of mankind require the promotion of a Global Enlightenment. But Conrad blunders right from the start when he references Toby Huff's book, Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution, as an example of the 'no longer tenable' 'standard reading' of the Enlightenment. First, this book is about the uniquely 'modern scientific mentality' witnessed in 17th century Europe, not about the 18th century Enlightenment. It is also a study written, as the subtitle says, from a 'Global Perspective'. Rather than brushing off this book in one sentence, Conrad should have addressed its main argument, published in 2010 and based on the latest research, showing that European efforts to encourage interest in the telescope in China, the Ottoman Empire, and Mughal India 'did not bear much fruit'. "The telescope that set Europeans on fire with enthusiasm and curiosity, failed to ignite the same spark elsewhere. That led to a great divergence that was to last all the way to the end of the 20th century". ---Fustian Man in a Multicultural Age
This brings up an interesting fact about the races and why Europeans still dominate in all fields. Asians are numerically superior and have higher, on average IQ's, so why are they not on the forefront of philosophical and scientific ground-breaking thought....at least not until some are integrated within European thinking? Why do they still lag behind, only adopting European innovations and mass producing them, cheaper? Why did the Jews create no lasting great works of art...not until some became influenced by European thinking, and then they only managed to produce second-rate imitations?
The secret is in the daemon. A balance between mind/body, produced by European history - populations brought to the edge of extinction by a harsh environment. Asians are passive...something their spirituality nurtures. Buddhist asceticism is not the same as Hellenic, Doric, asceticism. Science is the challenging of natural order....philosophy is the confrontational of the real with an ideal, where the idea(l) does not usurp the real, but the idea(l) is sharpened by the repeated friction. Jews, on the other hand, identify with being victims. Art, innovation, requires the courageous confrontation of the real, not the construction of internal alternate realities where up is down and down is up. They run inward rather than outward.
What is missing is 'spirit'. The desire to face the world, as it is, and self within it, with no inflation/deflation.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37193 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
race mixing is unnatural, argument against it not being unnatural:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] "Before the start of the experiment the males showed no significant differences in mating success. But after the large differences in tail length were artificially created, great differentials appeared in the number of new active nests in each territory. The males whose tails were lengthened acquired the most new mates (as indicated by new nests), outnumbering those of both of the controls and the males whose tails were shortened. The latter had the smallest number of new active nests. The females, therefore, preferred to mate with the males having the longest tails."
If there are objectively more attractive physical characteristics, it would be moronic to presume they are not more present in one race over another.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] A beauty contest was judged by AI and the robots didn't like dark skin The first international beauty contest decided by an algorithm has sparked controversy after the results revealed one glaring factor linking the winners
Overwhelmingly women preferred their own race, but whites are objectively more beautiful than others, when race "isn't a consideration". The ability to disregard race is not indicative of the complete irrelevance of it. In general, the idea that racial/subspecies physical characterstics are irrelevant to sexual selection is a testable hypothesis, with at least some cursory research already done in the first link I posted.(edited) Whether race is a better predictor of reproductive success with different racial collectives of females, is also a testable hypothesis - if you want to see whether money, height, or race is the most decisive factor, or which ones are more important than others. Condemnation of it to irrelevance is premature at best.
if it can be shown (as an example for a study) tigers and lions, forced together, choose to mate with their own kind over the different kind - and they are capable of fertile reproduction - then there is natural evidence for racial or subspecies preference in sexual selection and the choosing of different subspecies for reproduction is unnatural. in other words, degenerate, because it is a project of desperation or Lowest Common Denominator mate selection.
if a natural preference is demonstrated, going against the preference when racial similars are available, shows it is an unnatural choice.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37193 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Complex systems created by complex minds cannot be maintained by minds that adopted, or inherited them, or stole them, and had no hand in creating them. Multiculturalism leads to decline....it is a symptom of decadence. The final phase of a culture/civilization.
A meme, a culture a language, can be taught to a population that did not invent it, but it cannot be applied nor appreciated the same. An example would be how the Romans, though genetic relatives of the Greeks, adopted their culture and language but slightly corrupted it. Imagine what a people who are not genetically related to the Greeks have done to it, or can do to it. A meme is a manifestation of the relationship between a people, genetics, and the environment. People and environment are in an intimate interaction. The specific qualities of the environment will force the population to adapt, adjust, to it in very specific ways.
Genes birth memes...and world is the factor that determines the kind of meme will be produced by the particular kind of gene because the gene is a product of world, and meme is the extension of this gene. You cannot become a Hellene by visiting Greece, eating Greek food, listening to Greek music, or even by learning the language. You might imitate it, or adopt it as your own, but you can never embody the historical events that produced it...no more than a Greek can become Japanese by visiting the environment, the country and learning Japanese, or dressing Japanese adopting the Japanese lifestyle.
Gene Meme relationship is that of mother and child. A child can adopt or can be adopted by a non biological mother, but he will never be what a biological child would be for her.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
We are not born as clean slates (tabula rasa) because that would automatically discredit all biological categories and not only the ones liberals want to ignore and blame on some conspiracy, they call at times god, and at other times state and more recently they call with the term 'society'.
DNA is the inheritance of memories. These memories establish upper limits in the development of all biological traits - physical and mental. At the same time an organism is born open-ended - open to the world. Its brain is full of neurological connections that gradually reduce. This openness is its inherited potentials confronting and being confronted by world. Subject (identity - past) awakening to Object (world). This is what Dasein means. Past returned into world....because if no reproduction takes place these inherited memories are lost.
Young organism have this curiosity meant to develop their brains, because environments is changing, is change, that needs no fanatics to promote it....it happens whether we, as living organism like it or not. Environment, existence, is flux - in other words change - therefore the organism's inherited memories have to be constantly reaffirmed against the real, to validate. This is why consciousness is constant, and why ideas are not absolute but evaluated on their precedent, including both personal and inherited precedent. DNA is inherited precedent.
We never establish absolute certainty, but we establish the most probable - the highest, best, most possible. This is why the Abrahamic singularity God, is absurd, and exposes a motive lacking integrity. Some ideas, theories, have such a high probability that they are understood as being certain, by the layman who cares not for theories and for complicated evaluations of existence. For example.....that no Absolute has ever been found outside verbal statements and mental abstraction, makes it highly improbable....and contrary to what is found. It is a contradiction to what is experienced as multiplicity, fluidity, change. Nothing immutable, whole has ever been experienced - zero precedent. No 'one', no singularity, nothing complete has ever been experienced. The idea is theoretical and can be explained by well-intended minds. In fact, I've provided my own explanation as to why the noumenon becomes a abstraction believed in literally - the relationship of subjective to objective. Dismissing my explanation without offering another, better one, on the grounds that it is not whole, complete, perfect, already assumes what is absent, and sues it as an excuse.
In philosophy the natural method of 'survival of the fittest' applies. A theory is discredited by another better one - a superior one - and not on the grounds that it is also imperfect. A lion hunts and kills a gazelle on the ground that it is superior, and not that it is perfect. The weak member of a herd is culled not because other members are perfect, or immortal, but because they are superior in the organic sense - in the sense of what traits the particular species evolved as a specialized method of surviving. Each species is a reproductive category that also evolves a common method of surviving - specialization. Each specialized method has its own traits, that evolve in relation to environment. What makes one member of a species superior to another is based on fitness within world, within environment.....and this means in regards to the particular traits the species is characterized by, in regards to its specialized method of survival - traits manifest as appearance. DNA expressed as presence. Lions have their own, represented by their appearance. Gazelles have their own. Humans have their own.
Race is a sub-category of species. It is the process of evolution that has not resulted in DNA splintering - inherited past, memories, taking their own distinct path within environment.
A trait is evaluated not noetically, theoretically, but pragmatically - trait within world. Organism in relation to world. Subject in relation to Object. Pragmatically - not noetically but ideas converted to actions. Idea(l) in relation to the Real.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37193 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Jared Taylor is calling out Liberal Americans....he knows they are lying and he is putting them to a test. they say they do not believe in racial differences being genetic, so Jared wants to put this to the test and separate the races. The hypocrite twats know that any where the Negroes are placed they will destroy it, and then liberal twats would have nobody to blame to hide their hypocrisy and lies. It's happened in Liberia, it is happening in South Africa, and in Detroit. They know, but they will not admit it. instead they want Europeans to pick up the slack, and inter-breed to eliminate this fact....so they would rather destroy the superior than admit there is an inferior.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Anfang
Gender : Posts : 3989 Join date : 2013-01-23 Age : 40 Location : Castra Alpine Grug
One reason why promoting negroes is popular among shitlibs and cuckservatives is because it speaks to their sensibilities of promoting that which they feel superior to. Slave morality in terms of racial social politics.
It's a natural sentiment for them and only when the negro start to become an unavoidable problem for them because they can't afford to escape, only then will this discomfort outweigh their natural disposition towards promoting what they feel superior to.
Last edited by Anfang on Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
apaosha Daeva
Gender : Posts : 1849 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 37 Location : Ireland
_________________ "I do not exhort you to work but to battle; I do not exhort you to peace but to victory. May your work be a battle; may your peace be a victory." -TSZ
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37193 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
If the IQ differences are genetic, than it’s a tragedy, but its no ones fault.
The modern empiricist: “The sun shines, but it’s not as bright as you think.”
Such psychological ambivalence. The entire interview revolves around circuitous verbal politically correct etiquette, despite the assents and allusions to the superior/inferior racial hierarchy. Objectivity is synonymous with impartiality and impartiality with equality. It all leads back to the same delusion, to the same indoctrination, the same subversion. Reason, they agree, is what matters, not whether or not blacks are inferior or whether there is a racial hierarchy. In the end, an open mind, is what matters, not necessarily reality.
This is what sophistry is. Their subtle loyalties to their modern mythologies, controls their every word and utterance, and they are guided by it. Their Wills are kept on a leash by leftist politics and their minds are kept on a diet of modern ideological food. No courage to be honest with themselves. Just simple intellectual cowards and it is precisely their cowardice that leads to no greater perspective but only the reciprocation of their innocuous contentions that are not meant to resolve anything. Molynuex says he wants to use reason to "resolve" arguments, to resolve conflicts, when he uses the very tactics to perpetuate the same conflicts unresolved, for fear of jeopardizing his reputation or creating real conflict that has substance in the reality he claims to be loyal to. The fact that he believes in resolutions, points to his affinity to have faith, not reason. It doesn't surprise me why he gushes over Peterson like a little girl.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37193 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
He's talking to a jew...so has to appease the victim agenda. We see it in his flattery and self-abasement when mentioning Ashkenazim Jewish higher, on average, verbal intelligence.
There's also the matter of earning a buck. If he does not show the proper contrition he may lose a large portion of his earning base. He has to be edgy and deal in those issues nobody dares talk about, but at the same time he has to be apologetic and show suffering, like he shares in the pain of those who may be offended and hurt by the truth.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37193 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
The inferior always wants to mix with the superior. In female reproductive strategies it is called Hyeprgamy. She wants to breed with a male on her level or higher.
Blacks want to mix with whites. The superior is degraded, diluted by this mixing.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
The way I see it after this presentation, Ashkenazi Jews are advocating Europe to become more like them genetically; which is a male of Semitic origin race-mixed with the European female. Aryan males are then competing against this, and European females have no interest in whether or not they are conquered by Aryans or the Semites. Culture and religion are there to create conditions where the Aryan men are vulnerable to D&C techniques and blindness to the genetic war maneuvering. Christianity's major figure was of a Semitic female and an Aryan male hybrid, which is why Jews dislike it spiritually.
I'm wondering whether or not Greeks are as they were in their antiquity, genetically. I think it makes sense that they would be Middle Eastern, or Semitic.
Racially, among maternal lines, they're all technically 'white'; the Indo-European. 'Whiteness' has a history associated with it, which includes Italians, Slavs and etc. Turkey and Indian people appear excluded. --
Here we see that Greeks and Iranians and SouthWest Asians are distinct from what were referred to as 'barbarians' of the North/West. Ethnically, all the North/West Europeans are distinct from one another, but collectively they are closer together than they are apart from those different sub-races of whites.
Here is a sample of the Iranian people, though:
What we witness between the Iranian/Israel conflict may be the competition of paternally delineated Semites versus paternally delineated Aryans.
Largely, conflict against Islam from Western Europeans comes from a Christian origin. Western Europeans likely were satisfied with their Pagan religions to the exclusion of Islam and Christianity - but there was efforts to convert Pagans to Christians:
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37193 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
I'm re-posting this lecture to clarify. Nihilism, as I've said, is inverting. It takes the real and flips it on its head. Its symbol the Star of David depicts this inversion of the Egyptian pyramid, representing natural order, which placed the Pharaoh at the top. Judaism was known as an anti-nature, and misanthropic dogma since ancient times. They created their power by doing the work others refused to do...as they never felt that they belonged to the host culture they lived as parasites upon. They were not only into usury but were also tax collectors....this, and their refusal to offer their salvation to all slaves, in all tribes, is where antisemitism is rooted. They created a religion using this nihilistic inversion. they did not invent nihilism....they exploited it. Their only genius is with language...and have nothing to show in all other human disciplines.
They even practice a form of self-isolation that is not original, as many other memes are doing so....like gypsies. They are like gypsies in many ways, except their focus on intellectual, and psychological issues...which is part of their parasitical strategy - to exploit the host using language and psychological manipulation.
So, this inversion, in pragmatic terms, means that they are not a race, but a meme attempting to become a race, genetic. Semites were not Europeans....but came from Asia....and entered Europe where some mixing occurred. Semites are not Jews and Jews are not automatically Semites. Judaism stopped proselytizing to preserve their 'chosen' privileges...God, for them means them....the chosen. Who chose them? They chose themselves....and then abstracted themselves as a god. The other tribes all rejected this 'god' insinuating the multiple expulsions they suffered when their parasitism became intolerable to the host....mostly after the elites that used them to collect taxes lost power and so could no longer offer their protections. During the Inquisitions they pretended to convert to Christianity. Duplicity was a common practice...some even changing their names, or marrying from outside the tribe to become more like them in appearance....but remarkably they remain genetically homogeneous because of their dogma. You did not dare marry a non-Jew, and lineage was maintained matrilinially.
Semites are a non-European tribe.....Judaism is not....but Zionism is an attempt to make Judaism a tribe, through inbreeding, and political means - genetic isolation. Judaism is the nihilistic meme that infected the Semites, and from the Semites it spread to other tribes, when the conditions became optimum for such viral infections. Semites invented it, by synthesizing the different spiritualistic dogmas they came in contract with, from the many hosts they parasitized. From Egypt, through Babylon to Greece...at which point they fragmented into three, and the Greeks were infected with what would become Christianity.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37193 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
This is how race is proven. Give blacks a successful, and sophisticated system and they will destroy it. Sometimes unintentionally....simply because they do not have the intelligence for a system above what is common in Africa.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Anfang
Gender : Posts : 3989 Join date : 2013-01-23 Age : 40 Location : Castra Alpine Grug
I could show you all the data, statistics, and research in the world--and none of it would make you as racist as working just one week in retail. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— Matt Semite (@MattsOurSemite) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Whites are the only population that behaves in a 'humane' and 'civilized' way and actually pays attention to these qualities and is thankful for them in others. Niggers and arabs behave like you dont exist unless they physically need to get past you or retrieve something from you and they dont give a fuck about manners, respect, self-respect etc.
