History

Many individuals questioning my tweets are professors, even "experts" in medieval history, but not a single one has managed to construct a reasonable claim against my claims other than using labels. Fun Fact: 12C Medieval Renaissance led by White Men: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Dr. Ricardo Duchesne (@DuchesneRicardo) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

January is named after the Roman god Janus. He had two faces to see the future and the past [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Roman History (@romanhistory1) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This is why it is called "The Jewish Problem".

Jarno wrote:

This illustrates the quintessential modicum of modernity; individualism. The disintegration of the family closeness, replaced by the mindless self-serving nihilistic lifestyle of capitalistic atomism. They called it “self-independence”. Because to be independent, by modern individualist terms, means to be detached from your loved ones, disparaging them as hindrances to a life of “self-pursuit” and indulgence. The self, being connected to surrogate communes of materialism and careerism; state parenthood. For moderns, being independent means having your own bank account, buying your own crap, paying your own bills, living in your own dump somewhere; using artificial and economic means and resources provided for you by a system that controls you, and then believing you are “free” and “independent”.

Must be one of the reasons people have so poor judgement about others, even people who engage a lot socially only get these surface experiences, to me it seems "friend", at least in my culture has become meaningless. You wouldn't actually do much for this person, it's more like a reference to a casual acquaintance, people don't actually socialize that much without alcohol, nobody takes it seriously if you talk about your "friend", these people won't be around on bad times. There is not really a context that would make it easy to explain that this person who you talk about is important.

And these people who promote immigration don't even visit the homes of their migrant "friends" or invite them over, let alone live next to them. So how the hell is these peoples judgement worth anything, it's just shallow interaction. That's why I support direct confrontation so you know who are on your side instead of pretending to get along, there's enough division between the normal population. Social media is one of those things that makes you disappointed in most people, very few people seem to have any principles which I found shocking, everyone just wants to get along.

Black Plague was created in China

>"Genetic studies of modern and ancient Yersinia pestis DNA suggest that the origin of the Justinian plague was in Central Asia. The most basal or root level existing strains of the Yersinia pestis as a whole species are found in Qinghai, China"

— Gentle M. (@dappergentleman) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The reinterpretation and reinvention of history is only possible when words are used to detach, rather than attach, humans with environment.
A relationship of the subject with the object, the ideal with the real.

These are statues of the early Roman emperors, with colour added.

The Romans painted their statues - this is reasonably close to how they would have looked in the emperors' lifetimes. The hair and eye colours are taken from ancient Roman descriptions. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Roman History (@romanhistory1) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Etruscan helmet, 6th - 5th Century BC [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Roman History (@romanhistory1) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

street vendor sells mummies in Egypt, 1865 [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— History In Pictures (@HistoryInPics) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

A (Greek) explanation about ancient Greeks and their hypothetical homosexuality.
A linguistic issue based no a modern misinterpretation of the word (ερος) eros.
The Greek term for homosexual was Κίναιδος - from the terms κναίω, meaning 'street', referring to what is common or of public use, and αιδώς meaning shameless.

The relationship of student with teacher was erotic, in the ancient-Greek, platonic sense - nothing to do with physical intercourse, pleasure, sexual contact etc.
Intercourse of minds based no respect and common values and goals.

Around 5,000 years ago, this ritual death chamber served to commune people with their ancestors. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Watch a new episode of [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] TONIGHT at 9p ET only on [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] and on SCI Go. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Science Channel (@ScienceChannel) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The first gods and spirits were the dead.
One prayed to one's own dead parents and/or relatives.
Praying to an idea/ideal - an abstraction - came much later.

This makes you think...

Alright. Something to think about in relation to the dancing cops & nurses we've been seeing.

In 1374, a plague of dancing (choreomania) broke out. Bear in mind this wasn't long after the peak of the black plague epidemic in Europe. Even 20 years later it wasn't fully over. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Read The Signs (@Semiogogue) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Patterns repeat...

The black death. A plague many times more viral, deadly and catastrophic than this nasty little cold flu going around, and still the fear is palpable.

Moderns have no relationship with pain or distress, or struggle. Thier sheltered domestication is all they have known; living in bubble worlds where they have had to invent thier own masochistic realities of conflict, through movies and other controlled environments so they can vent thier suppressed energies but be free of pain in the process, has only instilled a deeper condition of aggression coupled with a deeper sense of fear and cowardice. The small dog syndrome; overreacting to any threat with extreme defense mechanisms, because it is consumed with terror of never having actually faced it or suffered its consequences.

Dancing is a way of coping with overbearing cognizance of a blighted, unsure future. If you cannot exercise control over the environment, you exercise control over yourself - in absurd ways if necessary. This is a coping mechanism to prevent insanity from an overreliance on "innocence", being "born without any fault", blank slate - and the taking of the world's maladies as a personal attack, like tribes saying a volcano God is angry. With Christianity it's inverted - born guilty.

Preserving 'innocence' in an anthropomorphically causal world is primary of the concerns. Dancing becomes a defiance of ownership of the effects (and the cause) for the malady. By dancing, it is out of your hands, and you can accuse others of defaming you if they attempt to call you on it. Only the noble will take full responsibility.

Addendum to the above, defamation for dancing is a "high sin" in a feminized world - and among the feminine. They cannot imagine, and are repulsed, by the idea of dancing being shameful. It is a ritual of self-worship, but so fundamental to a woman is her own value, so inextricable is her esteem, that she cannot imagine a deity against dancing. In the impunity, a sort of spiritual divining of herself is experienced - a form of self-worship granted impunity by a/any deity.

The erection of the Vatican obelisk by means of a lifting tower [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Anti-Climacus (@AnClimacus) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]