Psychology 101

Piers Morgan needs to apologize to me for failing to acknowledge how much hotter I am compared to him.

— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Under conditions of stress the true essence of an individual creeps through the facade, exposing with it the underlying insecurities it keeps under wraps.
It's nauseating....but not entirely from disgust and wretchedness, but by the vertigo of the contraindicating spin.

Being excluded from a group can be devastating because it can be life threatening - this is more a factor when the individuals has no other options because of a lack of an ability to socialize and become a part of a group of comrades.
Just as an incel will be devastated and obsessed with the first female that is kind to them - in his mind her attentions being misconstrued for sexual interest. Few social or sexual options makes the particular all the more important. The individual becomes obsessed with the first partner or the first group he was ever included within, unable to break free from this first encounter - imprinting it is called in lower life forms, such as ducklings or chicks following the first organism they see when breaking free from their encompassing eggs.

Solitude is anti-biological, which is why it’s dangerous for most. The social instinct overcomes the vast majority because connection to others is rooted in tribal survival; an impulse just as pronounced as sexual desire. Therefore, to be alone is to veer of into an unknown path, and so one must summon a spiritual element, one that must fulfill endeavors beyond biological impulse. It is an extension into a higher potential that few have the discipline or nature to reach for.

But solitude is a state of being that, like a genetic predisposition, the individual must be naturally capable of. The average extroverted idiot, who leads themselves to believe that they can do anything from the influence of modern self-therapy mythologies, will think they can break away from the group easily and learn something by isolating themselves, only to find they cannot endure it. The current situation of “self-quarantine” is a case in point.

It’s important to note as well, that many people are capable of being in solitude for no particular productive reason other than that they are mindlessly passive or empty in many ways, or they cannot relate to others because they genuinely have nothing of value to offer, even to themselves, and so they feel solitude as “loneliness”. Most are as they are either accidentally, or unconsciously/unwittingly, even if it might resemble strength or adaptiveness. You can spend hours building up the size of a muscle, but it won’t yield any real power or strength if it’s never been truly tested. Most do not understand how to be tested.

Satyr wrote:

Piers Morgan needs to apologize to me for failing to acknowledge how much hotter I am compared to him.

— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Under conditions of stress the true essence of an individual creeps through the facade, exposing with it the underlying insecurities it keeps under wraps.
It's nauseating....but not entirely from disgust and wretchedness, but by the vertigo of the contraindicating spin.

They expose themselves unconsciously. Base and primitive proclivities that they conceal beneath intellectualism. They allow themselves to be swept along with the tide of the noise of the herd, thinking their own braying noise wont be heard.

This is why they are so good at reporting the news and being "journalists". Its an occupation that involves being immersed in the mindless activities of the herd, exactly where they excel.

I have found that when I have solitude, at some point I end up doubting that I am behaving in a secure manner. A simple visit to the 'commons' ends up reminding me quickly why I leave it.

Both the silent type, and the vociferous type, share the same desperation for attention and validation from others. The nature is the same, only with different motives. The emptiness and lack of identity, must find itself in others, and this demands extreme social engagement, a constant refilling of the void inside themselves.

Moreover, they are primitive and lack the awareness of their own actions. Their awareness only comes from the validation and recognition they get from others. They are not addicted to themselves, but to others; they have no self. They are totally dominated by others. Need and weakness personified.

Sounds about right.
An inner emptiness fulfilled by constant external validation.
The ideal herd member. Any attention, positive or negative, will do.
Being excluded would be devastating to such a creature, especially after a period of inclusion and habituation.

The cult of subjectivity is promoting narcissism. There is no external way to validate self, other than other humans who must validate our private subjective world-view, and view of ourselves.
Their only importance is to verify the high opinion we have of ourselves, even by contradicting it.
Other is where the individual unloads all the negativity, purifying himself - sanctifying himself.

Others, the world, becomes a source of negative feedback - the world may be dismissed as illusory or as evil....implying one's own goodness.
They feel victimized because of their goodness, or superiority.
When they admit a flaw it is always in a self-aggrandizing way, like "My only flaw is that I am too trusting, or too smart, or too generous, or too good".

The seeking of 'tolerance' is quintessential herd focused approval-seeking.

Training the body makes it strong and able to deal whit heavy burdens.
Training the mind is also a way of coping with life and its burdens.

Training yourself to ignore, or to remain untouched by what you find contemptuous will help you endure and navigate a world full of psychotics and degenerates.

Resentment is a natural consequence of differing taste. Taste is inexorable, and the behavioral consequences of its denial or reversion, likewise. Chaos acts upon the organism as does an environment, anxieties and stresses, risking a breakage.

Postmodernism is about this subversive methodology of seeding doubt. This in turn, is what "post-structuralism" is about as well. The undermining of ideological and psychological foundations of selfhood and how this primes the subject for nihilism.

This is how a psychologist must approach a subject, by undermining the integrity of thier defense mechanisms in order to expose the underlined defects of thier behavior. They must make thier subject "vulnerable" by planting ideas in them which run counter to what they always believed about themselves; breaking them down. If one begins to doubt thier own existence, than the need for certainty, transforms into the need for denial. If They cannot know what they are, than they can absolutely know what they are NOT based on deifying reason as absolution.

Weak minds fall for this. Minds who have no identity or sense of self; no past or being. They are easily swayed by another's ability to give them substance of who they are.

This is what watching something like this reveals about human behavior. The predisposed inclination for blind social cooperation will not be overcome by one being exposed to it intellectually. Awareness does not automatically transmute into acumen. The slave has no clue what freedom is and does not acquire it when his chains are removed.

This is why changing the minds of most people is fruitless. The intellect still caters to instincts. All the "awareness" about the spiritual impoverishment of social media is everywhere, and yet the ones who claim to understand it the most, are the most active on facebook. A case in point. In very rare instances will one actually override their instincts with knowledge or wisdom.

When the hypermasculine fails, it fails hard. Hence "hyper" - fragility. It builds up faults in its foundations, and when one aspect of reality, that invalidates its typical behavior, happens - it ends up destroying collaterally what it relied upon, crumbling.

There is this phenomenon.
You see it in the person who likes to talk about the American Indians and how nice they were, in tune with nature...
Basically these American Indians share all the morals and values with the modern, maybe liberal, type who likes to talk about and cherishes those American Indians. They are the ideal human in the eyes of this usually cosy living urbanite. Yet when this same man looks out the window, his fellow Americans, especially those he deals with on a daily basis, so usually the White Americans, are deemed evil and greedy and so on and on...

So basically I'm talking about this phenomenon, this psychology, that makes some hate all those kinds of people, that type of people, which they actually interact with on a daily basis, while at the same time idealise the type of people who they don't interact with, or only very little.

What is experienced on a daily basis is deemed evil, unbearable. What is unknown may serve as a blank slate for wishes and dreams. The real is evil, the ideal is good.

It comes down to success in sheltered, protective environments versus success in nature outside of manmade sheltering. I think that people who idealise the unknown are #1 sheltered and #2 live in a spiritually dying/weak society. Such people, within a society with a strong spirit (no matter what kind of spirit, but powerful) become followers of that spirit within a society. But if the spirit is weak, a society which doesn't believe anymore in their destiny and rightfulness, such people find their purpose in the unknown, in the unknown other.

Idiot-Savantism

There's also the institutionalized form of idiot savant...the kind which is inept and retarded in everything except one discipline in which he cultivates a genius level knowledge and understanding.  

Also called "specialization".

It can conceal a general decline in IQ as it displays increasingly higher levels of focused IQ.

The irony of that is that this level of focused specialization is also what promotes dependence....an organism that cannot survive on its own but only in conjunction with other of its kind, each with its own specialized knowledge and understanding but completely retarded in all else - i.e., individuals that can see one tree, with increasingly greater and greater detail, but are completely blind to the forest.
Such minds are harmless to the system.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

The act of overcoming begins with repulsion.
Life, itself, is a constant nay-saying to what it judges to be toxic, or contrary to its well-being, or antithetical to tis objective.
Yay-saying, is a nay- to nay-saying.

Incels are the most passionate defenders of sexual fidelity.

Invertebrated minds sway and squirm, reshaping their spineless forms behind clouds of ink, before they make their getaway in a fury of spongy tentacles and a large head.

Culture & values, society, religion etc are never static, they always change with time. Human interaction, scientific knowledge, economic & political power all influence. UK has been in economic decline for many decades, immigration has to be regulated but it is not the cause

— Stephen Lawrence (@Stephen94345612) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The modern mind understands the world only by particular inductive reasoning based on uncertainties. Focusing on particulars allows them to avoid coming to any conclusions about what the truth is or what the idea may be determining the truth. The preoccupation with particulars also plays into their ego and allows them to feel a sense of intelligence that they have the open-minded capacity to consider many details at once, when they have no idea how these details connect to a whole or to an idea, or to reality. Like a child who cannot deductively reason from an idea, it must inquire and question endlessly from a myriad of random observations, because it cannot grasp how ideas involve patterns which lead to an understanding. Likewise, we find with these types a distinctive essence to remain within an infantile state of mind, escaping from reality by taking refuge behind obscure observations and leaving truth as an unimportant triviality they cannot be bothered by it, because the world is too complex to understand, so it is better to remain naïve.

With no god men begin worshipping other men with the same fervour.
Idealism replaces superstition, and, in accordance with natural selection, some separate from dogmas dominating their inferiors, declaring themselves gods, or earthly representations of the divine.
Intelligence has always seemed divine to those who do not possess it.
The superior can understand the inferior, but the inferior can only feel superiority, as if it were a mysterious godly presence, and a powerful magical force.

Devout followers and passionate believers can also be found among those that proudly call themselves “atheist”. They have replaced one master with another – substituting a corporeal master – with a face and name – with a faceless, nameless ideal, no less mysteriously absent.

Aristotle wrote:

He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god.

Co-operatives are admissions of an individual’s deficiency, making hierarchies, governing individual interactions, necessary.
To extricate oneself from this codependent relationship of need/desire one must become indifferent, due to an increase of independence based on self-esteem and self-confidence, decreasing need/desire, or ambitions that require mediators and facilitators.
A psychological approach towards this state of indifference reflecting an indifferent cosmos, i.e., constituting an approach towards the divine. With each step towards it the subjective is replaced by the objective; each step towards the objective a movement from the human towards the godly.